Posted by Michael Tackett 4:21 pm CST
Well, that didn't take long.
There is a natural rhythm to the Washington scandal. First, there are strong protestations of denial. Often that is followed by the group photo to show just how many people are supporting you.
Following soon is the hiring of a defense lawyer--always the first inkling that things won't go well. Then, those former friends who were so supportive start to get nervous.
And, as Rep. Tom DeLay of Texas, once considered the most powerful man in the House or Representatives, quickly found out, loyalty has its limits. In this case, as soon as it became clear to many other House Republicans their own re-elections were on the line, they were more than willing to cast aside the man also known as The Hammer.
The man that so many of them relied upon for perks, favors, and heaps of campaign cash was quite expendable when it became clear he would be spending a lot of his year with the word "defendant" attached to his name following his indictment on criminal charges in Texas.
Republicans came to quickly realize that if they didn't dump DeLay as one of their leaders, then they could easily expect to see a fall of campaign commercials from the Democrats of Republicans wearing orange jumpsuits.
Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, who heads the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, established a House of Scandal website many months ago and never tires of the alliteration of Culture of Corruption when describing the GOP.
By moving quickly to dump DeLay and change the subject, Republicans hope to avoid the damage and even try to retake the mantle of "Reform" that helped bring them to power in 1994.
In many ways the non-telegenic DeLay is an easy villain. A former pest exterminator, he's snarling, combative and has no interest in compromise with the other side, seeming to relish every fight. Those same traits made him brutally effective within his own party, but in the end, also a liability.
Look now for the GOP to install a kinder, gentler version of the House Republican leader.
So far, there seems to be no urgent threat to Hastert in his role as Speaker. That does not mean that Republicans will shelve their ideology--quite the contrary. The new leadership will almost certainly be dominated by conservatives.
But they will also likely be the kind of politicians who go down easier on the eye and ear when they appear on television. They need a newer generation now that the Gingrich Revolution has so obviously run out of gas.
DeLay as a leader will be missed in some ways. Not a conventional Washington creature, he could also be entertaining. He used to hold press briefings around the large wooden table in his spacious suite of offices--no TV cameras allowed--and enjoyed batting back reporters questions like so many batting-practice fastballs.
But he now will be linked in the long line up of Washington politicians whose careers were ruined because they thought they were smarter than the rules and laws they helped to write.




Comments
I fear for the changes this portends for our democracy. How will corporations prosper without being able to purchase legislation through the seamless connections forged by the persecuted majority leader?
Posted by: porkbarrel | January 7, 2006 4:52 PM
Something finally wiped that smirk off Delay's ugly face.
Bush is next.
Posted by: Andy Santilena | January 7, 2006 6:20 PM
When the GOP took over it was only a matter of time before their true intentions came to light. The GOP are border line Facists and their idea of democracy is not what I was taught or what our founding fathers intended. They only care about now and themselves and if they ruin the country so be it as long as they are gluttoned by greed they really don't care who they hurt. It's been a said, very said 5 years and we didn't learn with Watergate that the GOP are crooks I hope we finally learn that the GOP cannot be trusted......ever
Posted by: Paul | January 7, 2006 6:50 PM
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
Posted by: Ben | January 7, 2006 7:22 PM
Sometimes JUSTICE does prevail!
Posted by: Truth Seeker | January 7, 2006 8:51 PM
If you thought The Hammer was bad for the GOP, wait until you see what Jack Abramhoff and Duke Cunningham bring to the table.
Posted by: maxomai | January 7, 2006 11:21 PM
What "rules and laws" did TD violate?
He is charged with such, but stands convicted of nothing.
Very, very, poor form, Tackett. If you are alluding to mores and norms of Congress and party, you need to spell it out in some detail. What "code" or "understanding" did he ignore?
I thought the WV coal mine fiasco may have taught you a lesson - just because there is smoke does not a fire make. If you have documentary proof of a criminal statute, show us. Otherwise, retract this statement.
Posted by: Ed | January 7, 2006 11:42 PM
"Bush is next."
The full force of the GOP, and their campaign war machine, could not convict Clinton of a crime. The Democrats are far less coherent as a group and I doubt they have the backbone (and viciousness?) to make Bush "next".
Posted by: Mike | January 8, 2006 1:43 PM
Don't understand what Ed's up in arms about here. It's the Repugs who've dumped DeLay, not Tackett. Ed, ask the Republicans who were pressuring DeLay to resign about what rules or laws he violated. Otherwise stop telling folks what to do.
Posted by: Tim Schulz | January 8, 2006 4:15 PM
Let DELAY be a subtle anagram for other politicians whose corruption knocks closer. Think about it...
Posted by: Robert Salm | January 8, 2006 4:30 PM
Any early postulating on who will replace Hastert if this scandal brings him down?
Posted by: Carolyn | January 9, 2006 5:14 PM
Tim - I get why TD resigned his privileged position. Politically, he is radioactive. It also may be the case that he admitted to some GOP Conference members that he was too close to Abramoff. I am not naive.
Yet, I have had it with "analysis" that lapses into sccusations not proven. As of this writing, TD stands convicted of nothing criminally, nor of House codiciles.
I would actually LOVE to read of the inside baseball goings on in the Conference. This particular political sausage is, to me, luscious. I'd love to learn of the back-stabbing and backroom dealing. It would warm the coccles of my heart to see realpolitik in all its glory.
But until a man has had his day in court, or before the membership, I strenuously object to any inference, without caveat, that "rules and laws" have been violated.
Google "Ray Donovan" if you want a clue as to why.
Posted by: Ed | January 10, 2006 1:52 AM