Lieberman's (Republican) coattails: The Swamp
 
The Swamp
-
Posted August 10, 2006 8:48 AM
The Swamp

Posted by David Lightman at 8:48 am CDT


Sen. Joe Lieberman's independent candidacy could have a ripple effect that jolts Connecticut and national politics. The state has three vulnerable Republican incumbents who suddenly see gold on Lieberman's coattails.

We talked to the three, and the Democrats, in the article posted here:

GOP Reaches For Joe's Coattails

By DAVID LIGHTMAN
Washington Bureau Chief
Hartford Courant

August 10 2006

Suddenly the Democrats' nightmare scenario becomes plausible: They are a seat or two from gaining a House majority in November, but so many Connecticut Republicans go to the polls to vote for Joe Lieberman that the state's three vulnerable GOP incumbents win re-election.

"Whether he wants to or not, Joe's being on the ballot will juice Republican turnout," said former Democratic Rep. Toby Moffett, who is advising the party's candidates. "Does he want to go back to Washington as the guy who helped Republicans retain their majority?"

Republicans saw a big opportunity. Less than an hour after Lieberman announced he'd run as an independent, Rep. Rob Simmons, R-2nd District, rushed out a statement praising the senator; Reps. Christopher Shays, R-4th District and Nancy L. Johnson, R-5th District, later followed suit.

All three Republican districts are on every national insider's list of the 15 to 20 shakiest House seats in the nation. Democrats need a net gain of 16 to win control of the House for the first time since 1992, and polls and pundits see the party as having a good chance.

Connecticut is one of the party's key targets. Though each of the three Republican incumbents is considered moderate, and routinely opposes GOP leaders on social issues, they all have to defend consistent records of support for President Bush on Iraq and economic issues.

All seemed to be grabbing for Lieberman's coattails.

"I have the highest respect for Joe as a statesman and public servant who has conducted himself with dignity and honor representing Connecticut," said Johnson, who has long had a good working relationship with Lieberman. Her official website features a big picture of her with the senator at the top. And Tuesday Lieberman did well in several key towns Johnson represents, notably New Britain, Torrington and Waterbury.

Simmons seemed not at all put out by Lieberman campaign literature in which the senator takes credit for saving the Navy's sub base in Groton, a major economic engine in Simmons' district.

"I have enjoyed a productive working relationship with Sen. Lieberman on many issues over the years," Simmons said. "I know him to be honest, hardworking and bipartisan. This is particularly the case when it comes to Connecticut's defense industrial base and the nation's defense. He is a known quantity of known quality."

The strongest backing came from Shays, who also is facing a strong challenge based on his support for the war in Iraq.

"Joe Lieberman is my friend. I have tremendous respect for him," said Shays, who had earlier said the state Republican Party should endorse the senator. "I'm sorry he lost the primary, but unlike my opponent, I look forward to voting for him in the general election."

Nationally, Republicans chose their words carefully. Appearing on MSNBC's "Hardball" Wednesday evening, national GOP Chairman Ken Mehlman refrained from urging Connecticut Republicans to vote for GOP Senate nominee Alan Schlesinger over Lieberman, despite pressure from host Chris Matthews. It's up to individual voters to make that choice, he said.

Earlier, Mehlman issued a statement using Lieberman's defeat to paint Democrats as a narrow, intolerant party.

"It speaks volumes about the new Democrat Party: if you stand for a strong defense and victory in the war on terror, you have no place in the party and you must be purged," Mehlman said.

Democrats said Wednesday they were concerned that that argument has the potential to carry significant weight.

"It doesn't help," said Rep. John B. Larson, D-1st District, of Lieberman's candidacy. "But the anti-Bush vote is clear and you have to be encouraged by the large number of unaffiliated voters who registered Democratic" to vote in Tuesday's primary.

"I just don't know," added Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., when asked about the impact of an independent run.

Dodd joined other Democrats in the state and across the nation in putting on a united front supporting Ned Lamont and dismissing any talk that Lieberman could hurt them.

Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., chairman of the party's congressional campaign committee, thought Lieberman's presence could help Democrats, because the senator "will be talking about raising the minimum wage, energy policy - echoing the Democratic candidates' message."

And although Lieberman may embrace a Republican or two, Emanuel said, the Democrats will tell voters that Connecticut's congressional Republicans "have all been rubber stamps for George Bush."

Independent analysts see potential for Lieberman to help the Republicans.

"New England is the strongest anti-Bush region anywhere, and Democrats look like they can ride that wave into office," said congressional analyst Amy Walter, "and if there's anywhere they can ride the wave, it's Connecticut."

Lieberman's candidacy, she said, "is a potential sandbar. What we don't know is if it breaks the wave, or it's something Democrats can get around."

David Lightman reports for the Hartford Courant, a Tribune Co. newspaper.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Good article, Mr. Lightman. Very insightful.


Very wishfull thinking from the wing nuts.I agree,the people of New England are well informed,and will vote to remove the extremist who now run congress.While all (3) of the Republicans are moderate to liberal,they enable the Red States to dictate the type of govt.we have.

As Rahm puts it,they're rubber stamps for the neo nuts.

Once again,Dems need to keep it simple,if you want to invade several more countries,you like $4.00 gal gas,your jobs and healthcare vanishing to Communist China,expanded govt,govt.for sale to lobbyist,the list goes on.

If you enjoy the above,vote for wing nuts.


Gee. I'm glad we're not dealing in stereotypes.


Yep, I can just see Connecticut Repubs rushing to support Joe. Too bad there aren't enough of them to overcome these realities from the latest NYT/CBS poll (and remember: these numbers would be even more dramatic if only Conn. voters were counted):

62 percent disapprove of President Bush's handling of the war, while only 32 percent approve.
63 percent think the war with Iraq was not "worth the loss of American life and other costs" while only 30 percent think it was.

57 percent think things are going very or somewhat badly for U.S. "efforts to bring stability and order to Iraq" while only 41 percent think things are going very or somewhat well.

53 percent think "Iraq will probably never become a stable democracy" while only 4 percent think it will occur in the "next year or two."

56 percent think the U.S. should "set a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq," compared to 40 percent who oppose such a timetable.

72 percent think the Iraq war has made the United States' image in the world worse, 69 percent think it has hampered U.S. diplomatic efforts, and 41 percent think continued U.S. presence in Iraq makes the region less stable; only 25 percent think it makes the region more stable.


Boy, I wish we could trade one of our east coast, fringe liberals like Dick Durbin or Rahm Emanuel for a mainstream, common sense Democrat like Joe Lieberman. With the ultra liberals running the party, we are going to lose once again to corporate America, and we will all pay dearly for it. Barrack, you are our last hope to pull the party back to the mainstream!


That's right, the Democratic party has never been in any lobbyists hip pocket, and they are against illegal immigration, and they don't believe illegal immigrants should get any benefits, and that they should pay taxes. Also the Democratic party never sold military secrets to the Chicoms when Clinton was president in exchange for campaign dollars. Nor did a Democratic propose a 50 cent a gallon increase in gas taxes in 1993. And, of course, the cost of gas never went up to 2.20 a gallon in the spring of 2000 when Clinton was still president. None of these things happened or are policies of the Democratic party-- in the fantasy world that is the loony leftwing mind.


Hey Mainstream, Obama's doing a great job of setting himself apart from the fringe right now. His message about religion flew in the face of the DNC leadership. He's got a real shot, and I'm not just saying that because my name's Jeff Zeleny.

Durbin is too busy hunting for Nazis in the marine corps to come back from the precipice. I've never voted for Emanuel and don't live in his district. But I did meet him once in 2002 when he was first running for his seat. I was covering the election. He came into our offices with a full entourage of former Clinton staffers as if the emperor was visiting the provinces. He's a very effective politician but he sort of turned me off with that performance.


Do you think would be the democrat candidate for Senate today if today's terror arrests had happened two days ago? Thoughts?


Senator Lieberman's defeat shows that the spirit of Neville Chamberlain is alive and well within the Democratic Party. If al Qaeda, Hezbollah, the mullahs in Iran, and Kim Jong Il are not considered the type of evil that needs to be confronted and defeated, who/what is? Neville Chamberlain and the feckless French tried diplomacy and compromise with Hitler. Do the Democrats really think we can sit down with such people and convince them to change?


It's going to be hard slog is a nice corollation to "I promise you only blood, sweat, toil and tears," too, don't you think so, Charles?

Seriously, do any posters want to comment on what the outcome of the Lieberman - LaMont race would've been if the election occurred after today's news? It's intriguing, to me.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "b" in the field below: