by James Oliphant
Ohio, right now considered a toss-up between John McCain and Barack Obama, is swiftly becoming the front line for concerns over voter suppression and voter fraud at the polls.
The Supreme Court was asked Wednesday evening to intervene in a dispute between the Ohio Republican Party and the Ohio Secretary of State's office over voter rolls.
A federal appeals court ruling affirmed an earlier federal district court order compelling Jennifer Brunner, the secretary of state, to turn over lists of 200,000 voters whose names don't match those in government databases to local election officials.
Those officials may then force those voters to cast provisional ballots on election day. The names could also be challenged in court by Republican party operatives. Brunner was ordered to, in essence, re-program her state voter database and turn the names over by Friday.
Federal law requires states to ensure that information on voter registration match those in federal databases, but the law's proponents say it was passed in an effort to assist in processing voter registrations, not as a vehicle to challenge voters.
The Tuesday ruling by the full U.S Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed an earlier ruling by a three-judge panel and set the stage for Supreme Court review. Wednesday, the state of Ohio filed an emergency petition to Justice John Paul Stevens, who oversees the Sixth Circuit, seeking an order that will block the district court's order requiring Brunner to turn over the names. The state is arguing that altering Ohio's voter rolls at this late date will substantially disrupt the coming election and create havoc at polling places.






























