Posted by Frank James at 12:33 pm CST
During last year’s immigration debate (seems like a long time ago, doesn’t it?) supporters of immigrant-rights frequently claimed that illegal immigrants took jobs Americans didn’t want.
Meanwhile, those who wanted significantly greater enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws and no path to legal status for legal immigrants, argued that low-wage Americans were indeed hurt by undocumented workers.
The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) has an excellent story today which provides anecdotal support for the latter camp, that illegal-immigrant workers do hurt low-wage American workers who evidently will work in some of the economy’s least-appealing jobs if given a chance.
Senate leaders have said immigration reform is one of their top legislative priorities this year. So there may very well be another protracted debate on the issue in the coming months. If so, don’t be surprised if foes of legalization efforts, or amnesty as they prefer to call it, cite today’s Journal story into the Congressional Record.
Here's an excerpt of the story.
STILLMORE, Ga. -- After a wave of raids by federal immigration agents on Labor Day weekend, a local chicken-processing company called Crider Inc. lost 75% of its mostly Hispanic 900-member work force. The crackdown threatened to cripple the economic anchor of this fading rural town.
But for local African-Americans, the dramatic appearance of federal agents presented an unexpected opportunity. Crider suddenly raised pay at the plant. An advertisement in the weekly Forest-Blade newspaper blared "Increased Wages" at Crider, starting at $7 to $9 an hour -- more than a dollar above what the company had paid many immigrant workers.
The company began offering free transportation from nearby towns and free rooms in a company-owned dormitory near to the plant. For the first time in years, local officials say, Crider aggressively sought workers from the area's state-funded employment office -- a key avenue for low-skilled workers to find jobs. Of 400 candidates sent to Crider -- most of them black -- the plant hired about 200.
The story goes on to say that the situation has been a mixed blessing for both the company and the African-American workers. The company has witnessed more turnover and a fall in productivity since the native-born workers are more likely to assert their rights than the illegal workforce.
The allure of compliant Latino workers willing to accept grueling conditions despite rock-bottom pay has proved a difficult habit for Crider to shake, particularly because the local, native-born workers who replaced them are more likely to complain about working conditions and aggressively assert what they believe to be legal pay and workplace rights.
Meanwhile, the black workers have dealt with some fairly arduous working conditions of the sort that Americans are stereotypically said not to be willing to in.
While the story doesn't say it, it underscores why many congressional Democrats, including black Democrats, were ambivalent or downright hostile to demands from immigration advocates last year for a path to legalization for many undocumented workers.
In districts with significant low-come African American populations, there was real resentment about the possibility of a guest-worker program and at the presence of illegal immigrants.
An aide to a member of the Congressional Black Caucus told me her boss's mail and phone calls were running strongly against a guest-worker program and that even though he was a liberal, there was no way was he was going to buck the sentiment of his constituents. Some of those constituents would be very much like the African Americans described in the Journal piece.







Comments
"An advertisement in the weekly Forest-Blade newspaper blared "Increased Wages" at Crider, starting at $7 to $9 an hour -- more than a dollar above what the company had paid many immigrant workers."
And there's the crux of the issue. The "bad guys" in this story aren't the undocumented workers who are taking what opportunity they have to make a better life for themselves and thier families. The bad guys are the employers who's only interest is paying as little as possible for the work and realize that they can exploit the undocumented worker more than anyone else.
When the company is forced to, suddenly 14% higher wages are available for the same work.
Posted by: Tony | January 17, 2007 1:27 PM
This is an issue that I disagree with the democrats on. The rhetoric of jobs that Americans won't do is nothing more than being a case of it's what the employers can get away with. Like paying a decent wage. It's not that I am against immigration, just illegals. Why would an employer pay a decent wage if he can hire illegals that would be glad to do the job for less? I also believe that is one of the reasons it has not been addressed by the current administration or the past do nothing congress. It is ashame that this war has taken our focus off other real issues that need to be addressed.
Posted by: bill r. | January 17, 2007 1:28 PM
American workers have definitely been hurt by this. That's why companies that hire illegals should be punished for hiring them. If there were no jobs for illegals, less would want to come to the USA. Let's face it, though. Business friendly congress would never come down hard on their good buddies-corporate America.
It isn't hard to see why everyone wants to come here. It's the greatest country on earth.
Posted by: Catherine | January 17, 2007 1:37 PM
One cant ignore the average Americans insatiable appetite for low cost goods and services as a driving force behind the hiring of cheap illegal workers.
Crider could pay a buck or two more an hour to
legal workers, but a chorus of screams would ensue from consumers about the price of chicken tenders going up a quarter to half dollar a pound at the local Piggly-Wiggly.
Americans have a very tough choice to make.
Pay more for goods and services that are produced by higher paid legal workers and cross their fingers that any savings that are seen from the reduced participation of illegal workers in government funded education and health care systems would flow back to them in the form of lower taxes, or continue to pay less at the checkout counter but ultimately pay for the cheap goods through higher taxes needed to fund said education and healthcare programs.
I believe human nature will dictate what Americans do. They will opt for the immediate reward of lower prices, regardless of the hidden cost they will ultimately pay in the form of taxes. Furthermore, does anyone with a shred of common sense believe politicians in Washington will pass on the savings from reduced illegal worker participation in entitlement programs to the tax paying consumer?
If Americans really want to see the illegal worker disappear from the nations labor market, consumers must gladly accept higher prices for a multitude of goods and services. Fat chance of that happening anytime soon.
Posted by: johnf | January 17, 2007 3:01 PM
I don't think there is a job an American wouldn't do after watching the show "Dirty Jobs" with Mike Rowe. There are some really nasty jobs out there!
Posted by: lochnessmonster | January 17, 2007 3:30 PM
Thats why we need real leaders. To explain these things. I would gladly pay more for a product to know it's an American job. Also the leadership must also let the Americans know that in the long run it cost less due to unpaid taxes, health care, education, and cost of crime prevention due to illegals.
Posted by: bill r. | January 17, 2007 3:38 PM
The Wall Street Journal lives by anecdote-as-fact stories.
I'm not sure if it's just lazy journalism, or they have some kind of agenda, but those kind of "This is what happened to John Smith in Podunk, Kentucky" stories tell less than nothing.
If they can't come up with real, tested data to back their arguments, they shouldn't bother.
(BTW: I KNOW their editorial page has an agenda.)
Posted by: bb | January 17, 2007 4:45 PM
And there's the crux of the issue. The "bad guys" in this story aren't the undocumented workers who are taking what opportunity they have to make a better life for themselves and thier families. The bad guys are the employers who's only interest is paying as little as possible for the work and realize that they can exploit the undocumented worker more than anyone else.
When the company is forced to, suddenly 14% higher wages are available for the same work.
Posted by: Tony | Jan 17, 2007 1:27:46 PM
=====
Good point. I hadn't thought of that.
Posted by: bob | January 17, 2007 4:47 PM
Johnf and billr are right. Americans want it all, jobs for everyone but rock bottom prices. In the end we cry about the lack of jobs and wages, yet after work we run to the nearest Wal-Mart to buy cheap Chinese goods. All the hillbillies of the land crow about supporting the troops and how patriotic they are, then buy their jug of milk and pouch of chew at Wally world.
If a store opened next to Wal-Mart that guaranteed every item was produced in America with American labor but you would have to pay the higher price, where would you shop?
I thought so.
All hail Wal-mart, the store that single-handedly destroyed numerous small mom and pop shops that were owned and worked in by hard working Americans. We couldn’t bear the thought of paying more for some cheap crap we could get at the local Wally world.
We as Americans can talk the talk but when it comes to the walk, we go right to the rollback prices and the cute little happy face. Asian goods have the American pocketbook 'buy' the short and curlies. And we like it that way, just look at the parking lot at Wal-Mart on a Saturday afternoon, all those good patriots supporting America.
Posted by: erick | January 17, 2007 6:52 PM
I find it morally difficult to oppose immigration, illegal or legal, in the "land of the free". After all, we Americans are all descended from illegal & legal immigrants (and nearly all of them poor & looking for opportunity). I consider the first wave of immigrants illegal, since they came to this land, took it over, and kicked out or killed anybody who disagreed. How very democratic.
Economically, however, it is easier to make the case against illegal immigration in the present. We can't even provide our present citizens with universal health care and quality public education, which lag far behind European systems.
I disagree with Catherine's assertion that we are the best country in the world. By many indicators, we are not: expensive, nonuniversal health care, lower quality K12 public education, higher crime rates, greater income gap disparities, higher incidents of health problems (cancer, obesity, etc.), widespread discrimination, etc. We should tell the truth to the world and admit that we AREN'T the best country, which might ultimately lower immigration.
Posted by: Evanel L. | January 18, 2007 2:41 AM
Mr. James is correct to point out that the evidence is "anecdotal." We might also note that it is short-term.
The beauty of the illegal worker is that he will not only work for less, he will work for less for longer (hours and years). As some here have noted, that means lower costs for products and services. That means more business for the American economy.
Let's not lose sight of the big picture here, folks. It's not about what is right, it is about what is good for Americans as a whole.
If we were concerned about what is "right" then we wouldn't want our government to be supporting fraudulent elections or coups. As long as we're "good" with the latter, we can't thump our chests for the former.
Posted by: Bud McFarlin | January 18, 2007 3:19 AM
Frank - you and/or your readers can acess those wall street journal articles for free with a plugin called a netpass from congoo: http://www.congoo.com/netpass/install
I just thought this might be a useful tip.
Sincerly,
Allison Porter
Posted by: Allison Porter | January 31, 2007 11:38 AM
I've conducted no scientific study, done no valid random sampling, etc. I just know what I see in daily life, working in one of the industries most affected by immigrant labor: construction.
I am a self-employed carpenter. I concentrate on small jobs. Occasionally I hire short-term help. Occasionally, I hire on to work for others on larger projects.
My observations are: Our small but rapidly growing community had almost no Mexican labor 10 years ago. Today, many of the roofing, plumbing, landscaping and carpentry crews are exclusively Mexican. I don't know how many are legal or not. What I do know is that most of these immigrants crowd into housing, reducing their regular living costs. At the same time, many have left employers after several years of training, and struck out on their own. They hire relatives from Mexico, friends and their relatives from Mexico. All of it is cheap labor.
Someone needs to explain to me, a self-employed carpenter, how Mexicans saving money by crowding into cheap housing and hiring cheap labor from Mexico aren't a threat to my job. How can I compete and maintain even a modest standard of living if my competition is able to run on significantly lower overhead? It just doesn't add up.
And yet, whenever I or anyone in my position raises such concerns, we're accused of racism. My problem isn't with race; it's with an endless flow of immigrants, who eventually will force me to lower my standard of living to compete, and who crowd into and change the neighborhoods in which I've lived for years.
Posted by: Roger Hayden | February 28, 2007 9:11 PM
I totally agree with Roger's observations about the impact on illegal immigrants in the US. I have been turned down for housing because I was not latino, and for jobs because I didn't speak Spanish (at the time). Over the years as a teacher, my workload has exploded due to the numbers of instant citizens purposefully born by illegals, certainly my pay has not increased accordingly. Now that I speak Spanish I have learned how racists and really anti-USA many latinos are.
My SS# was stolen and I once owed taxes instead of receiving the refund I should've gotten.
My parents were unable to purchase vacation property in Mexico because they are not Mexican, yet illegals seem to think they have a right(!) to the housing, education, health care, and welfare payments of this country using our tax money. Meanwhile, they send dollars to Mexico instead of actually contributing to the economy they are sucking dry.
Though I am a single parent, I pay for private schooling for my children since the local school is over crowded and the funding is focused on second-language learners.
Mexico seals its borders to immigrants attempting to enter their country as a means of reaching ours, yet they have the gaul to call Americans racists and to stupidly compare the efforts to secure our borders as akin to a Berlin wall!?
I don't like the racist backlash folks, but we need reform now. I would like to w/hold my money and vote from politicians, companies, & other panderers to these illegals. I won't shop at Walmart and other non-union stores, and I would like to know how I can make an economic impact myself against the corporations who allow illegals to work after stealing SS#'s or otherwise criminally misrepresenting themselves. It is a real pity to see what this country is rapidly becoming due to the unwillingness of our elected reps to take a stand against the situation.
Posted by: nutmeg | April 28, 2007 11:46 AM