Cheney: No 'policy of retreat.': The Swamp
The Swamp
Posted February 20, 2007 11:30 PM
The Swamp

Posted by Mark Silva at 11:30 pm CST


ABOARD THE USS KITTY HAWK -- With a bid to reassure a region as well as troops deployed aboard an aicraft carrier that has seen action in the war in Iraq that the United States will not "retreat'' from the mission, Vice President Dick Cheney promised an unrelenting fight against terrorism.

"Every member of our military can be certain that America will stay on the offensive in the war on terror,'' Cheney said in a speech delivered aboard the aircraft carrier, the oldest active ship in the U.S. Navy, a conventionally powered aircraft carrier that launched 5,000 sorties into Iraq.

"The president of the United States and his national security team understand the threat ,'' Cheney promised. "We're not dealing with adversaries that will surrender or come to their senses. We'll be flexible. We'll do all we can to adapt to conditions on the ground. We'll make every change necessary to do the job. And I want you to know that the American people will not support a policy of retreat. We want to complete the mission, and we want to get it done right, and we want to return with honor.''

That retreat line drew quite a round of applause from the many hundreds of sailors assembled in the hangar bay of the Kitty Hawk, just beneath the flight deck. It was a campaign-styled rally, complete with banner and sailors seated in bleachers behind the vice president. Cheney also made a point of revising his own speech, whose text originially said the American people "do not support a policy of retreat." He changed that to say "will not support a policy of retreat.''


P1010015

Cheney in the hangar bay of the Kitty Hawk, which gave the vice president a 19-gun cannon salute upon arrival at the old naval base at Yokosuka which once served as headquarters for the Japanese Imperial Navy, but where today Cheney met with U.S. and Japanese officers working togeter. Photo by Silva.

Cheney's remarks seemed tailored as much for a home audience as the U.S. troops assembled on the Kitty Hawk and the larger Japanese audience following his words on a weeklong Pacific tour.

"Throughout this region our country has interests, and treaty obligations and commitments of conscience,'' he said. "To meet these responsibilities we need safe and unimpeded movement on the seas, and bases for our ships and personnel. From our Pacific bases we stand ready to defend our allies and friends. We keep the shipping lanes open for trade, which is the economic lifeline for so many countries. We keep an eye out for those who try to move deadly weapons across these waters. And we bring relief to victims of natural disasters. The United States is a powerful country, and also a decent, generous country. Our presence helps to ensure the peace and stability of a strategic part of the world. America does the job well – and for that, we can thank the men and women of the United States military.

P1010016_3

This was a campaign-styled event aboard the carrier. Silva

"Our nation is grateful, as well, to the people of Japan,'' he said. "Our two countries share common values and strategic objectives. Our forces work closely together – and some of the most important joint exercises are carried out right here at this base….

"In recent years, our forces have served together in Afghanistan and Iraq, and Japan has been one of the largest donors toward the reconstruction effort in those countries. Indeed, when the United States was attacked on September 11th, 2001, Japan's government made clear its firm commitment to joining the fight against terror. Japan has honored that commitment. As great democracies, Japan and the United States understand our duties in the world. Sometimes those duties are hard and dangerous, but we accept them. And none is more pressing than the figth against global terror.''

P1010019_8

Earlier in the day, the vice president met with Emperor Akihito at the Imperial Palace. Silva

Cheney spoke of the Kitty Hawk's early involvement in the war on terror, deployed just after 9/11 into the North Arabian Sea in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. And later, "in the campaign to liberate Iraq,'' it was deployed 29,000 nautical miles with more than 5,000 sorties flown from the deck.

"Since the war began, we've struck major blows against the al-Qaeda network that hit America,'' Cheney said. "We're removed two dictatorships that sponsored terror… liberated 50 million people from tyranny… and stood by young democracies as America always does.''

"The work goes on, because the set of challenges that arrived on 9/11 is unlike any other this nation has faced. This war is not a matter of finding an opposing army and engaging it, or finding a navy and sinking it. The terrorist enemies are hidden and dispersed, and they view the entire world as a battlefield,'' he said. "They are determined to commit indiscriminate murder against innocent, unsuspecting me, women and children.''

"These enemies want to seize control of a country in the Middle East so they can acquire a base for launching attacks, and oil wealth to finance their ambitions….''

To serve that goal, he said, terrorists are arming themselves with chemical, biological and "even nuclear weapons… to destroy Israel… to intimidate free countries… and to cause great harm to the United States.''

"We are their prime target. They hate us, they hate our country, they hate the liberties for which we stand. They want to destroy our way of life.''

"The terrorists have made Iraq the central front in this war.,'' he said.

And, now, he said Gen. David Petraeus is carrying out "a new strategy for victory on that front.'' Petraeus has said the enemy is determined, adaptable and barbaric and "there are no guarantees,'' he said. "The general has it exactly right. The terrorists know they cannot beat us in a stand-up fight. They never have.''

"Bin Laden continues to predict that the people of the United States simply do not have the stomach to stay in the fight against terror.''

"This nation has learned the lessons of history,'' he said. We know that terrorist attacks are not caused by the use of strength… they are invited by the perception of weakness. We know that if we leave Iraq before the mission is completed, the enemy is going to come after us…. We'll face them far from home, so we do not have to face them on the streets of our own cities.''

He commended the crew up and down, from the "Grapes on the flight deck… to the BTs in the fire room… to the intel specialists. "Your service makes a difference for a nation at war… and improves the chances that one day we'll see a world at peace.''

"The cause we serve is freedom. That cause is right. That cause is just. And that cause will prevail.''

P1010022_2

The Kitty Hawk, which launched 5,000 sorties in the war in Iraq, is the oldest active ship in the US Navy. Silva

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Mr. Bush explains the UK's Iraq troop withdrawal as "a sign of success" in Iraq.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blair-to-start-Iraq-troop-withdrawal/2007/02/21/1171733804555.html

Mr. Cheney says:

"We're not dealing with adversaries that will surrender or come to their senses. We'll be flexible."

Dehumanizing the enemy is the first step in justifying their annihilation. That flexibility quote is extremely ironic coming from a stay the course-and-surge type.

"We are their prime target. They hate us, they hate our country, they hate the liberties for which we stand. They want to destroy our way of life.''

Who started the cycle of hate?
Whose way of life is being destroyed? The American way or the Iraqi way?

"The cause we serve is freedom. That cause is right. That cause is just. And that cause will prevail.''

Whose freedom is at stake? Ours or Iraqis? To many Iraqis, the majority of which no longer desire our presence, our cause is neither right nor just, and it will not necessarily prevail.

Typical fearmongering, jingoistic, nationalistic propaganda to rally the populace. And to imagine, 100 million Americans actually eat this stuff up.


It is time we Americans put down our guns, stop building & expanding bases worldwide, and move towards dialogue and a genuine intention towards peace that encompasses multilateral interests...as opposed to current US foreign policy, which prioritizes unilateral American interests.

If we do not, more and more people & nations around the world will see us as the true enemy & the big bully-policeman on the block. We are no longer David, we are Goliath.

We truly have/had the opportunity to be a shining example of freedom, democracy, tolerance, and prosperity unto the world. Our time is slowly coming to an end, and we will end up on the dust heap of history unless we change course now, and begin to lead by example, and not by force.

Those who live by the sword, shall die by the sword.


This Administration's overriding policy is endless war. They have no interest in any other solution, no politics, no dsiplomacy, just destruction.

They don't care about adequately supplying the troops required, making sure there are enough troops in place, or that the troops are adequately cared for when they come home wounded and damaged, but the war must go on.

Next stop Iran.


Brave talk from a man who got five deferrments in his increasingly desperate attempts to stay out of a war himself.

Meanwhile, Demmark also decides to get out while the getting's good:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070221/ap_on_re_mi_ea/denmark_iraq;_ylt=AlyYhyaryy6EdD7r8ygsaxlvaA8F


It will be interesting to hear what Blair has to say what his reasoning is behind the troop pull-out (or will the right call it cut-&-run?).

So the strategy is, what? US surges, Britian cuts-&-runs? What's the Australian PM going to say about it? The terrorists are going to circle the date of Britian's pull-out? That Blair is on the side of terrorists?

Funny how conservatives want to slam Obama for suggesting a timetable for US troops to pull-out, but Bush's staunchest ally, Blair, does exactly that.


Any bet Cheney will face charges when he leave office


Dale-

My guess is that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are going to get the Pinochet treatment when they leave office.

The extrodinary renditions cases in Europe will quite possibily lead to cahrges being filed against them. They will be unable to travel to any country that will extridite or directly prosecute them on the charges.


Here's a reporter (Mark Silva) who writes about the war all the time, who's face to face with actual members of our armed forces, and he STILL refuses to talk with them, to get their take on the war.

How can you report on a war and NOT talk to the soldiers?

Actually, we know why. Because if the reporter talked to members of our armed forces, he'd find overwhelming support for winning the war. And he doesn't want that message broadcast.


Can we get a Cheney-Voldemoort '08 campaign? Or maybe Rumsfeld-Bolton?


Actually, we know why. Because if the reporter talked to members of our armed forces, he'd find overwhelming support for winning the war.

Posted by: bruce | Feb 21, 2007 11:57:31 AM

Bruce, did you ever stop to think that maybe this "overwhelming support" has anything to do with active-duty service members not being allowed to speak out against their commanders without fear of harsh reprimands?


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "r" in the field below:

Quizzes

palin or fey

Palin or Fey?

McCain

Know the presidents?

McCain

Your McCain IQ

Obama

Your Obama IQ

Latest polls

Electoral vote map

map

Test your scenarios

Galleries

Palin

Sarah Palin

campaign

Campaign trail

conventions

RNC | DNC

Unauthorized tour

Obama

Obama's Chicago

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Candidate match


Test assumptions