Posted by Mark Silva at 6:15 am CDT
Fred Thompson, who plays district attorney Arthur Branch on NBC's Law & Order, says Lewis "Scooter'' Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney found guilty of lying to federal prosecutors and a grand jury, deserves a presidential pardon.
But then Thompson, the Republican former senator from Tennessee who has made a career of TV and film, is a fundraiser for Libby's defense fund.
And Thompson, thinking of running for president, says he would prosecute the war in Iraq much the way that President Bush is: "I would do essentially what the president's doing. I know it's not popular right now, but I think we have to look down the road and consider the consequences of where we are.'
In our continuing series of one-percenters, people who barely move the meter of public opinion polls but are giving serious consideration to adding their names to the list of declared candidates for president in 2008 – a list approaching 20 names within the two major parties alone – this is a sampler of what Thompson had to say to a variety of media, from Fox News to the New York Times, as word surfaced that influential people were whispering in his ear about a presidential campaign and Thompson was actually listening.
Thompson, a real-life lawyer who served as minority counsel in the Watergate investigation, has appeared in such films as The Hunt for Red October, Cape Fear and In the Line of Fire. He also has served in the Senate, elected from Tennessee in 1994 to fill the unexpired term of former Vice President Al Gore and having left in 2003 to pursue his acting career. He served as chairman of Senate Governmental Affairs.
"I'm just going to wait and see what happens," Thompson. 64, has said of this talk of a presidential campaign, talk which he blames former Senate Majority Leader Howard Baker and other Tennessee Republicans for stirring up. "I wanted to see how my colleagues who are on the campaign trail do now, what they say, what they emphasize, what they're addressing, and how successful they are in doing that, and whether or not they can carry the ball in next November.
"I think people are somewhat disillusioned,'' he said. "I think a lot of people are cynical out there. I think they're looking for something different. ... and I think that they're going to be open to different things.''
Thompson, for his part, is not open to abortion rights. Calling himself "pro-life,'' he believes federal judges should overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision as "bad law and bad medical science."
But he is open to gun ownership, an opponent of gun control who praises a controversial new federal appeals court decision in Washington, D.C., to overturn the district's long-standing ban on hand guns. "The court basically said the Constitution means what it says,'' he says, "and I agree with that."
He is not wild about gay marriage, but says he would let states decide whether to allow civil unions: "Marriage is between a man and a woman, and I don't believe judges ought to come along and change that."
He has told Fox News that he has no truck with the current concept of immigration reform that President Bush and Democratic congressional leaders are seeking – "No, no, no, no… We woke up one day after years of neglect and apparently discovered that we have somewhere between 12 million and 20 million illegal aliens in this country. So it became an impossible situation to deal with. ... I'm concerned about the next 12 million or 20 million. So that's why enforcement, and enforcement at the border, has to be primary.''
And he stands by Bush's decision to deploy more troops in Iraq: "Wars are full of mistakes. You rectify things. I think we're doing that now. Why would we not take any chance, even though there's certainly no guarantees, to not be run out of that place? I mean, we've got to take that opportunity and give it a chance to work."
Thompson insists he is in no rush with his decision about seeking the GOP nomination in '08, suggesting that he can easily wait until summer to make a choice.
"The lay of the land will be different in a few months than it is today, one way or the other,'' says this potential presidential candidate, who has a pretty good day job. "One advantage you have in not ... having this as lifelong ambition is that, if it turns out that your calculation is wrong, it's not the end of the world."
(Photo from NBC.com "Law and Order" website.)








Comments
Fred Thompson, who plays district attorney Arthur Branch on NBC's Law & Order, says Lewis "Scooter'' Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney found guilty of lying to federal prosecutors and a grand jury, deserves a presidential pardon.
Pandering to criminals is not a good start.
Posted by: bill r. | March 13, 2007 7:20 AM
Oh, great another Bush-ite. Didn't we already elect an actor as president? I don't think we need another.
Posted by: Buckley | March 13, 2007 7:23 AM
"I think people are somewhat disillusioned,'' he said. "I think a lot of people are cynical out there. I think they're looking for something different. ... and I think that they're going to be open to different things.''
----
Kind of an odd statement coming from someone who agrees with Bush on every major issue.
Posted by: bb | March 13, 2007 7:27 AM
We're all aware of the GOP's odd penchant for actors (Reagan, Arnold, W).
Posted by: Kenny Bunkport | March 13, 2007 7:34 AM
Let me guess Republicrites, now we should listen to Hollyweird?
Posted by: jethro | March 13, 2007 8:01 AM
This story just serves to remind us that the '08 presidential campaign is starting waaaaaaay too early.
Posted by: no name | March 13, 2007 8:06 AM
The real question is,does he understand "trickle down economics",and how to cut taxes for the rich and increase taxes on the middle class?
Like another bad B actor who became Prez.
Posted by: Raving Loon | March 13, 2007 8:47 AM
Jeez. another Hollywood liberal getting into our pure politics.
Posted by: C.Morris | March 13, 2007 9:27 AM
He can't do any worse than who we have in the White House today, but because he's a fundraiser for Libby's defense fund, he'll never get my support.
Posted by: BC | March 13, 2007 9:30 AM
More nutcrack comments from the Loony Left. Anyway, Fred Thompson does work in Hollywood now but has been a senator and before ever working in Hollywood, he was in Washington and was one of the lead investigators and lawyers for the Watergate hearings. But don't let facts get in the way of the Left rants and overall generally looniness.
Posted by: John D | March 13, 2007 10:21 AM
Hey, i love the idea of Fred throwing in his hat into the ring. If nothing else, we'll get at least one half-way polished speaker who won't mangle the english language.
Posted by: Wolfgang | March 13, 2007 11:16 AM
JohnD,
We thinks you've beaten the "Loony Left" horse as dead as it can get. Can't you come up with something intelligent to say? What comments do you consider "nutcrack"? And your so-called "facts" were already mentioned in Silva's post...if you bothered to read it.
"I'm just going to wait and see what happens," Thompson. 64, has said of this talk of a presidential campaign...
Yep, he's definitely cut from the same cloth as our current president.
Posted by: DD | March 13, 2007 11:29 AM
Crazy Duck,
If you didn't get a tax break in 2003, you obviously aren't paying any income taxes or need a new CPA.
Posted by: Terry | March 13, 2007 12:02 PM
Sounds like Thompson agrees with Al Gore's lawyer that the Libby trial was a stupid witchhunt. Funny how the lefties on here scream for Libby's blood for doing the same thing done by their hero Bill Clinton. Just an example of their lack of common sense....
Posted by: chris | March 13, 2007 12:06 PM
All of the Republican candidates for President are bad actors,why not add another one?
Posted by: John E. | March 13, 2007 12:10 PM
This is supposed to be the cities Republican paper? Look at the lefties who are the regular posters. Cutting taxes for the rich? Come on you lefties can do better than that. Like Blood for oil or war for Halliburton. This is exactly why these media dinos are heading for the ash heap of history.
Posted by: Jim Leahy | March 13, 2007 12:11 PM
Beany boy,I received a large tax cut thanks to GWB.I also realize that my kids and grand kids are going to be paying it off.Un-like wing-nuts,that bothers me.
I also received tax increases from Old man Regan and Mr.Read my lips.
Posted by: Raving Loon | March 13, 2007 12:17 PM
Crazy Duck,
Give that healthy tax cut back to the gov't or put it into an account for you kids or grandkids. Don't do the liberal thing and spend it on Lotto tickets.
Posted by: Terry | March 13, 2007 12:34 PM
Dick Chaney rules
he's a cool guy - he deserves your write in vote becasue he cares about you
Dick's only interest in getting into politics is to serve americans, NOT to help rich guys
All dick'e buddies are real regular guys
Posted by: rich chaney | March 13, 2007 12:35 PM
Sorry, DD, but Loony Left is just so spot on.
Some examples in here? I'll point some out:
1. the post from "rich chaney"
2. Anything contributed from John "Will someone please shoot Cheney in the face and Paulo too" E.
3. Bill R is another king loon. "pandering to criminals is not a good start."
4. Just wait and watch. Janet nor Catherine have contributed yet.
5. Look to other Swamp posts. So far this one is rather mild, but plenty of other Swamp posts bring out the loons at their best.
Posted by: John D | March 13, 2007 12:48 PM
Of all the people complaining about name calling,I'd say YOU are the worst name-caller Dyslin and that's not a "leftwing conspiracy",it's the truth.
Posted by: John E. | March 13, 2007 1:28 PM
Reagan WON the cold war- deal with it.
Some of you lefties were probably pretty sad when Gorbachev was out-negotiated by Reagan, thereby putting an end to the cold war.
Posted by: Bob from Salem | March 13, 2007 1:51 PM
Bob from Salem,
The Cold War ended when Reagan was President because Reagan was carrying out the Truman Doctorine.
Posted by: jethro | March 13, 2007 2:23 PM
John E., what is your infatuation with my name? in fact, what is your infatuation with me?
See, DD, this is what I mean by a Loon. Here we have the King of the Loons, John E., feverishly trying to find out my name and where I live. See, DD, I certainly could care less who John E. is or where he lives. I don't think Paulo does either. Or any sane person on here. But nope, John E. is infatuated with me and who I am. Would you say that is Loony? Scary? Bizarre? Sick?
Posted by: John D | March 13, 2007 2:53 PM
Bobby from Salem,and your still paying for it.Even after he raised your taxes twice.Your kids and his kids and their kids are still going to be paying for it.That's called trickle down,Bobby.
I doubt the old geezer out-negoiated anyone,considering he was asleep most of the eight years.Slept right thru the Iran contra affair!!!!!
Posted by: Raving Loon | March 13, 2007 2:57 PM
"Some of you lefties were probably pretty sad when Gorbachev was out-negotiated by Reagan, thereby putting an end to the cold war."
Bob fro Salem-
Your lack of knowledge of recent history is very impressive.
Reagan did not negotiate and end to the cold war, the Soviet system in Eastern Europe imploded on it's own.
Please go look up the following items:
Glasnost
Perestroika
Solidarity
Vaclav Havel
Chernobyl
KOR
Boris Yeltsin
That should be a start for you.
Posted by: Tony | March 13, 2007 3:17 PM
Reagan's contributions to the ending of the Cold War is a lot more believable than Clinton's contribution to the econopmy of the 90's.
Posted by: Terry | March 13, 2007 4:22 PM
I had hoped I would never have to see this guy on TV again.
Posted by: C.Morris | March 13, 2007 5:13 PM
"Reagan did not negotiate and end to the cold war, the Soviet system in Eastern Europe imploded on it's own." says Tony.
I take your point, Tony, even if you're being just a teeney bit simplistic. You're correct, the Soviet Union had been crumbling for years. Reagan was just one player of many in the Cold War drama -- nevertheless, he was a player, like him or not.
I would argue that Gorbachev and Reagan (in that order) hastened the collapse that would have occured anyway.
That begs the question: in light of the chaos and instability in the world today, was this sudden collapse necessarily a good thing?
For one thing, it was the basis of the Neocon Imperial Creed which led to the invasion of Iraq. That is, now that the US is the only remaining Superpower it must use this opportunity to reshape the Middle East.
Posted by: Leo T | March 13, 2007 7:30 PM
He would be a better president than an actor. Yeah, I know, that ain't saying much.
Posted by: Leo T | March 13, 2007 7:33 PM
L T,
I would agree with your point that Gorby was a partner in ending the CW.
Dozens of Western Leaders and tens of millions of Western troops and populations all deserve some of the credit for ending the CW.
Posted by: C.Morris | March 13, 2007 8:21 PM
I don't know about anyone else, but if Thompson gets into the race, he will have my vote for sure.
Oh, and I am one of those left wing nuts that so many of you hate. I have voted Democratic in every election since I was 18.
Yes, Thompson is a conservative and I don't agree with him on everything, but I do believe that Thompson is honest and that goes a long way with me. He is telling you exactly what he thinks, NOT what he thinks I WANNA hear.
I'll even match that vote with a check for a $1,000.00.
Posted by: Fried Chicken Eatin Boy | March 13, 2007 8:41 PM
Leo-
I absolutely agree that Reagan had a role in the collapse of Communism, as did Thatcher, Kohl, and Pope John Paul II, amongst others in the west. However, The internal players, both within the Soviet Union, and within the Warsaw Pact countries of Eastern Europe seem to deserve the lion's share of the credit to me. They crafted unique, non-violent strategies and solutions that managed to make a large repressive empire disappear completely in a very short period of time with incredibly little bloodshed.
The biggest contribution that the leaders of the west made to the demise of Communism in Europe was having the sense to let the internal developments run their course without intervention.
Posted by: Tony | March 14, 2007 6:16 AM
Tony,
I agree, the internal players should definitely not be overlooked.
I still have to wonder, was this rapid collapse really such a good thing? For one thing it led to the current war in Iraq. (The Neocon war plan was predicated on the fact that our old Cold War nemesis is gone.)
Posted by: Leo T | March 14, 2007 8:45 AM
Republican or Democrat, Thompson is the best person to be president. We need values based on our founding principles, not "values" based on how many votes they will draw.
All of the major front-runners now want the job so badly that they will say or do anything to get it.
Thompson is not that type of person.
He's got my vote, for sure, if he runs.
Posted by: George M | March 14, 2007 10:00 AM
I still have to wonder, was this rapid collapse really such a good thing? For one thing it led to the current war in Iraq. (The Neocon war plan was predicated on the fact that our old Cold War nemesis is gone.)
Posted by: Leo T | Mar 14, 2007 8:45:52 AM
I understand your point.
One of the reason I supported the first Gulf war, was that I thought it was important that the whole international community united against the first post-cold war instance of international agression. It seemed to be a hopeful model for the future. Bush 1 got it right.
Since then things have drifted away from that model. Clinton bears some blame in the way the break up of the former Yugoslavia was handled, but the neo-cons have gone absolutely off the deep end with the unilaterism.
But all that said, I do still believe that the demise of the Soviet system was an overall positive. I look at the new, democratic, stable. increasingly prosperous countries of eastern Europe(I think we should go back to calling them central Europe as before the cold war.) and can't imagine that we'd be better off with them the way they were before.
Posted by: Tony | March 14, 2007 11:16 AM
Tony Bush 43 was never going to get the same international coalition that his father got because France, Germany, and Russia were neck deep in the Oil for Food Scandal with Sadaaam. Those countries wouldn't kill the golden goose.
Posted by: Terry | March 18, 2007 7:26 PM