by Frank James
Congressional Democrats are warning the White House and Vice President Cheney that they will use Congress's power of the purse to cut money for the operations of the vice president's office unless Cheney comes clean on his office's handling of classified information.
Both Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) who chair congressional committees that make funding decisions for executive branch functions, including, the vice president's office, have essentially told Cheney to change his behavior or they will whack him with a financial hammer.
Here's Durbin's letter:
June 25, 2007The Honorable Dick Cheney
Vice President of the United States
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.Washington, D.C. 20500
Dear Mr. Vice President:
As Chairman of the Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government Appropriations, with jurisdiction over the Executive Office of the President (including the Office of the Vice President) and the National Archives (including Information Security Oversight Office), I have been following the story first reported last week in the Washington Post regarding your attempts to exempt the Office of the Vice President from a presidential executive order that establishes a uniform, government-wide system for safeguarding classified national security information (Executive Order 12958.)
I write to express my concern and to call on you to take corrective action regarding this matter prior to our Subcommittee markup, which could be as soon as the week of July 9, 2007.
Serious questions have been raised about both the legality and the appropriateness of exempting your office from the rules that apply to all other Executive Branch officials. According to press reports, the rationale advanced as to why your office has not complied with Executive Order 12958 is that yours is “a unique office that is neither a part of the executive branch nor a part of the legislative branch, but is attached by the Constitution to the latter.”
That assertion is a Constitutional caricature, grossly distorting the intent of the framers. Just because the Speaker of the House and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate are in the line of presidential succession does not make them part of the executive branch. Nor is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court an officer of the legislative branch simply because the Constitution specifies that he preside over the Senate during an impeachment trial.
More importantly, the decision to exempt your office from this system for protecting classified information is deeply troubling because it could place national security secrets at risk.
For these reasons, I urge you, Mr. Vice President, to immediately comply with Executive Order 12958. It is my hope that you will take this action so that we will not be compelled to take corrective action in our appropriations bill.
Sincerely,
Richard J. Durbin
Chairman
Subcommittee on Financial Services
and General Government
And McClatchy's Washington bureau had a story about Emanuel's effort to rein in, as he sees it, the vice president.
Here's a copy of Emanuel's speech today on the House floor.
"Mr. Speaker, five years ago, when the Vice President met with the senior executives of big oil companies, and we wanted to know what they discussed when it came to energy policy for the country, the Vice President claimed executive privilege and said those meetings were private.
"Now when we want to know what he's doing as it relates to America's national security in the lead-up to the war in Iraq and after the fact, the Vice President has declared he is a member of the legislative branch.
"The legislative branch. Every 10 year old who studies social studies in the United States knows that the Vice President is in the executive branch.
"So we have decided that if the Vice President is no longer a member of the executive branch, therefore we will no longer fund the executive branch of his office, and he can live off of the funding for the Senate Presidency.
"We will follow the logic of this ludicrous argument that the Vice President of the United States is in the legislative branch, no longer in the executive branch.
"And the Vice President is acting like he is unaccountable and above the law. And in fact, there is a real consequence to his decisions. And his decision to avoid the historical record as it relates to America's national security has consequences.
"For too long, he has acted like he is above the law and not accountable, and it is time that we bring him back down to earth.
This move by congressional Democrats will play exceptionally well with the Democratic base, which contains many voters who loathe Cheney.
It may help Democrats regain some ground with liberal voters who have been down on congressional Democrats' because of their inability so far to impose a withdrawal timeline on U.S. troops in Iraq.
It also sets the stage for a major battle royale between Cheney and congressional Democrats, a relationship where there is no love lost, as illustrated by the profane exchange between Cheney and Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) a few years ago when Cheney told the senator to perform an anatomically impossible feat, just not in those words.







Comments
If they cut off funding for the OVP, Cheney will just hold up some liquor stores to fund it, and then claim that laws against armed robbery do not apply to the Vice President under the Constitution.
Posted by: Tony | June 26, 2007 11:17 AM
They finally found the man behind the curtain. The all powerful wizard of oz. Maybe he can get some more Haliburton money. That would be money staight from Iran because they just left Iran years after the government banned any business from doing it with Iran. Why the special treatment? I don't expect many republicans to come to his aid...they dislike him as much as the left.
Posted by: bill r. | June 26, 2007 11:18 AM
Are the Hardcore Wingnuts REALLY going to defend the proposition that the Office of the Vice President is neither in the Executive nor the Legislative Branch and thus subject to no checks and balances whatsoever?
Posted by: Bryan | June 26, 2007 11:19 AM
It's about time somebody started to light a fire to Dick Cheney's fat butt. When you talk about dangers to this country, Cheney has represented the most insidious kind, a hidden, shadowy, svengali who if given the chance would take over the country.
Posted by: GW | June 26, 2007 11:22 AM
Maybe the democrats can issue a non-binding resolution calling Cheney a fat potato-head.
Posted by: Barry | June 26, 2007 11:26 AM
Our Vice President is the biggest threat to America in the world. Much, much more of a threat than all of the terrorist in the world put together. He does not believe in Government of the People. He believes in Dictatorship. We must get him out of Washington.
Posted by: San Miguel | June 26, 2007 11:31 AM
Thanks so much, Sen. Durbin. That really puts things into perspective.
I must inform you, however, that I'm fully aware that what I've suggested is preposterous. This wasn't the first time and it won't be the last. #$% *&.
Posted by: The Real Prez | June 26, 2007 11:38 AM
Illinois Dickie Durbin is an embarrassment to our state and so is ram rod Rahm Emmanuel. Both are Clinonistas and apologizers for the Clinton disbarment and impeachment. Vice President Cheney was duly elected by the people of this nation not once but twice. Neither the President nor the Vice President as elected officials are effected by the Executive Order.It only applies to Cabinet members and staffers and Durbin knows this.He is just doing this to poke the eye of the President and the Vice President. Durbin is just a teenager playing grown up government. I wish he would resign as Senator before it gets any worse. I thought he flipped when he called our soldiers Soviets in their gulags or Pol Pot. It's just his stupidity on parade. Jerry White, Springfield, IL
Posted by: Jerry White | June 26, 2007 11:46 AM
We need to hire joey "the clown" lombardo to wack the Dick!
Posted by: The Decider | June 26, 2007 11:54 AM
I have read all your posts Jerry White......is it always a full moon where you live?
Posted by: bill r. | June 26, 2007 11:54 AM
San Miguel,
I believe you meant second biggest. Although Dick has big "ambitions", the decider guy has nukes.
Posted by: Barry | June 26, 2007 12:20 PM
Another Loony Lefty suggesting the assassination of a member of the Bush administration? And the morons who censor the LIBune always seem to let those posts through. What a great day it would be when someone drops a bomb on the Tribune Tower and its Washington office!
Just playing the game, folks.
Posted by: John D | June 26, 2007 12:22 PM
By the time they're through, this will wind up being just another "non-binding resolution."
Posted by: Op109 | June 26, 2007 12:39 PM
Well, lets hope they vote to de-fund that megalomaniac, Cheney. The Legislative branch does not claim 'Executive privilege'. He can't have it both ways. Either he complies with the law, or he gets defunded.
Posted by: weinerdog43 | June 26, 2007 12:48 PM
If Cheney is not apart of the Executive branch like he claims then he has no excuse for not answering a subpoena and testifying before Congress about his role in playing politics with the DOJ and his part in the outing of a CIA agent.
Posted by: John E | June 26, 2007 12:48 PM
You are incorrect again, as usual Jerry White of Springfield. Smarmy Cheney was not duly elected by the people of this nation. And again, as usual your comments do not make much sense.
By the way Mr. White, what is chickenhawk Cheney's approval rating these days??
Cheney needs to be held accountable, impeached, and prosecuted for his criminal misdeeds.
Posted by: Doug R. | June 26, 2007 12:54 PM
Johnny D, why is it wrong to talk about killing members of the Bush Administration, but perfectly OK for YOU to talk about killing the Democratic leadership? Are you not responsible for your own actions?
Posted by: tony | June 26, 2007 12:58 PM
I think we all know the President and Vice President have broken and continue to break numerous laws. Wouldn't it be great if we had a media like in the 70s that would investigate and get the goods on these guys? Where's Woodward and Bernstein when you need them?
Posted by: Paul | June 26, 2007 1:07 PM
I hope folks have been reading the "Angler" series in the Washington Post. The pieces clearly show what I've been saying for years - that Bush 43 is merely an affable, back-slapping frat boy who makes a good stage prop for Cheney and the Neocons to use to draw the attention away from what they've been doing.
But it's been Cheney and his staff who have - through force of will - been setting and executing the agenda for this Administration for the past 6-plus years. The Post series shows that on virtually all important issues (Iraq, torture, domestic surveillance, presidential power, tax cuts, energy policy, etc.), the pliable Chimpy McFlightsuit will sign just about anything that Cheney's staff puts in front of him.
I have predicted for a while that future historians will refer to 2001-2009 as the years of the "Cheney Administration" as it actually has been run by VP Cheney and his minions - not by the titular President.
Posted by: Buster | June 26, 2007 1:10 PM
Regarding "Another Loony Lefty". You seem to be trying to associate killing with liberals. Let's look at reality for a minute. There are 100,000+ dead Iraqi civilians as a result of the might on the right, unbridled. I think most will agree the author is loony, and the posting should not have been. Especially since my last entry was edited for using a slang of Mexican origin describing testicles.
Posted by: Barry | June 26, 2007 1:27 PM
The rumor is Cheney is on his way out, to be replaced by Fred Thompson. The Loony Right seems to think Thompson will be elected Prez in '08.
Posted by: Cheryl | June 26, 2007 1:48 PM
first things first johnDishonest--
YOU ARE A LIER
executing and assasinating are two different things...
it would be a great day in america and the world if we had courts honest enough to convict cheney for what he is guilty of... and if convicted, burn his fat ass on the stake...
that seniment is pure peace loving justice motivated love...
assasination is like what we did to mossadeq in iran in the 1950s when u had open democratic elections and women with voting rights etc... so after we assasinated this democratically elected man, we installed a murderous thug called thr shah, that is waht began the islamification of iran...
i think u are a low-life, but i don't think u are stupid... so that makes u a lier...
and that's funny, cause whatever u may think of my positions, whatever u may think of me, i'm no lier...
i don't misquote u or anyone else... but that is all u seem to do...
Posted by: seth | June 26, 2007 1:53 PM
If we really think we can fight barbarism with barbarism (executions) I propose we start with a uniform system of execution that is envirnmentally friendly, economically sound, and can be tailored to suit the particulars of the crime. Stonings. For the most minor of offenses requiring death, a large stone could fall upon the offender while he/she sleeps unaware. The most egregious offenders getting pea-sized pebbles in public square. We could leave that up to the um, jury.
Posted by: Barry | June 26, 2007 2:22 PM
we really think we can fight barbarism with barbarism (executions) I propose we start with a uniform system of execution that is envirnmentally friendly, economically sound, and can be tailored to suit the particulars of the crime. Stonings. For the most minor of offenses requiring death, a large stone could fall upon the offender while he/she sleeps unaware. The most egregious offenders getting pea-sized pebbles in public square. We could leave that up to the um, jury.
Posted by: Barry | June 26, 2007 2:22 PM
LOL
"So if she weighs more than a duck..."
"She's a witch!"
"Precisely."
Posted by: Anonymous | June 26, 2007 2:47 PM
it seems some balk at the notion of executing bush and cheney?
why is this? this question isn't for the right wingers, but for the more, um, au courant...
did, or did not these 2 'people' deliberately lie about wmd in iraq to drag the country into invading a sovereign nation AT A MOMENT OF GRAVE PERIL for this country??
if u believe answer is yes, i would suggest u look up the word treason in the dictionary...
the punishment for treason is clear...
this is strikingly uncomplicated stuff... the very fact that it hasn't been done already clearly shows how far we have deteriorated as a people...
now, don't get me wrong, i'm not trying to organize a committee, becasue it will never happen, for crying out loud we can't even impeach the traitors...
i mean, my god, we all know the litany, enron, 9/11, iraq, abu ghareb, katrina, on and on the list of grave failures goes... coupled always with extra-constitutional secrecy and obfuscation, duffle bags full of cash being flown out of the country, etc...
so we can discuss the finer points if u prefer, i salute dick durbin, i hope they can smash cheney's vice presidential spheres... i wish we had more like him...
just don't anyone ever expect me to regard bush/cheney as anything other than traitors to the nation, murderers, torturers, underminers of the constitution, etc...
in short, most highly deserving of the severest punishments possible under our body of laws
Posted by: seth | June 26, 2007 3:04 PM
yes seth, we must have executions, for it is written...
Posted by: Barry | June 26, 2007 3:36 PM
Hyperbole aside seth,
Intentionally taking the life of another human makes you a killer, regardless of what you call it. Once you become a killer, you remain a killer all your days. The human spirit is contorted beyond repair by the act and the soul is forever stained by it. So whether it's Iraqi insurgents, the vice president, or any other human being, please do not kill them on my behalf.
Posted by: Barry | June 26, 2007 3:52 PM
Whoa, what's all this business about executions and assasinations? Easy there guys.
I think Rahm is on the right track. If Cheney is serious about his office being outside the executive branch (despite his earlier claims of executive priviledge) and exempt from Congressional oversight, then he is clearly outside the scope of normal government funding. I'm sure he'll have no problem raising funds to run his own office, but he should be paying rent for any office space he uses in our government buildings.
Posted by: Tom O | June 26, 2007 4:37 PM
Loony Lefty Sethy, since dt loved to point out my spelling error yesterday, i will do the same to you: It's liar, not lier.
Now, that this business is done: Tony, my boy, read the post again, OK? I say I am playing the game. If your ilk can talk about killing Bush, Cheney, whomever, then I'll do the same for your kindred, which includes the Demoncrats and their co-conspirators in the media.
And Sethy, you really do need to be locked up. Heavens, I think you're even more off your rocker than John E. And that IS saying something!
Posted by: John D | June 26, 2007 4:45 PM
ok, hyperbole aside...
i'm not killing anyone... i don't have an aggressive bone in my body... defensive, well that is something different...
john D. - i stand corrected, you are a Liar-- and for u to talk about killing democrats who are guilty of no capital crimes, is not exactly the same as broaching the subject regarding those who have...
if the show fits, wear it...
john D, i don't have even the merest regard for your opinions... the germans who supported hitler in the early thirties weren't invaders from mars, they were 'normal' germans living in the most sophisticated country in the world...
my personal opinion is that anyone who ever supported bush is a fascist, whether they realize it or not, but with an eye toward moderation, i can safely say that anyone who continues to support him is decidely so...
and again the list goes on... utter contempt for the rule of law...
if 2 weeks ago one of the 'lefties' posed the question to the 'righties' how would u react if cheney declared himself exempt from all effective oversight by claiming that the vice presidency is not part of the exectutive branch-- the answer would have been straight forward...
'more lefty conspiracy theories... sure if cheney abused his power so blatantly he should be impeached, but he will never do it, so stop making up doomsday scenerios, etc...'
but here we are, and without missing a beat, the most blatant abuse of executive branch power in the history of the country doesn't even register in the minds of the pod people...
i may be uncouth, but i'm no liar, lier, or otherwise and i respect the rule of law in all things...
you cannot say that about yourself... well, maybe u will say it, but it would not be true...
i've been on here a few weeks now, and i've seen u run from every post...
u make assertions that are shown to be false, and -poof- u are off to the next post...
typical wing nut progression...
answer me one question johnD, if 65% of the venezuelan people want chavez to be their president, do we have ANY moral right to depose him?
should the USA now move towards hot animosity with the people of latin america? not the overly caked up makeup wearing prostitutes of the latin american right wing-- but the people...
tread carefully...
Posted by: seth | June 26, 2007 5:38 PM
Cheney is a traitor and should be treated accordingly. This man is the most corrupt VP ever. Though apparently not part of the Executive branch of government. p.s. John D please seek professional help.
Posted by: Logic Prisoner | June 26, 2007 5:40 PM
Hardball would be introducing articles of impeachment. Not these wimpish, non-binding political stunts. Stand up and do what needs to be done.
Posted by: Rick/Sneads Ferry, NC | June 26, 2007 6:00 PM
Durbin and Emanual dont have a backbone to stand up straight with. I am no fan of Cheney's by any means....Cheney is truly evil. What are Durbin and emanual going to do, cut off funding like they did in Iraq? The truth is those two and their dumocratic ilk will wash dishes and shine shoes for Cheney whenever Cheney tells them too. Durbin and Emanual are of the party of idosrganization and party of failure. Dumocrats, what are they goof for????...oh yeah, washing dishes and taking out the trash. Oh and how can forget the third of the three stooges, dumocrat obama...actually forgetting about how useless obama is the easiest of all. Obama is the biggest fraud of the three.
Posted by: jw | June 26, 2007 6:26 PM
Cutting off funding for Cheney won't mean a thing - He'll just live off his Haliburton money!
Posted by: Tim S | June 26, 2007 6:49 PM
Neither the President nor the Vice President as elected officials are effected by the Executive Order.
Every time the Republicans get caught in their lies and hypocrisy and can't defend themselves, they start making up lies like this to try to hide their other lies. Cheney has hidden behind executive priviledge every time he wanted to cover his illegal activity and secret business deals. It speaks volumes about the character of the people on this board who continue to defend this kind of lying. And you know who you are.
Posted by: Mrs. Jesus | June 26, 2007 7:24 PM
John D, please pay me for your last visit. Don't forget to take the Meds I gave you.
Posted by: John D's analyst | June 26, 2007 8:18 PM
The first problem with that letter is that it calls shotgun dick "honorable". The only thing that megalomaniac honors is his filthy blood money.
Posted by: snitramc | June 26, 2007 8:33 PM
I can't wait until Vice President Obama makes the same claim. And President Clinton pulls out the arguments presented today to back it up. The repubitard's heads will explode.
Posted by: snitramc | June 26, 2007 11:37 PM
I can't wait until Vice President Obama makes the same claim. And President Clinton pulls out the arguments presented today to back it up. The repubitard's heads will explode. ut I am sure Speaker Pelosi will support them! rotflmao
Posted by: snitramc | June 26, 2007 11:38 PM
I am not a lefty or a righty. The world is too complicated a place to exist on the peripherals of the political spectrum. I was not actually serious about having the Dick whacked (whacking - while in some cases seemingly desirable - would not be legal) - I was just exercising my constitutional right before it is taken away. However, emperor Cheney (and anyone who buys anything he has to say) is indeed guilty of treason, is a fascist, and should be dealt with "Nuremberg style"! Let em hang!!!!!!!
I am proud of our senators/congressmen for their actions even though they are only symbolic gestures. Hopefully, this will motivate more people in our government (and public) to stand up and tell these traitors to stop “pissin on our backs n’ tellin us it’s rainin”.
To those who seem confused: don’t forget who ran things (FDR/Truman in case you forgot) back when we turned our enemies into dust (some of it radioactive) and rebuilt the world. There is simply no need to attack when there is no REAL threat to our way of life. However, if there is a REAL threat, it must be dealt with decisively (see WW2). Several thousand malnourished extremists (some of whom can only read the Koran) trained on a playground (or by us in certain cases – Special thanks to Reagan, bush, and dick on that one!!!) are not a REAL threat. Some people seem to forget that rather quickly because they have not TRULY lost anything (I’m talking entire cities laid to waste) and are subjected to constant fear tactics. Open your eyes!
Posted by: The Decider | June 26, 2007 11:42 PM
Uh, Dick, Rahm, don't you guys have things better to do than threatening to defund the Vice President's office? Like, presenting an actual legislative agenda? No wonder why Congress has a 14% approval rating.
Hello? Hello? Anyone home?
Posted by: The General | June 27, 2007 12:16 AM
Mrs. J, from your post:
"Every time the Republicans get caught in their lies and hypocrisy and can't defend themselves, they start making up lies like this to try to hide their other lies. Cheney has hidden behind executive priviledge every time he wanted to cover his illegal activity and secret business deals. It speaks volumes about the character of the people on this board who continue to defend this kind of lying. And you know who you are."
You can replace Republican and Cheney with Democrat and Clinton all throughout the 1990s in regard to campaign finance laws being broken, perjury, lying under oath, the attempted personal and political character assassnation of Billy Dale and the White House Travel Office, 900 FBI files on Republicans illegally being in the White House, "no, clear legal authority" Al Gore, the retaliation upon Linda Tripp, Kathleen Willey and whomever else got in the Clinton's way, would you like me to ocntinue??? i easily could. Hmmm, selling of the Lincoln Bedroom, illegal coffee klatches in the White House, blow jobs while conjoling Congressmen to send American troops to war. Still want more???
Posted by: John D | June 27, 2007 8:46 AM
John D didn't anyone tell you that half the reason guys become president is to get blow jobs???
HELLO!!!
Posted by: Former Brainwashed Republican | June 27, 2007 9:39 AM
Johnny D-
Billy Dale and the folks at the White House travel office serve at the pleasure of the President, just like US Attormey's right? If it's no big deal to fire US attorneys for political reasons why are you so bent out of shape about firing travel agents?
Posted by: Tony | June 27, 2007 10:18 AM
Seth, I beg your forgiveness. I am not a very smart man, I just assumed that you were in favor of executing the vice president with cause. It must have been my inability to understand that is the problem. I just thought that since you started your comment with "it seems some balk at the notion of executing bush and cheney", that you were indeed for this notion. My inability to understand is certainly the root of this problem and once again I apologize for any angst my ignorance may have caused you.
Posted by: Barry | June 27, 2007 10:29 AM
JohnD, following your logic, Bush should be getting blow jobs too.
Posted by: Barry | June 27, 2007 10:53 AM
since we're bringing up the killing of politicians, here's a Republican proud of talking about killing Bill and Hillary Clinton:
[quote]
During the June 20 edition of his CNN Headline News show, Glenn Beck hosted Michael Graham, a conservative radio talk show host, who said that, while watching a spoof of a scene from the series finale of HBO's The Sopranos filmed by former President Bill Clinton and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), he wanted to see someone "whack" the Clintons. Beck, while smiling, said he "did not want to see that." Graham's comments were not edited out of subsequent airings of the program. Instead, CNN aired the same version of the show -- including Graham's remark about wanting to see "somebody come in ... and just whack" the Clintons -- at 7 and 9 p.m. ET on June 20 and at midnight on June 21.
The Think Progress weblog noted Graham's comments on June 21.
This is not the first time Graham has used violent rhetoric while discussing the Clintons. On the May 7, 2003, edition of MSNBC's Hardball, Graham said: "Anyone listening to Hillary Rodham in her speech last week about patriotism, that screaming, screeching fingernail, I wanted to bludgeon her with a tire iron."
[/quote]
from Mediamatters.com, 6/20/2007
You conservatives are such kind and peaceful people.
Posted by: BC | June 27, 2007 11:31 AM
John D and Jerry White,
You both take your turns ripping straw men and throwing out red herrings, but are either of you going to support the proposition that the Vice President, who has claimed Executive Prilvilege to keep almost all of his dealings secret, is not part of the Executive Branch and thus not subject to the 1995 Executive Order on Classification?
Posted by: Bryan | June 27, 2007 11:55 AM
barry, apparantly my last post is the one that confused you...
i am 100% in favor of trying bush/cheney et al for treason, and if convicted, for the severest of sentences...
just so we are clear.
Posted by: seth | June 27, 2007 12:18 PM
I think the confusion lies in the fact that you want executions but you do not want to take credit or be responsible for them, you want to remain non-aggresive, but still get the killing done.
Posted by: Barry | June 27, 2007 1:29 PM
That and a lack of a font for sarcasm.
Posted by: Barry | June 27, 2007 1:31 PM
i noted u'r sarcasm, as it was literally dripping off your post, u didn't detect mine? what the hell are u talking about??
credit and responsibility??
i'm speaking as a citizen... u show me the petition for trying these criminals for treason and i'll be happy to sign it, first name last name, address, phone number, everything...
what are u saying, because i'm not a murderer, i can't be in favor of traitors being executed??
boy that is a stretch, not entirely unfounded, but a stretch... what are u criticizing me for? because i am not against capital punishment?
i am in favor of capital punishment, generally, i have reservations due to the fact that those least deserving get executed, and those most deserving barely know they are in jail...
obfuscate all u want... they are guilty (in my opinion) of heinous crimes aginst this nation, and if a case was brought competantly, and a jury decided so, then let them reap what they deserve...
are u only in favor of justice being meted out when it is some poor city kid??
if some dumb kid steals a car worth $20,000 what is their punishment? 1, maybe 2 years in jail?? OK
To make the numbers nice, lets say its 2 years in jail for a $24,000 car... that gives us 1 month in jail for every $1,000 stolen...
I would love to see that be the measure of the law... strictly for non-violent offenses here... and no special jails either...
some business man absconds with millions... baby u'r goin to jail for life...
Posted by: seth | June 27, 2007 2:57 PM
it seems some balk at the notion of executing bush and cheney.
I would hope they would balk at the idea of executing a sitting President and Vice President, regardless of their approval rating, some I hope, might even insist on a trial before making that decision.
Posted by: Barry | June 27, 2007 5:41 PM
Obfuscation is the relationship between executing the president and the disparate treatment of individuals by the judicial system along socio-economic lines.
Posted by: Barry | June 27, 2007 5:54 PM