Congress wants to end monkey business: The Swamp
 
The Swamp
-
Posted July 11, 2007 2:36 PM
The Swamp

by Frank James

Congress wants to put an end to the monkey business.

No, not the monkey business that occurs in Congress and sometimes winds up getting members indicted and convicted.

And not the monkey business that occurs outside Congress, like the kind that happened on the boat actually called "Monkey Business" with former Sen. Gary Hart so many years ago. Or that has ensnared Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) this week.

It's the real monkey business it wants to shut down, the commerce in monkeys and other primates for the pet trade.

Here's a press release from the Humane Society of the United States that provides details on the Captive Primate Safety Act and explains the perceived need for the legislation. The act was introduced by Reps. Eddie Berneice Johnson (D-Tex.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) It just so happens that the aforementioned Vitter is a Senate co-sponsor.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Captive Primate Safety Act Aims to Cap the Dangers of Pet Monkeys

WASHINGTON (July 11, 2007) -- U.S. Representatives Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Tex.) and Mark Steven Kirk (R-Ill.) have introduced the Captive Primate Safety Act, H.R. 2964, which seeks to halt the commerce in monkeys, chimpanzees, and other primates for the exotic pet trade. The Humane Society of the United States urges Congress to pass this legislation swiftly to protect public safety and animal welfare.

"Primates are highly intelligent, social, and dangerous animals," said Michael Markarian, HSUS executive vice president. "They belong in the wild, not in our bedrooms and basements. It's time to end this dangerous monkey business."

"This legislation responds to a matter of public health and safety," Rep. Johnson said. "The animals deserve to live where their needs will be met and their conditions will be monitored. And people deserve to be free from the dangers these animals can pose when kept as pets. I am pleased that my colleagues have joined me in addressing this issue."

"It is inhumane to cage primates in private homes," Rep. Kirk said. "Besides the animal cruelty concerns, serious health risks are created with the unregulated transfer of primates, both for their owners and the public. The Captive Primate Safety Act takes important steps to ensure responsible care and appropriate guardianship for these animals."

People often get these animals as infants and then find they grow too difficult to handle. Chimpanzees become many times strong than humans, and even small monkeys can inflict serious injury by biting or scratching. In addition to the risk of attack, primates can spread deadly diseases such as Herpes B virus.

"The global trade in exotic animals -- especially primates -- as pets is a very dangerous enterprise indeed," noted Adam Roberts, vice president of Born Free USA. "We urge the US Congress to lead the way in closing down this unnecessary commercial wildlife trafficking."

A companion bill, S. 1498, was introduced in May by U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and David Vitter (R-La.). Sen. Boxer is the chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, where the bill has been assigned. The House bill has been assigned to the Committee on Natural Resources.

Facts:

An estimated 15,000 primates are kept in private hands in the United States.

At least 100 people have been injured by captive primates over the past decade, including 29 children, according to the Captive Wild Animal Protection Coalition.

Federal health regulations have prohibited importing primates into the United States for the pet trade since 1975.

About 17 states prohibit the private ownership of primates as pets, and additional states require permits for them.

The federal bill does not ban possession, but addresses the interstate commerce in primates, who are often sold over the Internet and at auctions around the country.

The bill targets the pet trade and has no impact on zoos or other licensed facilities.

The bill is similar to the Captive Wildlife Safety Act, which Congress passed unanimously in 2003 to bar interstate commerce in lions, tigers, and other big cats as pets. It includes technical corrections to facilitate enforcement of the big cats bill.

More than 50 organizations have joined The HSUS in supporting the Captive Primate Safety Act, including the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, the American Veterinary Medical Association, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, Born Free USA, and the Jane Goodall Institute.

The Captive Primate Safety Act passed the U.S. Senate unanimously in 2006 but was blocked in the U.S. House by Representative Richard Pombo (R-Calif.), then-chairman of the House Resources Committee. Pombo was defeated in his reelection bid.

Timeline:

July 10, 2007. Captive Primates Safety Act, H.R. 2964, introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives.
May 25, 2007. Iowa bill prohibiting primates and other wild animals as pets signed into law.
May 24, 2007. Captive Primate Safety Act, S. 1498, introduced in the U.S. Senate.
April 30, 2007. Washington state bill prohibiting private possession of primates and other wild animals signed into law.
July 11, 2006. Captive Primate Safety Act passed the U.S. Senate by unanimous consent.
June 19, 2006. Captive Primate Safety Act passed the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
May 16, 2006. Maryland bill prohibiting primates and other wild animals as pets signed into law.
April 6, 2006. Louisiana banned private possession of primates.
July 27, 2005. Captive Primate Safety Act introduced in the U.S. Senate.
July 15, 2005. Kentucky banned private possession of primates and other wild animals.
March 16, 2005. Captive Primate Safety Act introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives.
March 3, 2005. A man was brutally beaten by a chimpanzee who escaped his enclosure at an exotic animal facility in California.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

"Primates are highly intelligent, social, and dangerous animals...It is inhumane to cage primates in private homes." But, its not inhumane as long as its licensed and "for treatment." Have they seen the monkey's that retire to caged "sanctuaries" after lives sent in cages for "medical experiments"? Okay. Aside. The bill sounds like a good idea considering it targets interstate commerce in primates; especially targeting those sold over the internet an at auctions.


I know there's a Paris Hilton angle here somewhere.


I wonder what "varmint hunter" Mitt Romney thinks about this?

Wasn't it Mitt who strapped the family dog to the top of their vehicle for a 100 mile family vacation?


Speaking of "Monkey"--I'm facing the East while I type this....

Paulo


RNC Bruce,

Why do you accept the rascist rantings of Paulo?


Awwww Doug Kook,

Did you ever hear of "Freedom of Speech?"
Is it ok for you lefty degenerates to call our President every name in the book? But a monkey is a monkey and will always be a monkey????
Think...you monkey!

Paulo


Paul O,

I didn't say you don't have the right to rant like the rascist moron you are.

Actually there's a pretty compelling strategic case to be made that letting you giggle and snicker as you post your rascist, childish drivel is in the best interest of both Obama and the Democratic Party.

That said, I just want to know why RNC Bruce doesn't disavow you?


Paulo, the shallow Left loves to play the race card, when in reality the biggest racists in the world is the Left. They look at people and see race all the time. They see division. And they flourish on that.


Oh Doogie, what about your ilk and their anti-Semetic rants and anti-Christian drivel? I've seen more hatred from the Left toward Jews, Israel and Christians than anything from the Right that you consider "racist." Do you disavow all the hateful comments toward Christians and Jews from your Loony Left friends?


John D.,

You provide me with a quote on what you're talking about and I'll comment on it.

That aside, I couldn't care less about Paul O refering to me as a monkey but how can you defend soemone refering to a black man as a monkey?


Doug, I don't think Paulo was referring to any black man as a monkey. But if I am wrong and he is referring to any black person as a monkey then that simply is wrong and way out of line. But then in the last couple of days we've had your friend John E. post as Paulo, so perhaps those comments were not him.

In regard to the anti-Christian and anti-Jew comments, do I really need to go back over the past few weeks and you provide you with links to those comments? I do remember comments from JJ (whatever happened to that propane lover anyway?) calling me or Christians "bible thumpers," "bible bangers," which clearly is derogatory. And if I am not mistaken, I think you even jumped on that bandwagon, eh???
Christians worse or as bad as Islamic extremists? Those comments have been sprinkled for months in the Swamp.
Don't play dumb, Doug. There has been lots of those comments and you know it too!


John D.,

"Speaking of "Monkey"--I'm facing the East while I type this....

Paulo"

John, I'm listening.


Oh Doogie/John E/dt/Raving Loon/Janet, all the same: One collective, worthless human space.


John D.,

You're just one Pulitzer Prize away from your decoder ring.

Mental midget.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "y" in the field below: