by Mark Silva
Barack Obama has a question to answer today.
It's about Barry Bonds.
Last night, in the debate of Democratic candidates for president on Soldier Field, Obama, the junior senator from Illinois, was asked, if were president today, would he invite Bonds to the White House -- (in recognition of the baseball home-run record that Bonds was poised to break, yet cognizant of the controversy surrounding Bonds' alleged use of steroids.)
"He hasn't done it yet,'' Obama said when pressed to answer a question that he didn't answer with his first remarks. "So we'll answer the question when it comes.''
The new record came at 8:51 Pacific Daylight Time, nearly two and a half hours after the debate ended in Chicago. Barry Lamar Bonds hit No. 756, surpassing Hank Aaron's 31-year-old homerun record, blasting the ball out of Bonds' own home park in San Francisco.
"Senator Obama, were you president of the United States today, would you honor Barry Bonds at the White House?'' MSNBC debate moderator Keith Olbermann had asked Obama during the AFL-CIO's candidate forum at Soldier Field just hours before the San Francisco Giants slugger made his record off a pitch from the Washington Nationals' Mike Bacsik.
"Well,'' Obama replied, "first of all, he's still got to hit one more, and it's been taking a while. And I had the opportunity to meet Hank Aaron just this past weekend. It reminded me of what sports should be, and that is something that young people can look up to.
"Now, Barry Bonds has been a remarkable baseball player, and I honor his achievements,'' Obama said. "But I hope that all of us are focused on making sure that sports is something that kids can look up to, not something that they start feeling cynical about. We've got cynicism in politics without having cynicism in our sports teams as well.''
Olbermann: "Is that a no, sir, or a yes?''
Obama: "Well, like I said, he hasn't done it yet, so we'll answer the question when it comes.''
He laughed, but people may be asking him that question again today.







Comments
Yes, when he becomes president Mr. Obama should receive Barry Bonds in the White House as is the custom when Americans achieve something noteworthy. Bonds has not been tried or convicted of anything. None of the allegations against him have been proved. Most of the charges have been made by unscrupulous, shady people who do not merit the kind of trust that many in the public have given them. Every hitter in all of baseball could be given steroids their whole career and not accomplish anything. I liked Obama's response to the question and his reference made to Henry Aaron. Furthermore, major league baseball should be held to account for modifying the ball from time to time to give it greater resiliency, thus generating more home runs. If Bonds, and other, home run sluggers had been hitting the same quality of ball as Aaron and Ruth who knows if he would have produced fewer home runs, or more?
Posted by: GW | August 8, 2007 8:18 AM
Wow! What a decisive, courageous answer!
Posted by: [INSERT CLEVER POST NAME HERE] | August 8, 2007 9:09 AM
Of course, have Bonds come to the White House. Then he can say the following " See kids, cheat, take steroids and you too can be a record holder. Don't wait, start injecting now". Obama could go a long way to getting my atttention by refusing to acknowledge Bonds. HE cheated, and will forever be known as the man who cheated.
Posted by: Rob S | August 8, 2007 9:15 AM
GW,
Barry Bonds admitted to a grand jury to rubbing cream on his legs and putting drops called "the Clear" under his tongue. He is the shady character who says he did not know what he was putting into his million dollar body.
Posted by: jethro | August 8, 2007 10:15 AM
I don't belive presidents have ever honored an individual record. The president routinely host "teams" (or groups of individual athletes like the olympics) that have won a championship.
Am I wrong? Please enlighten me if I am. But I don't recall Mark McGwire being invited to the White House to celebrate his record setting '98 season. Or Bonds a few years later.
Posted by: Steve34 | August 8, 2007 10:18 AM
Who cares?
How is the game of baseball or the individual accomplishments of players of any political or governmental importance?
I'm pretty sure President Obama will have better uses for his time than hanging with athletes and stars. Bonds will simply one more citizen for whom President Obama will be President, nothing more, nothing less.
Posted by: Penny | August 8, 2007 10:27 AM
Bonds should go to the White House today. Then he can ask Bush "Hey, what about all of the steroid abuse that happened in the Rangers clubhouse while you were their CEO? You know, the drugs that Canseco, Palmeiro, etc. took on your watch - no big deal, right?"
Posted by: BC | August 8, 2007 10:35 AM
GW, have you read Game of Shadows? It is pretty convincing. I don't think you can just dismiss its authors as "unscrupulous" or "shady".
Your point about what other players could or could not do on steroids is irrelevant to whether Bonds cheated. The argument about MLB tinkering with the ball may or may not have merit, but again, it is irrelevant to the issue of whether Bonds cheated.
Posted by: Herbie H. | August 8, 2007 10:57 AM
Why was the Bonds dilemma presneted to Mr. Obama and not the other candidates?
OK, they're both black men. That's it - the only commonality. One's a boneheaded athlete; the other an intellectual family man, U.S. senator and family man. I dougnt if they've ever been in the same room with one another.
True racial progress comes when whites stop expecting blacks and other racial groups to account for one another. I'm very disappointed in Mr. Olbermann.
Posted by: alizoom | August 8, 2007 11:00 AM
So now we can criticize Obama for evading a stupid, irrelevant question. If I ever decide to run for President, shoot me please.
Posted by: Phil | August 8, 2007 1:20 PM
Upon realizing what he took and what effect it had on his homerun output, Bonds should have resigned from baseball.
THEN, and ONLY THEN, would he have been worthy of "the call."
Posted by: Bud McFarlin | August 8, 2007 2:37 PM
A stupid question? Yes but one without the politics and complexities of others like health care, the war etc. If Obama can't handle this one, I don't have much confidence in his answers to others. He demonstrated he is like all other politicians who will duck questions they don't like. I was disappointed.
Posted by: Dan | August 9, 2007 1:44 AM