The Swamp
-
Posted August 7, 2007 11:30 AM
The Swamp

by Mark Silva

Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York, who has called for a “foreclosure time-out’’ in the sub-prime mortgage market, today outlined a plan for protecting home ownership that includes a national registry of mortgage brokers enabling homeowners to learn more about lenders.

“Although many of us have done well in the last six years, the median income has dropped $1,300,’’ Clinton said, maintaining that misleading mortgage practices are not only hurting homeowners but also endangering the economy.

“This whole idea of pre-payment penalties, which are often buried on page 700 of fine print, often put homeowners in an unbearable position,’’ the Democratic candidate for president said in an interview with CNBC following the delivery of her policy speech on home ownership in Derry, N.H., today.

“I think we’ve got to require that lenders take a different approach with people who may not have the credit-worthiness to handle mortgages that are being given to them,’’ Clinton said. “We are looking at a cascade of foreclosures if we’re not careful here.''

“This has implications for the entire economy,’’ she said. “We’ve seen our economy have to clean up after kinds of messes… We also saw the collapse of the savings and loan industry, because regulators weren’t keeping up with all the new techniques….

“I think that we have not taken the kind of perhaps vigilant action in order to avoid problems that we’re now seeing come home to roost,’’ Clinton said. “I’m saying, wait a minute, let’s take a deep breath here… Let’s see if there’s a way that we can have a win-win… maybe less of a win for the lenders and more of a win for the homeowners.’’

From the Clinton campaign, here is the candidate’s proposal on mortgage reform:

PROTECTING THE DREAM OF HOME OWNERSHIP

Senator Clinton’s plan will curb mortgage abuses, assist families facing foreclosure, and expand affordable housing to protect the American dream of home ownership. She will introduce her plan when Congress returns in September.

Crack Down on Unscrupulous Brokers:

 Require mortgage brokers to disclose to borrowers that their compensation rises when borrowers’ mortgage rates and mortgage fees are high. Too many prospective homebuyers believe that the mortgage broker is acting on their behalf. In fact brokers earn more when they steer borrowers to mortgages with higher rates and fees. The broker’s and borrower’s interests are not always aligned. Borrowers need to be aware of this when assessing the advice brokers give them. To address this need, Hillary will require that brokers disclose to borrowers how they are paid.

 Work with states to develop strong licensing standards and require federal registration for mortgage brokers. Unscrupulous brokers have steered people into high cost mortgages, qualified them for loans they could not afford, and attached fees unnecessarily. These brokers are responsible for many of the lending abuses that occurred in recent years, but there is no single, national source for information about individual brokers. Hillary will establish national registration for brokers so that prospective borrowers can easily look up a broker’s employment history, violations, complaints, and other information. As President, she will also work with the states to develop strong licensing standards to ensure that mortgage brokers are qualified and properly screened.

Crack Down on Mortgage Lending Abuses:

 Eliminate prepayment penalties on mortgage products. Prepayment penalties, which are often used on subprime, Alt-A, and non-traditional mortgages, are a problem for borrowers. These penalties can lock borrowers into loans until the rates and monthly payments escalate. Families should not be discouraged from responsibly paying off their mortgages early, particularly when this would allow them to avoid balloon payments or high floating rates. Studies have shown that loans with prepayment penalties have a 52% greater risk of default than those without. Hillary will restrict the use of prepayment penalties.

 Require mortgage lenders to include the cost of taxes and insurance in the underwriting assessment of higher-risk mortgages. Many borrowers fail to consider taxes and insurance costs when weighing whether they can afford a particular mortgage. Sometimes, lenders exclude those costs from the underwriting assessment, and in the process qualify people for mortgages they cannot afford. Hillary will require that taxes and insurance costs be included in the underwriting assessment so that prospective homeowners can properly determine whether they can afford a particular house. This requirement would apply to subprime mortgages, Alt-A mortgages, and non-traditional mortgages like interest-only, no-money-down, and payment option ARMs.

Help Reduce Foreclosures:

 Establish a $1 billion fund to assist state programs that help at-risk borrowers avoid foreclosure. Hillary will establish a $1 billion fund to support state programs that help at-risk borrowers avoid foreclosure. Some state programs help borrowers make the single payment necessary to become current on their loans; others help borrowers renegotiate their loan terms, or simply provide financial counseling. These foreclosure mitigation efforts are more important than ever right now. Federal assistance for state programs that assist at-risk borrowers supplements Hillary’s call earlier in the year for “foreclosure timeout.” At-risk borrowers and lenders should be encouraged to work out alternatives to foreclosure.

 Expand Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s Foreclosure Prevention Efforts. Hillary would expand the goals of Fannie and Freddie, the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that help stabilize the mortgage markets, to include helping a larger number of at-risk homeowners avoid foreclosure. This would be consistent with Fannie’s and Freddie’s existing goals that promote home ownership. The GSEs already help mitigate foreclosures by enabling some borrowers to swap into less risky, lower-cost loans. Fannie also helps homeowners arrange payment forbearance, financial counseling, and loan restructurings. Hillary will expand those initiatives to make foreclosure mitigation a greater priority.


Expand Affordable Housing:

 Establish a $1 billion fund to provide federal support to housing trust funds established by state, county, and municipal governments. The rise in home prices over recent years, coupled with stagnant wages, has meant that people are committing an increasing share of their salaries to mortgage payments. Between 2001 and 2004, for example, the number of households paying more than half of their incomes on housing increased by 1.9 million. The Joint Center for Housing Studies estimates that housing is a “severe cost burden” for 15.6 million low- and middle-income households. Families facing such strains often forgo necessities. Other families simply forgo home ownership, or turn to high risk, alternative mortgage products. In order to encourage the development of affordable housing, Hillary will establish a $1 billion fund to support state, county, and municipal housing trust funds. Housing trust funds generally use dedicated funding sources to support initiatives like building subsidized rental housing and safety net housing, and they also support nonprofit housing developers. Hillary’s fund will supplement the funding states, counties, and municipalities have already dedicated to these initiatives.

The plan announced today supplements the plan Hillary announced earlier this year to address the problems in subprime mortgages. In that earlier announcement, Hillary called for expanding access to independent face-to-face counseling; restricting prepayment penalties for subprime mortgages; requiring “plain-talk, no-fine-print disclosure”; promoting “foreclosure timeout” in which at-risk borrowers and lenders work out alternatives to foreclosure; and strengthening the Federal Housing Administration so that it could provide more homebuyers with an alternative to the subprime market.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

But the Streamwood Serpents 401(k) is going gangbusters. That means no one could possibly be suffering in his little demented reality.


Beverly Hillbilly Jethro, you really need to get a life. Your infatuation with me, along with your bud John E.,' infatuation with me, is bordering on a sick and disturbed psychosis.

Never said no one is suffering either. People suffer when the economy is good, bad, indifferent. There are some folks who got mortgages that shouldn't and some mortgage plans were stupid.

And, actually the Queen B has a suggestion worth debating and examining. Not saying her idea is good or the best, but it's something to look at and to begin a dialogue on.

But really, Jethro, you need to get off your infatuation with me. It's not healthy.


Jethro, and you're different from him how...?

Obsession is unbecoming. Give it a rest.


I am against making the taxpayers bail out anybody. Not the bad mortgage brokers. Not the people who signed onto those stupid agreements. I know people who knowingly purchased homes they could not afford, saying that they planned to sell in a year or two and turn a great profit. Ond couple I know is barely able to make the interest only payments on their mortgage. They said no problem, we will sell this place at a profit and make a bundle. Should I have to bail those people out? I don't think so. That's called speculation and speculation comes with risk, as well as the possibility of great gain.


So where was the queen "B" when all this was taking place? How much did she,her husband and kid make on investing in this pyramid scheme perpetrated on the ignorant American consumer.


Anonymous, I'll keep this simple so perhaps you can understand. I have no interest who Jethro or John E or any other Loony Lefter is. I have no interest on where they live, who they work for, what they do.
However every day, these Loons speak of Streamwood, my magazine, my employer, post as my boss and a whole menagerie of things including posting as me.
So, "Anonymous," that is the difference. I do not google to try and find out who the demented little souls are, nor use other means to find out who these demeneted little souls are. But, there very well may come to a point in time when finding out who these demented little souls are will become a necessity. It is being monitored.


This "great economy" was a paper tiger from the very start; designed by W. and Shotgun Dick to keep the angry old rich Republican white guys happy while the middle and lower class Americans fight and die in their "war of choice" in Iraq.


Anonymous, I'll keep this simple so perhaps you can understand.
Posted by: John D | August 7, 2007 2:05 PM

That will teach you to come to the dark sides rescue.


San Miguel- You said it.

This program is another condescending " i am helping you" government program.

I bought the house that I could afford-

I paid for it with finacing that made sense to me-

In either case- I was always , up to the point of actually closing on my house and signing the mortgage agreement with my bank - able to say NO.

I am not sure why Hillary thinks it is appropriate for her to grab some of my money to help people that either willingly or ignorantly made bad decisions?


Hilary's regulatory suggestions seem well founded. But where have she and her congressional collagues been the past 5 years? Then she slips in the inevitable democratic proposal that taxpayers fund a bailout. If she and Bill wish to spend their money on a bailout, that's one thing, but forcing responsible citizens to do so is sheer robbery. How dare she tax responsible citizens to subsidize the frivolity of others? Her demogogic excess undermines our constitutional protection against excessive taxation. Doesn't Hiliary realize that speculators have been making billions in this market by flipping homes or speculative lending? Let them clean up their own mess.
Hasn"t she recived campaign contributios this year from big democratic doners, such as lenders and hedge funds, for whom her proposal whould bail out losses consequent to their own speculative lending practices? The Bear Stearns executive responsible for their two collapsed hedge funds is a prolific Democratic Party fund raiser in New York, Hiliary's "home state".


Peter, can you say Global Crossings? Global Crossings was headed by a Clintoon buddy, Gary Winnick, in which the Clintoons profited heavily and in which Winnick took out his millions upon millions before the company filed for bankruptcy.
While I noted Hillary's proosal was worthy of debate and not an endorsement by me, using taxpayer money to bail out folks who didn't know better or companies who acted improperly is not the solution.


Hilary's regulatory suggestions seem well founded. But where have she and her congressional colleagues been the past 5 years?

Posted by: Peter Dau |

They were being hamstrung by the Republicans and their pet special interests, I believe.


using taxpayer money to bail out folks who didn't know better or companies who acted improperly is not the solution.

Posted by: John D | August 7, 2007 3:36 PM

Why Johnny...You bailed out Bushs brother Neil in the Silverado savings and loan.


Why bail out these folks? 99% of us didn't get greedy, why should we bail out these folks. Let the mortgage companies go bankrupt and let the houses be foreclosed. This economy is strong enough to absorb this.

"We also saw the collapse of the savings and loan industry, because regulators weren’t keeping up with all the new techniques…." She should be able to speak to that very well.

Bill R - Does Madison Guaranty S & L ring any bells?


[quote]
Global Crossings was headed by a Clintoon buddy, Gary Winnick, in which the Clintoons profited heavily and in which Winnick took out his millions upon millions before the company filed for bankruptcy.

Posted by: John D | August 7, 2007 3:36 PM
[/quote]

John D:

Global Crossings was a telecommunications company and had nothing to do with mortgages or financing in real estate, so I'm glad to see that you know how to throw up red herrings in your posts.

By the way - got any PROOF that the Clintons, as you say, "profited heavily" from any type of investment in Global Crossings?


If Gary Winnick is such a friend of the Clintons, why HASN'T he given any money to Hillary's campaign?

http://www.newsmeat.com/ceo_political_donations/Gary_Winnick.php


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "x" in the field below:

Election 2008
Tag Cloud
[What is this?]