Federal Reserve cuts key rate 1/2 percentage point: The Swamp
The Swamp
Posted August 17, 2007 8:40 AM
The Swamp

by Frank James

In an attempt to loosen the credit crunch that's been tightening its grip on the economy, the Federal Reserve has announced that its cutting a key rate it charges banks for loans, the discount rate, by half a percentage point to 5.75 percent.

We'll know soon if this is enough to get the financial markets to stop what could be called their irrational gloominess of recent days as investors world wide have worried about the extent of the growing mortgage crisis in the U.S.

The Federal Reserve must be exceedingly worried about a possible recession to make this move now. Virtually every recent statement made by Fed officials, including Chairman Ben Bernanke, had indicated that the central bank's greatest worry was growing inflation, not slowing economic growth.

Here's how the Associated Press is reporting this morning's major news by the Federal Reserve.

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve, declaring that increased economic uncertainty poses risks for U.S. business growth, announced Friday that it has approved a half-percentage point cut in its discount rate on loans to banks.

The action was the most dramatic effort yet by the central bank to restore calm to global financial markets which have been roiled in the past week by a widening credit crisis.

The decision means that the discount rate, the interest rate that the Fed charges to make direct loans to banks will be lowered to 5.75 percent, down from 6.25 percent.

The Fed did not change its target for the more important federal funds rate, which has remained at 5.25 percent for more than a year.

However, it has been infusing billions of dollars in money into the banking system over the past week to keep that rate from rising above the target level.

Many economists believe if the financial market crisis worsens the Fed will soon move to cut the federal funds rate as well.

In a statement explaining the board's action, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues said that while incoming data suggest the economy is continuing to expand at a moderate pace, "the downside risks to growth have increased appreciably."

White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto declined to comment on the announcement but said, "We have full confidence in the Federal Reserve on these issues and respect their independence."

The Fed said it was "monitoring the situation and is prepared to act as needed to mitigate the adverse effects on the economy arising from the disruptions in financial markets."

The Fed said that "financial market conditions have deteriorated and tighter credit conditions and increased uncertainty have the potential to restrain economic growth going forward."

The policy announcment was approved unanimously by the Federal Open Market Committee, the group of Fed board members in Washington and Fed regional bank presidents who set the federal funds rate.

Many economists have been calling for the Fed to move to cut the target for the federal funds rate, which has been at 5.25 percent since June 2006.

The discount rate covers only loans that the Fed makes directly to banks. But the funds rate covers all loans that banks make to each other on a short-term basis. It is much more critical in determining interest rates in the economy such as banks' prime lending rate.

The nation's once high-flying housing market is sinking deeper into gloom, and credit, the lifeblood of the economy, is drying up. Many economists believe these problems, including declining consumer confidence, could lead to a recession.

Since setting a record close of 14,000.41 just a month ago, the Dow Jones industrial average has shed 1,154.63 points in a string of triple-digit losing days that have raised anxiety levels not just on Wall Street but on Main Street as well.

The markets have been pummeled by a rapidly spreading credit crisis that began with rising defaults in subprime mortgages — home loans made to people with weak credit histories. Now the problems are spreading to other borrowers.

Countrywide Financial Corp., the nation's largest mortgage banker, was forced to borrow $11.5 billion on Thursday so it could keep making home loans. It was a move that rattled investors who have watched a number of smaller mortgage companies go under because of credit problems.

The shockwaves have extended to giant Wall Street investment firms such as Goldman Sachs, which announced earlier this week that it was pumping $2 billion into one of its struggling hedge funds. BNP Paribas, France's largest bank, last week froze three funds that had invested in the troubled U.S. mortgage market.

The Fed and other central banks already had infused the banking system with billions of dollars in an effort to keep short-term interest rates from surging and making credit even more difficult to obtain. However, those billions did not calm investors worried about which big hedge fund or mortgage company will be the next to announce serious problems. For that reason, investors have become fearful to supply money through credit markets to companies even if they have strong credit records.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

It's interesting to read Limbaugh's comments on what's going on in the markets. Once again, he's blaming liberals.
I didn't realize loony-lefters were so prevailant on Wall Street, in banking, bokerage firms, hedge fund management, home building, development, & other similiar billion dollar industries.
And what's with Ben Bernanke saying "the downside risks to growth have increased appreciably"? That sounds like a typical liberal response to a "problem only the liberal media can make-up to scare you with".


A very different tune than only a week ago. Gives new meaning to Wall St bull.


And with the Republicans looking at more lost seats in Congress next year, I'll bet that we'll see a few more rate cuts between now and November 2008. Just like what we saw Greenspan do back in 2004.


Could this be considered a bailout? I thought the markets were Christlike and we should all abide by their will. Terry, please explain this to me.


This should " Jump start" the great Bush construction era right little johnny?


The problem is that the Republicans, starting with Reagan, switched the Federal economic policy from support of demand to support of supply. The result has been that productivity in this country (supply) has far outpaced wages (demand). What has made up the gap so that the supply can be taken up? Certainly not the export/import equation... It's BORROWING. Borrowing on our Homes and on the prior 50-years of democratic demand-side policy savings.

But the problem is that supply-side economics is not sustainable. The economy has a limited capacity for borrowing. Now that home prices have stopped appreciating (which was inevitable), the engine of our economy over the last couple decades, asset-based borrowing, has dried up, and now comes the reckoning.

Fortunately, it's not too late. The recent increase in minimum wage was a good start to stoking demand... Stopping the current policy of destroying Unions would be another good step. Rethinking our recent insistence on unilateral promotion of international free trade (i.e. allowing higher tariffs on foreign goods) would be another way to stoke demand for domestic goods.

A recession/depression can be avoided, and fortunate for us, the 2008 election is just in time. Now we jut need to make sure the message gets out so that the electorate understands the economic fundamentals and overwhelmingly votes democratic.

It's not too late to undo the "trickle-down" damage.


John / Bruce .......Is the Republican Talking POint Machine running a little slow this morning?


I purchased my home for $25,000, 26 years ago. A good price. It would now sell for $250,000. An optimist would say, the value of my home has increased ten fold. A pessimist would say the real estate purchasing power of the dollar is now 10% of what it was then. I am not sure what the debate would be between "Liberals" and "Conservatives". Funny thing about money, the easier it is to get, the less it's worth. If you gave everybody in America a million dollars a day, we would not all be rich, we would just need very big purses.


Catherine,

A bailout? Not in the traditional sense, but it will help stabilize the mortgage industry.

Personnaly, I wouldn't have done it. I think the mortgage companies that made these loans and the people that took these loans knew, or should have known, the risk involved. If they get a bailout, what lesson will they learn? Will their behavior change? Let's put in this way,if the housing market hadn't turned south, wopuld the ortgage companies be sharing their riches - no (nor should they). Would the individuals that held these mortgages be sharing their gains - no (nor should they).

It's what is called risk and return.


San Miguel,

If you plan on selling your house in the near future you can rejoice in your equity. If you plan on living there awhile, or for the rest of your days, you can curse the burden of higher property taxes. I fall into the latter. Sometimes it has less to due with pessimism vs. optimism, and more to do with circumstance.


Anonymous, unlike you and your wretched ilk, real people and real Americans have lives beyond responding to the absurdity of the Left wing Loons.

Bernanke did the right thing. Fed chairman increase and decrease the interest rate all the time. After years of increases and a slowing economy, Bernanke decided it was time to begin lowering it. Greenspan would have waited till a recession took effect before he would begin lowering the rates.


Goody, let's go borrow more! Hopefully the Chinese are buying it!


"Anonymous, unlike you and your wretched ilk, real people and real Americans have lives beyond responding to the absurdity of the Left wing Loons.

Posted by: John D | August 18, 2007 12:15 AM"

Hmmmm. Seems like YOU don't, or you wouldn't be in here ragging all the time about how much you hate liberals.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "q" in the field below:

Quizzes

palin or fey

Palin or Fey?

McCain

Know the presidents?

McCain

Your McCain IQ

Obama

Your Obama IQ

Latest polls

Electoral vote map

map

Test your scenarios

Galleries

Palin

Sarah Palin

campaign

Campaign trail

conventions

RNC | DNC

Unauthorized tour

Obama

Obama's Chicago

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Candidate match


Test assumptions