![]()
Major Gen. Rick Lynch at a June press conference. AP Photo/Mohammed Ameen.
by Frank James
The U.S. military in Iraq has a message for Iran: knock it off or we'll do it for you.
Of course, it's a message Iran will likely read as its activities in neighboring Iraq are having the desired effect on U.S. forces.
Major Gen. Rick Lynch, the general who briefed Pentagon-based reporters by videoconference from Iraq today, repeatedly hit one of the key points: there's an Iranian Connection to the death and maiming of many of his soldiers and he wants it to stop.
Lynch, commands Multinational Division-Center and the 3rd Infantry Division which have responsibility for an area around Baghdad the size of W. Virginia.
For many months, U.S. commanders have complained about weapons from Iran that are being used with lethal effect against U.S. and Iraqi troops so that wasn't new.
But it took up much of today's briefing from Iraq and clearly weighs heavily on the U.S. commanders. Lynch's growing exasperation with the situation was almost palpable. So it shouldn't be ignored.
Here's a large chunk of what Lynch said about the Iranian influence on the violence he's seeing in his sector.
We see Iranian activity through our area in three levels. First, U.S. soldiers are coming under attack from deadly weapons originating from Iran; specifically, Iranian rockets and Iranian-manufactured components for explosively formed projectiles. Second, we believe some, not all, Shi'a militants are being trained by Iran to use these weapons and then they're passing that training on to others inside of Iraq.
And third, we believe that members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps are facilitating training as well as transfer of weapons and munitions. We assess that there are 50 or so Iranian and Iraqi operatives working for Iran in our area, about 20 of which who we are actively targeting. These operatives fall in the same group that helped militants carry out the January 2007 attack against the Karbala Provincial Joint Coordination Center, resulting in the death of five of our soldiers.
Now, one way or another, Sunni militants are also getting their hand on this Iranian technology. Whether that's a direct hand-off or black-market activity, we don't know, but both sides -- the Sunni extremists and the Shi'a extremists -- have it and are using that technology to kill Americans and Iraqis, and that's got to stop. And we're using every means available as to monitor and take down these networks.
The scale of the Iranian problem is especially troubling when you look at the numbers of weapons we found and destroyed since the start of the surge. We have captured more than 117 Iranian-made munitions since April the 4th. Let me tell you about some specific instances.
Just over two weeks ago, soldiers from our 3rd Brigade Combat Team conducted a raid on a militant house in the town of Nahrawan, which is about 20 miles east of Baghdad on the east side of the Tigris River. They arrested one of our division's most valued targets, high- value targets, and he acted as a link between Iran and the Jaish al- Mahdi militia. He was the main Shi'a conduit in that region for getting Iranian EFPs and rockets into Baghdad, and his capture was a big blow to that network.
When we found him, we also discovered an insurgent video they were making that showed 46 Iranian rockets lined up to be fired at one of our U.S. forward operating bases. In fact, several of those rockets shown in the video actually fired and hit some of our bases on the 11th of July, killed one of my soldiers and wounded 15 others.
Just last weekend Iraqi army scouts recovered a cache of Iranian mines in the Wasat province after receiving a tip from an Iraqi civilian. We believe these mines were meant to kill coalition and Iraqi security forces due to the proximity of this weapons cache to one of our camps.
We are finding Iranian-made munitions and weapons systems throughout our area. But the fact remains we have a 125-mile border with Iran in the Wasat province, and that continues to be a concern.
We are up against a new wave of lethality sponsored by the enemies of the people of Iraq and its government. There have been 48 EFP attacks directed against my troops since the operation began in April, killing eight of my soldiers. We've also seen an increase in the use of precision and rocket attacks, and there have been 66 of those attacks since April, killing five of my soldiers.
There are several significant features associated with the 48 EFPs we found in NMD-C (sic; MND-C) which are unique to Iranian design, manufacture and distribution methods.
We're doing things like looking at tool marks on these EFPs and the source of the explosives and the manufacturing capability, and those EFP components are coming to Iran -- coming from Iran into Iraq, and they're killing Iraqis, and they're killing the coalition soldiers.
The good news is that we're having some success in bringing down these networks and countering these weapons' effectiveness. We've found and cleared 728 IEDs, to include EFPs, since the surge began. And in that same period, we've located and destroyed 248 weapons caches.
We're also bolstering the government of Iraq's efforts along the Iranian border. My soldiers are working with the Iraqi border security force, training them and helping them.
There is one point of entry into Iraq from the Wasat province -- into the Wasat province, and Iraqi border forces check trucks making that crossing. In the near future, 2,000 Republic of Georgia soldiers will secure six checkpoints, allowing us to thoroughly inspect every truck crossing along the main westbound route towards Baghdad. So every truck that comes into the Wasat province, from Iran into Iraq, will be stopped and searched in total by these great soldiers from Georgia.
Later in the briefing, Barbara Starr of CNN asked Lynch about the quality of the evidence for the alleged Iranian ties.
STARR: General Lynch, Barbara Starr from CNN. I wanted to ask you to follow up on several of the points you made about Iran. What is your real feeling right now, when you said maybe 50 or so Iranians and Iraqis influenced by Iran, these fighters that you're seeing? How many Iranians do you think are in your area? What do you think they're really doing?
And on the question of weapons, if you're looking at things like factory marks and manufacturing, are you convinced yet that you can tie this back to finished weapons or components coming in with the support of the Iranian government?
It sounds like you're awfully frustrated and concerned about this growth of Iranian influence.
GEN. LYNCH: Yeah, thanks for that, Barbara. I am indeed concerned. You know, we are in combat operations against Shi'a extremists, Sunni extremists and marked Iranian influence, and since we've been fighting this fight, since the 4th of April, we've lost 71 magnificent soldiers. They've paid the ultimate sacrifice, so I'm focused on taking out all the enemy. I got bad guys from all flavors. So right now, this focus is on the Iranian influence.
What I believe in my battlespace is I've got IRGC surrogates, people that have been trained by the IRGC in Iran who've come back in Iraq to conduct acts of violence, and I believe I got some members of the IRGC, some Iranians, who are working in our battlespace. And what they do is they transit the battlespace. They don't come in and they stay, but they're going back and forth. The primary concern, as I say, is the number 50; the good majority of those are IRGC surrogates. They're operatives that have been trained by the IRGC.
Having said that, I do believe that at any given time, I got up to about 20 Iranians working in our battlespace, you know, either training Iraqis to conduct acts of violence or conducting those acts of violence themselves, and we're working detailed targeting on all those people.
And then to your question about the munitions -- I mean, we study all these things. As we come across IEDs, you know the found-and- cleared IEDs -- we got opportunities to check them for fingerprints, put them under microscopes, and what we're finding is distinct marks that could only be created by machinery and capabilities coming out of Iran. So there's no doubt in my mind when I talk about EFP components being manufactured in Iran and coming into Iraq and then assembled inside of Iraq to attack our soldiers and Iraqi security force soldiers and innocent Iraqis, and that's most troublesome.
And this -- as I talked about the attack on FOB Hammer, there were 46 Iranian rockets lined up with Iranian timers to kill my soldiers out on FOB Hammer. And luckily, a great UAV operator was flying his UAV around, he saw those Iranian rockets, he turned to his leaders and said, "Hey, I think we got this problem." A leader sent ground forces out there, and bigger than Dallas, there's the rockets, and we were able to disconnect those rockets before they fired.
But when you take those rockets and you show them to experts in munitions, EODs -- they look at their documents, they focus on the munitions and say, "Those had to come from Iran." And that has to stop. And that's what I'm trying to do in Wasat province now with the Georgians. We'll set up those checkpoints so when trucks come from Iran into Iraq, we'll search every one of those trucks.
There will be no stone unturned, because if there is a rocket in there, or an EFP component there, we're going to find it before it hurts one of my soldiers.
The U.S. military is in a challenging position. On one hand, under the Bush Administration, U.S. foreign policy is to underscore whenever there's a chance the bad behavior emanating from Iraq in a hope to further isolate the Teheran theocracy in the world community. Lynch's complaints about Iranian made weapons fit that strategy.
But the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps could also read the voluble comments from Lynch and other U.S. military officials in recent months as acknowledgement that their proxy war in Iraq against the U.S. is causing Americans real pain. In which case, from the Iranian point of view, why should they stop?




Comments
Anybody who ever thought the U.S. could invade Iraq and not provoke any of it's neighbors has no place making important decisions. Anybody with a brain knows that we will have to take on virtually every mid-east country to conquer any mid-east country. The decision to invade Iraq was a decision to invade the middle east.
Posted by: San Miguel | August 24, 2007 1:50 PM
The Rightwing Evangelical nutjobs who still support Prez Chimpy don't care that we invaded Iraq for no good reason at all, in their minds they are at war with Islam and they want to kill as many Arabs as possible.
These wacky wingnuts are already fighting the war to end all wars.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaB1psXTjS4
Posted by: John E | August 24, 2007 2:12 PM
I don't see why anyone should be surprised that the Iranians are involved in Iraq. Yes, they are directly involved in killing U.S. troops. Actually Iran and been involved in activities in Iraq for several years. What is surprising to me is that the DOD never planned for or anticipated this.
I wonder if George Bush knows that al-Maliki has been holding meetings with the Iranians in Tehran.
Posted by: Doug R. | August 24, 2007 3:03 PM
Iranians aren't Arabs. They just seem the same to those who confuse so much else.
They look the same, talk funny, write backwards, wear robes and turbans. Must all be alike. Not that any moonbat could be prejudiced.
Posted by: whatnow | August 24, 2007 3:43 PM
Shiite's are a majority in Iraq & Iran. Shiites are provoking a civil war with Sunni's in Iraq. Where do you think Iraqi Sunni's are getting help from?
DUH
As much as Christian zealots would like to nuke Iran, the US is in no position to attack a 3rd country.
By the way, how many of these security forces the US trains wind-up taking sides in Iraq? What about the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi soldiers; you think they all just disappeared after the 2nd US invasion? Remember not too long ago the GAO stated almost 200,000 guns the US gave Iraqi's are unaccounted for?
Iraq is just all messed-up & that's after more then four years of our presence there, the best military the world has today.
What do you think is going to happen once the US leaves? Bush got us in, but he won't pull-out while he's still in office.
How convenient is that for Bush's legacy.
Posted by: RomanB | August 24, 2007 3:53 PM
Forgive me for being skeptical, but this administration has been lying for 7 long years. Why in the world would I start believing them now?
The Iranian gov't is nasty and evil. Unfortunately, our administration is so incompetent, the best course of action is to wait until 2009, because Shrubby and the gang will screw it up.
If you don't know where the Strait of Hormuz is located, I respectfully suggest you look it up. 40% of the world's oil supply passes through there. It is without a doubt the Iranians would close it off. Can you say $10.00+ per gallon?
Posted by: weinerdog43 | August 24, 2007 4:08 PM
Can you say $10.00+ per gallon?
Posted by: weinerdog43 | August 24, 2007 4:08 PM
Ya hit the nail on the head weiner. War with Iran??? Get real.
If only we had listened to the French and Jacques Chirac, we would not be in midst of this second Vietnam. If only we had listened to the French, we would have gone in and out of Iraq with great speed, but not become occupiers. They were our true allies and friends for they had fought and lost their own war in Algeria. Sometimes a friend tells you the hard news which you do not want hear.
The Saudis will support the Sunnis and the Iranians will support the Shia and the two groups will engage in a horrendous civil war much like the Iraq-Iran war of the 1980's.
Posted by: Logic Prisoner | August 24, 2007 5:04 PM
The prophecy says we must go to war with Iran. Unite and fight Christian brothers!
Posted by: Malachi Branson | August 24, 2007 5:05 PM
LP, the sad thing is that our idiots in charge of the national discourse were debating 'freedom fries' for god's sake. Unlike us, the French, English and Germans appear to have learned some lessons from war. Admittedly, it took them some time, but it seems like we are DETERMINED to repeat their mistakes.
War with Iran will be Iraq cubed. It is simply insane. Why are we not hearing about this in the Trib and the rest of the old media?
Posted by: weinerdog43 | August 24, 2007 6:03 PM
Why would anyone think that Iraq can have a central government? It is obvious that the Sunni are not going to join a Shia dominated country. They would be slowly murdered. The only possible solution for peace in the area is to have three states. The Kurds have already established theirs. Population shifts by refugees from militia attacks have most borders established. Final boundaries can be set by the countries of the Middle East and we can get out of there.
Posted by: c. perry | August 24, 2007 6:05 PM
According to Gen. Lynch, seems as though if we can get those 50 Iranians he's watching (or maybe even only the 20 he REALLY wants to kill), things will go a lot better for American troops in Iraq, then they can safely ease back into their roles as "liberators"--without anyone over there trying to kill them. I'm glad we've got the straight-shooting General on the job to see things for what they are.
Posted by: Capitol Hillbilly | August 24, 2007 6:10 PM
Isnt it funny i went to school the other day and asked who do you think is a mayga threat in the middle east irainians or persians everyone was like omg the persians are peacfull people lol just shows how much of a difference a name can make
Posted by: Ben | August 24, 2007 8:21 PM
Three states? With two million Iraqis living outside of Iraq how on earth do you see three states? Will the religious zealots representing each group not fight for the "best" vantage point, ie on or near oil fields? How big do you see the Sunnis "country" formed far from the reach of oil fields? I'm sure they will not have a problem with this AT ALL...Nor will the Sunni dominant countries in the Middles East.... three states is a pipe dream at this point .... Who will mixed cities belong to and how long and by what methods will they be resolved...take the example of Kiriku.. It was Kurdish with mixed ethnicities that were original to the place, in came Saddam with him resettlement and Arabizination of the place... families rounded up and their homes given to Arabs coming from Southern Iraq that then gave birth to their own families there - who know nothing else next to home but Kiraku...It's a can of worms....
Posted by: Anonymous | August 24, 2007 9:27 PM
Yes, Loons, Iran has been a peaceful, caring, kind, sweet, no supporters of terrorists country for the past 30 years. Go back to sleep, Loons.
Posted by: John D | August 24, 2007 11:45 PM
weiner is concerned about the price of oil and gasoline? Since when? Well since you brought it up, please tell the class what you think will happen to the price of oil when the US pulls out of Iraq and it devolves into a true chaos of blood and savagery? Oh, and as for the Iranians being able to "close off" the straits of Hormuz, maybe you've heard of this group called the US Navy? I hear they're pretty good at blowing up boats that try to challenge them on the sea. Just a thought.
Posted by: JB | August 25, 2007 2:17 AM
So, according to this good general, the great war machine of the USA has been brought to its knees by 20 "elusive" Iranian Revolutionary Guards, and one type of munition with "Iranian fingerprints" on it! I don't know where they find these guys but they are the best idiots money can buy.
Anyway, if what he says were true, then the US had better not even think about invading Iran. If 20 (imaginary) Revolutionary Guards are so effectively destructive, then the generals should know that there are hundreds of thousands more (real ones) on the other side of the border.
Posted by: Reader2000 | August 25, 2007 6:17 AM
Yes, Loons, Iran has been a peaceful, caring, kind, sweet, no supporters of terrorists country for the past 30 years. Go back to sleep, Loons.
Posted by: John D | August 24, 2007 11:45 PM
Hey Johnny, it's not the left you have to warn about the Iranians, it's your buddies on the right.
Reagan sold them arms to buy hostages back from terrorists, remember?
Bush has made them the strongest power in the region by destroying their counter weight in Iraq.
Republicans are an Iranian's best friend.
Posted by: Tony | August 25, 2007 9:44 AM
or ....
the republicans are not Iran's best friend ...
bc they armed them ...
bc they destroyed their counter weight ...
Iran can now predictably act in an embolden way which plays into the plan to have dirt on Iran to sell to the world in order to force Iran to swallow our way when it comes to nuclear power or no way since Iran did not agree to any treaties governing such nuclear power... and America does not like when countries can gain power without their consent bc it offers the possibility of power at the expense and loss of ours ...
Well Republicans being Irans best friend not really holding my breath there. And, nor will I bc whether it is Obama or Hillary they both will ride the train on these WMD Iran poses or can pose in the future. It is a reality that isn't really dependent on the Republicans or Democrats.
You say that the WH didn't plan on this... There is also the possibility that they did... Notice this WH always gets what they want... They just have a different strategy in how they align the chips...
Posted by: Anonymous | August 25, 2007 7:55 PM
And Gen. Pace says not a word about how 50% of the insurgents attacking US troops are coming from our "friend" Saudi Arabia.
But, hey: "Let's Attack Iran!" because, well, it'll make Bush & Cheney feel good.
Posted by: BC | August 27, 2007 2:10 PM
OMG splitting is a definite no no what is wrong here is you keep trying to figure out a way to fix this... THIS IS THE PROBLEM DONT FIX IT!!!!! LEAVE IT, U HAVE FIXED IT ENUFF!!
Posted by: moe | October 14, 2007 10:47 AM