by Mark Silva
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee today accused the Bush administration of engaging in a “Nixonian’’ brand of “stonewalling’’ in its refusal to let Karl Rove, the chief political adviser to the president, testify openly in an investigation of the firing of federal prosecutors.
“Sadly, our efforts to follow the evidence where it leads has led to Nixonian stonewalling,’’ said Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), voicing words that stem from the congressional investigation of Watergate. “The question is, what did the president know and when did he know it?’’
The White House has asserted that the president has the prerogative to hire and fire U.S. attorneys and that nothing wrong was done in the dismissals of several prosecutors last year.
Yet the White House, citing executive privilege, also has refused to let Rove and others openly testify to the Judiciary Committees of the House and Senate, which have subpoenaed Rove and other high-level aides to testify, instead asking that any questioning by members of Congress take place privately, behind closed doors, without any transcript kept or sworn oath.
Rove faced a subpoeana to appear at the Judiciary Commtitee today and did not, His aide, Scott Jennings, did appear, but cordially read a statement that he has been directed by the president not to testify and cannot answer questions about internal or external communications about the dismissals. He is, he said, "between a rock and a hard place.''
“Senator,’’ said Jennings, entering into a repeating refrain, “pursuant to the president’s assertion of executive privilege, I must respectfully decline to answer your questions.’’
“It sounds like the American taxpayers are paying you to stonewall,’’ Leahy said. “Mr. Rove was supposed to be here, and he basically has taken what I consider to be a bogus claim of executive privileges and failed to show up… We will take that up at another meeting.’’
Here is a copy of Jennings' lawyer's letter to the committee: Download file
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy. Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Images
The House Judiciary Committee has found others, including White House chief of staff Josh Bolten, in contempt of Congress for refusing to respond to subpeonas to testify there.
“The Senate should not be in this position,'' complained Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), maintaining that Democratic leaders have placed Congress in this "clash between exectuive privilege’’ and Congress.
"Although this was poorly handled,'' Hatch said of the federal prosecutor firings, "the president doesn’t have to state reasons. They can be for any reasons, including political reasons.’’
Yet, he said, the Democrats "chose to make demands which they know the White House would resist – demands which my Democratic colleagues would resist if the roles were reversed – and then they cry coverup.’’
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) is pressing Leahy to see if an accomodation can be made for the White House, suggesting that they and House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers meet with the president to see if some testimony short of the open, sworn appearance that members of Congress are seeking and the private talks that the White House wants can be arranged. Leahy has suggested he sees little hope of compromise.
Under the terms the White House is demanding, Leahy said, “whatever the White House provides initially must end the matter.. and the Judiciary Committee must end its pursuit of the truth.’’
The White House has offered to let Rove talk “basically on their agenda, behind closed doors, not under oath, and with no record of what the responses where.. No member of Congress, Republican or Democrat would agree to such a thing…. A one-time only secret interview with no chance for follow up.’’
“The White House cannot have it both ways, even though they continue to try to,’’ said Leahy. They “cannot claim executive privilege based on the president’s need for confidential advice, and then simultaneously claim he wasn’t involved.’’
This appears to be an attempt to cover for political operatives, Leahy said, “rivaling those of the Nixon Whjite House and Watergate era.’’
There is “a cloud hanging over this White House, he said, “and a gathering storm.’’
“Congress will continue to pursue the truth behind this matter,’’ Leahy said. “It’s our constitutional responsibility to do so. And it’s the right thing.’’





Comments
The Whitehouse has nothing to hide. It's all hidden.
Posted by: bill r. | August 2, 2007 10:41 AM
Patrick "Leaky" Leahy needs to go to the nursing home. He clearly has lost it, but then he never really had it anyway.
Posted by: John D | August 2, 2007 10:46 AM
Senator Patrick Leahy is a know it all egomaniac who is playing gothca partisan politcs with the President. As Senator Hatch says the President has a right to assert executive privilege if it goes this route it will take the courts years to determine. The Democrats just want to call Bush Nixon that was their proudest day when Hillary served as a legal staffer during Watergate. Ironic the Clintons got their own turn in the barrel of impeachment.
Leahy was thrown off the Intelligence Committee in the 80's for leaking info to the press that is why he is nicknamed Senator Depends.
This whole amount of oversight is driven by fundraising ideas and plans for the DNC 08 campaign nothing more nothing less.
These Jackasses don't want to govern just obstruct they are the party of no. Jerry White, Springfield,IL
Posted by: Jerry White | August 2, 2007 11:12 AM
Jerry White,
The white house won't allow them to govern. This is the fundamental problem. Checks and Balances exist so no branch can run amock with the law, federal spending or the freedoms Americans enjoy.
Law - subverted
Federal spending - skyrocketing
Freedoms - rapidly decreasing
If the white house hadn't screwed the pooch on basically every program it tried to push, the democrats wouldn't have to go grasping at straws in an attempt to stop this out of control administration.
It's coming down, once again, to the lesser of two evils. Either way, we're all going to lose.
Posted by: Mordechai | August 2, 2007 11:33 AM
Leahy ought to be in jail, not in the senate. From newsmax.com:
"Senator Pat Leahy was annoyed with the Reagan administration's war on terrorism in the 1980s. At the time he was vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
# "Leaky Leahy," allegedly threatened to sabotage classified strategies he didn't like.
# Leahy ‘inadvertently' disclosed a top-secret communications intercept during a 1985 television interview.
# "The intercept … made possible the capture of the Arab terrorists who had hijacked the cruise ship Achille Lauro and murdered American citizens. …"
# "The reports cost the life of at least one Egyptian operative involved in the operation."
# In July 1987, it was reported that Leahy leaked secret information about a 1986 covert operation planned by the Reagan administration to topple Libya's Moammar Gaddhafi.
# U.S. intelligence officials said Leahy, along with the Republican panel chairman, sent a written threat to expose the operation directly to then-CIA Director William Casey.
# Weeks later, news of the secret plan turned up in the Washington Post, causing it to be aborted.
# A year later, as the Senate was preparing to hold hearings on the Iran-Contra scandal, Leahy had to resign his Intelligence Committee post after he was caught leaking secret information to a reporter.
He should have been indicted, tried and sentenced.
Leahy's Iran-Contra leak was considered to be one of the most serious breaches of secrecy in the Intelligence Committee's 10-year history. "
Posted by: Bruce | August 2, 2007 11:33 AM
To Jerry and the rest of the kool-aid drinkers-
Why must you ALWAYS bring up CLINTON. GET OVER HIM DUDES..stop obsessing. W is in office now. Has been for a long miserable time..He is the one who has brought needless war upon us at the cost of 1 trillion dollars, lost a major world city on his watch, squandered the largest surplus this country has ever seen, rigged an election with the help of the biggest scumbags ever to step foot in the whitehouse. W is the one who is firing prosecutors for not coming up with bogus charges of "liberal voter fraud"...NOT CLINTON DUDE. W...get it..the worst, stupidest, most hypocritical born again drunk in the history of the US. Got it.
Vermont is proud of Patrick!
GJN-Burlington Vermont
Posted by: grant jed nelson | August 2, 2007 11:52 AM
The difference between Nixon and Bush is that Nixon KNEW he was lying. Bush doesn't have a clue. Which is worse: an intentional liar or a moron?
Posted by: snalg | August 2, 2007 11:56 AM
But what did Nixon have to say about Fred "Little Red Rented Pickum Truck" Thompson?
Oh yeah, "Dumb as hell."
http://www.southernstudies.org/facingsouth/2007/07/nixon-called-informant-fred-thompson.asp
Read 'em and weep.
Posted by: Doug Zook | August 2, 2007 11:59 AM
John D,
You're right -- Leahy's praise is too generous. Nixon actually had accomplishments on the foreign policy front.
Jerry,
You brought the definition of "leak" down to a much lower level.
Posted by: Kenny Bunkport | August 2, 2007 12:02 PM
I simply don't understand why the John Ds ad Jerry Whites are so adamant in agreeing with Dubya and company re: not allowing aides to testify. What are they hiding? Are the John Ds and Jerry Whites willing to let every single administration after this debacle of an administration practice the same thing? While I certainly hope that any Democratic administration will not be as secretive as Bush's, don't the John Ds and Jerry Whites realize "what's good for the goose, is good for the gander?"
Posted by: Janstress | August 2, 2007 12:09 PM
"These Jackasses don't want to govern just obstruct they are the party of no"
Jerry- yes, we are the party of no..NO MORE WAR for Hailburton. No more fake elections. No more Christian Fundamentaism ruling US policy. No more Ted Stevens, No More Mark Foley, No more Ken lay. No more Ashcroft, Rummy, Scooter and soon Gonzo.
Posted by: Nelson Jed | August 2, 2007 12:16 PM
You can always tell when a Republican gets his/her hands on a computer..they head for the porn, and spew vulgar mispelled inanities where ever they can. Misinformed, uneducated, the Republican constituency. Patrick Leahy, is a statesmen, is defending our democracy, for knuckle dragging deviants like you, John & Jerry. How old are you, 12?
Posted by: Pamela Strandquest | August 2, 2007 12:21 PM
Attempting to bring the DOJ under the political influence of the executive branch is a clear breach of the Constitutional guarantee of separation of powers, and undermines the ability of checks and balances that are the essence of our democracy. To all the Bushies here that think otherwise, please pack your bags and move to a communist country where this sort of behavior is widely accepted.
Posted by: Rory M | August 2, 2007 12:34 PM
For those of you not familiar with newsmax.com, Bruce's hot source for news, one of today's headlines is "Hugo Chaves Praises Sean Penn". This has a more prominent posting space than the Minnesota bridge collapse. Draw your own conclusions.
Posted by: kb | August 2, 2007 12:58 PM
Brucie,
In November 2006, Nielsen issued a press release stating that NewsMax was the #2 web site in the U.S. "with the highest concentration of Republicans." NewsMax.com's audience, according to Nielsen, is 65.4% Republican. The only site with a higher percentage of republican audience is RushLimbaugh.com.
Next time, cut and paste from a more balanced source.
Posted by: Kenny Bunkport | August 2, 2007 1:04 PM
J & J or is it JJ, because we know its not "GOOD TIMES" IN AMERICA. We all also know its tough being a crackhead in america just stuck on stupid day end and night. We forgive you too don't worry no judgements because at the end road in Baghdad USA one of us will save you not knowing who you are; just the mere fact that J & J were there.
"BEWARE THE COMMANDER GUY WANTS YOU. Thats right he "WANTS YOU" because he has a special place in mind for you too.
He doesn't player hate, you can be lame, no fame, a sad true sick minded little man but you will serve him. Oh he is not worried "BECAUSE HE HEARS THE VOICES." HE HAS SEEN THE "EVIL DOERS."
HE WILL COME FOR YOU, AS YOU ARE IN HIS MASTER PLAN JERRY & JOHN "BECAUSE HE HEARS THE VOICES."
"Jerry and John, JJ are "DYNOMITE"
Posted by: Roger Morris | August 2, 2007 1:12 PM
I've read the Constitution over and over and I cannot find anywhere in that document where Executive Priveledge is discussed. How could a Strict Constructionist agree with something that doesn't exist in the Constitution?
Posted by: jethro | August 2, 2007 1:15 PM
"Patrick "Leaky" Leahy needs to go to the nursing home. He clearly has lost it, but then he never really had it anyway.
Posted by: John D | August 2, 2007 10:46 AM"
Well, John D - you're truly the expert in that department. By the way, would you like to comment on how much Sen. Leahy spends on his suits, or will you just make something up like you've done before?
Posted by: BC | August 2, 2007 1:39 PM
If you were running for the Republican presidential nomination, whose support would be worth the equivalent of many millions in campaign dollars? Newt? Nah. Bush? Ha. Try Roger Ailes, the head of Fox News and former media adviser to RICHARD NIXON.
Mr. Ailes was the media consultant to Mr. Giuliani’s first mayoral campaign in 1989. Mr. Giuliani, as mayor, officiated at Mr. Ailes’s wedding and intervened on his behalf when Mr. Ailes’s company, Fox News Channel, was blocked from securing a cable station in the city.
This year, they were tablemates at the White House correspondents dinner, which Mr. Giuliani attended as a guest of Fox’s parent company, the News Corporation.
The festival of back-scratching continues with Giuliani's presidential campaign. Despite Fox claims of impartiality, Giuliani has certainly been getting his turn as the scratchee.
So far this year, one political journal found, Mr. Giuliani has logged more time on Fox interview programs than any other candidate. Most of the time has been spent with Sean Hannity, an acknowledged admirer of the former mayor, according to the data compiled by the journal, known as The Hotline.
Should Rudy ever get the opportunity, I'm sure Roger -- and Rupert -- have a few ideas about how he might pay them back for their favoritism.
With all the rope that Ailes is tossing Giuliani, the wonder is not that the Democratic presidential candidates won't conduct a debate on Fox, the wonder is that the Republican candidates will agree to debate on a network that already has it's champion.
Posted by: John E | August 2, 2007 1:42 PM
I will not be happy till Bush & all these clown are behind bars, where they belong. I think the Dems should drag it past the next election to avoid pardons and make sure these guys are getting the bonding they desrce in the big house!
Posted by: Michael | August 2, 2007 2:03 PM
Leave it to the Republicans that come along to be on the side of criminality, defending it, and advocating for the rule of checks and balances (the plan of our forefathers) to get kicked under the bus, and laughing and ignoring of our Consititution, and Bill of Rights, ensuing.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN: "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter, and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
"Well, here we are at that crossroads. Are we going the way of democracy or unitary rule. (monarchy)
ALBERT EINSTEIN: "Democracy taken in its narrower purely political sense, suffers from the fact that those in economic and political power possess the means for molding public opinion to serve their own class interests."
And the results of the molding of public opinion of the big money, what is best for the fat cats, is always parroted by the Republican Conservatives, with so little genuine capacity for independent thought and objective discernment, they obey, like children, what Bill O'Rielly and Savage, and Rush Limbaugh tell them think, whatever the corporate sonsors that keep those media sources afloat, and their shills the aforementioned, and the like.
Posted by: blubonnet | August 2, 2007 2:04 PM
This administration makes the Corleones look like a bunch of pussies. As for Junior, it must be excruciatingly painful to be in the highest office of the land and be fully aware every waking moment that you have no business being there - I guess that's why he prefers to sleep early. He is obviously incapable of grasping the extent of the harm he has wraught on our Nation...
Posted by: Anonymous | August 2, 2007 2:09 PM
For those of you not familiar with newsmax.com, Bruce's hot source for news, one of today's headlines is "Hugo Chaves Praises Sean Penn". This has a more prominent posting space than the Minnesota bridge collapse. Draw your own conclusions.
Posted by: kb | August 2, 2007 2:30 PM
JAMES MADISON: "If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
JAMES MADISON: "The fetters imposed on liberty at home have ever been forged out of the weapons provided for defense against real, pretended, or imaginary dangers from abroad."
JIM HIGHTOWER, a brilliant polititcal commenter said the following, which sums up our situation, if you realize that each of the adiministrative officials of the executive branch, or their families, are making enormous amount of money from this war. Hightower said: "The corporations don't have to lobby the government anymore, they are the government."
Fascism is most succinctly defined as a collusion between government and business, although there are numerous characteristics that result from that. I'll bring a link in my next post, which defines fascism more elaborately.
WILLIAM DODD, former ambassador to Germany in 1938 said: "Fascism is on the march today in America. Millionaires are marching to the tune. It will come in this country unless a strong defense is set up by Liberal and progressive forces. A clique of US industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government, and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. Aboard ship a prominent executive of one of America's largest financial Corporations, told me point blank that if the progressive trend of the Roosevelt administration continued, he would be ready to take definite action to bring fascism to America."
One of those industrialists was Prescott Bush, (George W. Bush's grandfather) who was known to be working for Hitler, in WWII. If you doubt it, use your search engine now, and prove it to yourself.
ALEX CAREY said: "The twentieth century has been characterized by developments of great political importance-the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate porpaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy."
Posted by: blubonnet | August 2, 2007 2:37 PM
The 14 Characteristics of Fascism:
www.oldamericancentury.org/pts.htm
Posted by: blubonnet | August 2, 2007 2:41 PM
Oh BC-BS, you have the suit fetish, not me. So, you telling me the information from Men's Vogue that Edwards buys imported suits (hence, expensive suits) is not true, eh?
And for those Loons disparating Newsmax as a credible source of info, how does that sqaure with you ding dongs using salon.com, rolling stone and other loony left wing sources?
Posted by: John D | August 2, 2007 2:57 PM
The 14 characteristics of fascism (blubonnet's link missed it)
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm
Posted by: david k | August 2, 2007 4:41 PM
Interesting how Leahy stood stony cold silent over the Clinton White House reviewing 1,000 secret FBI files on his own Congressional colleagues or the Clintons accepting laundered campaign funds from the Chinese Communist government. Leahy's own checkered past speaks volumes.
Posted by: Lafayette | August 2, 2007 4:58 PM
Leahy's own checkered past speaks volumes.
Posted by: Lafayette | August 2, 2007 4:58 PM
So does your inability to address the substantive issue, Laffy. You've attacked the messenger but have nothing to say about the message, so I guess that means you agree with it.
Posted by: a blinkin | August 2, 2007 5:47 PM
God bless Senator leahy; and those who are trying to restore our constitution. you all better hope ur not at the wrong place at the wrong time and never given a fair trial. its communism what the bush administration is doing. they are trying to get us to appreciate the constitution at the lives of many innocent people. the bush administration is retarded clearly on of the biggest blunders in USA history.
Posted by: Paul Ruiz | August 3, 2007 12:46 AM
[quote]
Oh BC-BS, you have the suit fetish, not me. So, you telling me the information from Men's Vogue that Edwards buys imported suits (hence, expensive suits) is not true, eh?
Posted by: John D | August 2, 2007 2:57 PM
[/quote]
If that's true, then it should have been easy for you to PROVIDE A LINK TO THE STORY BACKING UP THIS CLAIM!
So why didn't you?
For someone who claims to be a "journalist" you sure do a lousy job of backing up your allegations that you post here in The Swamp.
Posted by: BC | August 3, 2007 11:24 AM
Why the hell is Edwards or any other politicians attire of any relevance, unless they presented themselves as complete bums?
WE've got Edwards appearance in spandex while bicycling an issue among the Conservatives.
We've got his haircut costing too much.
We've got Hilliary's very slight appearance of cleavage an issue.
We;ve got Edwards suits an issue.
Edwards is a wealthy man, while anyone on their side that has obtained wealth, it is defended, but...us...once again, blatent hypocrisy.
The desperation is more than obvious of the Right-wing-nuts, of lack of anything of substance to go after the Left. What is more frightening is the mentality that bites, onto those talking points. Wow, talk about stupidity!
Posted by: blubonnet | August 4, 2007 3:44 PM