by Frank James
National Public Radio's "Morning Edition" broadcast an interview with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) this morning during which the presidential candidate promoted his latest book, a thinly veiled variation of John F. Kennedy's "Profiles in Courage" called "Hard Call," an examination of the difficult decisions made by American leaders throughout history.
The book is essentially a call on Americans to search out character in their leaders, the ability to take difficult, unpopular for the nation's sake.
McCain obviously believes if voters did so, he'd have a better shot at gaining their support since he's known for supporting issues controversial with many voters, whether reforming the nation's immigration laws or campaign finance.
Given that the underlying premise behind his conversation with interviewer Renee Montagne was that character counts, it was ironic that McCain told a whopper of an untruth during the interview.
Here's the exchange which began with Montagne asking McCain if he couldn't have done more to change the U.S. course in Iraq:
MONTAGNE: Given that you have argued since the very beginning of the war that more troops were needed and you have since said mistakes have been were made, could you yourself though as a very powerful senator and a Republican could you have done more?
MCCAIN: I think maybe you could always have done more. But I guarantee you I worked very hard to reverse that failed strategy and called for the strategy that is now winning.
MONTAGNE: But you also did publicly support President Bush at a critical time during President Bush's re-election.
MCCAIN: I supported President Bush (because) his opponent wanted a complete and immediate withdrawal as I recall. I felt strongly that the Democratic candidate would doom us to failure not only there but in other parts of the world.
McCain was talking of course about Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.,) the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee. If you give McCain the benefit of the doubt, he misremembered Kerry's position. If you're more cynical, he intentionally misstated Kerry's position to make his own support of Bush more palatable.
Either way, it was odd coming in an interview where McCain sought to align himself on the side of character.
Here's what Kerry actually said during a major Iraq speech he gave on April 30, 2004 at Westminster College in Missouri, chosen because it was where another politician known for character, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill gave his famous "Iron Curtain" speech:
As complicated as Iraq seems, there are really only three basic options: One, we can continue to do this largely by ourselves and hope more of the same works; Two, we can conclude it’s not doable, pull out and hope against hope that the worst doesn’t happen in Iraq; Or three, we can get the Iraqi people and the world’s major powers invested with us in building Iraq’s future.
Mistakes have complicated our mission and jeopardized our objective of a stable free Iraq with a representative government, secure in its borders. We may have differences about how we went into Iraq, but we do not have the choice just to pick up and leave—and leave behind a failed state and a new haven for terrorists.
I believe that failure is not an option in Iraq. But it is also true that failure is not an excuse for more of the same.
Here is how we must proceed.
First, we must create a stable and secure environment in Iraq. That will require a level of forces equal to the demands of the mission. To do this right, we have to truly internationalize both politically and militarily: we cannot depend on a US-only presence. In the short-term, however, if our commanders believe they need more American troops, they should say so and they should get them.
That is not even close to the "complete and immediate withdrawal" McCain mentioned.
McCain may not have meant to malign another senator and Vietnam vet who he is known to have become friendly with over the years after a frosty initial relationship between the former North Vietnamese prisoner-of-war (McCain) and the one-time war protester (Kerry.)
But it definitely wouldn't be considered of sign of good character to accuse someone of holding a controversial position he never held.





Comments
McCain is becoming more obscure every day.A once proud man has reduced himself to a panderer.
Simply pathetic!
Posted by: Raving Loon | August 14, 2007 5:11 PM
John Who??
Posted by: bill r. | August 14, 2007 5:19 PM
RL,
It's called 'saying anything to get elected'.
Hey 'Dorian' John!; Have you checked the portrait in the attic recently?
Posted by: C.Morris | August 14, 2007 5:19 PM
"PUT A FORK IN HIM, HE APPEARS TO BE DONE"
McCain is the better of the bunch, and probably could turn out to be a good President, but he has to let the skeletons out of the closet.
"STRAIGHT TALK" IS JUST THAT.
"TIP TOEING AROUND THE WHITE HOUSE, BECAUSE YOU THINK IT BELONGS TO YOU, IS A LOT DIFFERENT THAN TAKING IT"
ITS JUST SAD TO WATCH HIM TAP TOE AROUND GEORGE'S ADMINISTRATION. FORGET THE PROMISES MADE AS GEORGE CANNOT DELIVER IT TO HIM ON THAT SILVER PLATTER AS HE WAS PROMISED.
HE IS BETTER OFF CALLING ON THE GHOST OF TERRY SCHIAVO FOR GUIDANCE THAN ALL THAT "pop like it's hot rhetoric he is spinning every day"
32 flavors.....of big booty delicious campain rhetoric.
MCCain the last American, I mean Arizona Maverick.
NEXT!
Posted by: Roger Morris | August 14, 2007 5:20 PM
Frank James says that McCain may have misrepresented Kerry's position on Iraq, and I'm thinking, is that possible?
Posted by: Herbie H. | August 14, 2007 5:23 PM
The whole idea that McCain is a "straight talker", and a man of character is an urban myth. A man of character would not suck up to Bush after Rove's slime job in the S.C. primary. A man of character would not cave on his position against torture to allow the administration to interpret what methods of "enhanced interrogation" qualified as same. And how can anyone call the "straight talk express" credible after McCain's absurd assessment of security in a Baghdad market?
I used to like the guy even though I never bought the "maverick" label or even the moderate label. Now, I think he's possibly senile. IMO, he still would have made a better President that the current criminal-in-chief.
Posted by: dt | August 14, 2007 5:27 PM
McCain attacking Kerry? Two decorated Vietnam veterans who both have zero chance of getting into the White House are attacking each other.
Great idea.
Posted by: RomanB | August 14, 2007 6:15 PM
John Kerry -- Ho Hum.
Posted by: Al Hambra | August 14, 2007 6:34 PM
It's too bad for McCain. He once opened his heart and mind, now he only opens his mouth.
Posted by: Charles Bisbee | August 14, 2007 6:36 PM
John McCain -- Ho Hum.
Posted by: Commentator | August 14, 2007 8:36 PM
Maybe McCain thinks that Kerry is running again?
Posted by: chimpymcflightsuit's navigator | August 14, 2007 10:32 PM