Sen. Warner, 80, with a future to ponder: The Swamp
The Swamp
Posted August 27, 2007 6:15 AM
The Swamp

Warrnersolo.jpg


by David Lerman

These are trying days for Sen. John Warner.

At the age of 80, Virginia's senior senator has promised to decide by next month whether to seek re-election next year for another six-year term.

The centrist Republican, long one of Virginia's most respected and relatively popular politicians, offered his most reflective public thoughts on the matter so far in an appearance Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press.

Presenting himself as a man who is genuinely undecided about his political future, Warner confided that he has been keeping a daily diary for the past six months, assessing how he feels each day about his work-- and whether he is ready to commit to another six-year term.

``What do you think I should do?" Warner asked moderator Tim Russert. ``What would you do if you were 80 years old?"

When Russert offered no advice, Warner continued to brood.

``The people of Virginia have stood with me strongly," he said. ``Now, I've got to go out and assess each day. For six months, I've kept a little diary. I feel this way: not physically, but mentally. Should I stay, should I not?"

The answer to that question could hold profound consequences for Virginia, and perhaps for the country.

A decision to stay would likely ensure that Warner retains his seat for another term. But a decision to retire would trigger a fierce competition for an open Senate seat that potentially could tilt the partisan balance in the U.S. Senate.

The opening could prompt former Democratic Gov. Mark Warner to make a Senate bid. Republicans, meanwhile, could be in for a bruising nomination battle between U.S. Rep. Tom Davis, a Fairfax County moderate, and former Republican Gov. Jim Gilmore, a conservative.

The Senate is currently comprised of 51 Democrats (including two independents who caucus with Democrats) and 49 Republicans.

John Warner, who first won his seat in 1978, made clear that he enjoys his job but must weigh the toll it takes on a man who would be serving-- if re-elected-- until the age of 87.

``The Senate requires you to go full bore, six or seven days a week," he said. ``Tremendous energy. Got to Iraq, jump in and out of helicopters, get on the cargo planes, no sleep. And that's different things we've got to do all around. And I've got to assess, at this age, whether it is fair to Virginia to ask for a contract for another six years."

Asked if that is a lot to expect of a man in his 80's, Warner replied, ``That is correct. But anyway, I'm going to make that decision, and I'm going to do what's right for my state and my country in terms of running again. I am confident that I can run a good, strong campaign. But then I've got to also say to Virginia, on the eve of my 88th birthday, I'm still going seven days, seven nights with full steam. I might be able to do it. Stand by."

There has been much speculation in Washington in recent weeks that Warner was more likely to retire. Several of his top staffers recently left for jobs in the private sector, and Warner has raised virtually no money for a re-election campaign so far.

But Warner has downplayed such events, insisting he was sending no signal of his intentions one way or the other. His staff members left for personal reasons unrelated to his own future, he has said. And Warner, a multimillionaire, said he did not feel comfortable raising money until he had decided whether to seek re-election.

Asked Sunday which way he was leaning, Warner told Russert: ``My dear friend, I'll go back and make a little diary entry after this day. But I'll keep that counsel to myself."

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Well i don't always agree with Warner, but there is no doubt he has served with respect and decency. But I have grown weary of these old senators running and running and running, whether it's Warner, Ted Stevens, Ted "Manslaughter" Kennedy, Robert "KKK Grand Wizard" Byrd, Strom Thurmond, etc. Let's get a little more youthful, at least folks in their 60s?!?!?!?!


I think what may be wearing on Warner is the idea that he does not have an especially remarkable career. Yes, he has been a high profile figure in the Senate, but has not distinguished himself with any landmark legislation or activity that causes people to think that he was one of the great thinkers in congress.


The reporter's assertion that Warner's running for reelection "could hold profound consequences for Virginia, and perhaps for the country." is pompous nonsense.

Nothing for or against Warner: it's just that one senator doesn't really matter that much.

As one who survived the great Chicago storm last Thursday, I think I speak for many when I say that a good powerline repairman, or garbage pickup, makes more of an impact on people's lives than any senator.


Warner's decision to come out in favor of a token withdrawal of US troops by the end of 2007 has been given far too much importance.

As many have pointed out, he will not vote against the President on the war where it counts, in the Congress. In other words, he will vote to continue the war. And the opinions of a likely departing Senator are unlikely to have a huge effect on fellow Republicans.

As to our corps of elderly senators....they are there because voters in their states continue to put them there because it's easier than evaluating newer candidates.


Sorry to say the only cosideration is what type of person will replace him. He is not important,his successor is. Can the Dems take this seat?


I partly agree with bruce in that I have more respect for my power guy and my garbage guy than I do my state Senator. But I doubt either of those guys could deliver federal funds for massive water projects or road building. If you've read "Cadillac Desert" you know how much influence a Senator can have on state and regional projects, however ill-conceived. Some politicians, like Lott and Murtha, deliver the "pork" along with the bluster.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "g" in the field below:

Quizzes

palin or fey

Palin or Fey?

McCain

Know the presidents?

McCain

Your McCain IQ

Obama

Your Obama IQ

Latest polls

Electoral vote map

map

Test your scenarios

Galleries

Palin

Sarah Palin

campaign

Campaign trail

conventions

RNC | DNC

Unauthorized tour

Obama

Obama's Chicago

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Candidate match


Test assumptions