President Bush and Michael Mukasey, nominee for attorney general. AP photo
by James Oliphant
Judge Michael Mukasey continued his rounds on Capitol Hill today, paying a visit to Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) that started out lightly enough.
Television cameras and photographers were in the room as Durbin invited Mukasey into his office, where he jokingly asked if Mukasey thought he would ever "live down the endorsement of Chuck Schumer."
"It puzzles people," Mukasey cracked, grinning. "But it's a conversation starter."
Afterward, Durbin said the meeting went well, noting it was the first time he had met the retired New York federal judge.
Mukasey's chief virtue at the outset seems to be his being a certified member of the ABA, the Anyone But Alberto club. Durbin found Mukasey to be more forthcoming than the former attorney general.
"I hope he is more open and honest," Durbin said in his office after Mukasey's departure. "Alberto Gonzales wouldn't tell you what time it was if you asked him."
Durbin said he told Mukasey of three primary concerns he has about the troubled Justice Department: the controversy over the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys; the degree of warrantless wiretapping employed by the department, and the treatment of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
Gonzales, of course, was deeply involved in all of those issues. But Mukasey, coming from private practice in Manhattan, doesn't have that baggage.
Durbin is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will take up Mukasey's nomination. The committee is locked in a dispute with the White House over testimony and documents relating to the U.S. attorney investigation. The committee's chairman, Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), intimated Monday that the administration would have to play ball on the investigation if it wanted Mukasey's confirmation proceedings to get under way.
Tuesday, however, Leahy clarified his position after meeting with Mukasey, saying progress was being made. "Cooperation from the administration in making progress on our longstanding oversight requests is still needed and will be helpful in moving forward," Leahy said. "I am pleased to report that recent discussions that I have had with [Fred] Fielding, the White House counsel, have been encouraging on that score. I take him at his word that he will work to provide the Judiciary Committee with information and documents that we need."
Leahy and Fielding are expected to meet again tomorrow. There is no timetable yet for when the confirmation hearing will begin. Leahy's office said Wednesday that the proper paperwork for the nomination had yet to be filed with the Senate. The White House has pushed for a confirmation vote on Mukasey by Oct. 8.
Currently, Assistant Attorney General Peter Keisler is running the Justice Department on an interim basis.







Comments
Heaven help us all. Dubya stumbles into consensus building at the 11th hour of his presidency.
Say what you will about Bill Clinton, but when he nominated Republican U.S. Senator Bill Cohen to be Secretary of Defense, Clinton put national, security above politcs.
Posted by: Doug Zook | September 19, 2007 3:51 PM
I don't like this getting to know you meetings of these appointees. Kind of like "selling" the person.
Posted by: lochnessmonster | September 19, 2007 4:17 PM
I'm sure Bruce and John D will jump all over Dick Durbin's erroneous statement. Dick said Alberto wouldn't give you the time of day if you asked, but I believe Alberto testified that he "didn't remember" or "couldn't recall" the time of day (or anything else related to his responsibilities at the Justice Department).
Posted by: Tom O | September 19, 2007 4:54 PM
Doug,
The only reason he nominated Cohen was because he couldn't find a qualified democrat to take the job. The only qualified dem was Sam Nunn and he wanted nothing to do with Clinton.
Never did hear your views on Move-On and their accusation of an active duty solider of betrayal to his country.
Posted by: Terry | September 19, 2007 7:05 PM
Terry,
You insult millions of Democratic veterans, combat and otherwise, when you say Clinton couldn't find a Democrat qualified to be Sec. of Def.
Men and women who put their lives on the line so you can post your insults here. And those who gave it all who can't respond.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Posted by: Doug Zook | September 19, 2007 9:33 PM
I looked into the origins of the nickname "Betrayus".
Many people are falsely assuming that "Betrayus" was a clever rhyme made up by Moveon.org for the New York Times ad. Which I think is a key assumption for this ad controversy to work for the republicans.
And that assumption is false. The nickname did not originate with Moveon.org.
I clearly remember reading Petraeus's nickname on various military forums/comment threads over two years ago. I remember it so because I thought it was very clever and suitable nickname. In the past couple of months, I have also started seeing the nickname used on progressive blogs and comments.
So when this "controversy" happened yesterday, I did a google search (i swear google really is a blogger's friend!) to see if I could find an old posting or comment that used the nickname.
Here's a comment from 2005:
From BLACKFIVE: Generals of yesterday and today
I don't know GEN Petraeus personally...but when I was in the "Devil Brigade" folks called him "Colonel Betrayus". He came up with things like the "Devil button" (button your BDU collar up to the top when on jumps) and the "Devil grip" (special name for keeping your trigger finger out of the trigger well) which sounded hokey to most of the troops at the time.
Can any other All American paratroopers out there expand on my comment?
Posted by: TBone | November 19, 2005 at 10:52 AM
This kind of changes the narrative, doesn't it Beanie Boy?
Posted by: Learning material for 1st grader Terry | September 19, 2007 10:47 PM