The Swamp
-
Text size:  A A A A A

« Bush: Candidates warning U.S. at risk will 'do well' | Main | Bean foe gets DC help »

Same vote, different reasons for Dodd, Lieberman

Email Print Link
Election 2008
[What is this?]
Posted September 21, 2007 11:49 AM
The Swamp

by David Lightman

Sens. Christopher J. Dodd and Joseph I. Lieberman voted the same way this morning on whether or not U.S. troops should be pulled out of Iraq--but for very different reasons.

By a 47 to 47 vote, 13 votes short of the number needed to cut off debate, the Senate blocked a measure that would have brought most troops home within nine months. Both Connecticut senators oppose the measure. The bill, sponsored by Sens. Carl Levin, (D-Mich.), and Jack Reed, (D-R.I.), was nearly identical to a similar measure rejected earlier this year.

Lieberman, an independent who caucuses with Senate Democrats, has been a consistent opponent of firm timelines for withdrawal. Dodd, a candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, has been an ardent advocate of troop withdrawals, but said he simply could not go along with this measure.

He had backed the Levin-Reed measure in a July vote, but a series of events, such as the continuing bloodshed in Iraq and the Sept. 11 testimony of Gen. David H. Petraeus saying he could not say if the war has made the United States safer, has convinced Dodd stronger action is needed.

But this time, Dodd said, "This bill will not stop this president from continuing to wage this war, while a firm deadline is necessary, it is not sufficient without it also being enforceable through the power of the purse."

And, he figured, "given this president's loyalty to his own failed policy, it is clear to me that anything short of a firm, enforceable deadline that forces his hand will only serve to perpetuate our involvement in this civil war."

As a result, Dodd said, "I will only vote to fully fund the complete redeployment of our troops out of Iraq."

Dodd's opponents for the nomination, though, thought otherwise. Voting for the Levin-Reed proposal were Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, Barack Obama of Illinois and Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware.

Obama called the measure "a responsible course to bring our troops out of Iraq, with a hard date to begin our drawdown and a hard date to complete it….It's time to leave behind the political posturing so that we can end this war.


Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

"It's time to leave behind the political posturing so that we can end this war."

Amen!!!


"We Might Win, We Might Win"

As we continue to wonder why we are at such Perils in America, The GOP's "Willing Suspension of Disbelief" Men and Women, Children and Sons, Daughters and Mothers are dying.

In 2005 that GREAT YEAR OF PROGRESS TOWARDS MEETING OUR GOAL OF "VICTORY", WELL its 2007 and it's nothing but BLAH BLAH BLAH, BLAH BLAH BLAH, WE GOT TIME ON OUR SIDE, YES WE DO.

WHAT IS THE PLAN! WHAT IS PATREAUS' PLAN! HIS INSURGENCY PLAN IS NOT IN PLAY. SO WHAT IS THE PLAN, 43 REPUBLICANS WHO JUST CHECK NO AND WENT TO THE BATHROOM, OR TO THE PARK, OR TO MADAME GIVE UP, WHAT IS THE PLAN?

WHAT IS THE PLAN?


Joe Lieberman for vice president...on either party's ticket. Diogenes would like him.


Mr. Morris,

Careful with that cap key bro...


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below:

-

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Those were the days
More Handelsman
Editorial cartoons

Galleries

Iraq

Iraq War 5th anniversary

Dog

Campaign trail

Quiz

Obama

Your Obama IQ