Edwards will take matching funds, if...: The Swamp
 
The Swamp
-
Posted September 27, 2007 4:50 PM
The Swamp

By Jim Tankersley

CONWAY, N.H. - Live from the John Edwards presidential campaign press van comes confirmation that the former North Carolina senator will accept public matching funds for the general election campaign -- if he makes it that far.

The former Democratic senator from North Carolina announced the decision today in an interview with CNN, in which he called on rivals Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to join him in accepting public funding down the road. Both Clinton and Obama have outraised Edwards by large margins so far this year; the third fundraising quarter ends Sept. 30.

This afternoon, Edwards' campaign said the decision to take matching funds came from principle, not financial weakness, and that he is on track to raise raise $40 million this year. A spokesman attempted to link the public financing acceptance to Edwards' refusal to take donations from lobbyists and political action committees.

Edwards is taking public funds "to help do his part to curb the influence of money in politics" and "to make a statement that the influence of money is rampant in politics and has gotten to the point where it dominates the race," said Kate Bedingfield, an Edwards spokeswoman.

Read on for a full press release from the Edwards campaign:

EDWARDS TAKES NEXT STEP IN REJECTING MONEY FROM SPECIAL INTERESTS BY SEEKING PUBLIC FINANCING

Challenges Clinton, who said on Sunday she supports public financing, to join him now in ending the money game in Washington

Chapel Hill, North Carolina – Today, Senator John Edwards announced he will be seeking public financing for the 2008 presidential primary campaign. Just as he challenged the Democratic Party to stop accepting contributions from lobbyists, today Edwards is again taking the lead in ending the money game in Washington.

“You can't buy your way to the Democratic nomination – you should have to earn the votes of the American people with bold vision and ideas,” said Edwards’ campaign manager Congressman David Bonior. “This is the most expensive presidential campaign in history, by far. And the simple fact is that the influence of money in politics – and the focus on raising money in this election – has gotten out of control. It’s time to get back to focusing on the issues that matter to the American people. That’s why John Edwards has decided to play by the rules that were designed to ensure fairness in the election process by capping his campaign spending and seeking public financing.”

Since the campaign began, Edwards has focused on issues that matter to the American people – universal health care, the war in Iraq, education, global warming and helping American workers. He’s promised to end the game in Washington and has challenged the Democratic Party to send a powerful signal to the American people about whose support really matters by refusing to accept donations from federal lobbyists. Senator Clinton has refused to stop taking contributions from federal lobbyists, saying that public financing is the solution to ending the influence of lobbyists.

“Senator Clinton said she believes public financing is the answer to ending the influence of lobbyists and special interests in Washington,” said Congressman Bonior. “If she really believes that, she should join Senator Edwards and seek public financing, or she should explain to the American people why she does not mean what she says.”

Under the public financing system for the presidential primaries, the government will match up to $250 of an individual’s contributions to an eligible candidate. To establish credibility, a candidate must show broad-based public support by proving to the FEC that he or she has raised in excess of $5,000 of matchable contributions in each of at least 20 states. This is done through a threshold submission to the FEC. In addition a candidate must also agree to: limit campaign spending for all primary elections; limit campaign spending in each state; and limit spending from personal funds to $50,000.

Currently the campaign is working on the first step in this process - to make its threshold submission to the FEC in order to establish Senator Edwards’ eligibility to receive matching funds.

“Edwards has raised more than any Democratic candidate in history before this race. We have more than enough money to compete,” said Congressman Bonior. “The truth is, this election is about ideas – not how much money you’ve raised. And no one has better ideas for how to bring real change to America than John Edwards. That’s why we’re confident he can not only compete in this election – but he will win.”

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

A shocker: multi-millionaire Democrat John Edwards will suck up federal tax money to finance his campaign.

Money taken out of the pockets of every taxpayer in this country, rich as well as poor (money either designated by the "check off", or taken from other taxpayers to make up for what those checking off don't pay).

And he has the nerve to label this money grab as campaign reform!


shocker: multi-millionaire Democrat John Edwards will suck up federal tax money to finance his campaign.

Money taken out of the pockets of every taxpayer in this country, rich as well as poor (money either designated by the "check off", or taken from other taxpayers to make up for what those checking off don't pay).

And he has the nerve to label this money grab as campaign reform!

Posted by: Bruce | September 27, 2007 6:12 PM


Allardice,
I agree with you on this one.
Edward is a rich man and he should just tell the poor people of America to go suck on it the same way that the Angry Old Rich Republican white guys who are running for President always do.

Screw the poor people.
I agree with Brucie and Trickle Down Terry, those poor people just don't understand that rich Republican white guys need more tax cuts, what is wrong with them?

P S - Hey Brucie, are we going to dress up and play civil war games this weekend?


Bruce's first posting. Please note date.


"In the interests of full disclosure, will the Tribune contributors to "the Swamp" (Frank James, Mark Silva et al.) reveal their political biases by disclosing who they voted for in 2000 and 2004 (and other years) for president? How can the readers fully or accurately assess their postings, the "take" they have on current events, or even what they consider "newsworthy", without this information?

Posted by: Bruce | January 5, 2006 9:55 AM


"Bruce's first posting. Please note date."

Posted by: TheReamer | September 27, 2007 9:41 PM


You've got a lot of time on your hands, dont you?


Ferd, time is the only thing the Far Loony left has. They like to keep tabs on all those they disagree with and hate.

Anyway, since the media likes to poke fun at the verbal mistakes of President Bush, here is a mistake from Jim Tankersley (notice the double wording):

"This afternoon, Edwards' campaign said the decision to take matching funds came from principle, not financial weakness, and that he is on track to raise raise $40 million this year."


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "k" in the field below: