by Aamer Madhani
In a move intended to bolster oversight of private security contractors in Iraq, the House passed a bill this morning that would make all private contractors working in Iraq and other combat zones subject to prosecution in the U.S. courts.
The bill was passed 389-30 and is the latest fallout from a Sept. 16 incident in Baghdad in which employees of the private security firm Blackwater USA are accused of killing at least 11 Iraqis. Even before the House voted the White House expressed concerns about such a bill.
The FBI has dispatched agents to investigate the case, and has triggered both the Defense Department and State Department to review their oversight of the thousands of contractors working in Iraq and Afghanistan. The incident has also resulted in a flood of Democratic lawmakers wagging their fingers over the use of private contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan.
There are approximately 137,000 contractors in Iraq, a small fraction of which are used for security and protecting VIPs and diplomats. Others are used for pedestrian tasks such as running the chow halls, picking up trash and doing the laundry. The U.S. government pays Blackwater about $1,200 per day for each hired gun they provide to the U.S. missions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Most of Blackwater employees are tasked with providing security for U.S. diplomats and other American VIPs, such as visiting Congressional delegations, visiting the war zones.
In a statement issued Wednesday, the White House said the bill would have "unintended and intolerable consequences for crucial and necessary national security activities and operations."
(Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) added an amendment requiring the Justice Department to release a description of charges brought against contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. Chicago Tribune staff photo by Heather Stone)
Presently, U.S. contractors in Iraq are immune from prosecution in Iraqi courts, a shield for American citizens that was instituted by former Ambassador Paul Bremer back in the early days of the war when the Coalition Provisional Authority was still in power.
Personnel working for the Defense Department in both Iraq and Afghanistan are subject the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act. Contractors with Blackwater, which has long had a reputation on the Iraqi street of being a band of rogue mercenaries, work for the State Department in Iraq, so it is uncertain whether they would fall under MEJA.
Included in the House bill is an amendment from Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) that would require the Justice Department to release the description of charges that have been brought against contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan and a description of the legal actions that have been taken against them. Schakowsky has been one of the earliest critics of Blackwater and the U.S. government’s reliance in combat zones on the private security industry.
Earlier this week, Blackwater CEO Erik Prince testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and maintained that his company has “acted appropriately at all times."
But many Democrats are skeptical of Blackwater after the September incident and another incident last Christmas in which an intoxicated Blackwater employee shot and killed a bodyguard to the Iraqi vice president. That employee was fired and flown out of Iraq less than two days after the shooting, but no charges have been filed against him.







Comments
This make make someone here feel better, but does nothing for the Iraqi concerns.
Posted by: bill r. | October 4, 2007 1:50 PM
A Blackwater employee shot an Iraqi guard in cold blood and the most they could was fire him ?? This bunch has absolutely no respect for the rule of law ---let's teach them....impeachment -- NOW
Posted by: pitsniff | October 4, 2007 2:06 PM
Isn't it ironic that Congressthug Schakowsky, in which her husband is rotting in prison for money crimes and she should be rotting beside him for her participation in those crimes, would demand oversight?!?!?
Anyway, I have nothing against oversight. Oversight can be a good thing. But it needs to be universal. Dems like "universal" things, don't they? Let's have some oversight into all domestic spending on the federal level, state level and county level.
Speaking of which I am intrigued as to why the Loony Left in Crooked County hasn't been barking up a storm over the County's plan to increase the sales tax by 2 cents on the dollar, and in reality by 300 percent, from .75 cents to 2.75 cents. Doesn't that hurt the poorest people the most?
Posted by: John D | October 4, 2007 2:23 PM
Umm, Johnny D??
What does Blackwater have to do with Cook County taxes?
So let's have oversight on spending - do you think that all spending in this country is based upon the Democrats? How about 6 YEARS of not one single veto of a spending bill, but now the the Dems are in charge, Georgie is complaining about spending??
Give me a break!!!
Posted by: BobinATL | October 4, 2007 2:44 PM
What is accountability and why am I supposed to learn what this French word means?
Posted by: Republican Joe | October 4, 2007 2:59 PM
Speaking of which I am intrigued as to why the Loony Left in Crooked County hasn't been barking up a storm over the County's plan to increase the sales tax by 2 cents on the dollar, and in reality by 300 percent, from .75 cents to 2.75 cents. Doesn't that hurt the poorest people the most?
Posted by: John D | October 4, 2007 2:23 PM
Lil Mickey'D's Johnny,
Does that include the amount John Edwards spends on his suits?
Posted by: John E | October 4, 2007 3:17 PM
Funny one there, Unemployed Johnnny E. Perhaps you should ask your bud, BC, though.
IN regard to the question what do Crooked County taxes have to do with Blackwater? Everything. There needs to be accountability at ALL levels of government. Why did the Dan Ryan project go from $500 million to $1 BILLION? The O'Hare expansin keeps leaping up by billions at a time.
It's just time that ALL government spending and those contractors hired by the government get their books checked.
Posted by: John D | October 4, 2007 3:37 PM
Will Jan's husband help balance the check book?
Posted by: Terry | October 4, 2007 10:40 PM
Maybe John "the Joseph Stalin of Streamwood" D can tell us how much Rep. Jan Schakowsky pays for her suits. I'm sure he knows the exact figures - just like he claimed he knows exactly how much John Edwards pays for his suits.
Anything JOhn D says has to be taken as the BS it really is.
Posted by: BC | October 5, 2007 11:13 AM