by Mike Dorning
COLUMBIA, S.C.—Barack Obama's presidential campaign today begins a tour of gospel singers around this Bible Belt state to praise the Lord and offer testimonials on behalf of the candidate, a modern twist on a style of old-time politicking right out of the film "O Brother Where Art Thou."
The gospel music tour stirred controversy this week because one of the featured performers, Grammy Award-winning singer Donnie McClurkin, has offended gay activists with his view that homosexuality is a choice and that gays can "overcome" their orientation by turning to God. The campaign sought to tamp down criticism from gay rights groups by adding an openly gay minister to deliver an invocation.
But the three-day gospel concert series—at which Obama is not scheduled to appear—is just the most visible element of the Obama campaign's efforts to target religious voters, especially churchgoing African-Americans.
The Illinois senator's campaign is in the midst of a "Forty Days of Faith and Family" initiative in South Carolina. The program also has included several high-profile appearances by Obama at prominent churches, interviews by the candidate and campaign officials on gospel and Christian radio stations, and so far at least 17 campaign-sponsored "faith forums" that highlight connections between Obama's political stands and the values of the faithful.
For more, see the rest of the story in today's Tribune:
The approach in part reflects the practical political implications of a highly publicized argument that Obama made shortly after his election to the U.S. Senate that faith should play a greater role in politics, particularly in communicating the moral basis for progressive political goals.
But the efforts also reflect the long-standing role of the church in African-American political life and the importance of black evangelicals, who often hold liberal views on economic and civil rights issues but tend toward more traditionalist feelings on abortion and homosexuality.
At the same time, the focus on faith allows Obama to strengthen bonds with African-American women, a demographic group which also feels a strong draw to Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.). About two-thirds of active black church members are women, said Frederick Harris, a political science professor at Columbia University who has written several books on the African-American church.
And churchgoers of all races and denominations generally turn out to vote at higher rates.
While the Obama campaign also has launched faith outreach efforts in such other early voting states as Iowa and New Hampshire, its most extensive effort so far has been in South Carolina—and for good reason.
In the 2004 South Carolina Democratic primary, 74 percent of African-American voters said they attended religious services at least once a week, as did 59 percent of all voters in the Democratic primary, according to exit poll data. National exit polls showed only 34 percent of Democratic voters in the 2004 fall presidential election were regular churchgoers.
With its large black population—about half of the voters in the 2004 Democratic primary were African-Americans—South Carolina plays a key role in the Obama campaign's strategy. Advisers hope a strong showing here will provide momentum going into the slew of primaries scheduled for "Super-Duper Tuesday" on Feb. 5, 2008.
The Obama campaign has built up the largest field staff of any candidate in South Carolina and has mounted other operations to mobilize black voters, such as an initiative to organize support through barber shops and beauty salons, traditional social centers for black Southerners.
Obama's faith outreach efforts have not been limited to black churchgoers. He kicked off the current "Forty Days" campaign by attending Sunday services at a historically back church in Columbia, S.C., and then crossed town to do the same at a conservative white Baptist church. The following Sunday, he went to services at a Greenville, S.C., church with a racially diverse congregation.
But African-American congregations are clearly a focus and the gospel concert series involves worship music popular with blacks.
At a faith forum the campaign sponsored this week in predominantly white Greenville, S.C., more than half of the people who attended were African-American women, most of them dressed in their Sunday best.
Obama's national religious affairs director, Joshua Dubois, the stepson of an African Methodist Episcopal minister and himself a former associate minister at a Pentecostal church, told the group of Obama's Christian faith: "It's a strong faith, a robust faith."
And, as Dubois prompted participants to name ways that the next president could help their families and change the community, he drew connections between religious teachings and political goals such as health coverage and better education.
"Aren't those moral values issues? Don't our holy books speak to those issues?" he asked the audience.
Obama has shown greater comfort than his Democratic primary rivals in incorporating the themes and language of faith into his public rhetoric.
He has written about his adult conversion from a secular life to Christian faith under the mentorship of Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr. at Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's South Side. And he routinely incorporates religious imagery in his speeches. "I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper," is one line that he regularly includes.
During a visit to a church in Greenville earlier this month, Obama told the congregation that faith "plays every role" in his life. The first radio ads that the Obama campaign aired in South Carolina in July introduced him as "a Christian family man."
Traditionally, Democratic politicians have reached out to black churchgoers primarily by cultivating local ministerial alliances and then individual pastors. Those pastors then may introduce the candidates to their congregations or even sometimes directly urge a vote for them.
Obama's initiative appears designed to circumvent or at least supplement that traditional route, noted Harris, the Columbia University professor.
Many black pastors are now more nervous about direct political involvement because of high-profile cases in which the IRS under the Bush administration has taken enforcement action against churches alleged to have engaged in political activity incompatible with their tax-exempt status.
Also, like other African-American political leaders, many pastors are postponing making a choice between support for Obama and Clinton, the former first lady of a White House that developed strong ties to black churches.
Even Rev. John Corbitt, pastor of Springfield Baptist Church in Greenville and the host of a luncheon this week to introduce Dubois to local black clergy, allowed in a conversation afterward that he has still not decided whether he would support Obama or Clinton. He said he planned to host a similar gathering for the Clinton campaign.
"Both of them are friends of the black community. Both are advocates of poor people, struggling people, minorities," Corbitt said.
In the meantime, the Obama campaign has been using the faith forums to recruit lay congregation contacts to spread the word on behalf of the candidate in their own churches.
White evangelicals already have demonstrated that lay activists can be extraordinarily effective campaign volunteers when they turn their efforts toward organizing support within their churches, said John Green, a senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
"There's a large group that they can easily tap into. They know where to find them—they see them every week—and it's an established social network," Green said.
Likewise, the gospel artists who will be touring this weekend for Obama have a huge following that looks to their songs for spiritual inspiration. In addition to performing, the musicians will be speaking about their support for Obama during the concerts and in interviews on gospel and Christian radio stations that the campaign has arranged, said a campaign official.
"It adds some legitimacy to the campaign, religious legitimacy," Harris said. "Here is a space where people are speaking about the glory of the Lord and the importance of electing Barack Obama."
Still, Clinton has a powerful surrogate she could deploy: her husband, Bill Clinton, who remains a beloved figure among African-Americans clearly at ease in the black church.
"I don't think Barack Obama can go up against Bill Clinton in a black church," Harris said. "Everyone I'm sure would be very proud of Obama. But he can't rival Bill Clinton in his style, in the way he can rattle off a Bible verse to make his point."





Comments
Obama should leave religion out of his dying campaign. He will try anything to get a few votes. Eventually he will surface as the con man that he is. Go home rock star!
Posted by: wallace | October 26, 2007 7:38 AM
Introduce DuBois to local churches? Say what?
Posted by: Buc Beattie | October 26, 2007 7:40 AM
The media obviously believe that a Democrat campaigning in churches is just hunky-dorey, but when a Republican goes anywhere near a church or a religion-based college, it's a violation of the line between church and state and a
demonstration of those nasty "right wing
religious zealots." Sing it out, Obama. On the other hand, anything to beat Hildy.
Posted by: Guilfoyle | October 26, 2007 8:23 AM
Go Obama! We support you!
Posted by: MBH | October 26, 2007 8:27 AM
Just do the country a favor and vote for Ron Paul. Everyone else running is an enemy of the Constitution.
Posted by: Keith | October 26, 2007 8:51 AM
Hmmm, where are the comments from the Loony Secular Left admonishing Barack for mixing polirics with religion?
Posted by: John D | October 26, 2007 9:30 AM
Religion is one of the things that make Bush such a fool. When are people going to learn to leave religion out of politics?
Posted by: Charles Duwel | October 26, 2007 11:42 AM
why dont you people get a life stop kicking the black man you go boy Barack Obama.
Posted by: james | October 26, 2007 12:32 PM
"A strong faith" in what?
In the Constitution?
In Democracy?
Let's sing praise to separation of church and state!
Obama taking a page out of Bush's playbook??
Go Kucinich!
www.dennis4president.com/
Posted by: Purplehazel | October 26, 2007 9:16 PM
I have a question for the African American voters in South Carolina or any other state... Regarding Bill Clinton, how do you feel about the fact that Bill and Hillary sat back and watched, via satellite, the whole Rwandan genocide take place in Africa during their time in the White House? They did nothing to stop the genocide. However, they sure did intervene when it came time to stop the genocide in Bosnia. Could it be that that genocide had to do with Europeans? Just asking. Something for African Americans to seriously think about, when they think how great the Clintons were. That was an absolutely SHAMEFUL CHAPTER in American modern history, and they could have intervened and stopped the slaughter of over 1 million people within 3 months. Shame on them. I think that is why Bill, especially, is so eager to have his photo ops with Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela whenever he can, to deflect America's attention to his gross negligence in not stopping that African genocide in the 1990s. That is a terrible moral failing and it should not be forgotten.
Posted by: pacifica1 | October 26, 2007 10:44 PM
@pacifica,
I am an African American voter and I feel a lot of different things about the events that happened in and concerning Rawanda. I feel saddness, anger, disappointment, as well as disgust, and there is no ONE target at which these sentiments are aimed. There's enough blame to go around on this one.
When I think about the taking of life so brutally by blacks against blacks, I feel sad. When I studied the history of how the events in Rawanda came to be, I felt angry at white europeans (namely the Belgians) that showed up and raped that country and absolutely sowed and watered the seeds of division that ultimately led to the masacre.
When I think about the fact that Bill Clinton was actually poised to go into Rawanda with military force to stop the masacre, but instead decided to kowtow to Newt and the Republicans who would not support Clinton's domestic bill unless he took Rawanda off the table, I feel disappointed and disgusted. I feel disappointed that Clinton caved in, and I feel disgusted at the Republicans for even stonewalling such a dire situation.
Bill Clinton's domestic bills resulted in a very prosperous domestic economy, which I directly benefited from, but if it had not been for such a racist republican controlled senate and house, Rawanda could have also been addresed instead of used as a barganing chip.
While I'm disappointed at the backing down that Clinton did on Rawanda, at least he does have a conscience about it. When a reporter asked him what was the one thing he regrets most of all about his presidency, I saw his eyes water as he bit his lip and said "that I didn't go ahead with plans to go into Rawanda and stop the masacre". I have more contempt for Republicans because they have demonstrated no such conscience about it. Instead, they keep trying to score political points by clubbing clinton over the head for not going into Rawanda, as if they are innocent in the whole matter.
Posted by: Alisa | October 27, 2007 3:35 AM
I think that Bill Clinton could have pushed more to go into Rawanda instead of giving up so easily. They never thought it was important, after all it is just another Africa country, "let them kill themselves if they so desire"
My vote is NOT going to Hilary because l do not believe anything she says.
Barack Obama is my chioce.
Posted by: Julie | October 27, 2007 11:46 AM
Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton, Clinton is a slap and shameful to our democracy.
There is stupidity among some brothers who keep on pandering on Clintons' trickeries. No one can have the feelings of a black man in America than a black-man himself. Neither Bill nor Hill can do to the brothers what Barack Obama has already started doing in Illinois.
For a politician to get Oprah’s endorsement, it means he really has done enough to the brothers. Clintons are here just for our votes, but will never lift us from the despicable conditions we are in or the disrespect we are facing.
How can the Clintons say they are one of us while when were in power, they never even put us in position of influence? Even Bush did better than them with Collin Powel and Condoleza. The Clintons just catered us with peripheral junk posts.
We have one of us who equally is affected by being one of us. A man who can form a bridge between the black and white America while understanding our sufferings. Why should we go for the Clintons? We need to give Obama 100% of our support now and during the election time. It is us who drives Clinton ahead of Obama in polls and that gives her the momentum she desperately need. We ought to stop this nonsense of the Clintons being black, which is stupidity at its highest. Let’s gang behind Obama, and am sure we will never regret voting for this real change. The hypocrisy of the Clintons should stop today. USA is not a dynasty. Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clinton, Clinton is slap to our democracy. Wake up brothers, we need each other.
Posted by: baba | October 28, 2007 1:40 AM
To Alisa:
We all remember how truth full Bill Clinton is don't we, especially when he has been caught red handed doing something wrong. Or is that one of those elephants in the living room that no one is supposed to say anything about?
Posted by: jacob | October 28, 2007 8:03 PM