by Aamer Madhani
As Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned that he may send troops into Iraq “at any time” to crack down on the Kurdish rebel group PKK, a senior State Department official expressed displeasure today over Iraqi Kurdish leaders failure to clamp down on the terrorist organization.
David Satterfield, the State Department’s Iraq coordinator, put the onus on the Kurdistan Regional Government in heading off a Turkish incursion against the guerilla fighters in northern Kurdistan.
“In the first instance, responsibility for dealing with this threat lies with the Kurdish Regional Government leadership,” Satterfield told Defense Writers in Washington this morning. “This organization is based in and operates from the KRG territory. We look to the Kurdish leadership to take steps in their own interest against this group.”
“And I must tell you, this is not anything which the Kurdish leadership is not aware of from our own voice. We are not pleased with the lack of action undertaken against PKK…..They [KRG] should act and they should act now in meaningful fashion against the PKK in order to prevent an action the consequences of which could be harmful to them, to Iraqi interests and certainly to our broader interests.”
Satterfield’s comments came as Erdogan ratcheted up the rhetoric about a possible incursion into Iraqi Kurdistan. At a news conference in London today, Erdogan said that he was prepared to halt exports into Iraq and was prepared to launch a military strike into Iraqi Kurdistan.
Erdogan also called for the U.S. to take more divisive action to stamping out the PKK, a militant organization that both U.S. and EU classify as a terrorist organization. The PKK, also known as the Kurdistan Workers Party, for years has been fighting for an independent Kurdish homeland that includes southern Turkey.
"The Iraqi government should know that we can use the power vested in us to conduct a cross-border operation at any time," Erdogan said.
In Baghdad, Iraq’s foreign minister Hoshyar Zebari pledged that Iraq would take action against the PKK to restrict members movement. Zebari met on Tuesday with his Turkish counterpart, Ali Babachan.
But Satterfield’s criticism of the Kurds seems to reflect the White House’s frustration with Kurdish leaders seeming reluctance to deal with the PKK.
Jalal Talabani, Iraq's President and a Kurd, said on Monday that the, "the handing over of PKK leaders to Turkey is a dream that will never be realized."
Iraq’s Deputy Prime Minister Barham Saleh, also a Kurd, said during a speech at the Brookings Institution in Washington on Monday that demands on KRG and Iraqi government "could well be a recipe for an open-ended conflict in which we will not win and will basically destabilize the only stable part of Iraq."
Satterfield would not say if there is a red line where U.S. military intervention would be considered.
“We are not looking at worst cases, at inevitabilities,” Satterfield said. “We are working to try to stop a further escalation, further deaths by innocent Turkish citizens, further potential destabilization….We don’t believe cross-border operation, we don’t believe military operations inside Kurdish Region Government territory are intrinsically stabilizing or helpful. We think they have the opposite impact. But the consequences of continued acts of terror against innocent Turkish citizens are also enormously destabilizing and unhelpful.”




Comments
Now we want to set off a Kurdish civil war within the larger Iraqi civil war.
And yet another widely forseen consequence of our invasion in Iraq comes back to haunt us.
Posted by: AJF | October 23, 2007 3:15 PM
It would be real crisis for Iraq, Kurdish Iraq, the US Iraq policy in general, if the Turks invade N. Iraq to 'punish' the PKK.
But the biggest disater, IMO, would befall the creaky, old line Turkish army.
They would be driving down roads in what look like old, worn out tanks, using old tactics, into remote areas controlled by perhaps 100k Kurdish fighters.
Afghanistan/Russia?
Vietnam/USA?
Britain/France/Their colonies?
Posted by: C.Morris | October 23, 2007 5:26 PM
Time to correct the mistakes of the past
Has America attacked Saudi Arabia because most of the 9/11 terrorists were from there?
Who is a terrorist? those who are fighting on their homeland and their houses rejecting to be ruled by the worst regime that has committed the second well documented genocide in the history or those committed the armeninan genocide and not deny it? Should they be allowed to repeat it?
How much success had the US in finding Bin Laden in Tora Bora? How can the Iraqi Kurds fight in similar geographical locations?
The truth is that Turkey has misguided its public opinion and now they have to something stupid otherwise they will loose a local political battle.
What a shame!
Posted by: Hiwa Afandi | October 23, 2007 5:42 PM
"But Satterfield’s criticism of the Kurds seems to reflect the White House’s frustration with Kurdish leaders seeming reluctance to deal with the PKK."
The KRG can't stop thems' because theys' is thems'.
Posted by: C.Morris | October 23, 2007 5:53 PM
AJF,
You are correct; this was all foreseen and discussed.
Posted by: C.Morris | October 23, 2007 5:54 PM
"KURDS AGREE TO RECONCILIATION IN IRAQ OR BE INVADED IF YOU DON'T AGREE"
NOW YOU KNOW THE REST OF THE STORY.
Posted by: Roger Morris | October 23, 2007 6:05 PM
What knuckleheads within the Department of Dubya forsaw the Kurds desire to reinstitute Kurdistan?
You are correct.
None of them.
Posted by: Doug Zook | October 23, 2007 7:28 PM
Erdogan is not a fool.
Turkey is not going anywhere - any action will be the minimum required to placate an enraged public and far short of a meaningful invasion.
The PKK's political wing, DTP, cannot even muster more votes than AKP in the Kurdish heartlands, much less in the rest of the country. That is an awful lot of 'uncooperative' Kurds for them to kill, as is their policy.
The fat lady has pretty much sung for the PKK but without popular support for their existence, how do they explain the need for their massive organised crime network throughout Europe and beyond?
With no war to fund, suddenly they will start looking like just a nasty bunch of selfish criminals who prey mostly on their own kind.
Posted by: Lee | October 23, 2007 9:59 PM
The Turkish army is just using the opportunity to flex some muscle for olitical gain. Turkey is not America.
Posted by: Silent Dark & Obscure | October 23, 2007 10:26 PM
Gee, imagine, not pleased?
Perhaps you shouldn't have created the chaos in the first place?
But that's too logical for any top U.S. official.
The Kurds are only doing what the U.S. took it on itself to do: use force to get its pwn way.
Posted by: John Chuckman, Toronto, Canada | October 24, 2007 8:18 AM