U.S. leadership 'still wanted,' time to restore faith: The Swamp
The Swamp
Posted October 15, 2007 11:07 AM
The Swamp

by Mark Silva

“American leadership is wanting, but it is still wanted,’’ Democrat Sen. Hillary Clinton writes about the foreign policy she proposes as president of the United States.

“To reclaim our proper place in the world, the United States must be stronger, and our policies must be smarter,’’ she writes. “The next president will have a moment of opportunity to restore America's global standing and convince the world that America can lead once again… We should aim to lead our friends and allies in building a world of security and opportunity…a world that will be safer, more prosperous, and more just."

Republican Sen. John McCain writes: “From the American Revolution to the Cold War, Americans have understood their duty to serve a cause greater than self-interest and to keep faith with the eternal and universal principles of the Declaration of Independence. . . Now it is this generation's turn to restore and replenish the world's faith in our nation and our principles…

“In the face of new dangers and opportunities, our next president will have a mandate to build an enduring global peace on the foundations of freedom, security, opportunity, prosperity, and hope, he writes.

Sound similar?

There are differences, of course, between the Democrat from New York and Republican from Arizona. Their visions of U.S. foreign policy – starting with what they propose to do about the war in Iraq – are spelled out in the new issue of Foreign Affairs magazine, providing a forum for each of the major presidential candidates to outline their visions for the U.S. and the world.

See more excerpts here, and the articles by Clinton and McCain in the November/December edition of the Council on Foreign Affairs’ magazine:

Clinton on Iraq: "We must withdraw from Iraq in a way that brings our troops home safely, begins to restore stability to the region, and replaces military force with a new diplomatic initiative to engage countries around the world in securing Iraq's future. To that end, as president, I will convene the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the secretary of defense, and the National Security Council and direct them to draw up a clear, viable plan to bring our troops home, starting within the first 60 days of my administration."

McCain on Iraq: "So long as we can succeed in Iraq-and I believe we can-we must succeed. The consequences of failure would be horrific…and it is a miscalculation of historic magnitude to believe that the consequences of failure will be limited to one administration or one party."

Clinton on Iran: "Iran must conform to its nonproliferation obligations and must not be permitted to build or acquire nuclear weapons. If Iran does not comply with its own commitments and the will of the international community, all options must remain on the table…If Iran is in fact willing to end its nuclear weapons program, renounce sponsorship of terrorism, support Middle East peace, and play a constructive role in stabilizing Iraq, the United States should be prepared to offer Iran a carefully calibrated package of incentives. This will let the Iranian people know that our quarrel is not with them but with their government and show the world that the United States is prepared to pursue every diplomatic option."

McCain on Iran: "Protected by a nuclear arsenal, Iran would be even more willing and able to sponsor terrorist attacks against any perceived enemy, including the United States and Israel, or even to pass nuclear materials to one of its allied terrorist networks. The next president must confront this threat directly, and that effort must begin with tougher political and economic sanctions…And military action, although not the preferred option, must remain on the table: Tehran must understand it cannot win a showdown with the world."

Clinton on the military: "To help our forces recover from Iraq and prepare them to confront the full range of twenty-first-century threats, I will work to expand and modernize the military so that fighting wars no longer comes at the expense of deployments for long-term deterrence, military readiness, or responses to urgent needs at home."

McCain on the military: "As president, I will increase the size of the U.S. Army and the Marine Corps from the currently planned level of roughly 750,000 troops to 900,000 troops."

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

In order to lead, neither of these two suggests as they should, that the leader must recognize that the rest of the World is not about to have business as usual -a United States of America whose people have become fat and greedy and consume and waste more of the World's resources than everybody else combined. A leader needs to help shape the psyche of this country to accept the fact that the actions of the Bush administration has done a fantastic job of steering this nation rapidly toward the inevitable fate that we may not be the most powerful country much longer. The next leader is going to have seriously do something to blur the divisions between people here. Before standing in the rest of the World can be improved the people in this country are going to have to once again trust the government. That's why the old politics of Clinton need to be rejected. She's talking about stopping Iran's nonproliferation, but what does she say she will do about our own weapons proliferation and that of Russia and China?


Yes Hillary, please usher in the Feminist Matriarchy and watch as free men sit back, relax, and watch the slow descent that all matriarchies in history have taken. The Men Have Left The Building. You Are On Your Own. Men Opt Out, Go Your Own Way.


As we struggle to know our domestic enemies. No, matter your political party affiliation, and setting aside your thoughts on issues. We all need to remember what it is to be an American Citizen. We need to make sure our elected representatives obey their Oath of Office and keep their Oath of Allegiance. See http://tinyurl.com/2znnvl Know whom you are voting for.


To reclaim our proper place in the world, the United States must be stronger, and our policies must be smarter,’’ she writes. “The next president will have a moment of opportunity to restore America's global standing and convince the world that America can lead once again… We should aim to lead our friends and allies in building a world of security and opportunity…a world that will be safer, more prosperous, and more just."

Hard to argue with that thinking. Never the less I'm sure the Hillary haters will find a way.


Dr Coles this link is for you. Given your statements on healthcare last week.

http://www.brookings.edu/articles/2002/07france_dutton.aspx


bilbo-

Patriarchies work out better?

Yeah, right.


HRC says "American leadership is wanting, but it is still wanted"..Sorry, I must have missed it: What other country still wants American leadership? How sad.
McCain says "...it is this generation's turn to restore and replenish the world's faith in our nation and our principles" Not so fast, I think we need to first restore and replenish our own faith in ourselves.
This golden goose is not so golden anymore, and she is singing badly. We need to heal her from the corruption, debt, ego, war-on-a- lie, class-economy divisions, outsourcing, erosion of the constitution, the and well planned incompetence of the Bush/Cheney administration first. Lets see if she has any golden eggs left for American infastructure, rebuilding each states' National Guard, actually paying down the .650 trillion and counting Bush/Cheney invasion/war supplementals that have been put on my daughters' credit cards, and digging our way out of the shackling trade debt. Just like anything or anyone else, it is a nation's natural ebb and flow of giving and replenishing herself that maintains health. Bush/Cheney and congress- thats HRC and McCain- have been poor stewards of America. I have not heard anything that says either HRC or McCain would be better on the domestic side. A child or geriatric hand out does not count.
HRC and McCain both want to expand and increase the military. I don't want either in office because both sound like psudo cowboys, and neither speak much of a logical domestic agenda. Have either of these candidates ever said, "it just does not make sense to lower the taxes on the wealthiest 1-3% while the nation is at invasion/war?"


As could be expected, the Clinton "plan" on Iraq is a joke--a bunch of feel-good goals, with the promise (when elected) to demand that somebody else draw up a plan within 60 days.

Yes, her "plan" is to wait 17 months, then order someone else to draw up a "plan".

This is beyond parody.


Clinton writes: "If Iran is in fact willing to end its nuclear weapons program, renounce sponsorship of terrorism, support Middle East peace, and play a constructive role in Iraq, the United States should be prepared to offer Iran a carefully calibrated package of incentives."

What in the world leads Clinton to think Iran is willing to meet ONE of those four conditions, let alone all FOUR?


This is beyond parody.

Posted by: Bruce | October 15, 2007 4:42 PM

Bruce you are a parody. According to you the only solution is to glass over Iran, North korea etc.

Endless war. No negotiating. Maybe the 7% solution isn't working for you. Keep drinking the Kool-Aid propaganda minister.


As long as Hillary keeps making things up she'll be fine. She is endorsed by the main stream media so she can spin and weave her way to a coronation. Her pandering is extemporaneous. The brilliance of her campaign is that nothing really has to be thought out. Her strength lies in her ability to avoid substance without showing a necessity to have it. She is experienced.


"Alberto G." doesn't even try to defend Hillary Clinton's silly non-plan "plan". Because nobody can.

Yet another Hillary howler from above: "We must withdraw from Iraq in a way that ... replaces military force with a new diplomatic initiative to engage countries around the world in securing Iraq's future."

All the Obama-esque weasel words are there: "new diplomatic initiative" (in other words, more useless talkie-talk) to "engage countries around the world" (countries that for the past decade, including the Bill Clinton years, have done nothing concrete about Iraq) "in securing Iraq's future." (ignoring the fact that it is Iraq's future as a haven for terrorists, not as a peaceful state, that many of these countries want to secure).

A rain dance has more chance of bringing rain than this vapid non-plan has of bringing peace.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below:

Quizzes

palin or fey

Palin or Fey?

McCain

Know the presidents?

McCain

Your McCain IQ

Obama

Your Obama IQ

Latest polls

Electoral vote map

map

Test your scenarios

Galleries

Palin

Sarah Palin

campaign

Campaign trail

conventions

RNC | DNC

Unauthorized tour

Obama

Obama's Chicago

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Candidate match


Test assumptions