A matter of principle -- or principals? Rep. Rahm Emanuel with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi after the House failed to override President Bush's veto of the children's health insurance bill. AP Photo by Charles Dharapak
by David Nitkin, updated by Mark Silva
The White House took a claws-out swipe at House Democrats today -- and Rep. Rahm Emanuel in particular -- over their insistence on sending President Bush a second child health care bill that is only slightly revised from a version vetoed by the president earlier this month.
Telling reporters that Congress has "not made the changes the president talked about" to refocus the expiring State Children's Health Insurance Program on lower income children, White House Deputy Press Secretary Tony Fratto accused Emanuel, the Illinois Democrat and aggressive chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, of playing politics with the issue rather than trying to get things done.
"The last principle Rahm Emanuel knew was in high school," Fratto said during a morning session with reporters, eliciting whistles, groans and gasps from the press corps.
Emanuel had his own words for the White House:
“I’ll gladly see my high school principal, if President Bush will allow 10 million kids to see a pediatrician,'' he replied. "And by the way, after I helped negotiate the bill to create SCHIP, Governor Bush was second to last in enrolling kids in SCHIP, but I do appreciate the lecture.”
Bush, a former governor of Texas, has pledged to veto the revised initiative that was passed by the House on Thursday.
Proponents say they addressed Bush's concerns by prohibiting money from being spent on children in families that earn more than three times the federal poverty limit, or $61,950 for a family of four. The White House says the revised legislation is still too expensive and is an encroachment by the federal government into private health care, and opposes a federal cigarette tax increase that would fund the $35 billion expansion over the next five years.
The White House has said it is willing to negotiate on components of the program, which expired this month but was temporarily extended through mid-November. But Fratto said yesterday that congressional Democrats did not appoint negotiators to meet with White House officials before the House passed the new bill.
Democrats sense political advantage over the issue, and liberal interest groups have already begun running advertisements in the districts of vulnerable Republicans who voted against the expanded children's health care program.
David Nitkin covers the White House for the Baltimore Sun, a Tribune Co. paper.





Comments
"Fratto said yesterday that congressional Democrats did not appoint negotiators to meet with White House officials before the House passed the new bill."
What's the point? The president and his vast intellect does not know how to negotiate. He knows what's right. Fratto and Bush can both stick it.
Posted by: Tim | October 26, 2007 10:49 AM
Excellent point by the deputy press secretary -- Emanuel is a slug.
Posted by: mpat | October 26, 2007 10:52 AM
Hit em hard Rahm.Wingnuts only enjoy when they're attacking.They've found out Rahm punches back and now they want him to stop bullying the poor wingnuts!!!!!!!
Posted by: Raving Loon | October 26, 2007 10:56 AM
Once again, Georgie won't spend $35 billion over 5 years for kid's health care, but wants to spend $200 billion THIS year in Iraq and Afghanistan??
And now, the total costs of the war will reach $2.4 TRILLION??? What is wrong with this picture??
Posted by: BobinATL | October 26, 2007 11:11 AM
The irony that Tony Fratto is lecturing about principles when mouth-piecing for this dark administration full of hacks is only hightened by the fact this is a healthcare bill for children. If principles are the concern, then quit killing people in Iraq and start helping people here who need it.
Posted by: kb | October 26, 2007 12:00 PM
kb the fact that SCHIP is a healthcare insurance program for children who honestly need it the poor children. But, your statement we're doing it for the children who need it is the constant liberal cry to mask a Democrat power grab.
The argument against it is $35 billion is too much John Boehner said Bush and he are open to compromise maybe $15 billion.
The Democrats led by Nancy Pelosi says why can't President Bush say yes. After all Nancy and Harry and Dickie Durbin and Ram Rod Emmanuel can't say no!
Liberal Democrats are asking so much to grease the skids for Hillary's socialized medicine.They don't fool anyone except liberals trying to take over one-sixth the economy for Hil's socialism re-distributing wealth.Tony Fratto is right. Jerry White, Springfield, IL
Posted by: Jerry White | October 27, 2007 11:00 AM