by Frank James
These are good days to be a white-collar criminal or a corrupt public official, apparently.
According to an analysis of Justice Department data, federal prosecutions of white collar criminals are down significantly since the period before President Bush took office, as are prosecutions of corrupt public officials.
A non-partisan research organization with an ungainly name, the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse which is associated with Syracuse University, looked at the numbers and found that prosecutions of white-collar criminals have fallen 27 percent between fiscal year 2000 and 2007.
Meanwhile, public corruption prosecutions have fallen 14 percent in that same time period.
It’s possible that there’s less white-collar crime and public corruption in the nation which would explain the drop but that’s rather unlikely.
What really explains the drop, according to TRAC, is the reduction of resources to investigate and prosecute crimes in these areas as more resources have flowed to counterterrorism. Much of the drop appears to come during fiscal 2004.
This is a trend that’s likely to continue, TRAC says.
The signal that further declines are highly likely in the prosecution of matters not connected to terrorism — such as white collar crime and official corruption — comes from the most recent staffing request submitted by the FBI in the Justice Department's FY 2008 budget. The FBI historically has played a major role in the investigations of these kinds of crimes. In FY 2006, the agency unit (now called "Criminal Enterprises and Federal Crimes" (CEFC) decision unit) that "comprises all headquarters and field programs that support the FBI's criminal investigative mission" had 12,595 permanent positions. In FY 2008, assuming Congress accepts the administration's proposal, the number of positions in this unit will decline by 14.3% to 10,800 positions. Declining staff almost certainly means declining enforcement. See budget submission, p. 4-110.
An even more dramatic insight into current FBI priorities — strongly focused on intelligence and terrorism work — can be found in the distribution of funds outlined in the FY 2008 budget submission. Here are the numbers: 60% ($3,838 million) for all intelligence/counterterrorism work, 33% ($2,131 million) for criminal law enforcement and 7% ($463 million) for state and local assistance. See Figure 6 and budget submission, Exhibit B.
Why does this matter? Because, as TRAC says, what deters some corporate executives and public officials from breaking the law is the fear of getting caught. Substantially reduce or remove that fear and bad things happen.
The overall impact of this shift in resources and concomitant decline in many areas of criminal prosecutions is not clear. But according to explanatory text in the FBI budget document, the potential consequences of this dramatic drop could undermine efforts to root out corrupt government officials all over the United States, to maintain a healthy national economy, to assure honest elections and to deal with other such problems. This is because the detection and prosecution and convictions of corrupt officials, crooked business executives and shady political operatives are thought to be key to deterring such criminal activities in the future.
The one bright spot? Criminal immigration prosecutions were up a resounding 127 percent, according to TRAC, with the big gains coming during and since fiscal 2004.





Comments
Another example of Georgie taking care of his business cronies - remember Kenny Boy and Enron? I'm sure that if it was not for the public outcry, he would have had that swept under the rug too.
Posted by: BobinATL | October 15, 2007 11:38 AM
Clueless-for-life Bobin, history shows that Ken Lay and his Enron buddies did their dirty deeds largely under the Clintoon presidency. It was under the Bush administration that they were arrested and tried for their crimes. Same as for Worldcomm and other so-called corporate scandals. Most of the dirty deeds took place under the Criminal-in-Chief Bill Clintoon, while the apprehension and prosecution took place during the Bush administration.
But then facts and being a Loony Lefty never did have a relationship.
Posted by: John D | October 15, 2007 11:55 AM
Years ago, the mayor of Washington D.C., was arrested for dealing in narcotics. He served some time, went back to D.C., ran for mayor, and was re-elected. What good does it do to prosecute criminal politicians, when the ignorant voters are willing to re-elect the scum?
Posted by: Arthur Nicholas | October 15, 2007 11:59 AM
Yes, don't try to steal a loaf of bread. You'll be quickly sent to jail! hahaha. . .
Posted by: Lou | October 15, 2007 12:09 PM
Maybe the prosecutions of political opponents of the corrupt Clinton Administration ended or the locals picked up the slack or legal evasions were implemented or any number of other reasons are at play.
But then again protecting people over property may also be at play.
Posted by: whatnow | October 15, 2007 12:09 PM
They being prosecuted less because they're all in the government now.
Posted by: jboz | October 15, 2007 12:12 PM
You're so right, Johnny.
All the electric trading that Enron did in California that had them laughing on the phone about the little old ladies that caused the recall of the governor? Under Bush.
And remember, Bush at one time was thinking of making Kenny Boy Secretary of Energy. Plus, he lied about his relationship with Lay - said he barely knew him, but then there was the birthday card addressed to "Kenny Boy".
That still does not account for the drop in prosecutions, Johnny. Look at what he has done at the SEC - he wants the teeth taken out of their oversight of companies.
And look at all the cases regarding corporate fraud that are now coming before Federal courts - Bush and his Justice Department are filing friend of the court comments for the corporation. Not for the consumer.
When was the last time this Administration pushed ANY legislation that was NOT tilted toward corporations??
Posted by: BobinATL | October 15, 2007 12:15 PM
I don't recall, even a few, oversight hearings regarding the Bush/Cheney administration initiated by teh Republican led congress. The Republicans seemed not to have thought it necessay to carry out their constitutional duty to be the check and balance of the executive branch. And, I don't think this new congress is far behind.
The Bush/Cheney whitehouse has allowed, and I believe favored, vacancies to persist at the DOJ for the achieved effect of the decrease in white-collar and public corruption prosecutions. Oil companies certainly have been left alone. I hope that this current congress' attempt at building a veto/filibuster proof group, while letting the constiution and public corruption slide, works for them. However, I think it is a lopsided and dangerous proposition. Forget billions t Blackwater, train the regular military the right way, and leave billions more to get the "buddies" of the corrupt at home who think they are home free.
Sorry for type-Os.
Posted by: Vivian | October 15, 2007 12:44 PM
I don't recall, even a few, oversight hearings regarding the Bush/Cheney administration initiated by teh Republican led congress. The Republicans seemed not to have thought it necessay to carry out their constitutional duty to be the check and balance of the executive branch. And, I don't think this new congress is far behind.
The Bush/Cheney whitehouse has allowed, and I believe favored, vacancies to persist at the DOJ for the achieved effect of the decrease in white-collar and public corruption prosecutions. Oil companies certainly have been left alone. I hope that this current congress' attempt at building a veto/filibuster proof group, while letting the constiution and public corruption slide, works for them. However, I think it is a lopsided and dangerous proposition. Forget billions t Blackwater, train the regular military the right way, and leave billions more to get the "buddies" of the corrupt at home who think they are home free.
Sorry for type-Os.
Posted by: Vivian | October 15, 2007 12:45 PM
"White-Collar And Other Prosecutions Fall Under Bush"
Gee, I wonder why?
The Republicants are in the back pocket of big business (Halliburton, Blackwater).
Listening to these angry old rich Republican guys try and tell everyone who should and should not be able to afford healthcare is a flipping joke.
In the Republican world if you have an apple to eat for dinner and a cardboard box to sleep in at night you should be able to afford your own healthcare.
Posted by: John E | October 15, 2007 1:21 PM
Bobin, No matter what happens, it's always Clinton's fault. The Republicans are not responsible for anything.
It's good to see all the US Attorneys are now following the Republican "ownership society" rules:
1) The owners should not be held responsible for their actions unless it is absolutely necessary. 2) Owners should pay less in taxes. 3) Government funds should be directed, whenever possible, to owners who make campaign contributions.
Posted by: Tom O | October 15, 2007 1:52 PM
For this administartion anything done in the name of profit is perfectly acceptable.
Take Blackwater. You can shoot 17 civilians who haven't fired on you and who were running away, and you don't even lose your government contract.
Corporations are above the law.
Posted by: AJF | October 15, 2007 1:53 PM
Frank you are playing with numbers that might not mean anything. Libby got prosecuted didn't he? RINO Arlen Specter's jab at Justice is the thanks W gets for endorsing this loser over Pat Toomey, the director of the Club for Growth. Toomey was a real Republican not one who plays fast and loose with Senator Depends Leahy.
Specter doesn't like Alberto Gonzales and he wants to poison the water hope it comes back to bite him for re-election the ego maniac.
This man loves himself more than anyone in Congress exceptions: Chuckie Schemer and Dickie Durbin.
The Justice Department is in good shape except for the leftover Clintonistas leaking to the press to help Schemer in 08 elections.
This story is driverby media psychobabble and has no basis in fact.Jerry White, Springfield, IL
Posted by: Jerry White | October 15, 2007 2:26 PM
"These are good days to be a white-collar criminal or a corrupt public official, apparently."
Nice to have a president in the pocket of rich white corporate America.
Iraq the great Bush boondoggle.
Posted by: Logic Prisoner | October 15, 2007 2:32 PM
Bobin, you are a true Loon, aren't you?
Wow Ken Lay got a birthday card from Bush, and it was addressed to Kenny Boy! Yep, that shore means they were best buds forever!!
Ken Lay was asked to be Energy Secretary??? You get that from the Huffingloon Post?
I love how you Lefties hate the rich, but yet you folks gobble up everything the super-rich Ariana, Babs Streisand and George Soros throw your way. What goofs, you folks are.
Posted by: John D | October 15, 2007 2:43 PM
Johnny D:
No, it meant that Georgie DID know Kenny Boy - unlike what he told people about not really knowing him.
How much money did Kenny throw at Georgie during his campaigns for Governor and President?? Wasn't he part of the group that represents the highest donations to W??
Posted by: BobinATL | October 15, 2007 2:59 PM
Jerry:
You should know about psycho babble - you practice it all the time.
Just read your posts.
Posted by: BobinATL | October 15, 2007 3:01 PM
Posted by: BobinATL | October 15, 2007 3:01 PM
Bobin,
The Decider Guy's lifetime campaign contributor, and one of his best friends, Kenneth Lay, presided over the largest corporate bankruptcy fraud in U.S. History, Enron.
The Republickin party used Enron private jets and corporate attorneys to assure Prez Chimpy's success with the U.S. Supreme Court during his election decision in 2000.
Georgie Boy and Lil Dick Cheney protected their friends at Enron and Halliburton against investigation or prosecution.
More time and money was spent investigating the Monica Lewinsky affair than has been spent investigating one of the biggest corporate rip- offs (Enron) in history.
Posted by: John E | October 15, 2007 3:23 PM
Actually, John E., one of the biggest corporate fraud/bankruptcy cases concerns Global Crossings. This company went belly up, but not before the Clintoon couple and their friends made out like bandits.
Actually Global Crossing makes Enron look like a ma and pa store. And, in this link, notice how BusinessWeek had to do a correction. The company donated to Dems 55 percent to 45 percent rather than the originally reported favoring of Republicans.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_06/c3769068.htm
Posted by: John D | October 15, 2007 4:21 PM
Posted by: John D | October 15, 2007 4:21 PM
Lil Johnny D'ecider Guy,
Newsflash:
BILL CLINTON HAS NOT BEEN THE PRESIDENT FOR 6+ YEARS NOW !!!
Get over it, moron.
Posted by: John E | October 15, 2007 4:56 PM
I love how you Lefties hate the rich, but yet you folks gobble up everything the super-rich Ariana, Babs Streisand and George Soros throw your way. What goofs, you folks are.
Posted by: John D | October 15, 2007 2:43 PM
Read one of your own comments crazy person. Keep genuflecting to your corrupt heros in the white house. Kool-Aid must taste really good.
"It’s possible that there’s less white-collar crime and public corruption in the nation which would explain the drop but that’s rather unlikely."
Very unlikely!
Posted by: Alberto G | October 15, 2007 5:23 PM
It’s possible that there’s less white-collar crime and public corruption in the nation which would explain the drop but that’s rather unlikely.
Ya think. It's more than possible that GW and Dick hold all the cards and aren't going to prosecute their cronies.
Posted by: Rick/Sneads Ferry, NC | October 15, 2007 5:38 PM
Posted by: John D | October 15, 2007 4:21 PM
WOW! John "the Joseph Stalin of Streamwood" D provides a link to ACTUALLY BACK UP HIS POST!
Now, if he could only do that for his ALLEGATION that John Edwards pays as much for his suits as Bush does; I mean, it's only been almost 2 whole months. What's he waiting for?
Posted by: BC | October 16, 2007 3:43 PM
Actually Global Crossing makes Enron look like a ma and pa store. And, in this link, notice how BusinessWeek had to do a correction. The company donated to Dems 55 percent to 45 percent rather than the originally reported favoring of Republicans.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_06/c3769068.htm
Posted by: John D | October 15, 2007 4:21 PM
This is from your link. You're lying again, Mr.Santimonious.
The then-high-flying telecom was an evenhanded giver: Of its total $3.6 million in contributions since 1998, Republicans pocketed 53%, Democrats got 47%. Top recipients in Congress were key figures in telecom regulation: Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) got $31,000, and Representative Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), $12,500. In 1999, on behalf of Global Crossing, McCain asked the Federal Communications Commission to encourage the development of undersea telecom cables.
Posted by: chimpymcflightsuit'snavigator | October 16, 2007 8:53 PM