
The Democrats lined up at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas. AP photo.
by Mark Silva, and updated throughout the debate
It would be a cliche, just like the headline, to call the debate of the Democratic candidates for president in Las Vegas this evening high-stakes.
But it would also be true.
The aftershocks of the last Democratic debate in Philadelphia still ripple through the campaign of front-running candidate Hillary Clinton, whose performance both on stage and on the road in the following weeks raised questions about characteristics that Americans consider essential in a president: Strength, straightforwardness and certitude among them.
This, after months of practice in debating Democratic rivals who have trailed the senator from New York and former First Lady in the polls but only recently resolved to start tackling her on the hustings.
It's time, from Clinton's perspective, for some corrective action -- recapturing that sense of confidence that she possessed from the start of this long season's debates, when relatively few people were paying any attention.
And it's time, from the perspective of Clinton's leading rivals -- Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina -- to take full advantage of the vulnerability they have exposed in their adversary.
Another stumbling performance on Clinton's part could have a cascading effect on those polls, just as a resoundingly strong performance could reclaim her leading role. In this calculus lies an opportunity for an Obama, or an Edwards, to start making a new name for themselves.
Those are high stakes, by any definition.
Yet when all was said and done tonight, Clinton had not stumbled -- she had indeed shone on the question of a woman running for president -- and both Obama and Edwards had held their own in debate. They had neither skewered Clinton nor necessarily catapulted their own campaigns. Indeed, it was Obama who had trouble answering a simple yes or no at one point.
Clinton was asked more than an hour into this contentious and personal debate about going to her alma mater, Wellesley College, and speaking of running against a “boy’s club.’’
“Well, I’m not exploiting anything at all. I’m not playing, as some people say, 'the gender card,'’’ Clinton said. “Here in Las Vegas… I’m trying to play the winning card.
“They’re not attacking me because I’m a woman,'' she said of her rivals. "They’re attacking me because I’m ahead.’’
When questioner Campbell Brown pressed Clinton about what she had meant by the term, boys club -- “Campbell...’’ Obama replied with a knowing look. “Well, it is clear… from women’s experiences that, from time to time, there may be some impediments… To be able to aim toward the highest, hardest glass ceiling is history-making.’’
“I think that every single candidate on this stage should be held to exactly the same standard,'' Edwards suggested. "There is nothing personal about this… But I think there are differences between us, and voters are entitled to know what those differences are.’’
A lot of the differences were aired tonight.
With the two-hour show now finished -- it started at 8 pm EST -- the Swamp's Spin Room, opened for pre-game comments, remains open for post-debate analysis. Follow the Tribune's John McCormick in his on-the-ground accounts above as well, here in the Swamp.