by Mark Silva
“Yeah, I swear,'' says Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico. " Yeah, I smoke a cigar occasionally. Yeah, I make mistakes. The American people should know who I am.
"I’m overweight,'' he says. "I’m trying to lose weight. But I’m comfortable with who I am.'' And "the smarty-pants in Washington'' will not decide who is elected president, he adds.
Richardson, while maintaining that he doesn't "try to imitate'' Bill Clinton, acknowledges the former president's influence on him. "This has always been my style. But yes, there’s a little bit of Bill Clinton in me.''
And where does Richardson say all this?
In his interview with Playboy magazine, featured in the December issue.
Just as we were commenting here in the Swamp this week about the paucity of presidential candidate interviews in the illustrious (or is it illustrated?) magazine since Jimmy Carter confessed to lust in his heart a long time ago, comes word that Richardson, still a single-digit contender in the Democratic field of presidential candidates, has sat for the Bunny.
"I don’t mope around at night worrying that I didn’t look good on Jay Leno—though I saw myself, and though I’ve lost 30 pounds I’ve got to lose more..'' Richardson says in his interview with Jeff Greenfield, the CBS News political correspondent who joined Richardson on the campaign trail in Iowa, New Hampshire and New York.
Greenfield dug up an old interview of Fred Thompson, the Republican candidate for president from Tennesee, for a piece that Playboy posted recently. But this is the Real McCoy, "The Playboy Interview.'' It runs seven pages.
And here are some excerpts:
“I will never go negative. I will never attack them personally. I will, however, emphasize my advantage over senators Clinton and Obama.
"The so-called front-running candidates arrive, do a structured town meeting with a thousand people in a gym and then leave. I go into living rooms and meet people directly. I stay for three days, go into 10 homes a day, each with 100 people. I connect with people. My message is getting out. My ads are well received. Hell, there was some political writer who predicted I’ll win Iowa. Did you see that? You never know...
"You target your efforts and resources in the two most important states in the race, Iowa and New Hampshire. People there aren’t swayed by the smarty-pants set in Washington and New York...
"I want all troops out of Iraq. Residual troops, too. The other leading candidates don’t. They leave in 25,000 or 50,000."
"Too many people in Washington have been listening to the wrong military and political advisors. That’s why we’re in this mess. I would shift our priorities. Our obsession with Iraq has cost us the ability to form international coalitions and strategies to deal with international terrorism, nuclear weapons and the like. It may be the greatest cost of the war.”
"When we invaded I said I supported the invasion in order to support the troops. At the time, I felt it was the best thing. As I look back, it was a mistake. At the time, however, I was making public statements and wasn’t participating in the decision to invade. The president should have gone to the UN and used diplomacy, but I didn’t push hard enough. I should have pushed harder for diplomacy. But remember, we were also operating on limited information. At the time, I thought, I don’t have all the intelligence; Bush says Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. However, I never bought the Al Qaeda link. So it was a mistake. And what happened afterward was massive incompetence and massive deception...
"The first week I’m president I would take on three issues, and we would have to come up with solutions—bipartisan solutions. One is Iraq. We’ve got to get out. The second is our $9 trillion deficit. Third is Social Security and Medicare...
"I am strongly pro-choice. I’ve always been pro-choice, to the consternation of my bishops in New Mexico. As president I would have a national goal to reduce abortions, and I’d promote strong adoption procedures. I would encourage family planning. But I wouldn’t apologize for my position on choice...
"I'll tell you what I did as governor. I proposed doubling the number of border-patrol agents, which is consistent with a 9/11 Commission recommendation. I can easily see 15,000 at the border. Right now it isn’t adequately protected. I would extend the tour of the National Guard. Many of us had reservations about using the Guard for this, but it seems to be working; they’re deterring the flow. I would also increase the detection equipment at the border...
"My worst nightmare is nuclear material—uranium, plutonium—being transported by a terrorist across the border. And two years ago I angered a lot of Hispanic and immigrant groups by being the first governor to declare a border emergency. At the time, the border patrol was almost nonexistent in my quarter. There were drugs coming in, violence—the flow was huge. I declared a border emergency, which enabled me as governor to hire local law enforcement. I took state appropriations to pay for law enforcement at the border, which is essentially a federal function. Also, I vetoed legislation that said local law enforcement couldn’t cooperate with federal law enforcement agencies...''
On meeting Fidel Castro: “Fidel Castro has an enormously powerful intellect and is well informed. He told me he reads every newspaper, sees every morning broadcast and reads prodigiously. He showed me all the books he read. While I have enormous dislike for his policies—especially human rights; he incarcerates everybody who disagrees with him—he is a fascinating character who tries to intimidate you with his intellect.
"Saddam Hussein, on the other hand, tried to intimidate me with his physical actions. He would try to stare me down. He had a bunch of the Revolutionary Guard around us. He was heavily armed. His gestures were menacing. But through his intellect, Castro would try to destroy every argument I made about why he should take certain steps."
On emulating President Clinton: “I don’t try to imitate him. This has always been my style. But yes, there’s a little bit of Bill Clinton in me. One of the things that used to drive me nuts about him, though, was how he would try to convince his enemies he was a good guy. He’d sometimes spend more time talking to his enemies than to his friends. I don’t believe I’m like that, but I do believe you try to seek common ground in order to convince somebody."
On gun control: "I resent some elites telling me my position on gun control is wrong, for example. It’s a cultural issue in New Mexico and the West, a respect for a way of life. Most gun owners are law-abiding. I’m not going to change my position. That’s where I may deviate from others in my party, too, the elites on the coasts. I have very common tastes."
On his “common tastes”: “I like sports. I’m a regular person. I don’t make any pretenses. I like the arts—I like modern art—but I’d rather spend time watching a football game or a baseball game. I go to the opera and leave at intermission. I like to smoke a cigar.”
On his favorite baseball team: “I was asked, ‘What is your favorite team?’ The Red Sox. Another time, the Associated Press asked, ‘If you weren’t running for president, who would you rather be at this moment?’ I said, ‘I would like to be number 7, center field for the New York Yankees, Mickey Mantle.’ So they asked, ‘Is he a Yankees fan or a Red Sox fan?’ When I was growing up in Mexico City, the Red Sox didn’t exist. The Yankees were the universal team. Mickey Mantle was the hero of kids around the world. It was as if the Yankees were America’s team. But when I went to New England, to Middlesex and then to Tufts, I became an ardent Red Sox fan.”





Comments
And now you know why I support Bill Richardson, heart and soul!
Posted by: David Buchanan | November 2, 2007 12:19 PM
I'd take a Richardson/Webb ticket.
Posted by: Paul | November 2, 2007 12:33 PM
Bill Ricahrdson is not flashy, but he is universally respectde by both Dems & Reps. That in itself would make him tough to beat. I like him a lot
Posted by: Barry Flicher | November 2, 2007 12:55 PM
Unfortunately, intelligent people who take a stand on issues and try to find solutions don't get elected.
Posted by: PS | November 2, 2007 1:01 PM
One thing Governor Richardson does the other Democratic candidates cannot is put states in the South and West in play. Everyone forgets that the real election is not popular vote, but a state by state contest for electoral vote. Unfortunately, for the Democrats, they only seem to win the Northeast and California every four years.
Richardson immediately puts Florida with its 27 electoral votes in play because of his Hispanic heritage. As Governor of New Mexico he brings the 5 electoral votes of that state. This combined total of 32 would have put Kerry over the top in 2004. If nothing else Governor Richardson, as the candidate, forces the Republicans to spend money and resources in states the otherwise would not spend them in.
There is a long list of failed Democratic candidates from the North - Kerry, Dukakis, Mondale. Even Al Gore was by all accounts a Northerner or Washington insider when he ran in 2000. In fact he couldn't even win his home state of Tennessee. I am tired of looking at the map on election night and seeing the whole country red except the Northeast corner and California. However, if Democrats continue on the course they are going, 2012 looks like a repeat.
Posted by: TC | November 2, 2007 1:24 PM
He lacks the charisma to be president, end of story. His resume is impressive, give him a Cabinet position or perhaps Vice President.
Posted by: Distrust and Verify | November 2, 2007 1:30 PM
Distrust and Verify - please tell me how your candidate's chrisma is going to win in Arizona, New Mexico, Florida,or Arkansas? I just want people to do the math and add up the electoral votes. I am from the South and I can tell you Southerners and Westerners do not trust all these Northern Senators with charisma! Democrats have won the popular vote before and still lost the White House.
Posted by: TC | November 2, 2007 3:29 PM
Despite the realities...I hope he gets it.
Posted by: Ken | November 2, 2007 3:57 PM
The other problem with Distrust and Verify's post is that he/she is assuming that the Democrats have the national election wrapped up in 2008. I've got news . . . Bush is not running and people are just as mad at the Democratic Congress as they are at the President. Take a look at the polls. The fact that most of the Democratic Presidential candidates come from the unpopular Congress makes things worst. The party better have a 50 state strategy. A red map with a patch of blue in the Northeast and in California will not win the White House!
Posted by: TC | November 2, 2007 4:11 PM
I think a Richardson/Osama ticket has great possibilities.
They both have the same objectives.
Posted by: M. Simon | November 2, 2007 8:23 PM
He's great! I once heard a republican say to me that the one candidate they are terrified of going up against is Bill Richardson because they can't attack him. He said they WANT Hillary or Obama because they can beat them.
That's interesting, I hope Richardson get's the nomination.
Posted by: Actric3 | November 2, 2007 9:56 PM
Former Chrysler Corp. Chairman Lee Iacocca has endorsed Governor Bill Richardson - says Governor Bill Richardson is his pick for president, citing the governor's foreign relations background and energy policy. Calls Governor Richardson a "legendary problem-solver," also stated, "I think experience counts and so does character. And after the last seven years, that's the kind of president we need right now." Lee Iacocca is a great American and great minds do think alike so no surprise here that he has endorsed Governor Richardson.
Posted by: threeriverscrossing | November 3, 2007 10:13 PM
Bill Richardson declared a State of Emergency on the border with Mexico without talking to his Homeland Security Advisor or his Military Advisor. He took action because he saw Napolitano getting all the press in Arizona. He is a grandstander who does not deserve any attention in a US Presidential race.
Posted by: Kaiser Sosa | November 4, 2007 12:06 AM
The Republicans, as noted by Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia and one of our most respected political analysts, are TERRIFIED of having Richardson to run against in the general. They would lose by a landslide.
Experience, grace and candor - Bill's got all the goods.
Posted by: Julie in VT | November 6, 2007 6:07 AM
Bill Richardson is the best candidate hands down. The Dem frontrunners are getting all the press because their names sell ad space. Richardson is the most qualified to be president. He has pledged to announce his cabinet before the general election and it will include Dems, Repubs, and Independents. We haven't seen a candidate like Richardson for many decades. I mean that in a good way.
Posted by: John Pikeville Kentucky | November 6, 2007 4:31 PM
My first choice for the Democratic Presidency would be Bill Richardson. His platform is sound and makes a lot of sense. If he would not be nominated, I would like to see him as Vice-President. Any Democratic contender for the presidency would be a fool if they didn't take Bill Richardson as a running mate. He appears to have a lot of power in the south and southwest.
Posted by: Mario A. Garcia | January 4, 2008 7:14 PM