Closed books at the Clinton Library: The Swamp
The Swamp
Posted November 12, 2007 7:00 AM
The Swamp

By Mike Dorning

LITTLE ROCK, Ark.--Visitors to the gleaming glass-and-steel William Jefferson Clinton Presidential Library can see the former First Lady Hillary Clinton's gold-embroidered 1997 inaugural ball gown and hear Clinton extol his wife's contributions to his administration.

In time, Hillary Clinton "will deserve a lot of the credit" for the comprehensive health coverage that the former president predicts is on the horizon, he gushes in the audio for an exhibit celebrating "The Work of the First Lady."

But while tourists wandered through the museum one afternoon last week, awed by the bullet proof presidential limousine and the life-size replica of the Oval Office, the tables in the library's reading room sat empty--unoccupied by the scholars, journalists and opposition researchers who might be expected to pore over the unique historical record of a White House that featured a leading role for a current presidential front-runner.

For good reason. Almost three years after the library's opening and nearly two years after the administration's archives became subject to federal open records laws, only a small fraction of the archives has been opened to the public.

Virtually all of the 3 million pages of documents that detail the internal workings of the health - care task force that Hillary Clinton chaired remain stored away in boxes, for example.

Although lengthy delays in releasing White House papers are typical, the presidential candidacy of a former first lady presents an unprecedented circumstance. Processing by government archivists is partly responsible for the slow pace, but critics note that Bill Clinton could lift restrictions that keep many controversial records out of the public eye until 2013, and he could speed up release of records by waiving a review by his personal representative.

An inventory displayed on the Clinton library Web site Friday morning showed that 23 requests for records made under the federal Freedom of Information Act have been fulfilled so far. The library had received 397 open-records requests through Sept. 26, according to a court filing in a related lawsuit.

Nearly half of the documents released so far were in response to requests for photos. The only large trove of documents released at the request of an independent researcher were 13,000 pages pertaining to the White House's public and cultural diplomacy initiatives.

According to the inventory, the library's only release of materials directly involving Hillary Clinton is a condolence letter she wrote as first lady to Laurance Rockefeller, a wealthy conservationist, on the death of his wife, as well as White House photographs of a trip she made to his ranch in Jackson, Wyo.

So a political couple who battled an independent counsel and congressional investigators finds themselves again tussling with political opponents over the release of documents.

This time it is Democratic rival Barack Obama who is challenging Clinton to speed up the flow of records, arguing that someone who has largely pitched her candidacy based on her experiences in the White House owes the public a closer look. Republicans have joined in the criticism.

Documents that might shed light on the first lady's role in scandals such as the White House travel office firings, the fundraising scandals of the 1996 election and pardons received by people who made payments to her brothers Hugh and Tony Rodham remain closed. Attorney Hugh Rodham had been paid to lobby for a pardon, and later returned the money; the Clintons said they were not aware of the payment when the pardon was granted. Tony Rodham was employed as a consultant by a couple who received a pardon, but he has said his work was unrelated to it.

Also closed are papers that might provide insight into roles she apparently played in substantive policy debates such as the Clinton administration's reversal on welfare reform and its early reluctance to intervene in Bosnia and later decision to do so, noted Sally Bedell Smith, author of "For Love of Politics ," a portrait of the couple's partnership in the White House.

Asked about the delays at a recent debate, Clinton first noted that the decision was in the hands of her husband and then promised, "Certainly we'll move as quickly as our circumstances and the processes of the National Archives permits."

In a subsequent interview with CNN, Clinton offered a more calibrated response, in which she asserted--correctly--that her husband "has done more than any other president" to open up his archives.

Indeed, every recent former president has struggled to shape his historical legacy, and White House papers typically trickle out slowly after a president leaves office.

"It's not that unusual at all," said presidential historian Robert Dallek, who noted that there are tapes Lyndon Johnson made of Oval Office conversations that have not been released nearly 40 years after his administration ended.

The current Bush administration's policies have made it easier for former presidents to delay disclosure of records. An executive order issued by Bush in November 2001 gives former presidents the power to delay release indefinitely while they review records for potential claims that the records are protected from disclosure. A federal district court struck down parts of the executive order last month, but the administration is considering an appeal.

Tom Blanton, executive director of the National Security Archive, a private group that promotes disclosure of archival material, said the release of materials from all presidential libraries also has been slowed by "a culture of secrecy" that the Bush administration has encouraged since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and an archival system that is overwhelmed by the explosion in the number of electronic records created in the information age. Archivists must process documents before they are released.

Overall, the wait time for President Clinton's records is not out of line with his recent predecessors. Susan Cooper, a spokeswoman for the National Archives, said the wait time for FOIA requests for non-classified materials is currently two-and-a-half years for the Reagan library and four years for the George H.W. Bush library.

While the Presidential Records Act calls for the release of White House papers five years after a president leaves office, Bill Clinton exercised an option he has under the law to withhold records in broad categories for 12 years--a restriction every other former president also has placed on their records since Reagan became the first president whose papers were covered by the current law.

Clinton imposed somewhat less far-reaching restrictions on communications from his advisers than did his immediate predecessors. But the restrictions he ordered still effectively wall off most communications regarding the many controversies of his presidency until 2013.

Bill Clinton ordered records withheld if they touch on "a sensitive policy, personal or political matter" or include "advice (on) matters subject to investigation by Congress, the Justice Department or an Independent Counsel." He also ordered withheld "communications directly between the President, and the First Lady, and their families, unless routine in nature."

"When you put all that together, the only things that are not excluded are the most trivial," said Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University Law School professor who has criticized both the Clinton and Bush administrations.

The representative Clinton chose to review the papers before their release also has drawn attention from critics: Bruce Lindsey, a famously tight-lipped confidant of the former president who often managed damage control for the White House. Once archivists have processed documents for release, Lindsey has taken an average of an additional 237 days--about eight months--to review them, according to a Sept. 26 court filing. Lindsey's spokesman did not return numerous calls seeking comment.

The same court filing provided an estimate for when the archivists at the Clinton library would finish processing the first request for records from Hillary Clinton's office filed by the conservative group Judicial Watch.

Some 10,000 pages of appointment calendars for the first lady should go to Lindsey for his review in January 2008--shortly after the Iowa caucuses.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Just what is it that you're looking for? What's there that hasn't been gone over a thousand times?
Or is this nothing at all really, only a Halperin-inspired scavenger hunt?


Mrs. Clinton, on one hand, says "look at my record and experience." Then, on the other, she and her husband deny news media and the public access to her records so that her experience -- slim as it is -- can be examined. What does she have to hide?


I agree with Grover Norquist we need a constitutional amendment to stop the Clinton dynasty. It's not right for a husband President to hand off the Office to his wife.
The Clinton's are trying to build a dynasty.
8 years of Clinton rule is enough Hillary NO in 08!Jerry White, Springfield, IL


Does this surprise anyone? Probably under lock and key next to a few hundrede FBI files, Rose Law Firm billing records, secrets of cattle future trading, etc...


Going after Hillary/Bill about papers is about as pointless and dizzying as a dog chasing his own tail. They ain't gonna let it happen. No way Hozay. The Hillary/Bill campaign is already so anal retentive that even a gallon of the most powerful laxative imagined could not create a free and open channel to how these people really think and operate. These two are very clever about covering each other's butts, but the strange thing is that they do it in public so effectively that we all stand around in amazement and wonder how they get away with it. This tryst over the papers is another reason why America does not need to be subjected to another 4 years of Clintons.


Why should he do any different than any other president? Hillary Clinton's public record as first lady speaks for itself. And that is the record she's running on, take it or leave it.

The former president shouldn't hasten the release of documents just appease his wife's political foes' pathetic and cynical search for dirt, any dirt they can find. They can dig for it on their own.

When Obama releases his state senate records we'll talk.


I'm all for whatever it takes to get Hill/Bill the nomination. Even Alan Keyes can beat that shrew.


Hillary is running on her "experience." What is that experience? Well, she won't tell us, which leads me to believe that her experience is in evading questions and parsing words.

No doubt, she has a lot of experience - but is it the type of experience we need?


This is not an issue Americans should even focus about. It's really a non-issue. We need to focus on important issues like: Green Energy, Economy, War, Debt, and issues that effect the average Joe and his family.

I don't really care about the past. It's old news. I don't care about Whitewater (everyone problably made a bad investment at one time or another in their lifetime). I don't care about Lewinsky (it's a private issue). I don't care about all these tabloid headlines (they don't put food on your table or mine). I just want to know what she can do for America.


Hard to imagine anyone wishing to remain ignorant of the past on Mrs. Clinton's records or any other issue. It's a well-worn statement that those who fail to learn the mistakes of history are bound to relive them. And frankly, the thought of reliving all the mistakes of the Clinton years is the ingredient of nightmares.


On the plus side, the Clinton library has private apartments on the top floor where the Clintons can "stiff" waitresses--each in their own way.


All I can say is, "He who has not sinned, let him cast the first stone!"

Way too many people think they are perfect. It's ok to be unperfect. It's normal to have skeletons in your closet. It's how you handle the problem and learn from it. What is not normal is people who think they are perfect? Now, that is a lot more scarier!


Making money off Hillary hatred? We at www.eatmehillary.com have never seen that before.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "v" in the field below:

Quizzes

palin or fey

Palin or Fey?

McCain

Know the presidents?

McCain

Your McCain IQ

Obama

Your Obama IQ

Latest polls

Electoral vote map

map

Test your scenarios

Galleries

Palin

Sarah Palin

campaign

Campaign trail

conventions

RNC | DNC

Unauthorized tour

Obama

Obama's Chicago

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Candidate match


Test assumptions