Clinton may not be Albright, but who is Obama? at least Clinton knows when to put her hand on her heart.

Obama, just shut up! Albright endosed Hillary, not you. So you do not have a point here!

Really,???
Is that all you've got on mr. obama?
lame, lame, lame.
I don't want the nineties again and I suspect most americans don't either.
-vice prez BUSH
-vice prez BUSH
-prez BUSH
-prez CLINTON
-prez CLINTON
-prez BUSH
-prez BUSH
-prez CLINTON
-prez CLINTON

That's 36 years of TWO names being at the top echelon of american government if MRS. Clinton is elected for two terms.
There is a name for this in government...it's called an oligarchy.

Obama in 08.
Real, sustained leadership when know one is looking.

Wow! Obama is really zinging Hillary lately. Hey you Hillary-lovers should check out the latest Zogby poll that shows Hillary trailing the top 5 GOP candidates while Obama leads them all. Hillary's inevitability and electability are in serious doubt now.

Obama's right, Hillary trying to co opt everything good that happen in Bill's presidency and distant herself from the bad (ie. Nafta). But I did not read anything about Hillary negoiating the Bosnia peace accord.

It's fun to watch the Queen B Loons and the Obama Loons duke it out.

Anyway, Hillary the face of U.S. foreign policy in the 1990s? Really?? She was the face as leader of the Bimbo Eruption Squad. Did she even go out on foreign policy visits on her own, other than Billy's foreign excursions? I do remember one time when she and Chelsea did venture out, but i think that was when Hillary needed some space from Bill so she wouldn't kill him.
Anyway, the Queen B has as much foreign policy experience as any American tourist.

Anyway, I thought the face of America in the 1990s was that of Sec of State Sleepy Warren Christopher.

I thought Lloyd Bensten said that???

"Senator, I served with Madeleine Albright . I knew Madeleine Albright . Madeleine Albright was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Madeleine Albright." Something like that...hahaha. Just having a little fun on a Monday!!!

Hillary was the face of foreign policy. Sounds like a gaffe our present president would make.

Clinton may not be Albright, but who is Obama? at least Clinton knows when to put her hand on her heart.

Posted by: Gary H. | November 26, 2007 3:40 PM

Listen to these whiny fascist Republicans, always trying to get their "heroes" elected on some divisive wedge issue (flag pin, flag burning etc.) instead of actually trying to find someone who will be a President for all of America (Obama) and not someone who want's to be President of the Republican Party of America ( Bush/Cheney, Giuliani, Romney, Hucksterabee) and who actually stands up for our constitution, who want's to stop the killing of our troops from a trumped up war in Iraq and want's to stop the raiding of our national treasurary by BushCo and the Republicriminal robots.
Spin on Wingnuts!

If Hillary was the face of foreign affairs, Monica was the face of domestic affairs! Haha, couldn't resist...

Anyway, the Queen B has as much foreign policy experience as any American tourist.

Anyway, I thought the face of America in the 1990s was that of Sec of State Sleepy Warren Christopher.

Posted by: John D | November 26, 2007 4:10 PM

Lil Johnny Doughboy,

Hillary has more foreign policy experience than Rudy Ghouliani whose entire foreign policy experience consists of doing photo-ops and interviews on 9/11 and quiting the Iraq study group.

...and then you have Mitty Romney whose entire foreign policy experience consists of running off to France to avoid the Vietnam draft.

I've said it before, I'll say it again: I've been to Canada and Mexico and lived in several states in the USA. Does that qualify me for the job of "Emporer of North America?"

No, it does not. Hillary is no more experienced than Obama or Edwards. Unless the expereince you are talking about, of course, is experience in lieing and mudslinging.

Anyone but Hillary (or Romney.)

You are certainly no Albright, Hillary

I'm trying to think of what the likes of Hillary and Obama have done in their political careers and I come up with a blank. Nothing stands out. One has a name and the other seems like a nice guy. If you were looking at someone to run your business with that on their resume would you hire them? Fortunately for many their standards are so low that as long as they hear the right words and they beat the Republicans nothing else matters. Remember, there are many bad people out there that are praying that a Democrat gets in because they know who will stand up and defend America and who say they will.

If Clinton thinks experience is so important, she should drop out and support Biden or Richardson. They each have more experience than Clinton and Obama combined.

Hillary has less foreign policy experience than Barack. At least Barack serves on the Foreign Relations committee in the Senate.

In fact Hill's choice of the Armed Svcs vs. Foreign Relations is indicative of how she is a warhawk and he is pro-diplomacy.

Our system of government requires LEADERSHIP in the oval office to govern. It is not like a business where the CEO gets to run things and manage people and fire people. Rather, it is a co-equal branch of government and that requires the ability to build consensus and work well across the aisle in order to get legislation passed and change national policy. The President sets the mission for the military, domestic and internationa agenda.

Hillary has shown no capacity to lead. Not while she was First Lady nor as a Senator, she has not spoken out on any issue nor is she responsible for significant legislation on any matters of domestic importance especially with regard to child welfare or families despite her constantly touting 35 years of public service. There is nothing of significance that Hillary can show for that.

Whereas Obama has shown the ability to drive policy and enact legislation on significant issues such as ethics reform, anti-proliferation as well as setting a date to bring our troops home. Barack was the one who was capable as a rookie Senator to gain consensus from his peers on a date, not Hillary. That takes leadership and that is what we need.

Obama has the experience that counts..judgment and leadership to get the job done.

Far more importantly, she's no Margaret Thatcher, either.

Remember, there are many bad people out there that are praying that a Democrat gets in because they know who will stand up and defend America and who say they will.

Posted by: Stan | November 26, 2007 4:34 PM

Yeah Stan, there are bad people out there who wish to do America harm:
http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j2/danakf1/?action=view¤t=Mission-Accomplished.gif

For all their toughguy talk and bluster why haven't the Republicans and their "leaders" found him?

GO BARACK!

Remember, there are many bad people out there that are praying that a Democrat gets in because they know who will stand up and defend America and who say they will.

Posted by: Stan | November 26, 2007 4:34 PM

Yeah Stan, there are bad people out there who wish to do America harm:
http://s76.photobucket.com/albums/j2/danakf1/?action=view¤t=Mission-Accomplished.gif

For all their toughguy talk and bluster why haven't the Republicans and their "leaders" found him?

GO BARACK!

"If Hillary was the face of foreign affairs, Monica was the face of domestic affairs! Haha, couldn't resist..."

----Agree 100%.

Barack Obama has 8 years experience as a state senator in Illinois. He was a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago for 5 years. He has taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago for 10 years.

He graduated from 2 of the top ten schools in America -- Columbia and Harvard. He was president of the Havard Law Review and graduated at the top of his class at Columbia Unviversity and at Harvard.

He has written books that have sold in the millions and he did all those things with out being born to rich parents! Go Barack!
He was also a civil rights lawyer as well. Plus he has successfully passed legislation in illinois for people to get health insurance and he helped pass important death penalty laws. Obama is the real deal!! Vote Obama!

Hillary has served 6 complete years in the US senate. Oops, that's all. Oh and she worked as a lawyer for a few years when her husband was governor of Arkansas. Whoopie! That's it. That's her documented experience.
She claims experience as a first lady counts -- but I do not agree with that, plus she will not let Americans see her records from when she was first lady -- go figure.

Obama '08

She also wasn't Rubin, Richardson, Reich and a whole lot more. I eat Chinese food, but that doesn't make me an expert on China. Been there, too and stayed in the State Guest House. Saw what the Chinese wanted me to see. Same with Hillary.

Here it is folks. Hillary's experience in elective office dates to 2001 period. The only candidate with less is Edwards and he doesn't try to be something he's not.

Obama hit it on the head and should keep hitting it. Now, ask Massachusetts just what they think of Clinton's mandated health care now that theirs is self-destructing.

We've got a fine field out there. Don't blow it and give the GOP another four years with Clinton II.

Neither Hillary or Obama has much experience. Hillary however was a vital part of Bill's staff and that can not be denied. SHe wasnt the normal Pres wife who just worries about charitable causes. However Obama on the other hand has NEVER DONE ANYTHING of note at any level of his life. He has no experience to speak of and cant even use his 2 years in teh Senate because he has been campiging for the his entire time in the Senate. I still have yet to find one person who can explain a tangible result of anything Obama has done, or why he should be elected president.

When Hillary Clinton traveled, she met with wives of leaders, not with leaders themselves other than an occasional photo op. Maybe Hillary's qualified to lead the Stepford Wives' club but certainly not the United States of America.

I used to have respect for Madeleine until she endorsed Hillary/Bill. Remember how all during the Monica drama she was horror struck at Big Bill's deception and lies, almost to the extent of resigning? She of all people should want to see these people back in the White House.

Stan,

Republican' tough "foreign policy"?
http://photobucket.com/mediadetail/?media=http%3A%2F%2Fi76.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj2%2Fdanakf1%2FMission-Accomplished.gif&searchTerm=mission%20accomplished&pageOffset=2

That's an oxymoron if there ever was one.

everyone knows that personality is more important than policy in US politics-- especially in the executive branch. If one appoints an experienced cabinet, you can't go wrong (unless its Donny R). That being said, Obama clearly trumps Hillary. Experience, unfortunately, is nothing in this position. Therefore, why not nominate Obama, who can unite the country with his rhetoric, rather than eight more years of division between red and blue?

Does she actually think people are going to buy her being First Lady as actual experience?

Dems are not stupid and they are soon going to take heed of polls like the latest from zogby.com that shows her losing to five top Republicans, while at the same time Obama and Edwareds lead all five. Clinton can't win the independent vote, therby she would be the worst candidate to represent us in the general. Wake Up Dems, if you do not want four more years of Republican rule.

Enough of the hand over heart stuff, get your facts straight and stick to the issues.

Remember, there are many bad people out there that are praying that a Democrat gets in because they know who will stand up and defend America and who say they will.

Posted by: Stan | November 26, 2007 4:34 PM

Ohh, please Stan.

George W Bush is the best thing to happen to the Radical Islamic movement in decades.

Al Qaeda has a permanent safe haven in Nuclear armed Pakistan with the willing aid of our "ally" Musharaf.

Iran is now the strongets power in the region thanks to our complete destruction of their rival Iraq, leaving it an extremely weak if not completely failed state.

World wide terrorism had RISEN every year of the Bush administration.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/30/terror.report/index.html

Osama Bin Ladin remains at large.

If the bad people care at all about who the US President is, they can't hope for anything better than one who will continue the policies of George W. Bush.

You know...with this many people who can't stand Hillary, Barack may be sure to take the nomination...I think there is nothing but Clinton fans voting in the polls. When the Primary comes then it will seem like Obama fans have tripled.

I think Obama voiced confidence in Albright's ability to realize that Hillary was not the face of America during Bill's tenure. I mean, everybody knows Hillary was not Lady Di for Pete's sake.

If Obama did not know Albright had been stumping for HIllary it is probably because the idea is pretty much a stretch.

I've got to think Albright was asked for support and caught saying "of course" in an off moment and now has to follow through on it.

It says something about her loyalty and follow-through, but not mcuh about her wisdom in her dotage.

Hillary still has not explained what value all of her alleged experience has. It certainly does not inform good judgment, just look at the most important decisions she's made as a Senator. Maybe she thought taht she didn't have to read the NIE and could just go with her gut the way "experienced" folks like Cheney and Rumsfeld did on Iraq. I don't know why she didn't do her homework and read the intel reports before supporting Bush's rush to war, but I do know that her alleged experience didn't inform good judgment all by itself.

So what kind of experience does Hillary have?Is it her vote for the Iraq war?Is it her failed health care plan in the 90s?Is it the vote for Kyl-Lieberman amendment that gives Bush more power to threaten Iran and even start a new war?

No Hillary, don`t think you can fool people on your so called experience.

This is what Bill Clinton said in his race for the Presidency 1992:

"Experience counts, but it's not everything"

Obama 08!

Nafta may have its flaws but is a start. Free (fair) trade is an important component of any good foreign policy.

Even though many may like the policies that Senator Clinton proposes, they should also consider her record , just as Senator Clinton insists.
.
The last Clinton Administration, when faced with the fact that protection rackets where torturing people with poison and radiation, chose to avoid its responsibilities to incarcerate the criminals and protect the citizenry.
.
Instead, they made a deal with the criminal gang stalker protection rackets to leave them alone and to consequently abandon the citizenry.
.
Do we want a President who sells out the citizenry for votes?
.
Do we want a President who sends a "crime does pay" message to society?
.
Would you vote for a President who has signed nonagression deals with the KKK or the Nazi party? Gangs that torture with poison and radiation are much like the KKK and Nazi Party.
.
We do not need a sellout President. We need a principled leader President.
.
If you are one of the few who do not know what the above refers to, do a web search for “gang stalking” to see the tip of the dirtberg. Do it before you decide to reply to my post.
.

Thank you all for changing my mind. Go Hillary!

Is Albright the best and brightest of democratic foriegn policy? What next Jimma Carter? God help us.

Laura Bush for president, she's traveled around the world, she has Condie Rice to endorse her. Oh!!! She also has Barbara Bush's experience as former first lady.

Laura Bush for president, she's traveled around the world, she has Condie Rice to endorse her. Oh!!! She also has Barbara Bush's experience as former first lady.

Why does Albrights reply sound so Old school?

Turn the page!

Two questions for Hillary how many joints have you smoked. How many blow jobs have you performed.

Obama or Clinton - If either one falls hostage to AIPAC (American Israeli Public Affairs Committee) which is partly responsible for the current state of foreign affairs, he/she may succeed in foreign policy. This committee has destroyed senators, congresssmen and anyone in public office who does not support Israel, a racist nation which practices ethnic cleansing, apartheid, manufactured terrorism which spread to our shores on 9/11. If either candidate can be strong and principled enough to resist the manipulation of this particular foreign interest, then they have the appreciation of true Americans and maybe my vote.

None of the likely Republican candidates has foreign policy experience. This election will not be about experience. It will be about leadership. Hillary is barking up the wrong tree.

Go Obama '08

Hillary was the face of foreign affairs while Monica was the face of domestic affairs !!

I LOVE IT, it should be used by Obama campaign !!!!

I thought Lloyd Bensten said that???

"Senator, I served with Madeleine Albright . I knew Madeleine Albright . Madeleine Albright was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Madeleine Albright." Something like that...hahaha. Just having a little fun on a Monday!!!

So Hillary is now claiming she was Secretary of State during the 90's? How can she claim SHE represented America on the world stage?
Wow....she is really confused.

the truth commented: ..This committee has destroyed senators, congresssmen and anyone in public office who does not support Israel,....

Not to worry, you can rest assured before long this serpent will raise it's head and strike. Joe Lieberman could have something to say about how and when the strike will occur, and remember he is a rock solid Hillary/Bill supporter.

Laura Bush for president, she's traveled around the world, she has Condie Rice to endorse her. Oh!!! She also has Barbara Bush's experience as former first lady.

Posted by: Jay | November 26, 2007 9:01 PM

Funny!!! Almost makes GW seem like a viable candidate. Wait, there's still that darn 22nd amendment thing. Get Cheney on the phone!!!

When Obama speaks, I believe him. When Hillary speaks, not so much. Her "experience" has made her talk out of both sides of her mouth, or maybe that's how she and Bill got to the top.

I admire Obama for not going there, for saying what he means, even if it's not always pretty.

Has anyone seen this new Zogby's poll? Clinton loses in a sample of over 9500 people, -+1 percent, nationally, against ALL TOP 5 GOP Candidates, even Thompson!!! Meanwhile, Obama handily beats all five GOP guys. Obama is rising in Iowa, NH, S. Carolina, and nationally.

I honestly fear for our country if either Hillary or the GOP gets into office. I don't think she can win easily. I've canvassed for Obama and looked at the canvass numbers across California. they break down 40 percent undecided, 7 percent Hillary, and 30 percent Obama. That says volumes.

I cannot, absolutely cannot wait to have Obama take the oath and the chair in the oval office. He will truly go down in history as a President of integrity, grace under pressure, honesty, as well as a President who made great changes that helped this country tremendously and this world too.

Get off your butts and help the right guy get into office for a change.

Obama 08!!!

Well, as far as Madeleine not-to-bright goes...She gave the FBI the order to burn and kill the nutty Christians in Waco.
She also sent that Cuban kid back to ['that imprisoned island'...J.F.K.] to Castro and his communistic father.
No Hillary is no Madeleine,and she's not [head] nor [tails] compared to teenage interns and that just chokes her.

Paulo

To: The Truth ,more like The Nut Obama for 08 and Ms O for VP

If the Republicans are so weak on "foreign policy" they why do the terrorists/liberals want them out so bad. As for Bin Laden, kill him and he becomes a martyr, alive he is a talking head. Besides didn't Clinton have 3 shots at getting him and passed each time, and wasn’t it Carter that started the terrorist movement when he was in, now that is strong foreign policy. As for more terrorists under Bush, fine by me, more to kill even if you fail to acknowledge we are winning the war of in Iraq. I don’t get that info from the “experts” in the blogs but from letters I get from my friends that are serving there. They know the score while some of you don’t even know where the “game is being played”. Those troops knows the difference between those who really supports them and the ones that say they do. Oh, and for those that think the Democrats will pull all the troops out if they get in, think again. It won’t happen, they will just tell you that because they hope you are stupid enough to fall for it so they will get elected.

This is a cheap shot by Obama that will backfire. There seems to be a pattern here. He is trying to ridicule Hillary's role in Bill's administration and is overreaching in a demeaning way. Almost like suggesting that a wife's role in a presidency is to enjoy the travel, shut up and listen.
It's not just demeaning to Hillary, it makes us wonder what he thinks about a woman's/wife's role.

Really disappointed that he would go there.

"As for Bin Laden, kill him and he becomes a martyr, alive he is a talking head."

Well at least now we've got a Wingnut who will actually come out and say it: Republicans actually PREFER Bin Laden alive (as long as its Bush who isn't catching him), but will in the same breath blame Clinton for not catching him.

So, to clarify, Clinton had, according to "Stan," 3 chances to catch Bin Laden (this number is a Limbaugh number, but nonetheless). Well, with an act of war, troops on the ground, and formerly world public opinion behind him, Bush has had over 2200 opportunities to seek to bring him to justics, and has failed each and every day since September 11.

Mission Accomplished.

"If the Republicans are so weak on "foreign policy" they why do the terrorists/liberals want them out so bad."

Liberals want Bush out because they care that his foriegn policy hurts america, and helps the terrorists.
As for Bin Laden, kill him and he becomes a martyr, alive he is a talking head."

So Bush was lying when he said that he was going to "smoke out" Bin Ladin "dead or alive".

"Besides didn't Clinton have 3 shots at getting him and passed each time,"

You just defended allowing Bin ladin to live (tough on terror aren't you?) And the answer is "no, Clinton did not pass on three chances to kill Bin ladin."

"and wasn’t it Carter that started the terrorist movement when he was in, now that is strong foreign policy."

You really need to learn some history, The Islamic Terrorist movement was alive and well long before Carter was President. Ever hear of the Munich Olympics?

Talking about past Presidents being week on terror, how about Reagan? No response to the deaths of 241 Marines in a suicide bombing, and then he sold the Iranians arms. I bet the terrorists we real scared of him.

"As for more terrorists under Bush, fine by me, more to kill"

You get pleasure from killing? That really a sad statement about what a sick twisted person you really are.

This is very simple for Hillary. If she was the face of the foregn policy of the 90s, let us see her docs and we will decide what she was doing at the white house. Anything short of that is a meare fabrication.

The Truth and GW,

I have comforting news.

American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Forum on March 2, 2007:

"That effort begins with a clear and strong commitment to the security of Israel: our strongest ally in the region and its only established democracy. That will always be my starting point. And when we see all of the growing threats in the region: from Iran to Iraq to the resurgence of al-Qaeda to the reinvigoration of Hamas and Hezbollah, that loyalty and that friendship will guide me as we begin to lay the stones that will build the road that takes us from the current instability to lasting peace and security."

--Obama

Go Obama! Lost respect for Albright today. My question is if Hillary did so much of her job, what did she do? Thought she was suppose to be the face of America. Now I question Albright's credibility! She would do well to sit down somewhere and be quiet! She's starting to look bad!

No Hillary is no Madeleine,and she's not [head] nor [tails] compared to teenage interns and that just chokes her.

Paulo

Posted by: Paulo | November 27, 2007 2:28 AM

Get back on your meds, crazy boy!