Two former Va. guvs to vie for Senate seat: The Swamp
The Swamp
Posted November 19, 2007 11:35 AM
The Swamp

David Lerman

Former Republican Gov. James S. Gilmore III announced Monday he will be a candidate for the U.S. Senate next year.

In a widely anticipated announcement that was e-mailed to supporters, Gilmore said he offers the experience required to fill the Senate seat being vacated by veteran Republican Sen. John Warner.

``I can offer Virginians unparalleled experience and a strong and steady hand in the Senate," Gilmore said in an annoucement video on his new campaign Web site, www.jimgilmoreforsenate.com. ``Virginia's legacy of solid principles and values is ingrained in me."

If he wins the Republican party nomination, Gilmore is likely to face former Democratic Gov. Mark R. Warner, who succeeded him in the governor's mansion. A recent Washington Post poll found Virginians favoring Warner over Gilmore by a 2-to-1 margin.

The race is likely to be one of the most competitive and closely watched Senate contests in the country. Democrats are counting on picking up the seat next year to expand their majority in the Senate.

Gilmore was spared a brusing battle for the GOP nomination when U.S. Rep. Thomas M. Davis III, R-Fairfax, opted out of the contest last month. Davis, a Republican moderate, ruled out a challenge to the more conservative Gilmore when the state party decided to choose its nominee next year at a convention of party activists instead of a primary election. Conventions typically draw the party's base of hard-core conservatives, while Davis was counting on a primary election to draw more moderate, independent-minded voters.

Gilmore, 58, is a Richmond native with modest roots. He was the son of a supermarket meat-cutter. A University of Virginia graduate, he served in the Army and then practiced law in Henrico County. He became a county prosecutor in 1987 and was elected the state's attorney general in 1993.

In 1997, Gilmore won the governor's mansion by pledging to eliminate the state's hated car tax. While the plan was popular, it proved too costly for the state to eliminate the tax entirely as the state's economy began sagging in 2001.

After backing President Bush for the 2000 Republican presidential nomination, Gilmore served a year as head of the Republican National Committee, but clashed with operatives of the Bush White House. He also headed a commission on terrorism that warned the country was not prepared for a terrorist strike before Sept. 11, 2001.

Earlier this year, he launched a quixotic campaign for president that had little backing. Gilmore billed himself as the conservative alternative to GOP frontrunners who he suggested were either too liberal or inconsistent in their policy positions.

But Gilmore raised little money and was never more than an asterisk in national polls. Gilmore later said he entered the race too late and did not have the national network of donors needed to compete effectively.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

He doesn't have a chance against Mark R. Warner.

Warner can offer Virginians unparalleled excellence & intellect.


It makes sense to vote for Warner, look at the money that will be saved in not replacing the nameplate, the stationery, the telephone message


Logic??? Prisoner,

Yeah, if you like Tax & Spend, Cut & Run Liberals, stick with Warner.


Yeah, if you like Tax & Spend, Cut & Run Liberals, stick with Warner.

Posted by: ThJudg | November 19, 2007 2:04 PM

You mean like the $9 trillion debt that the Bush Republicans ran up between 2001 - 2006?

Repugs don't want to raise your taxes, they want to put it all on your maxed out credit card so that your grankids will have to worry about paying off our massive debt curtesy of communist China.

"Conservatives", my arse...


Anyone who would vote (or not) for someone purely on the basis of their political affiliation is embracing the highest level of human ignorance.

Gilmore was a mediocre governor who embraced a slash and burn approach to governing. He was responsible for inhumane cuts to public service that are still only partially healed today.

Mark Warner, on the other hand, has demonstrated the highest level of excellence and committment to governing "for the people" in Virginia.

Take them both, forget about the political affiliation, and compare them side by side. Any person with an ounce of intelligence and integrity will agree that Warner was and is a superior leader in almost every category.


``I can offer Virginians unparalleled experience and a strong and steady hand in the Senate," Gilmore said…

Baloney! Why did a person possessing such "unparalleled experience" not even manage a blip in the GOP presidential polls? The only reason he was elected Governor was because he bribed the citizens with that car tax repeal. He essentially bought votes with someone else’s money.

Mark Warner then had to spend his term cleaning up the mess Gilmore left after his Sherman-like approach to governing. The Commonwealth of Virginia needs Gilmore as a Senator about as much as we needed George “Macaca” Allen. As I recall, he was asked to leave.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "d" in the field below:

Quizzes

palin or fey

Palin or Fey?

McCain

Know the presidents?

McCain

Your McCain IQ

Obama

Your Obama IQ

Latest polls

Electoral vote map

map

Test your scenarios

Galleries

Palin

Sarah Palin

campaign

Campaign trail

conventions

RNC | DNC

Unauthorized tour

Obama

Obama's Chicago

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Candidate match


Test assumptions