by Frank James
HCD Research used its MediaCurves.com technology to get a sense of how a modern-day audience reacted to Mitt Romney's "faith" speech and the original such speech, given by John F. Kennedy in 1960.
They tested segments of both speeches for a members of an Internet audience who were able to register using their computer mice how sincere or insincere they found either politician to be.
Here's the researchers' press release:
Flemington, NJ, December 6, 2007 – A new national study released today compared the levels of sincerity that Americans reported as they viewed John F. Kennedy’s famous 1960 speech on religion and a similar speech given by Mitt Romney earlier today in Texas.
The study was conducted among 750 Americans during December 5-6. During the split-sample study, 250 participants viewed segments from the Kennedy speech and 500 viewed segments from the Romney speech.
The communications research study was conducted by HCD Research, the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion (MCIPO) and the Louis Finkelstein Institute for Social and Religious Research at The Jewish Theological Seminary.
While viewing video segments of the speeches, participants indicated the levels of sincerity of John Kennedy and Mitt Romney by moving their mouse from left to right on a continuum. The responses were recorded in quarter-second intervals and reported in the form of curves. Participants were also asked pre- and post-viewing questions.
The responses of all voters regardless of party affiliation seem to track fairly tightly during
the Romney segments tested.
That differs noticeably from the response to JFK's speech which indicates that Democrats viewed him as significantly more sincere than other voters.
The reaction by the group of viewers identified by religious affiliation became interesting when Romney began criticizing secularists who want to separate church and state in the public sphere.
Protestants gave him higher marks for sincerity here than Jews, Catholics and those in the "other" category did.
In the portion of the Kennedy speech that tested, all the religious groups tracked with another though the "other" category spiked downward when Kennedy said he believed in an America where no Catholic prelates sent orders to Catholic politicians nor where politicians sought instructions from clergy. It's hard to tell what that viewer reaction meant.







Comments
Wow, how far we've sunk in 40+ years. We're debating something that was clear over 200 years ago...This is a Republic, not a Theocracy!
Willard has managed to irritate 2 completely different groups: The Christianists and the Atheists. Nice going. Auf Wiedersehn Willard! Don't let the door hit your butt on the way out!
Posted by: weinerdog43 | December 7, 2007 6:19 PM
Should'nt they asked more people about this?750 people is'nt a lot of people.
Posted by: Anon | December 7, 2007 10:54 PM
"Mitt Romney's religion is only part of his problem. A bigger threat to
his Republican presidential candidacy, advisers say, is a record of
policy flip-flops and nagging doubts about his credibility."
I personally thought he delivered a great speech. But this speech did
not change my opinion of his record. In fact, it really is another
flip-flop. He supported abortion, now he doesn't. He supported gay
rights, now he doesn't. He's against illegal immigrant employment, but
just two days ago continued to hire them. He tried to distance religion
from his campaign, now he fully embraces it. I have more respect for a
candidate that supports all the positions the Romney used to take and
does not change them for political gain.
Posted by: Ted Okawa | December 8, 2007 3:33 PM
@weinerdog
What is a "Christianist" ??
also..
If it was over 200 years ago, were you alive then ? How do you know there was no discrimination? Are you even aware that in 1842 the Mormon presidential candidate was shot to death by a mob because of his religion? Are you aware the governer of Missouri gave a written order in 1838 that all Mormons be shot on site because of thier faith?
Thnks about what you are saying man. Read some books, you have no knowledge of the subject.
Posted by: Nate | December 8, 2007 9:26 PM
Let's see, Mitt's church is the Church of Jesus Christ (of Latter-Day Saints). Is he Christian?
Is Grant buried in Grant's tomb?
That's about as silly a question as the one about Grant. Check the dictionary definition of "Christian" which everyone except Southern Baptist preachers accept.
Posted by: Bot | December 9, 2007 9:08 PM