The Swamp
-
Posted December 18, 2007 9:54 AM
The Swamp

by Christi Parsons

UPDATED

Illinois will soon be home to a new $1.5 billion coal generation plant, officials announced this morning.

The plant in downstate Mattoon will be a joint venture between the U.S. Department of Energy and the FutureGen Alliance, a non-profit consortium of coal producers and energy generators.

Illinois' congressional delegation has been trying since 2003 to persuade officials to choose Illinois for the plant, which promises a significant boost for the state economy and for the state's coal industry.

Sen. Dick Durbin, a leading champion of the project, was all over the announcement this morning.

"Downstate Illinois has the coal, the geology and the commitment needed to make this project a success," Durbin said in a press release that came out seconds after the announcement was made. "The success today is a tribute to the community, the state and all those who worked so hard to secure the FutureGen project for Illinois."

It doesn't hurt the politicians who fought for it any, either. The plant will be in Rep. Tim Johnson's downstate district. It was also a high priority for Reps. John Shimkus and Jerry Costello.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Congratulations Illinois! Now we have to make it work.


Wow. They left more than a half billion on the table not going to Texas. I'm surprised.


Gonna be a bunch of long faces in Odessa, Texas today.


Thank you Sen.Durbin for bringing home another win for the people of Illinois.

Obviously you had greater skills then the two wing nut Senators from Texas.

Isn't this great for Illinois Jerry?


Coal?!

Have you heard about Global Warming, senator? It's been all over the TV and newspapers lately.


I'm sure he has. The FutureGen plant is a prototype near-zero emissions plant. Research there will go a long way towards combating global warming.


Crazy Duck,

On gee, Illinois won a gov't handout, let the celebration begin.


James,

Prototypes and theories often sound good at first blush but turn out to be bad. Witness hydrogen power, nuclear fusion or corn-based ethanol. All are highly touted alternatives that are either wholly impractical or environmental disasters.

Consider: what are the environmental ramifications and energy expenditures involved with extracting the coal? And should we not be trying to move away from finite fossil energy sources?

If Durbin (or any pol) were a driving force behind R&D for geothermal, wind or solar power I'd have some respect for him. As it is he's just another hack bringing home the pork.


Isn't it funny how the coal industry realized recently that if they spent less money on lobbyists who try and resist government regulations to tighten pollution restrictions and instead put that money to invest in cleaner technologies, everyone wins?


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "z" in the field below:

Election 2008
Tag Cloud
[What is this?]