By John Chase
OSCEOLA, Iowa -- Mike Huckabee chose a manufacturing company of hunting accessories to take aim at chief rival Mitt Romney on Saturday, accusing Romney of running misleading TV commercials that he suggested might mean he’d mislead the American public if elected president.
“You need a president who gets the job honestly because if they don’t get it honestly (they) won’t serve honestly,” Huckabee told a crowd of about 100 people Saturday morning inside the crowded lobby of the Boyt Harness Company in Osceola, Iowa. “And if I don’t tell you the truth about how I applied for the job, I probably won’t tell you the truth if I get the job.”
Huckabee said the ads questioning his decisions on taxes, immigration and crime are a distortion of the former Arkansas governor’s record. And he even defended U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), one of his Republican opponents running for president who has also been subject of Romney TV ads.
“The attacks that Mitt Romney has been putting out, not just on me, but now he’s putting them out on John McCain. And, look, John McCain is a rival in the presidential race, but John McCain is an honorable, decent true to heaven American hero. And it’s enough to attack me, but now to attack John McCain it’s like Mitt doesn’t have anything to stand on, except to stand against,” Huckabee said.
“I’m saying enough is enough,” he continued. “And ladies and gentlemen what I’m going to say to you today is if a person is dishonest in his approach to get the job, do you believe he will be honest in telling you the truth when he does get the job?”
Up until now, Huckabee has eschewed criticizing his Republican opponents, especially by name. But with less than a week before the leadoff caucuses on Jan. 3, he said he is “defending” himself against the barrage of “offensive” TV ads by his opponents about his record.
“I said his ads are dishonest. I certainly did. And his ads are dishonest, they’re very dishonest,” he said following a second event in Indianola. “The mail pieces, the television advertising. It’s dishonest toward me. It’s dishonest toward John McCain.”
Huckabee also took the offensive for the first time in criticizing Romney’s position on abortion. Romney, the former Massachusetts governor now running on an anti-abortion platform, has been criticized for switching positions on the issue when he decided to run for president.
“He says we’re both pro-life and I just want to point out that if he’s saying things that aren’t true about me he’s also saying things that aren’t completely true about himself,” Huckabee said.
Huckabee also acknowledged he’s received the help of Arkansas legislators who served while he was governor. At a Romney event Saturday morning, several of the legislators, calling themselves a “truth squad” criticized Romney for a recent mailing that they said distorted Huckabee’s record on immigration.
“They clarified my record,” Huckabee said. “They took a mail piece that he had sent out to Iowa homes that was completely erroneous. It was just false on every point and they were there because they were in the legislature, they knew what the facts were. And they weren’t attacking his record, they were actually defending mine and pointing out the absolute factual errors of his mail piece. So that’s what their purpose was.”
The former Arkansas governor also acknowledged making a mistake about how many Pakistanis have entered the United States illegally.
In the wake of the killing this week of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, Huckabee, who has been steadily criticized for having a lack of knowledge and experienced on foreign affairs, argued on Friday the United States has to clamp down harder on illegal immigrants from Pakistan, saying 660 Pakistanis illegally entered the country last year.
Huckabee on Saturday clarified that 660 Pakistanis had entered the country over the past four years, but insisted he was still correct in his position that a crackdown is needed.
He said the United States still needs to do better securing the borders and said the events in Pakistan highlight that the issue of illegal immigration is one of national security.
“If I made it that 660 was in one year and it was in four then that clearly was a mistake, but the mistake was not in the point I was making…and getting out of the context, which I did,” he said. “By the way, it won’t be the first one that I’ve ever been guilty of making, won’t be the last one. I’ll make a bunch more. But the mistakes that I think you’ll find me making I think are going to be mistakes of a word here, a figure there, but not mistakes of the heart, not mistakes of honestly trying to put the issue in perspective.”
Huckabee’s event in Osceola was his second since Christmas featuring the same theme as hunting. The day after the holiday, Huckabee went pheasant hunting where it was reported he and the group he was with shot over the heads of a gaggle of reporters.
Huckabee disputed the report.
“Now I want to tell you that simply didn’t happen, and I can tell you why it didn’t happen,” he told the group, many of them hunters themselves. “We specifically knew that there were some reporters there, about 800 yards away, not 75 (yards). But the other thing was that, let me just assure you guys, if we’d of shot at those reporters the guy wouldn’t have written the story.”
The crowd laughed.





Comments
The Republican Party has become the laughing stock of the world:
http://photobucket.com/mediadetail/?media=http%3A%2F%2Fi108.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn4%2FRobertOak%2FMittRomney.gif&searchTerm=mitt%20romney&pageOffset=9
Posted by: Robby Rapture | December 29, 2007 5:54 PM
Mr. Huckabee, I'm being very pedantic this year in determining who I'm going to vote for in the next presidential election. I have never voted along party lines. I am more concerned about critical issues that need to be resolved in a very short timespan. I have meticulously studied and listened to a myriad of candidates in the race for president, and quite frankly, I have boiled it down to you and maybe one or two other candidates. This is what I need to know: What is your stance on abortion? What is your stance on illegal aliens in this country? What are
your views on the HUGE trade imbalance between China and the United States?
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
Roger L. Castonguay
CTO1, USN, Retired
Posted by: Roger Castonguay | December 29, 2007 6:39 PM
Romney has been attacking Huckabee for three months. The minute Huckabee defends himself, the media throws up headlines saying Huckabee is attacking Romney. My distaste for the media continues to grow - with the possible exception of the reporter who wrote this piece. At least there was an attempt at honest journalism.
Posted by: Chris | December 29, 2007 6:43 PM
if Huckabee (or McCain) is the nominee, i will do as i did in 1992 (Perot) and 1996 (Browne - Libertarian) and vote for a third choice.
beware what you ask for evangelical Republicans, as it may mean Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama.
Posted by: C. Moore | December 29, 2007 6:44 PM
Mitt is my first choice, but I have to look and say that he may not win, that Huckabee might actually win. That being the case I want to have an open mind about him as a president. I just am not impressed. It seems like his supporters are trying to make this a fight about personality vs. competence. I just don't think that being a nice guy is enough to make for a good president. His charm has made it so he rarely has to talk about issues, but every time he does talk issues he seems to fall on his face. I could vote for any of the Republicans out there, except for Huckabee. I would rather have a competent Democrat than an incompetent Republican. I think we've had enough of that. I'm a Republican, but I still have to wonder whether the country would be in a better place if we had Gore or Kerry at the helm. They would have enacted some economic policies I strongly disagree with, but I know they would have looked twice at intel reports before invading a sovereign country. To me, competence is most important, then policies, then personality. That makes Huckabee far down on my list.
Posted by: Mike | December 29, 2007 7:18 PM
It's great to hear that the crowd laughed! However, in the future, let me suggest less recounting, more reporting.
For instance, rather than simply allowing Huck to imply that his minions had corrected Romney's mailer, let me suggest going through the mailer and their response point-by-point.
The NYT does a ever-so-slightly better job here, and I see that one of their "corrections" was in error.
Huck does indeed support "amnesty", even if he (like everyone else) won't admit that that's what they support.
CNN played this same game (youtube.com/watch?v=wm0uWz2BS9M), and the way to get the truth is to ask them how it would be perceived by potential illegal aliens. When millions of potential illegal aliens see Huck's "RevolvingDoor", many of them will perceive it to be amnesty with a predictable result.
Posted by: TLB | December 29, 2007 7:50 PM
I don't get it. The first part of this advertisement says that Huckabee wants "to take aim at chief rival Mitt Romney" and the second says he wants to do it honestly? Which is it?
Posted by: Mrs. Nelson | December 29, 2007 8:18 PM
As a recemt resident of Massachusetts I can tell you a few things about Mitt Romney as Governor. He supported gay marriage and many gay people flocked to Boston to be married as soon as the bill passed the legislature. Hooray for Mitt. He was also openly pro-choice. He may not apoprove of it for his family but he did not think government should interfere with a woman's right to choose. Hooray for Mitt again. He was also for handgun control and to the best of the average person's knowledge Mitt was never a hunter.
Hooray for Mitt. Immediately upon announcing his candidacy for President, he turned a complete about face and began courting the anti-abortion folks; suddenly changed his mind about gays; and I would not advise anyone to go hunting with Mitt. When asked recently why his sons were not in Iraq he replied that their interests lay in a different direction. I'll bet they do! With their fine educations and life style I am sure they prefer the good life to possibly getting killed. I haven't deceded for whom I will vote and I don't know if it will be a Republican or a Democrat but it surely won't be Mitt Romney. He does not measure up to the man his Father was. Too bad.
Posted by: HELENFALK | December 30, 2007 1:09 AM