by Frank James
A quick guided tour of some of the morning's most important, most interesting, or both, Washington-related stories.
Two bombings killed at least 45 in the Algerian capital of Algiers today, with one explosion apparently targeting the U.N. while another was near the nation's constitutional courts. A group linked to al Qaeda immediately came under suspicion.
The Supreme Court gave federal judges more flexibility in sentencing drug offenders, particularly those whose convictions involve crack cocaine who have generally received stiffer penalties than other cocaine offenders, resulting in minorities receiving longer sentences.
A former CIA agent said that waterboarding resulted in gaining vital intelligence information from Abu Zubaida, the first high-ranking al Qaeda member captured after 9/11, that likely saved lives but that he now regards the technique as torture.
A new poll reinforces what has been observed for months on the campaign trail—Democratic voters are far happier with their choices for the presidential nomination than their Republican counterparts, with many GOP members unable to find a candidate. But the problem now is that the Iowa caucuses are only three weeks away.
Economists say the risk of a recession is growing and that the Federal Reserve Board needs to continue to cut key interest rates in order to prop up the economy.
The pharmaceutical industry is laying off thousands of chemists as the once secure field falls victim to changes in how new drugs are developed, which involves a greater emphasis on biotechnology methods.
Central Intelligence Agency Director Michael Hayden faces two days of intense questioning on Capitol Hill, with the recently disclosed destruction of terrorist-interrogation videotapes expected to be at the center of the closed-door sessions.
The Army may reduce its order for the mine resistant ambush protected vehicles in part because of the declining violence in Iraq. The Marines have indicated that they would ask for fewer vehicles.





Comments
I just don't get it.
How can there be more than a little doubt that someone within the White House authorized the use of water boarding?
There is no doubt that this is against a variety of US and international laws on torture.
So why aren't the Democrats all over this issue?
Bring whoever in. Three questions. Were you involved in water boarding? Who gave you the order to do it? When did they give you the order? Then you turn them over for prosecution.
No matter whether you were given a direct order by a superior, or not, you cannot use the excuse of following a direct order to mitigate your own culpability.
These folks belong in prison!
The end never justifies the means. Illegal is illegal.
Posted by: dogjudge | December 11, 2007 10:15 AM
Dog,
Speaker Pelosi sure approved it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/08/AR2007120801664.html?hpid=topnews
Posted by: Terry | December 11, 2007 2:05 PM