by James Oliphant
Atty. Gen. Michael Mukasey continued Wednesday to hedge on the legality of the interrogation technique known as waterboarding, frustrating some members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Mukasey was appearing before the committee for the first time since it voted to confirm him as Alberto Gonzales’s successor in November.
During that confirmation hearing, Mukasey jeopardized his nomination by refusing to brand waterboarding as illegal torture. But he promised to research the issue once confirmed and report back to the Senate.
But prior to his testimony Wednesday, Mukasey sent a letter to Judiciary chairman Patrick Leahy of Vermont, telling him that because waterboarding currently isn’t authorized for use by Central Intelligence Agency operatives, he could not opine on its legality. (The CIA has, according to the administration, used the technique in the past on suspected terrorists.)
“I do not believe that it is advisable to address difficult legal questions about which reasonable minds can and do differ, in the absence of concrete facts and circumstances,” Mukasey said in the letter.
He echoed those words before the committee, angering several members. “It’s like saying you’re opposed to stealing but not saying whether bank robbery would qualify,” said Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts.
“Would waterboarding be torture if it was used on you?” Kennedy asked him.
“I would feel that it was,” Mukasey replied.
But like the cool and collected federal judge he was for almost 20 years, Mukasey refused to take the bait. He restated several times that he wouldn’t draw lines as to when the technique may or may not be legal, even as pressed by senators such Joseph Biden of Delaware, who accused the attorney general of saying that torture was simply a relative matter.
“You’re the first person I’ve ever heard say this,” Biden said.
Mukasey reiterated his belief that under federal law, a balance needed to be struck between the heinous nature of the interrogation practice and the type of information that needed to be obtained.
“This is an issue that people of equal intelligence, equal good faith, with equal vehemence, disagree,” he said.
Nor would Mukasey commit to Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York to advise the president to prohibit waterboarding altogether, despite his belief that the practice is “repugnant.”
“You have a chance to be a leader,” Schumer implored.
The attorney general also addressed legislation pending in Congress to permanently amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, repeating his call for the Senate to provide immunity from civil suits to telecom companies for allegedly cooperating with the National Security Agency’s warrantless wiretapping program. That bill will be taken up again next month.







Comments
So why is Congress still holding hearings on this?
The administration has thwarted the issue of torture coming before the courts once already.
John Negroponte has already admitted that the technique was used by the CIA during the tenure of this administration.
The administration has admitted using the technique.
So why the h*ll hasn't someone, anyone taking this to court?
Whoever authorized this should be in jail. Or as Judge Wallach opined, "In a recent journal essay, Judge Evan Wallach, a member of the U.S. Court of International Trade and an adjunct professor in the law of war, writes that the testimony from American soldiers about this form of torture was gruesome and convincing. A number of the Japanese soldiers convicted by American judges were hanged, while others received lengthy prison sentences or time in labor camps."
Posted by: dogjudge | January 30, 2008 3:34 PM
Mukasey is stonewalling on the US attorney firing investigation, he is stonewalling on the CIA torture tapes, he is stonewalling on torture and pretty much everything else.
The only difference between Mukasey and Gonzales is that Mukasey isn't participating in new crimes - just covering up the old ones.
Posted by: John E | January 30, 2008 4:34 PM
"MUKASEY SPEAKS"
CAN WE JUST ALL GET ALONG.
CAN WE JUST END THE CONSTITUTION RIGHT HERE AND NOW. CAN'T WE JUST LET THIS PRESIDENT RULE AS KING CONGRESSMAN AND CONGRESS WOMEN.
YOU KNOW I AM A POLITICAL FLUNKY NOW. YOU KNOW AMERICA NOW KNOWS THAT I TOO AM NOT GOING TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITITUTION UNTIL GEORGE AND DICK ALLOWS ME TOO.
CAN WE ALL JUST LET IT GO.
ALBERTO, JOHN AND I ARE JUST LAME DUCK WANNABEE ATTORNIES WHO THOUGHT THEY UNDERSTOOD THE CONSTITUTION AND TORTURE.
YA'LL ALL KNOW WE GOT TO COVER THIS UP. CAN WE JUST LET IT GO. DICK IS NOT GOING TO RESIGN HE HAS TOO MUCH RIDING ON CLOSING ALL OF THE NUCLEAR PLANTS.
COME ON, NANCY, COME ON...YOU CAN DO IT. JUST LET THIS CRIMINAL GO FREE.
PLEASE.
Posted by: Roger Morris | January 30, 2008 5:41 PM
Different day, different mouth, same office being just another mouthpiece for the unconstitutional Executive Office.
Posted by: Rick/Sneads Ferry, NC | January 30, 2008 5:43 PM
How can this guy not answer a simple question? All the semantics are ridiculous. This leads me to beleive that he is hiding something, or covering his and his fellow crooks behinds. Just answer the question already!!!
Posted by: Eddie | January 30, 2008 6:31 PM
Waterboarding has been ruined as an effective interrogation device, because now they know they aren't going to die. I am counting on creative minds to come up with suitable replacements.
Posted by: Jack Wilson | January 31, 2008 9:15 AM
I'm amazed there's no outrage in the media over Mukasey's evading of the torture question, or any question for that matter. The headlines, few in number, suggest that "the Democrats" are the only ones upset. Are others too cowed with fear of retribution by their peers?
Posted by: Tom Spence | January 31, 2008 12:37 PM