by Matthew Hay Brown
Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill today expressed optimism that they could quickly come to agreement on an economic stimulus package of the sort described this morning by President Bush – even as they described differing visions of the legislation they would support.
Consider the following statements by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Hoyer, a Democrat, said he was “hopeful that we can come together;” McConnell, a Republican, said “agreement is within our reach.” But this is how they described the discussions already underway:
“There is a broad consensus that quickly enacting a simple, focused and temporary plan that puts money in the hands of low and middle-income Americans will be the most effective shot in the arm to our nation’s economy,” Hoyer said.
“There is an increasing, bipartisan agreement that an economic growth package must be aligned with our long-term economic interests to ensure maximum effectiveness,” McConnell said.
Democrats favor some combination of tax rebates – such as the checks of several hundred dollars that Congress sent to individuals and households in 2001 – extended unemployment benefits, home heating oil assistance and food stamp increases. Republicans back tax breaks that they say would secure jobs and create new employment by encouraging business investment.
The sides also differ on how to pay for a package. Under the “Pay-As-You-Go” rules favored by Democrats, new spending must be offset by spending cuts or revenue increases elsewhere. Republicans oppose tax increases, and some favor taking the opportunity of a stimulus package to make the Bush tax cuts permanent.
“It is clear that hard working families in America are struggling to make ends meet and that the economy needs a boost,” Rep. Jeb Hensarling, chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee, said today in some of the most detailed comments on what a stimulus package could entail.
“Conservatives know that it is never a bad time to let families keep more of their own money,” the Texas Republican continued. “We agree that now is an especially good time for family tax relief given rising energy, food, and tuition costs. However, temporary consumer tax rebates should not be confused with economic stimulus. I remain concerned that in the rush to act, an opportunity to put together legislation that will actually grow and stimulate the economy is being missed.
“The last time our country faced recession, rebates were helpful to consumers but did little to turn around the economy,” Hensarling said. “History shows us that the best way to provide an economic turnaround, preserve jobs and spur economic growth is to ensure that job creators face a lower tax and regulatory burden. … Nothing would help our economy more than making permanent the tax relief that is soon to expire. Congress should also immediately enact laws that reduce the corporate tax rate and capital gains rate while indexing gains attributable for inflation."
House Minority Leader John Boehner suggested a path that could involve both a payout and tax breaks.
“Republicans believe this package should focus on putting more money back into the pocketbooks of middle class families and help employers who create jobs for the American people,” the Ohio Republican said. “I am particularly pleased that the President’s principles for economic growth make clear that tax hikes and unrelated or wasteful spending increases are a non-starter. We need to stimulate the economy, not government programs.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Democrats welcomed Bush’s “willingness to work together with Congress to provide urgent relief to the millions of Americans facing economic hardships.
“We have agreed on the need to provide assistance immediately, and Congress will continue to work with the Administration to stimulate the economy in a way that is timely, targeted, and temporary,” Pelosi said, repeating the phrase coined by former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers that has become a Democratic mantra in the stimulus package discussions.
“We must invest our resources in such a way that injects confidence and consumer demand, promotes economic growth, and creates jobs.”







Comments
Democrats favor tax rebates? Say it isn't so. After they've spent the past seven years bashing President Bush for his tax rebates of 2001? Geez, next they'll be calling for tax cuts for business. Oh wait, Nancy Pelosi already did today according to Washington media.
Posted by: Secrist | January 18, 2008 3:36 PM
already did today according to Washington media.
Posted by: Secrist | January 18, 2008 3:36 PM
Gee, looky here...
It's the guy who has called himself at various times on here:
-Juanito
-Leo T
-Anonymous
-M J
...and now "Secrist"?
This weenie is to afraid to actually use his real post-name (all four of them) because he knows what an embarrassment he has become....and he thinks he's going to trash talk the Dems?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
OBAMA 08!!!!!
Posted by: John E | January 18, 2008 4:15 PM
Secrist,
The tax rebats of 2001 was the Democrats idea. They were not on the table in Bush's initial tax cut package. Go somewhere else to spread lies.
Posted by: john | January 18, 2008 4:32 PM
Don't Cry for Me, America; Paul Krugman:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/opinion/18krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Posted by: dt | January 18, 2008 4:40 PM
I believe Huck has the correct idea...prayer.
Posted by: bill r. | January 18, 2008 5:21 PM
"AMERICA SPEAKS"
KEEP YOUR STIMULUS PACKAGE
JUST LEAVE!
INVEST 150 BILLION IN HEALTHCARE AND GIVE AMERICA A LONGTERM SAVINGS INSTEAD OF AN IRS (YOU OWE ME).
BUT WHEN IN DOUBT, INVEST IN A COMPANY THAT IS NOT SEEKING IMMUNITY FROM CONGRESS.
QWEST STOCKS NEED YOU. PRIVACY RIGHTS IN AMERICA NEEDS YOU.
NOT WALMART OR CHINA OR CITICARD, OR MASTERCARD, OR SOMETHING HECHO IN MEXICO.
9.00 A SHARE OF QWEST STOCK WILL YIELD ME A LOT MORE THAN GEORGE BUSH'S GOVERNMENT HAS IN 7 YEARS.
BUSH NEEDS A SHOT IN THE ARM FULL OF IMPEACHMENT JUICE!
Posted by: Roger Morris | January 18, 2008 5:45 PM
The rebates were Demo ideas? Yeah, and pigs fly. If that were true, why did the Demos spend the last 7 years trashing the rebates and the tax cuts. And now they're proposing to do the same thing? Hypocrisy begins with the letter H, same as Hillary.
Posted by: Secrist | January 18, 2008 6:10 PM
Secrist--because of how it was distributed, mostly to the wealthy.
Posted by: dt | January 18, 2008 9:01 PM
Idea- With each state having different needs and ways to stumulate their economies. Dispense the moneys on a per capita basis to the states that have an economic stimulus plan. In a State like Nevada we could use the money to shore up state revenues for need services for citizens and still have plenty of money to pump the job creation areas and the economic development or chambers of commerces to assist small business. Other states might do other things. But a economic stimulus plan outlining priorities from the states would be required to receive funds on a cash flow basis not just a huge infusion that evaporates quickly..
Posted by: Arnold Lopez III | January 19, 2008 12:55 AM
Have Republicans ever met a problem they didn't want to solve by giving away the treasury to the top .01%?
Posted by: athena | January 19, 2008 2:10 PM
can't beat an article by the "objective" Paul Krugman?
Athena - how is this proposed rebate plan a give away to the top .01%?
Posted by: Terry | January 19, 2008 4:31 PM
Athena must be confusing reality with hillaryitus...if everyone gets a check, how is everyone .01%? Damn those corporations for giving us jobs and making money!
Posted by: Ray | January 23, 2008 10:50 PM
Oh please people!!! It's an election year. They're just using this to try and buy more votes.
Posted by: Tim S. | January 29, 2008 11:42 PM