Post a comment
(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)








Comments
If President Bush wants to remain at all relevant and leave any kind of positive legacy in his last year in office, he could put whatever muscle he has left in service of restoring the federal government’s commitment to medical and health research.
Early in his first term he recommended budgets that strengthened research through the National Institutes of Health. However, since then, he has proposed budgets that undercut decades of sustained investment in research which has drastically reduced early deaths from heart disease and stroke and even reduced cancer deaths.
In his final State of the Union speech, he can show the nation a renewed commitment to this vital public priority.
There seems to be bipartisan support for a short-term economic stimulus of $150 billion, but an increase for research funding should be an integral part of our longer-term growth package.
Research ensures our ability to compete in the global marketplace and helps fuel local economies all over the country. Yet for five years, the federal research budget has been flat.
When federal funding for research stalls, private research spending ultimately stalls, too, resulting in a downward spiral that costs lives, costs jobs, and deters smart young people from choosing careers in science. We must reverse the current trend.
Research!America, the nation’s largest not-for-profit public education and advocacy alliance working to make research to improve health a higher national priority, has good information and analysis on the impact of federal research support on the economy. www.researchamerica.org
Posted by: Ray Allen | January 28, 2008 11:46 AM