![]()
Defense Secretary Robert Gates pauses as he testifies during a hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill February 6, 2008. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
by Aamer Madhani
On arriving to Capitol Hill this morning to discuss the Bush administration's new Pentagon budget, Defense Secretary Robert Gates again said that he didn’t want to hazard a guess on how much the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will cost in the next fiscal year.
But pressed by Sen. Carl Levin, Gates said that it would cost about $170 billion in 2009, an estimate that the secretary offered with the caveat that he would “inevitably” be wrong.
"I have no confidence in that figure," Gates said during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the budget.
In rolling out a proposed $588 billion in new defense spending earlier this week, the Bush administration asked for a bridge allotment of $70 billion to pay for the few months of the next fiscal year, which starts Oct. 1.
Some in Congress have expressed displeasure with Bush again offering a budget that does not include the costs of the two wars. Congress has already allocated about $690 billion for the wars since 2001.
Both the defense secretary and Joint Chiefs chairman, Admiral Mike Mullen, said it was too difficult at this point to determine just how much money will be needed without knowing how many U.S. troops will be in Iraq beyond July.
The Bush administration has sent strong signals that there could be a pause in troop reductions in Iraq this summer. One combat brigade and two Marine battalions have been withdrawn from Iraq without replacements in recent weeks, and four more brigades are scheduled to be withdrawn by this summer and not replaced.
But Gen. David Petraeus has said that he would like to review how the reduced troop levels are affecting the situation in Iraq before further reductions are considered.
Although President Bush has said publicly that he trusts Petraeus’ recommendations and would go along with what he thinks needs to be done, Gates said he and Adm. William Fallon, the chief of Central Command, will also have input.







Comments
Wake up AMERICA!!!!
Posted by: bill r. | February 6, 2008 3:01 PM
Both the defense secretary and Joint Chiefs chairman, Admiral Mike Mullen, said it was too difficult at this point to determine just how much money will be needed without knowing how many U.S. troops will be in Iraq beyond July.
----
Ooh. This is really tough! Need a whole team of Harvard MBAs to work through this. Never in the history of budgeting has someone tried to budget for things that were not entirely predictable.
Try this, deceitful, traitorous, cowardly pigs: Seek an appropriation that assumes the worst, and then don't spend it if things turn out better than assumed. That way the whole country -- not just you criminals who are half out the door anyway -- will be able to adequately assess its financial needs.
Any of you Bush Apologistas have a better idea? How 'bout a fresca?
Posted by: a blinkin | February 6, 2008 3:34 PM
So far, $690 billion. $70 billion more from Georgie, plus another $100 billion from Gates.
According to my Chicago Public Schools math education, that totals $860 billion for this war.
Then throw in John McCain as President, and pretty soon you are at $1 TRILLION!!!
Like a great man once said, "a hundred billion here, a hundred billion there and pretty soon you are talking real money".
Posted by: BobinATL | February 6, 2008 3:37 PM
Nothing clarifies the mind like the night before a hanging. We have both fists into this tar-baby and leaving Iraq or the Middle-East is not an option and never was. Unless someone has a formula for safely burning radioactive oil we are stuck. Iraq was a mistake and it was poorly planned, poorly executed and miserably managed. Time to change, but not with a pull-out. That country belongs to us and it is time we made the point.
Posted by: Charles J. Budde | February 6, 2008 3:43 PM
"A billion here, a billion there. Pretty soon you are talking about real money."
The initmitable Everett Dirkson
Posted by: Charles J. Budde | February 6, 2008 3:45 PM
"SECRETARY GATES SPEAKS"
JIM NUSSLE IS ON CRACK AMERICA.
170 BILLION EMERGENCY SPENDING EVERY SIX MONTHS EQUATES TO THE AMERICAN DOLLAR BEING WORTH ABOUT
$.33 CENTS TO THE DOLLAR.
THAT SHOULD BREAK AMERICAS MIDDLE CLASS FOR THE NEXT 60 YEARS.
THAT MEANS THE GOP WILL BE BACK BABY. WE WILL BE BACK BABY AND HALLIBURTON WILL BE IN DUBAI AND NONE OF YOU GEORGE BUSH, DICK CHENEY HATERS OUT THERE CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT OUR "PRIVATE EQUITY FIRMS IN AMERICA"
THANK YOU JOHN, THANK YOU MITT, THANK YOU MR. BOEHNER.
THANK YOU SUPREME ALLIED COMMANDER OF NATO FOR BEING DISSED AND NOT COMPLAINING. THANK YOU, AFGAN POPPY IS UP!
Posted by: Roger Morris | February 6, 2008 4:24 PM
I thought war was supposed to be good for the economy?
I guess not.
Posted by: Logic Prisoner | February 6, 2008 4:25 PM
Iraq was a mistake and it was poorly planned, poorly executed and miserably managed. Time to change, but not with a pull-out. That country belongs to us and it is time we made the point.
Posted by: Charles J. Budde | February 6, 2008 3:43 PM
That country (Iraq) does not belong to us, it never has and it never will.
The Republican Party is going to pay dearly for this in 08 whether they want to acknowledge it or not.
Posted by: Dr Strangelove | February 6, 2008 4:44 PM
TeamBacteriaClusterBush is trying to destroy us, right? What else can it be?
They are spending on these wars like something from beyond the drunken sailor analogy. They are spending like a drunken crack w#o&e with a stolen Visa card?
Posted by: C.Morris | February 6, 2008 6:19 PM
C.Morris,
Crack wh$$res are much more disciplined when it comes to spending.
Posted by: johnf | February 6, 2008 7:59 PM
Are we Nation Building with hard earned US tax dollars?
Posted by: Raving Loon | February 6, 2008 8:57 PM
I wouldn't worry too much. . .in '09, unless it's a Republican President in '09. Then, that budget is problably actually too low.
Posted by: Lou | February 6, 2008 9:35 PM
Raver,
More like with easily borrowed Chinese $$$.
Posted by: C.Morris | February 6, 2008 10:07 PM
Thats $472 million a day.
Posted by: dt | February 7, 2008 12:18 AM
"The Republican Party is going to pay dearly for this in 08 whether they want to acknowledge it or not."
Let's put more Dems in congress. They've done a wonderful job with the economy during the past 14 months.
The war, the sub-prime mess. They are kicking a$$.
How much of that 860 billion dollars was appropriated by the Democratically controlled congress that took power in Nov 2006?
Posted by: Prisoner of Logic | February 7, 2008 1:17 AM
Prisoner of Logic:
Lame effort, but very little is expected of your ilk.
If Congress had not appropriated the money (not nearly the 860bn, btw), people like you would have been the first to crow about how the Dems don't support the troops. So it's a bit incongruous for you to attack them now for appropriating Commander Murderer's blank check book.
Also, I'm pretty sure it was a certain "war resident," supported by bootlicking Republicant opportunists like McCain, that started and completely botched up this wholly unnecessary war.
Posted by: a blinkin | February 7, 2008 10:04 AM
"Also, I'm pretty sure it was a certain "war resident," supported by bootlicking Republicant opportunists like McCain, that started and completely botched up this wholly unnecessary war."
Keep telling yourself congress has no responsibility and no role.
They've abandoned their constitutional responsibilities to support the dumbest and worst president in history.
Or, are they enabling the President to prosecute a 'botched up' war for political reasons?
They watch troops die and do nothing to stop it.
Go Democrats, your kind of ilk,
Posted by: Prisoner of Logic | February 7, 2008 10:42 AM
"
Any of you Bush Apologistas have a better idea? How 'bout a fresca?
Posted by: a blinkin | February 6, 2008 3:34 PM"
Blinky,
The numbers are staggering, yet we can't afford SS or national health ins?
Hey Big Oligarchy! Sometimes you have to throw a crumb to common proles.
Posted by: C.Morris | February 7, 2008 11:25 AM
Charles:
Thanks for the tip-in on my quote. What ever happened to the days of Republicans like Dirksen, Rockefeller, etc?? Even Barry Goldwater's family is saying he would be appalled at what has happened to the GOP the past few years.
Posted by: BobinATL | February 7, 2008 11:28 AM