by Frank James
Ever since Sen. John McCain's stunning comeback from the political wasteland to become the clear frontrunner for the Republican nomination, many pundits have said that virtually no one in Washington journalism foresaw late last year that the senator from Arizona would be in the position he's now in.
Ahem. Actually your devoted Swamp reporter was on record last year saying he foresaw McCain getting the nomination.
Joe Strupp, a reporter for a publishing industry magazine, Editor & Publisher, asked several political bloggers at newspapers which candidates they thought would win their respective party's nomination.
Here's what he published on Dec. 1, 2007:
The Bloggers Weigh In
James Pindell
The Boston Globe
Blog: Primary Source
Most Crucial Campaign Issue: Iraq
Expected Democratic Nominee: Hillary Clinton
Expected Republican Nominee: Can't choose now
Dark Horse: Mike Huckabee
Political Reporting Hero: David Yepsen, Jules Witcover
Worst thing about blogging: Anxiety
Frank James
Chicago Tribune
Blog: The Swamp
Most Crucial Campaign Issue: Iraq
Expected Democratic Nominee: Hillary Clinton
Expected Republican Nominee: John McCain
Dark Horse: John McCain
Political Reporting Hero: I.F. Stone
Worst thing about blogging: Endless
Kate Phillips
The New York Times
Blog: The Caucus
Most Crucial Campaign Issue: Iraq
Expected Democratic Nominee: No Choice
Expected Republican Nominee: No Choice
Dark Horse: Mike Huckabee
Political Reporting Hero: None
Worst thing about blogging: Only the reader sleeps
Chris Cillizza
The Washington Post
Blog: The Fix
Most Crucial Campaign Issue: Iraq
Expected Democratic Nominee: Hillary Clinton
Expected Republican Nominee: Mitt Romney
Dark Horse: Mike Huckabee, John Edwards
Political Reporting Hero: John Harris
Worst thing about blogging: Time commitment
Andrew Malcolm
Los Angeles Times
Blog: Top of the ticket
Most Crucial Campaign Issue: Iraq
Expected Democratic Nominee: Hillary Clinton
Expected Republican Nominee: Mitt Romney
Dark Horse: John Edwards
Political Reporting Hero: R.W. Apple
Worst thing about blogging: Venomous comments
OK, I admit I was wrong on the Iraq thing although it may rise once again to be the top concern of voters by November. And I could still be wrong on both the McCain and Clinton picks, which were only educated guesses, after all, and neither candidate has the nomination sewn up. But it does look increasingly like McCain will be the Republican nominee.
It always seemed to me that McCain had too much of a political brand name and too interesting a personal biography story to be written off as completely as he was. He was well known and didn't have to be introduced anew to voters.
That presence in voter's minds is important in American politics. It creates a certain comfort level when people are faced with difficult choices.
Also, late last year you could see the Iraq surge was bringing down levels of insecurity in the country and that seemed like a factor that could neutralize the war issue, even before the economy rose to become voters' top concern.
The other reason I thought McCain was still viable back then was that while conservatives had many bones to pick with him, all the other Republican candidates had raised alarm bells for Republican voters too, which those same voters kept telling reporters about.
Whether it was Mitt Romney's alleged inconstancy on important issues or Rudolph Giuliani's moderate social views and messy personal life, if was difficult seeing any of them breezing to the nomination.
All McCain had to do was keep trudging along long enough until the other candidates began to lose lift by voter concerns, which he did. Americans like that kind of tenacity, especially in a presidential candidate, and they're rewarding him in part for it at the polls.
Here's hoping my predictive powers don't fail me when March Madness rolls around.




Comments
That's just because Frank read the comments from devoted volunteers like me. He had the pipeline to McCain's secret weapon.
Just kidding. Great pick, Frank.
Posted by: Jeff | February 6, 2008 12:40 PM
"MCCAIN SPEAKS"
JON NOW YOU KNOW WHAT WE HAVE TO DO.
ARREST ALL POLL WORKERS OVER THE AGE 65 IN ARIZONA.
CLOSE ALL BUT FOUR (4)POLL BOOTHS AT ALL HIGH SCHOOLS.
CONFUSE THE ELDERLY, CONFUSE THE INDEPENDENTS.
GET OUT THOSE "PROVISIONAL BALLOTS" YOU KNOW THE ONES THAT DON'T COUNT.
DON'T COUNT EARLY VOTES.
CALL THE "KEATING FIVE" AND GET ME SOME MORE MONEY.
BY THE WAY, I HATE ARIZONA, I HATE EVEN COMING HERE, AND I DON'T KNOW WHY ALL THESE OLD BROKE MEDICARE RECEPIENTS CONTINUE TO VOTE FOR ME.
THEY GET ON MY NERVES.
SHHHHHH MR. AZSCAM GETER DONE! OKAY!
VOTER SUPPRESSION IS ALIVE IN ARIZONA. CAGING OF VOTES IS ALIVE IN ARIZONA.
WHERE IS U.S. ATTORNEY PAUL CHARLTON WHEN YOU NEED HIM.
OH YEA, TESTIFYING ABOUT "PURGING OF THE PROSECUTORS"
ONE UP FOR JON KYL, MR. JUDICIAL WATCHDOG HIMSELF.
Posted by: Roger Morris | February 6, 2008 1:59 PM
Ingraham, Hannity ,Limbaugh
& Co., or IHL & Co. (pronounced ill), attempted to promote their notion that ideological purity should matter most to Republican primary and caucus goers.
McCains wins did prove them wrong, but that doesn't mean their actions are without negative consequence for the GOP in the general elections.
They will have a very tough time getting the pack of purists they helped create rally behind McCain if he is the nominee.
Ask a purist to flip-flop?
Good luck.
McCain can't rely solely on the votes of moderate Republicans and conservative Democrats to win the general election given the high level of voter participation displayed by the Democrats.
IHL& Co's. actions, however high-minded and good intentioned, may leave the GOP very sick come November.
Posted by: johnf | February 6, 2008 2:31 PM
Look at the Republican choices!?!?!
It's a warmonging "maverick" McCain, or a southern fundie wacko who thinks the world is flat because it says so in the Bible (Huckster), or a soulless robot playing the part of a politician (Romney), or a libertarian wacko from Texas who thinks that returning to a gold standard will help to legalize marijuana (Paul).
Compared to these clowns, McCain actually looks pretty good, he wins because of a terrible group of candidates not because he's anything special.
I'd hate to be a Republican right about now.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushmccainhug2.htm
Posted by: John E | February 6, 2008 2:36 PM
Go ahead and pat yourself on the back for the McCain pick -- you deserve it. But it's interesting that no one seemed to have given Obama any kind of chance, either as the expected nominee or even a dark horse. That certainly speaks of a certain lack of foresight.
Posted by: Fred App | February 6, 2008 4:30 PM