by Mark Silva
"Just relax,'' former President Bill Clinton says to people calling for his wife, the senator from New York, to quit the Democratic presidential contest.
Clinton was marching today in the St. Patrick's Day parade in Girardville, Pa., a tiny town in the coal region of northeastern Pennsylvania, which will hold a party primary election on April 22 that Hillary Clinton counts on reestablishing her claim to the nomination.
Clinton responsed to the argurment voiced by many -- but most notably Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), an Obama supporter, this week -- that Clinton cannot win enough delegates.
Clinton suggested that Leahy doesn't want the former first lady to compete in states such as Pennsylvania because — as he put it — "she might win."
"People should just relax and let the process go on."
The Associated Press reported.







Comments
Let's just relax and release those tax returns and presidential library donors...
Posted by: CTA | March 29, 2008 4:18 PM
I agree with Billary. They have every right to stay in there. So did Hucklebee, and everyone was fine after he dropped out. This thing will resolve itself.
Posted by: karl | March 29, 2008 4:41 PM
When Leahy called for Clinton to get out of the race, he was talking about BILL.
Posted by: tony.s | March 29, 2008 4:42 PM
The Clinton campaign is about $5 Million in debt and the people inside the campaign itsself admit that Hillary is already finished but if they quit now the Clinton family would owe a ton of money because they thought when this primary started that Hillary would have the nomination locked up by Feb 5th. Hillary should have fired her campaign manager, Mark Penn, a long time ago, just for being a dumbarse.
The people who still support Hillary with campaign donations are being used by the Clinton's to pay off the Clinton campaign debt.
The Clinton's, just like the Bush's, don't care about the "little people", it's all about them getting power, nothing more, nothing less.
Tuzla, Northern Ireland, NAFTA ... do Hillary Clinton's repeated claims that turn out to be false fit a pattern? Watch this compilation and decide for yourself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixg4F-qnQvQ
Posted by: Vince Foster lives | March 29, 2008 4:52 PM
Just relax and explain to us what happened with those FBI files.
Posted by: letma | March 29, 2008 4:59 PM
Rezko who received a $3.5 million loan from London-based IRAQI billionaire Nadhmi Auchi -- a loan that was later forgiven in exchange for shares in a prime slice of Chicago real estate. Rezko gave $700,000 of the money to his wife and used the rest to pay legal bills and funnel cash to various supporters."
These Funds from Auchi's loan helped finance a complex series of transactions between Rezko and Democratic Presidential candidate Illinois Senator Barack Obama involving the 2005 purchase of Obama's Chicago mansion and Rezko's purchase of an adjoining landlocked parcel.
Rezko claims he paid “full market price” and Obama apparently received a “discount” of several hundred thousand dollars for his parcel. Rezko then improved his parcel to benefit Obama.
Instead of handing cash to Obama, Rezko handed Obama a preferential price for property. This is the same form of “honest graft” and preferential treatment that sent former Illinois Governor Otto Kerner to jail over 30 years ago, see United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974).
The Chicago Sun-Times recently reported that Mr. Rezko, around the same general period he was wheeling with Obama, also provided a preferential price for a property purchase by U. S. Representative Luis Gutierrez.
Instead of transferring cash to buy influence, Rezko was engaging in structured property transactions and preferential treatment of public officials to confer significant financial benefits on them, far above the legal limits of any legitimate political contribution permitted by federal law.
Mr. Tony Rezko who owns a slum landlord business in inner city Chicago is under indictment in Illinois for seeking to extort money from potential state vendors.
Posted by: Thomas Richards | March 29, 2008 5:02 PM
They should continue; however, it needs to be done w/o the personal attacks, cheap shots and irrelevant rhetoric. Focus on the issues alone and I'm buying: keep arguing over petty and ultimately meaningless and destructive material and I'll vote McCain!
Posted by: David | March 29, 2008 5:05 PM
Right on CTA!!!
But, alas, the Clintons can't relax because of sniper-fire.
Posted by: Dave | March 29, 2008 5:11 PM
Another Hillary "foreign-policy-expert" Clinton moment:
(robertamsterdam.com - no plaigarism here)
quote
The Russia Today reporter said that Clinton was “seemingly savvy on the Medvedev question,” but focused on the fact that she struggled to get his name right. When asked to name the First Deputy Prime Minister, Clinton responded, "Meh, uhm, Me-ned-vadah -- whatever."
end-quote.
Posted by: Dave | March 29, 2008 5:13 PM
5 comments:
(1)Which candidate has been vetted, meaning has provided on his website for the world to scrutinize years of tax documents since being n public office...vs. which candidate continues to conceal that information? And most importantly...WHY?
(2)Which candidate has been caught over and over in lies i.e. Bosnia on at least 3 separate occasions-and yet calls at least 3 separate occasions and mis-speak...and when involved in property scandal said over and over "I don't remember". Do we want a president who 'doesn't remember' and who repeatedly 'mis-speaks'?
(3)Which candidate has denounced special interest groups - the one and only way to change Washington politics...and what does that say about the other candidates? Can they be bought?
(4)Which candidate voted for the Iraq war?
(5)Which candidate supported NAFTA?
The answer to these questions are compelling.
Posted by: lambs | March 29, 2008 5:13 PM
You know, when all this primary stuff started a year ago, I really didn’t have much interest in any of the candidates specifically, only “let’s get anyone else in there other than Bush”. I hadn’t heard of Barack Obama, didn’t feel any specific kinship towards Hillary Clinton, and probably was leaning more towards John Edwards except I couldn’t quite picture him tough enough to accomplish the job. So, I started watching the debates and reading up on all the candidates. I even got on that website (?) that asked a series of questions to see who was more in-line with my own beliefs and positions. I knew once this race got really going, the mudslinging would start, as it tends to do when so much is on the line. But I also knew to try and focus on the message, the track record and the gut feeling I got watching all the Democratic candidates make their cases on the debates. So, here we are, 2 people left standing, a lot of mud everywhere, and my focus still the same: who do I believe will get up, everyday, and work their butt off for me and every hardworking American, because frankly, that’s what matters at the end of all this. Not Parties, not what-ifs, not should haves, but who I believe and trust to seriously get the job done to clean up this situation we find ourselves in, thanks to 8 years of lunacy. Let’s face it, America’s world reputation is in tatters, our economy is a mess, our troops are battered and dying, and frankly, we have a LONG way to go to mend the lines of divisions in this country: racial, gender, economic, etc. In a perfect, ideal world, we wouldn’t be voting for a person because of their “Party” and friends, we would be voting for that individual who has a track record of crossing those very lines and trying to get the important things we all want in life: health, wealth, harmony and happiness, regardless of, gasp, party affiliation. So, after taking that ridiculous but helpful little web questionnaire, watching all the debates, looking at the candidate’s records and just comparing resumes to resumes, I find myself picking the person that has a track record of what I am looking for. That person is Senator Clinton. She has worked hard and diligently for all Americans, and spent years (35) building strong relationships because she has a passionate vision of what America can be, not just because she is running for President. Senator Clinton is the right choice for me in '08
Posted by: sunny florida | March 29, 2008 5:20 PM
“Too little and Too late”
Among a few analysts the question is not who will win the 2008 Democratic nomination race but what would the winning/losing margin. Taking into account the intricacies involved in the race, it is difficult to develop a mathematical model to answer that question with precision. However, using other methods an attempt has been made. Subject to errors and omissions, the findings can be summarized as follows:
HRC will be the overall winner in pledged delegates in the ten (10) remaining contests. The win will be spearheaded by her strong loyal supporters; sympathizers; those who would like to stop Obama’s accession to the general election; and a number of Republicans who recently converted to Democrats in order to propel the feud between the two Democratic candidates. She will win a net margin of about six (6) percent or 35 pledged delegates. Her largest award will be in PA where she will collect a net of 25 delegates. In relative terms, her largest win of about 65 percent will be attained in WV. However, it will only yield a net gain of eight (8) pledged delegates. She will lose in NC and OR.
Overall, Obama will attain the Democratic Party nomination with a net margin of three (3) percent or 115 combined pledged and super delegates. Although the race may appear to be very tight, the size of Obama’s bank of pledged and super delegates is too large for HRC to overcome. Her recent surge in campaign efforts are commendable, but its results would be too little and too late to change the course of the race.
Posted by: jesse | March 29, 2008 5:20 PM
I agree, relax let the people vote, that's why we have a process. We can't believe all the hype surrounding Hillary, which there has been alot of since the race began. Vote on the issues and the character of the person you like best, PERIOD!
Posted by: naNYminute | March 29, 2008 5:28 PM
Politics would be very important if not so worthless.
Posted by: Jorge | March 29, 2008 5:28 PM
CTA...precisely...the Clinton entitlement demands it's pound of flesh.
Posted by: kww | March 29, 2008 5:30 PM
So long as Obama's racist minister of hate is around, Obama's campaign could collapse and open the door for Hillary.
Posted by: client #10 | March 29, 2008 5:30 PM
"People should just relax and let the process go on."
Bill should just relax and....Oh, that's right, he can't relax since he's going to court in the next couple of months to answer to fraud charges concerning the Peter Paul issue.
Posted by: captainkona | March 29, 2008 5:32 PM
How is the candidate of ordinary working class people in PA? Obama.
Here is the proof:
2,514 people in PA donated a total of $2.1 million to Hillary.
3,719 people in PA donated a total of $1.5 million to Obama.
Hillary has the support of big-cats. Obama has the support of common working class people.
Posted by: dave | March 29, 2008 5:33 PM
LET ME HAVE YOUR ATTENTION
OBAMA'S HOME MORTGAGE DEAL WAS SUBSTANDARD.
NOW HE IS WANTING TO PASS A BILL SO FOLKS CANNOT DO WHT HE DID.
Posted by: Don Jones | March 29, 2008 5:34 PM
The Clintons, as usual, have only their own selfish interests at heart. They are not true Democrats, as they have always found it impossible to put the party first. HRC has already lost, but the Clintons are trying to handicap Obama in the general election so that they can come back in 2012. If superdelegates would just rally around our nominee, then we could put an end to this interminable primary. Where are the grown-ups in the party?
Posted by: Jane G. Thomas | March 29, 2008 5:34 PM
Bill Clinton is a senior statesman, vetted at the national level. A great president.
Obama still gets lost in the halls of oCongress. Literally!
Please.
Posted by: geraldinetoo | March 29, 2008 5:37 PM
I'm for Obama, but I'm also beginning to believe what ol' George McGovern said a few days ago. Hillary can't win as long as she's a woman. That's pretty sad. Here's a good thread on the topic:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/27/AR2008032702968_Comments.html
Posted by: GHarri | March 29, 2008 5:39 PM
Leahy doen't care about Pennsylvania, he cares about Hillary winning the battle (PA) but the DEMOCRAT losing the war.
Note that Bill doesn't really adress what Leahy is saying. Bill never addresses the point which is that Hillary is unlikely to win and in the meantime is doing more harm than good.
Bill won't address the harm to the Democratic Party because he's never been loyal to it. It's always been a vehicle for his personal vanity and ambition. Look how badly the Dems lost Congress during his presidency.
Posted by: JTS | March 29, 2008 5:40 PM
I'm a Rep. so I'm looking at this from the outside, but in a race this close, I don't think she has an obligation to drop out. Anything can yet happen. If she wins PA, then neither will have enough delegates to win.
This is what the Dem's setup when they created the Super Delegates. Anyone could have seen this coming when they created this system.
Posted by: Russ | March 29, 2008 5:40 PM
You relax Bubba. Tell your wife the movie is over. Horror movie. Go back to the Senate. The ego of this woman...wait duck Hillary I hear sniper fire!
Posted by: Hillary's wake up call | March 29, 2008 5:55 PM
No, Bill, it's not because she might win. She can win with substantial margins in all the remaining contests and she will still be trailing Barack.
It's precisely because she cannot win the nomination. At some point a good team player who clearly cannot win says, "It's not all about me," withdraws, and throws their support to the winner.
Posted by: mitchgander | March 29, 2008 5:56 PM
What are Obama's supporters so worried about that they need to push to end the primary season before everyone has had a chance to vote? Sounds like something big hasn't yet come out... Also, if Obama is so confident about winning, why is his camp continuously attacking Hillary? If this were really a done deal, he could choose to look like a statesman and not sling mud, but apparently he's not doing as well as he and his supporters are trying to project. Perhaps Hillary has a far better chance to win than what the Obama camp is willing to admit. Hillary, stay the course!
Posted by: Time for Obama to Step Down | March 29, 2008 5:56 PM
just relax Bill and read this:
WASHINGTON -- Six years ago, the launch of Hillary Clinton's career in the US Senate was marred by allegations that her brothers had received payments from people pardoned by President Bill Clinton in the waning months of his presidency.Boston.com in the wake of the launch of her presidential campaign, the pardon controversy has reemerged in an obscure court case in which Senator Clinton's brother Tony is battling an order to repay more than $100,000 he received from a couple pardoned by President Clinton.Tony Rodham, who acknowledged approaching the president about a pardon for the couple, is the second of Hillary Clinton's brothers to receive money from people who were eventually pardoned by President Clinton. Hugh Rodham received $400,000 from two people, one of whom was pardoned and one whose sentence was commuted.But while Hillary Clinton immediately expressed chagrin over the news in 2001 that Hugh received the money -- and asked him to return it -- she said Tony was "not paid," according to a congressional report. The Clinton campaign yesterday declined to comment on the case involving Tony Rodham.Clinton critics have been seeking to revive an array of controversies, from the Whitewater land deal to the Monica Lewinsky case. The Clinton campaign has sought to depict them as old or moot cases. But the Tony Rodham case could be different because it is in court just as Senator Clinton's campaign reaches full speed.
Posted by: Lucia Gilmore | March 29, 2008 5:57 PM
lol we are such a backwords country
Posted by: adam | March 29, 2008 5:58 PM
Interesting to note that Obama supporters are showing themselves to be the most divisive, hate-mongering, aggressive, confrontational voters I've ever encountered. So much for uniting the country, guys. Your actions speak far louder than your cult leaders words.
Posted by: JRucker | March 29, 2008 6:00 PM
Let's just relax, tell people what they want to hear, make it up as we go along, saying anything that will get people to vote for Hillary. Let's just RELAX!!!!
Posted by: DB | March 29, 2008 6:01 PM
Yes, people should relax. Obama doesn't want them to of course, because he's not relaxed. See, he realizes he's slumping in popularity since word came out that he's a racist along with his pastor, and he's lied about Nafta and how he compromised his values and got his house. Of course Obama does not want people to show how they feel about him now, he's running scared and so he should be. The truth on Obama came out and not too soon. Thankfully, we all got to see what he's all about. Naturally he wants Hillary to quit, he's afraid of losing. If he were confident it wouldn't matter to Obama if Hillary were in the race just as it didn't matter to McCain that Huckabee was.
Posted by: john | March 29, 2008 6:06 PM
As an Obama supporter I understand that Hillary needs to stay in the race so her supporters can pay off her campaign debts.
Who cares if Hillary stays in the race, it doesnt bother me one way or the other, I understand that the Clinton's don't want to leave this race while they're millions of dollars in debt.
More power to ya Hillary, I hope you recoup all of your losses because you ran a good race and now we can go about the business of making you the new Senate majority leader
Posted by: Paula Jones | March 29, 2008 6:07 PM
The information shown below is result obtained from a campaign contribution search done at The Federal Election Commission website.
http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/
You can get to the above address from Federal Election Commission site.
Covering Period 01/01/2008 Through 01/31/2008
Obama:
Cash on Hand (on 01/01/2008) 18,626,248.13
Total Receipts This Period 36,774,374.00
Total Disbursements This Period 30,460,462.70
Cash on Hand (on 01/31/2008) 24,940,159.43
Covering Period 01/01/2008 Through 01/31/2008
Hillary:
Cash on Hand (on 01/01/2008) 37,947,874.30
Total Receipts This Period 19,747,246.49
Total Disbursements This Period 28,508,779.44
Cash on Hand (on 01/31/2008) 29,186,341.35
Early February Hillary said she loaned her campaign $5 million because her campaign was running out of money, and couldn't pay her staff.
Why loan her campaign $5 million when they had $29 million cash?
Who do you trust now?
Posted by: Dave | March 29, 2008 6:07 PM
Yes, people should relax. Obama doesn't want them to of course, because he's not relaxed. See, he realizes he's slumping in popularity since word came out that he's a racist along with his pastor, and he's lied about Nafta and how he compromised his values and got his house. Of course Obama does not want people to show how they feel about him now, he's running scared and so he should be. The truth on Obama came out and not too soon. Thankfully, we all got to see what he's all about. Naturally he wants Hillary to quit, he's afraid of losing. If he were confident it wouldn't matter to Obama if Hillary were in the race just as it didn't matter to McCain that Huckabee was.
Posted by: john | March 29, 2008 6:09 PM
If she'd quit helping the McCain campaign by praising him as the only other qualified candidate, and if she wasn't doing spectacularly ridiculous things to turn this into a circus like "misspeaking" about ducking bullets in Bosnia when she actually stepped off the plane to a formal greeting, party leaders would probably be content to let this play out. But this circus is just an embarrassment and a distraction.
Posted by: JackieBinAZ | March 29, 2008 6:12 PM
What's next: Hillary claiming that she's been dodging sniper fire from the Democratic leadership?
Posted by: Tom | March 29, 2008 6:14 PM
The Democratic party has fallen and will not be back up in 08.
This has been a tremedous embarassment to all people who have supported the party over the many years.
Have we ever put out two less qualified insincere than these two?
This will not just be a loss for the eventual loser of this primary,but a loss to the Democratic party for years to come.
Posted by: Left out | March 29, 2008 6:15 PM
JFK would be ashamed to have his name conected in any way to these two.
Posted by: enough is enough | March 29, 2008 6:18 PM
Yes Sir Mr. President we will all take a sigh of relief when you and Hillary are no longer in the race. Lights Out!
Posted by: Leon | March 29, 2008 6:32 PM
These people who call for Hillary to quit are just fearful that their anti-white and anti-american Obama will loose before of instead of his boast 'to know me is to love me', voters will find 'to know Obama is to run away from him'.
Neither Clinton nor Obama earns enough delegates to have a legitimate win. Both has an equal 22% (according to a poll) of voters who would like to see both to withdraw.
My advice to these so-called elders and Obama's supporters is to avoid disfranchising the voters or stop listening to their voice because it is us who will decide who will become the president.
As it is, the DNC is already giving Michigan and Florida to McCain by disfranchising the voters of those two states
Posted by: vote4thebest | March 29, 2008 6:33 PM
Gee there's a shock... mr cigar, no-retaliation-for-terrorist-attacks wants us to chill.
What happened to the day wehn ex=presidents conducted themselves with honor.
What a national shame he is
Posted by: Kevin | March 29, 2008 6:39 PM
Here's the most important thing you need to know about this race: it's neck-and-neck.
Only 130 delegates separate Hillary from Senator Obama -- and that's not counting Florida and Michigan. The difference in popular vote is less than 1 percent, and millions of voters have yet to make their voices heard. This election should be about their choice.
But now we're hearing people -- elected officials, party members, and Obama campaign surrogates -- call for Hillary to pull out.
This is Obama's same old "Bare Knuckle Politics" showing through. Have a look at this article to read more about how Obama used "regular old politics" to win in Illionois:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/chi-0704030881apr04,0,6468332.story
Hillary is the best person for the job, give her your support, and most importantly, let the voter decide.
Posted by: America | March 29, 2008 6:45 PM
It's easy for Bill Clinton to say relax; he and Hillary are among the elite of this country and are set for life. For most Americans, another four years of a far-right Republican administration will be diasterous. Hillary needs to drop out and let Obama take on McCain. Hillary, it's OVER.
Posted by: Clark D | March 29, 2008 6:48 PM
YUP!
Thats exactly what I say to my wife when shes right and upset!!!
Posted by: f scott winslow | March 29, 2008 6:48 PM
Wait, the real story is that Girardville, PA holds its St. Patrick's parade two weeks late...oh, and Hillary should drop out.
Posted by: Mike | March 29, 2008 6:50 PM
You Clintons think your owed the white house, its over release your tax returns before they get
lost or misplaced then,
let the new world begin
with change OBAMA as it should. And you wont have
to lie anymore about bosnia
or any where else Hillary
Posted by: Mike | March 29, 2008 7:03 PM
BOTH BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA and Hillary should drop out!
Posted by: mr_cpp | March 29, 2008 7:05 PM
Hillary still has a chance to win the popular vote. If that happens, then why should she drop out? If she wins the popular vote, it would be obama gaming the system for his own victory, not Hilary. Not to mention a very populous state, florida, would again not have their votes counted. I would think the person with the most votes should win an election. Preventing that from happening is exactly what the superdelegates are there for. This idea that Hilary will steal the election is silly. What would having her drop out accomplish? It would just further distance her supporters from Obama. I say let the process work.
Posted by: Joe Jacson | March 29, 2008 7:18 PM
Why is it when Hillary comes up with something that Obama immitates her? And then the press slants all its articles towards Obama? Wow what biased Journalism. His experience would not even get him to run congress let alone our nation. Scarry that he has gotten this far. Amazing that this is looking more like a popularity contest versus the persons abilities. Obama voted NO to withdraw troops from Iraq on 6/22/06 Bill #S 2766, and then goes around the nation he is for Change and has "always been against the War." His attitude in change started when he started campaigning as president. he has done nothing for Change in the last 3 years in congress.
Posted by: Rachel | March 29, 2008 7:21 PM
Relax is right. Do the math, Obama will win. Hillary will just make a fool of herself. btw, if she misspoke because of sleep deprivation, then please don't call President Hillary at 3am. Let her sleep! The world depends on her.
Posted by: Zzz | March 29, 2008 7:37 PM
According to Real Clear Politics, Obama is 167 pledged delegates ahead of Hillary. They estimate that Hillary can come out plus 17 pledged delegates in PA and Obama plus 5 in NC for a gain of plus 12 by Hillary. That would put Obama at plus 155 pledged delegates. After NC, there are only 289 total left to be won. So after PA and NC. If Hillary won 80% of those (231) and Obama won only 20% (58), Hillary would be a total of 6 delegates ahead -- in other words, if Hillary won far beyond any expectations and way beyond any win so far, she would just tie Obama.
Senator Chris Dodd has the right answer, the sensible compromise between “Hillary drop out now” and “let all states vote in the primary before a decision’s made no matter how obvious it already is that statistically one candidate has already won”. Senator Dodd says let’s see how PA(4/ 22) and North Carolina (5/06) and Indiana (5/06) votes go. Surely then the outcome will be very obvious; why pretend otherwise. After May 6th there will be only 202 pledged delegates left to vote out of a total of 3253 pledged delegates. That is about 6.2 %. And May 6th sounds like a very realistically early enough date for the Democratic primary winner to start concentrating on a campaign against McCain, who so far is being given a complete pass by the MSM.
Posted by: Kristin | March 29, 2008 7:54 PM
Relax, tune out, turn off.
Obama 2008
Posted by: Bubba Gump Clinton | March 29, 2008 8:34 PM
YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-)
If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience can manage, and get us out of two wars better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) went to war only when he was convinced that he absolutely had to. Then completed the mission in record time against a nuclear power. AND DID NOT LOSE THE LIFE OF A SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER. NOT ONE!
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience saving the environment is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) left office with the greatest amount of environmental cleanup, and protections in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with little or no education experience is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose ;-) husband (Bill Clinton) made higher education affordable for every American. And created higher job demand and starting salary's than they had ever been before or since.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that Obama with no experience will be better than Hillary Clinton who spent 8 years at the right hand of President Bill Clinton. Who is already on record as one of the greatest Presidents in American history.
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think that you can change the way Washington works with pretty speeches from Obama, rather than with the experience, and political expertise of two master politicians ON YOUR SIDE like Hillary and Bill Clinton..
You Might Be An Idiot!
If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton. :-)
Best regards
jacksmith...
Posted by: jacksmith | March 29, 2008 8:51 PM
It's a call reminiscent of "Frankie Goes to Hollywood":
Relax don't do it
When you want to go to it
Relax don't do it
When you want to come
Relax don't do it
When you want to come
When you want to come
Relax don't do it
When you want to to go to it
Relax don't do it
When you want to come
Relax don't do it
When you want to suck to it
Relax don't do it
When you want to come
Come-oh oh oh
But shoot it in the right direction
Make making it your intention-ooh yeah
Live those dreams
Scheme those schemes
Got to hit me
Hit me
Hit me with those laser beams
I'm coming
I'm coming-yeah
Relax don't do it
When you want to go to it
Relax don't do it
When you want to come
Relax don't do it
When you want to suck to it
Relax don't do it (love)
When you want to come
When you want to come
When you want to come
Come-huh
Get it up
The scene of love
Oh feel it
Relax
Higher higher
Hey-
Pray
Posted by: Bud McFarlin | March 29, 2008 9:29 PM
If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton. :-)
Best regards
jacksmith...
Posted by: jacksmith | March 29, 2008 8:51 PM
Speaking of idiots have you looked in the mirror lately???
Posted by: Alfred E Numan | March 29, 2008 10:40 PM
Obama is so pathetic and so are the Dumbacrats. How could they try to get her out of the race when in reality she is the only one who won the states a Democrats needs to win to win the nomination. Number two: Obama and Pastor
:racist & antisemetic. Number 3: He is promoting racism when the Clintons have done more for the African American Community than any presidents has done in years. Just because you are a minority does not mean you support them. Number 4: Obama did not vote against the war.
5. He is surpressing the votes in both Michigan and Florida.
6.Even though he is a Democrat and a minority, he does not stand for either
7. Finally: If you want a president that has no experience we can have another Bush by putting in Obama
8. Dumbacrats welcome John McCain to the White House.
Posted by: Jerome | March 29, 2008 10:42 PM
Hillary quick duck...there's sniper fire!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwXP_eVVM9A
p.s. Bill get a hobby.
Posted by: Hillary's Call of Duty | March 29, 2008 10:45 PM
If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton. :-)
Best regards
jacksmith...
Posted by: jacksmith | March 29, 2008 8:51 PM
Dude,
Would you PLEASE stop cutting and pasting that "you might be an idiot" crap?!
I'm a Hillary supporter and even I quit laughing at that garbage about a year ago!
Posted by: stacy | March 29, 2008 10:47 PM
For the first time in the history of the USA presidency representative of half of the society/ the female gender Lady Clinton has risen to the occassion so close yet so far.This historical injustice to women who should have got by now half share is yet to get a chance forthe female president.How starnge that now you have one qualified & competitive lady whom some people are calling to quit before the entire process is over. If Mr. Obama shd get the nomination because he is th first black to become president & from minority community then madame Clinton is also the first woman & will make more impoftant history.Why not make double history & sure winner by teaming then up.The fact that afro asian community voting en block for Mr. Obama looks like color racism that is of bad taste. Mr. Obama is no more a clen candidate as we now know of many controversies. So it does not guarantee sure win. So let us pray for the sure win team.
Posted by: Ram Bahadur K.C. | March 30, 2008 12:13 AM
I am amazed that people are still talking of Hillary's 35 Y of experience helping the poor & down trodden.
Here are my highlights
More than ten years @ union busting Rose Law Firm
1986-1992 Board of Walmart. (Gee I wonder whether the plan Mrs. Shank has is the one HRC wants us all to have.
My personal favorite getting a 42 year old rapist a reduced sentence by impeaching his 12 Y old victim.
I think I understand the sniper fire misspeaking.
I'd rather be shot than live with doing that to a child.
Posted by: Miriam | March 30, 2008 12:39 AM
B.J. Clinton---'Just Relax'
Like you were B.J. in the 1990's when terrorist attacks went on at home and abroad and you did nothing, but relax?
Were you relaxing when 9/11 was planned under your nose for three years?
THE SECOND WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY...B.J. CLINTON!
The Grand Prize winner is still Jimma Carter at #1
Paulo
Posted by: Paulo | March 30, 2008 1:29 AM
Sleep it off Paula. William Jefferson Clinton left office with one of the highest approval ratings ever. He will forever be revered as one of the best Presidents this country has ever had. George W. Bush will consistently be considered the worst.
9/11 could have been prevented, if Al Gore were president.
Posted by: haywood Jablome | March 30, 2008 1:01 PM
THE SECOND WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY...B.J. CLINTON!
The Grand Prize winner is still Jimma Carter at #1
Paulo
Posted by: Paulo | March 30, 2008 1:29 AM
I gotta admit Paulo (or Paula) you guys have us beat. Bush/Cheney wins hands down. A failed president who started a criminal war to profit his corporate stooges. 4,000 or more dead and countless wounded. Untold more with bloodbourne illness courtesy of KB a.k.a.(Halliburton) developing problem that will dwarf Gulf War Syndrome. Yep Paulo you've finally beat the liberals and created the Monster you always wanted he lives in the Whitehouse and in Crawford TX. You on the other hand still live under a rock. p.s. enjoy the Kool-Aid!!!
Posted by: Bush Family Value$ | March 30, 2008 5:35 PM
Sen. Leahy is a totally womanish he should be wearing the old skirts of Hillary, why should he be so jealouse about Hillary??
Hillary has been recognised her attributes of leadership qualities, experience and she didn't come up or appeared from nowhere. She has the reputation and ability to be a competent, most strongest contender in the political field than any other males or females in the USA. This is what I should that people must making judgement of the levels beyond their reach another words Leahy is only a Sen. he has never tried to compete for the presidency nomination neither he would have been recognized even if he had tried so why Leahy is telling someone who is with better ability and experience?
Hillary is a very clear model for the people of America and women foe America and the men can now believe in women which created a historical event to the American hisory.
"God Bless Hillary"
Posted by: saranklimbu | March 30, 2008 9:51 PM
I listen to you All Hillary's supporters very well. One thing you all are missing are that :
(1) T o becom e a Strong Leader, you will have to be Trusted
(2) To become a Strong Leader you will have to be Calm Cool and be a Good Listeners
(3) T o become a Strong Leader you must be able to Carry the Feelings of your Grass Roots people
(4) To become a Strong Leader you will have to be Frank and have a Not Wavy Judgement and Not to say what peolple wanted you to say and Politics as usaul
(5) Tom become A Strong Leader Hillary must have not and Lied over to Discredit Peter Paul and Sterling in 2000 after helping to Fund your Senatorial campaign
(6) To become a Strong Leader Hillary would have Not Lied over Bosnia and later called Misspoken
(7) To be come a Strong Leader Hillary would not be prefering the Oldies like her as better than a Party Rival to become the President of America.
Hillary is NO MORE the FRONT RUNNER, she will continue to Trail Obama in the Remaining Primary Delegates cvount and in Popular Votes and the win in the number of States, even come reelection into Michigan and Florida, although I think such have a great Remote of happening.
The Super Delegates are only waiting for Results of remining primaries before they will show Hillary the door.
Posted by: Roy | April 20, 2008 9:16 AM