The Swamp
-
Posted March 25, 2008 12:05 PM
The Swamp

by Frank James

I don't know if Sen. Barack Obama made a Lincoln-at-Gettysburg style comment that the world would little note nor remember the words he spoke at the modest 2002 anti-war protest in Chicago.

But it's clear Obama's speech, which has become central to his presidential campaign since it demonstrates his opposition to the Iraq War since before its start, wasn't exactly the speech heard around the world at the time. In that respect, it was the antithesis of Obama's 2004 speech at the Democratic National Convention.

National Public Radio's "Morning Edition" program had an interesting segment today on the speech and how little notice it had at the time. Then-Chicago Tribune reporter Bill Glauber didn't even quote Obama in the article he wrote, which you can read below.

To show just how little noticed the speech was at the time, NPR could only find 13 seconds of audiotape of Obama's remarks. Even the Obama campaign couldn't find tape of it, having to recreate it for purposes of the presidential campaign.

In any event, knowing everything we know now, it's worth looking back at that speech and the real-time reaction to it, which was arguably pretty underwhelming.

Here's the story by then-Chicago Tribune reporter Bill Glauber:

War protesters gentler, but passion still burns

Date: Thursday, October 3, 2002
Source: By Bill Glauber, Tribune staff reporter.
Illustration: PHOTOS 2
Caption: PHOTO (color): A crowd of about 1,000 listens to Jesse Jackson Wednesday at a Loop rally against a possible war with Iraq, as Vietnam-era protesters and college students mingle. Tribune photo by Abel Uribe.

PHOTO: Peace rally organizers Marilyn Katz (from left) and Bettylu Saltzman meet while Adele Simmons, former president of the MacArthur Foundation, watches the protest. Tribune photo by Abel Uribe.

They sang "Give Peace a Chance," waved tasteful "War Is Not An Option" placards and listened dutifully to speeches that echoed in the glass-and-steel canyon that is Federal Plaza Wednesday.

Some in the crowd of about 1,000 came straight off the college campus. Others were veterans of past protests to stop the Vietnam War. There were even a few second-generation activists following in the wake of parents radicalized by Vietnam.Older and grayer, the 1960s anti-war vets were as passionate as ever to demonstrate against the Bush administration's preparations for war in Iraq.

Organizers pronounced themselves delighted with the rally's modest turnout, its content and its civility.

"Well, nobody misbehaves anymore. We're all too old," said Don Rose, a longtime social and political activist.

Despite the small turnout, the rally marked the first high-profile public disapproval in Chicago of the Bush administration's war against terrorism.

The rally wasn't a replay of the Days of Rage--it was more like a gentle call to arms for a nascent peace movement desperate to head off a new Gulf War. From savvy public relations experts, veteran political activists and religious leaders to a few scruffy anti-global campaigners, a loose coalition took shape in a Chicago square.

Organizers and speakers went to great lengths to emphasize that it's not all wars they oppose--just the prospect of a rush to war against Iraq.

"I've been surprised in the last three or four weeks how vocal people have become" against war in Iraq, said Rev. Paul H. Rutgers, executive director of the Council of Religious Leaders of Metropolitan Chicago.

The familiar cast of Chicago activists voiced its opposition while trying to summon a new generation to the front lines of protest.

"There are a lot of new people and a lot of the usual suspects. That doesn't bother me because you've got to begin somewhere," said Marilyn Katz, a one-time organizer for the 1960s Students for a Democratic Society.

The genesis of the rally occurred Sept. 21 over a dinner at Pasteur, a Vietnamese restaurant. Bettylu Saltzman, a Democratic Party activist who serves on a host of civic boards, was dining with her husband and two couples and discussing current events.

"We've got to do something," she recalled saying of the buildup to war in Iraq.

Even though the grandmother of eight hadn't been to any peace rallies in decades, she knew exactly whom to call the next morning: Katz. A one-time anti-war firebrand, Katz has slipped easily into the mainstream, running an influential public relations firm.

The two e-mailed old friends, sought ideas and set up a meeting at Saltzman's home, where around two dozen people showed up to plan a rally.

"Everyone took assignments and just starting doing it," Saltzman said.

The rally was launched--and the Chicagoans Against War in Iraq was born.

But the organizers and protesters clearly have a way to go before currying widespread favor with an American public girding for another war. An anti-war rally last week in London drew 150,000 people.

Rev. Jesse Jackson told the Chicago audience, "This is a rally to stop a war from occurring." He implored the crowd to look to the sky and count to 10.

"I just diverted your attention away from the rally," Jackson said. "That's what George Bush is doing. The sky is not falling and we're not threatened by Saddam Hussein."

Beyond the anti-war rhetoric, the protest was significant because it placed on display Chicago's anti-war community in a serene setting where police stood by and watched as the rally unfolded without incident.

"It's not coming from above, it's coming from across all generations, all walks of life," said one of the rally organizers, Jennifer Amdur Spitz, a public relations executive. "This is not a fringe movement."

Still, it looked a lot like the old peace movement.

Rose, 72, has been in politics since his teenage years, when he supported the third-party presidential insurgency of Henry Wallace. In his 20s, he was at the vanguard of an effort to integrate Chicago, often a tavern at a time. He later served as an anti-war spokesman during the height of Vietnam-era demonstrations. And in his political prime he managed the winning Chicago mayoral campaign of Jane Byrne.

"I was in sit-ins before we knew they were called sit-ins," he said.

Rose said he didn't protest the Gulf War and was "generally supportive" of the 1999 U.S.-led bombing campaign in Kosovo.

"This one, the impending Iraq war, really began to scare me," he said. "The people who are in Washington right now scare the pants off me. I think it's the most dangerous administration not just in my lifetime, but possibly the entire American century. Whatever I can do, I'll do, even though it seems like little more than punching a keyboard."

The Internet--and e-mail--were key tools the organizers used to get the rally staged so quickly.

Gary Wheaton, 59, a carpenter, said he attends protests "every time there is a war" and added the rally had a quality of "deja vu."

"It's self-contained," he said. "Everyone knows the script, the roles and the stage."

Jeffrey Scott, 58, a human resources manager who last protested during Vietnam, said it is difficult to get the masses on the streets to oppose war because society has changed dramatically since the 1960s.

"You see people in other countries bringing down a government beating on pots and pans with spoons," he said. "Here, people go to health clubs, or work 12 hours a day, or go to their kid's sports games."

Among the new generation in the crowd was Amanda Klonsky, 23, whose father was a member of Students for a Democratic Society. At the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Klonsky was among 54 activists who took over the chancellor's office in February 2000 to protest school clothing made in sweatshops.

"Many of the students who are coming out in opposition to the war, many of them are children of people involved in the anti-war movement of the 1960s," she said.

There were some protest newcomers, like Ayne Dowd, 21, of Omaha, who attended the rally with three of her classmates at DePaul University.

"It's very cool, very empowering," Dowd said.

Andrea Juracek, 22, a DePaul senior from Mt. Prospect, is a protest veteran, participating in rallies against the death penalty and against the bombing of Afghanistan.

"I think this can grow," she said. "More people are against the war rather than for it. When the word gets out, people will start coming out."

Organizers are hopeful the movement will mushroom. They said they handed out more than 1,000 buttons at the downtown rally.

"Maybe the Allstate Arena will be next," said one of the organizers, Amdur Spitz. "We'll have a meeting and figure it out."

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

But you found it! And it wasnt a total contradiction of what he is saying today! Unlike some other people.


This was a great speech by Obama in 2002, what a shame it was not heard throughout the world. He and Rep. Byrd and the several others were right on about this invasion of Iraq and too bad they went ignored.


Frank, exactly what was your [political]purpose for posting this non-issue blog? The only thing OBama has ever said (albeit repeatedly) was that he PUBLICLY opposed the war at least as early as 2002. That has been proven, even by you. End of discourse. There are many IMPORTANT things going on today (and yeesterday)that you should be spending your mind on. Thanks


There are some things that Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson and George Washington and Martin Luther King Jr. said that STILL are not important, even today. Does it diminish their place in history ?? Move on to something more noteworthy!!!


When the President and Vice President of the United States, and the Secretary of State lie about something repeatedly, and the mainstream media echos the lies without question, of course most Americans are going to believe it and not pay attention to those speaking the truth. Good thing they didn't lie about a personal affair that affected the country in no way, then people (media) would be outraged.


The war that anti-war Obama voted to fund until 2006? Oh, that anti-war Obama!


The group that Obama spoke to is, like the kooks who terrorized Holy Name Cathedral last Sunday, associated with International Answer, the Marxist group that is anti-military and anti-American. (Source: Chicagoans Against the Iraq War website). You judge people by the company they keep and Obama was keeping company with a Marxist-Leninist organization in his 2002 speech.


You judge people by the company they keep and Obama was keeping company with a Marxist-Leninist organization in his 2002 speech.

Posted by: Danforth | March 25, 2008 1:34 PM

Joe McCarthy Lives!


Danforth -- reading is a skill...

The article makes it clear that it was an outdoor rally (one I was supposed to go to but had to work). It was a public forum.

It is easier to simply call people names and diminish an event. No matter what, these people who were protesting the war BEFORE it started were RIGHT. The sitting administration was WRONG. Actually they weren't just wrong, they lied to us. Plain and simple.

And to Jeff, yes, Obama voted to fund the military after he entered the Senate. He never said he was against the military, who are already in harm's way, he said he was against this war policy. There is a huge difference. Obviously you've never served in the military. He also, with each vote, made it very clear that his vote was to continue to support our troops. Do you have a problem with that??


The group that Obama spoke to is, like the kooks who terrorized Holy Name Cathedral last Sunday, associated with International Answer, the Marxist group that is anti-military and anti-American. (Source: Chicagoans Against the Iraq War website). You judge people by the company they keep and Obama was keeping company with a Marxist-Leninist organization in his 2002 speech.

Posted by: Danforth | March 25, 2008 1:34 PM

I'm guessing Obama wouldn't be getting your vote if he'd been hanging with the Vienna Boys Choir either, Danforth. Look up the word "pretext."


His 2002 words were before he was a Senator. After he became one in 2004, he admitted he didn't have access to the Senate Intelligence Reports, and admitted he doesn't know how he would have voted on the Iraq War Resolution had he been a Senator. Subsequently, he voted multiple times to fund the war, and called early withdrawal a "slap in the face" to the troops. Now he is back in the anti-war stance, trying to pretend he was there all along.


Obama has been running for President for a very long time and everything he has done- community organizing, joining the popular Church of his district, running for Congress and losing, running for state senate and winning, running for US Senate and winning--and now while still a Jr. Senator running for President. It all seems so calculating and focused- the way he has developed as an orator, the branding of his name and personality, etc. He is indeed a very seasoned politician emerging from the Chicago Political Machine.


"OBAMA SPEAKS"

PLEASE REMOVE "ATTORNEY GENERAL" IN DEALING WITH THE COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION AND INSERT "SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY"

I CHOOSE "NEGROPONTE" AS HEAD OF HOMELAND SECURITY.

REMOVE "INTERIOR SECRETARY" IN DEALING WITH SECRETARY OF INTERIOR AND INSERT "SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY" AKA "NEGROPONTE"

THAT'S RIGHT AMERICA INDIANS TOO GIVE UP THEIR SOVEREINTY UNTO MY "SECRETARY"

WE DON'T NEED TO RECOGNIZE NO STIKIN TREATIES. AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES I WILL MAKE 11 MILLION "Z" PEOPLE ATTEST AND PAY INTO MY (EEVS/SSN/REAL ID)PRIVATE EQUITY SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNTS HELD IN OUR OVERSEAS MARKETS.

OH THAT WAS MCCAIN'S SPEECH, I'M SORRY.

THE IRAQI OIL "LIBERATION" IS NOT "AMERICAN LIBERATION" THEOLOGY. THAT'S GEORGE BUSH "IRAQI OIL LIBERATION"

IN 2002, I DIDN'T VOTE YES, BECAUSE I READ HIS UNSUSPECTED, I DIDN'T KNOW, "SEE SPOT RUN, SEE AMERICA RUN SPEECH"

I NOTICED THE "UNDERTONES" VS HIS "OVERTONES"

IT WAS OBVIOUS THE SPEECH WAS WRITTEN THAT EARLY MORNING.

THAT IS WHY I DIDN'T VOTE TO AUTHORIZE GEORGE BUSH TO GO TO THE UNITED NATIONS PRIOR TO "OCCUPYING" IRAQ!


I notice that none of the posters deny that International Answer, an organization that admittedly has Marxist-Leninist staffers, includes as its members the ill-named Catholic Schoolgirls who trashed Holy Name, and the Chicagoans Against the War, nor that they were and continue to be anti-military and anti-American. Maybe Obama did not know this when he spoke to CATW, and just thought it was a group of well-meaning people who happened to meet over coffee. Okay. But if so, he wins the award for lollipop of the year. And finally, for Just Steve, I had 7 years in the military. How about you?


He wasn't a US Senator then...

What did you expect? The State of the Union broadcast on all cable channels from a guy at an ANTI-WAR rally in 2002! ANTI-WAR! In 2002!

No, that's why it wasn't big. At least until Obama's prescience was proven with 4,000 troops dead, and roughly 30,000 injured.

It was big in courage.


This rally was 5 1/2 months before we went to war in Iraq. Why is it all the loons keep saying "President Bush 'rushed' us into war"?


How can he stump on a 2002 speech given when he was not in the U.S. Senate, could not lose his post for voting against a lying president (he lied!!!! and is impeachable at LEAST for it now), and NOW when he IS IN THE SENATE, has VOTED EXACTLY LIKE HILARY TO CONTINUE FUNDING FOR THIS WAR.
HYPOCRITICAL, IT SEEMS.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "f" in the field below:

Election 2008
Tag Cloud
[What is this?]