LIVE DEBATE BLOG TONIGHT: Philadelphia Free-for-all

This is the first thing Clinton should be asked about at the debate tonight!

Hillary Clinton On Working Class Whites In 1995: "Screw 'Em":

Yes that First Lady Hillary Clinton comments after congressional elections. Sounds a bit bitter to me and a bit elitist.

"In January 1995, as the Clintons were licking their wounds from the 1994 congressional elections, a debate emerged at a retreat at Camp David. Should the administration make overtures to working class white southerners who had all but forsaken the Democratic Party? The then-first lady took a less than inclusive approach".

"Screw 'em," she told her husband. "You don't owe them a thing, Bill. They're doing nothing for you; you don't have to do anything for them."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/16/hillary-clinton-on-workin_n_97017.html

Lisa--looks like 3 negatives for Obama and 1 sorta negative for HIlary.
But the polls the Swamp is using are dead wrong. Use the ones in the Philly Inquirer--I think they're more accurate.
Clinton's ahead 6 points, but that's before the whole 'typical white people bitter' snafu. (Just droppin' pearls outta his mouth, doncha know).
And the mainstream media is gonna fluff his pillow and powder his behind tonight as they want this thing to drag out so they can get more money and help the Dems lose in the Fall.

http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/New_Daily_News_poll_shows_Obama_closing_in_on_
Clinton.html
Chauncy--you work for Obama HQ, right?
Why would you try to destroy the person who's probably going to be the topof the ticket against McCain? Do you want us to lose to McCain at Obama HQ?
And, even if she had said that--it's not hurt her yet in southern states. The Repugs voted Obama to the top of the ticket there.
HIS PLACE IN THIS RACE IS FAKE. It's a FAIRY TALE, folks. Just like his 'war opposition' is a fairytale.
Obama needs to stop hurting America and become Hilary's veep.
Then he can donate all those campaign contributions to repair the Chicago housing his friend Rezko trshed in his own district while he was a state legislator.
Cover the blow by blow, Trib, but also do some real reporting now and then, please?

I do hope the time of the debate will not be wasted on non-issue dribble. We need to hear what and how the candidates are planning to put this country back on track. Enough time has been wasted talking about the things that don't matter to the election. We need to hear from both the candidates what their plans are. I hope Hillary gets the questions second so we can see how Obama does without her prompting.

Hillary Clinton On Working Class Whites In 1995: "Screw 'Em":

Clinton really stepped in it when she tried to make an issue over the "angry and bitter" comments and now, as is usual with her, it turns out that Hillary was not only saying the very same thing but much worse...

There Hillary was at Camp David, back behind......a little cottage her grandfather had built, using only his bare hands and a worn, patched loafer for tools.

Relaxing with Bill over some skeet shooting, a skill taught to her by her hard-working daddy back in Scranton, P-A.

"Screw 'em, Bill," she said, bitterly.

And, then, Bill did.

One working-class Southern white woman at a time.

Ask Hillary about her connection with the upcoming Peter Paul trial.

Is the debate televised, and on what channel?

"Is the debate televised, and on what channel?" - Carol Harvey

Ahh, I'm always amazed at people that comment on articles without reading them. Read the article and you will find you answer. Sorry, you will actually have to determine the channel number in your market all by yourself.

I hope Hillary can pull this out. She is the best candidate in the Dem party. Obama is a liar and a racist. He has ties to Rezko. He took money from the crook. He took land at a very cheap price from the man. Obama is slick. He wants us to believe that he will bring change to Washington. He has ties to corruption and racism. What in the world would he be changing. He would screw White people and push affirmative action programs and welfare programs for his black brothers. White People need to wake up. This man does not stand for you. He stands with rev Wright the racist, anti-white, anti-American idiot. Keep America Safe. Vote against Barrack Hussin Obama.

It doesn't matter if Obama or goes first. In the end you will have the same outcome. Hillary will give what ever response that she thinks is suitable for the current audiance, regaurdless if she contradicts herself from a previously recorded statements. Obama will nail every question that is thrown at him. People may not like Obama's plan; however, given the current candidates he's more profitable for the country. If anyone does any emulation of candidates that would be Hillary. If anyone pays attention to her ads, they say that Hillary talks about more concerning issues. This would include the economy, health care ect. Hillary is the candidate that is persues debates over other candidates personal lives, Obama was strictly trying to keep the campaign on the road of what his organization has to offer. Obama also attacks every issue that concerns America. He then gives solutions to problems. Hillary can't compete against Obama. Her only line of defense is to scramble the meaning of his speaches. I think America know that Obama is going to be the nominee. To be honest Hillary is a tougher opponet than McCain. All I can say, which I've said time and time again, watch the debate, analyze each candidates response. Afterwards decide who the better candidate is. Understand how it will affect your life and the future of this country.

This will be nothing but one non-issue jab after another. We're not going to get answers now just "You're a turd", "I know you are but what am I?" pee-wee level non-answers to questions. I for one blame Clinton and her clintonians for bringing the level of the campaigns to the lowest level in the first place. I'm not for Obama myself but he kept his head above the water for as long as he could without being dragged down by this bug-eyed power-mad-hungry queen.

If Clinton has any sense, she won't bring up or allude to the Wright comments, or the "elitist" theory. Obama has proven many times he can talk his way out of just about anything relating to those and many other issues, things that would sink any other candidate and instead, he'll come out of it looking like a saint.

I hope that campaigns come up with something worth discussing. I'm still undecided and this Annie Oakley and elitist babble is just making McCain actually seem like a viable candidate to me.

The debate is on ABC, Channel 7.

No offense intended, but I hope people actually watch the debate, rather than blog their way through it. Blog your butts off afterward, though! I know I will!

I'm concerned the reason so many people support Hillary is because they don't take the time to actually watch her and listen to what she says. Take the time and actually pay attention to her body language - ask yourself if this is the person you want representing the United States. She is repellant.

This is a very important debate and I hope it will be the final nail in the Clinton Campaign Coffin.

Chauncy posted a very real comment from the past- kinda like blast from the past, only a sad one. I could never trust someone who has wily campaign managers, has boatloads of money but no concrete plan to bring affordable housing, gas price relief, and security to us all... and she points a finger at another democrat.
If only mcduggal (read McCain) was not 71, and would promise to bring troops home,... I'd go for him.
Get real both you dems, stop the silliness.
Help me vote the dems in the WH, both you senators.

What did Obama's tax returns reveal?

"Packing a 6 shooter" what kind of language is that? Slang ghetto? Is Obama really a thug with a racist chip on his shoulder? I say maybe.

what i want to know is why did he deny he made these statements for almost a week. why did it take it being released to the airwaves before he admitted it.

is it because he considered them derogatory? and why did he lie and say he never said them?

Hey Jilly, tell Angellight and Julie Mack and the other kids travelin' with the messiah hoping to get a job in the white house that attacking HIlary right now is exactly what Howard Dean asked the campaigns not to do.
Hilary's been a class act.
Not so Obama. When he issues his W.O.R.M. statements (what i really meant) he ALWAYS blames Hilary for it making the news-- and it's always false! It is always a news story ahead of time.
rezko=Obama=Mccain.
He's a spoiler.
I think he's crooked and you don't wanna see it.
It would be a form of withdrawal from the messianic training the Obamas made you endure. (The campaign's looking more and more like a bad cult--the worse thing in the Mayhill Fowler piece was the bit where he said he wanted 'new people' to replace the party stalwarts. He doesn't mention anything about stolen elections. And he's a closet sexist who won't admit he likes his women a certain demure way).
Wake up.
Why you think he took that trip to the caribbean right about now--with all those secret service guys to hurry through the security? Taking cash? Documents about Rezko and god knows what?
Read a newspaper. Get off the blogs and live your life!
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-court-story,0,7957753.htmlstory
- - - -
- Witness tells of mysterious ‘consultant’
- Investment firm received contract from Caribbean.
-
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-court-story,0,7957753.htmlstory
- - - -
- Witness tells of mysterious ‘consultant’
- Investment firm received contract from Caribbean.
=======

Obama HQ---keep the kids off the koolaid. And off the blogs.
And if Howard Dean EVER finds that Obama campaign funds were spent to do blogging during this race---I hope he kicks Obama's snobby (not elitist--elitist is somethingyou earn)
butt.
Julie Mack or Chicago in PA or whatever your handle is-I hope obama gets asked about his convenient caribbean trip.
- - - -Hey Jilly, tell Angellight and Julie Mack and the other kids travelin' with the messiah hoping to get a job in the white house that attacking HIlary right now is exactly what Howard Dean asked the campaigns not to do.
Hilary's been a class act.
Not so Obama. When he issues his W.O.R.M. statements (what i really meant) he ALWAYS blames Hilary for it making the news-- and it's always false! It is always a news story ahead of time.
rezko=Obama=Mccain.
He's a spoiler.
I think he's crooked and you don't wanna see it.
It would be a form of withdrawal from the messianic training the Obamas made you endure. (The campaign's looking more and more like a bad cult--the worse thing in the Mayhill Fowler piece was the bit where he said he wanted 'new people' to replace the party stalwarts. He doesn't mention anything about stolen elections. And he's a closet sexist who won't admit he likes his women a certain demure way).
Wake up.
Why you think he took that trip to the caribbean right about now--with all those secret service guys to hurry through the security? Taking cash? Documents about Rezko and god knows what?
Read a newspaper. Get off the blogs and live your life!
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-court-story,0,7957753.htmlstory
- - - -
- Witness tells of mysterious ‘consultant’
- Investment firm received contract from Caribbean.
-
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-court-story,0,7957753.htmlstory
- - - -
- Witness tells of mysterious ‘consultant’
- Investment firm received contract from Caribbean.
=======

The singlemost thing I am tired of hearing about at this point is that Barack is winning only because he is getting the "Black" vote... If it's truly the case that barack only won the majority of states, the majority of voters, the majority of delegates because the "Black" vote turned out, then maybe, just maybe the "Black" vote is no longer a marginalized minority. Maybe if he has garnered the numbers that he has, then may, just maybe the "Black" vote deserves just a touch more attention that it currently receives. Is there any chance that somehow, during the years of "Black" disenfranchisement, of "Black" disparagement, of the "Black" vote being ignored, the "Black" vote has surpassed the "White" vote in national importance?

It's possible that the "White" vote has become so used to being the clear majority that it somehow can't conceive that it could ever NOT be the deciding voice. Welcome to America, we are a diverse country, everyone has an equal voice, even the "minorities" can decide the future of this great nation.

SUPERDELEGATES SHOULD REMAIN INDEPENDENT UNTILL THE CONVENTION.....

Superdelegates remaining undecided should be left alone and independent to decide which candidate to support.

They should take all the time they need ….

http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/04/superdelegates-independence-of-vote.html

This debate is short on policy and high on issue the press think are hot issues. Please get to the real issues in your questions.

This debate is short on policy and high on issues the press thinks are hot issues. Please get to the real issues in your questions.

Well, the debate is into the first half-hour and I still haven't heard one questions concerning the Iraqi occupation; healthcare; high gas and food prices; NAFTA; Iran; the economy. ABC, your questions are irrelevant and not what the average American wants to hear. All you want to do is stir up trouble with the candidates instead of informing the American people. Bring back the League of Women Voters to run the debates.

Why is the media wasting our time with this stuff, why not ask them what their healthcare plans are?

What is their strategy for Iraq, and foreign policy?

What are their plans for trade with foreign governments who do not follow any human rights that we "supposedly" want to represent?

How are they going to educate our children so our economy can grow? How are they going to reskill our workforce for the future? How are they going to deal with energy policy which is rapidly becoming a crisis.....

Where the freaking heck are the real questions, to me the media is the most embarrassing part of this country by a long shot!!!!!!

c'mon!
i'm trying to keep an open mind here but sen. clinton is getting away even more easily than i thought when i found out that the moderator was a clintonian for 15 years (cfr: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stephanopoulos)!
they spent 10 minutes on the reverend wright comments!
and all she gets back is the "do you really think everybody should have gotten up and left the church?" question!! what challenge is that!

Since Hillary no longer has a valid complaint to continue to bash Obama for his comments without the public looking back at Bill Clinton's statement while he was running for president, " The reason (George H. W. Bush's tactic) works so well now is that you have all these
economically insecure white people who are scared to death," Clinton was quoted saying by the Los Angeles Times in September 1991. I guess now she will accuse him of plagiarism, since her husband made a similar statement first. Read this article.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/13/bill-clinton-flashback-al_n_96433.html

She has never apologized for her repeated lies. If saying,"I misspoken" or "This proves I'm
human" is an apology.. then she has gotten by with another.

If Bill Clinton can make such a derogatory statement and not only be forgiven but elected
president, What's the big deal with Obama... Clinton should know, oh so well, He misspoke! It's proves he's human.

Why are we asking about the lapel pin/ When are they going to start asking about real issues?

I am completely outraged that when so many important issues confront this country that the questioners on the dabate have focused on he said, she said. What about people dying Iraq. Genocide in Darfur, global warming. How small and trivial can we be.

c'mon!
i'm trying to keep an open mind here but sen. clinton is getting away even more easily than i thought when i found out that the moderator was a clintonian for 15 years (cfr: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Stephanopoulos)!
they spent 10 minutes on the reverend wright comments!
and all she gets back is the "do you really think everybody should have gotten up and left the church?" question!! what challenge is that!

I would like to hear what the candidates intend to do about
medicaid cutback, and our small rural hospitals on the verge of closure.......

I would like to hear what the candidates intend to do about
medicaid cutback, and our small rural hospitals on the verge of closure.......

I would like to hear what the candidates intend to do about
medicaid cutback, and our small rural hospitals on the verge of closure.......

Why is the media wasting our time with this stuff, why not ask them what their healthcare plans are?

What is their strategy for Iraq, and foreign policy?

What are their plans for trade with foreign governments who do not follow any human rights that we "supposedly" want to represent?

How are they going to educate our children so our economy can grow? How are they going to reskill our workforce for the future? How are they going to deal with energy policy which is rapidly becoming a crisis.....

Where the freaking heck are the real questions, to me the media is the most embarrassing part of this country by a long shot!!!!!!

Is this a "debate"? or a tabloid headline review? What does asking one candidate (Barrack more than Hill) about such trivial matters (who said what and meant what) and then allowing the other to comment on what they really meant help me decide who will best serve me and my community in the office of President? I'm young and excited to participate in the electoral process, but this is the best the Democrats can provide to help lead my vote? Why Barrack doesn't wear a flag and allowing Hillary to respond? It's worse than the lunchtime dither over US Weekly and The Biggest Loser recaps! Why don't we get around to some issues and stop allowing these pathetic questions and long-winded, wandering, rhetoric-filled responses! This really reflects poorly on the Democratic party as a whole. Are these edgy, point-blank questions supposed to drum up tv ratings? Much more than that, they're not accomplishing much and I hope upon hope no ones vote is decided upon during this catty side-show!

Anyone who has to bring up the color of Obama skin is the one who is racist. He's not racist, you are. I'm white and proudly was not raised to be racist by my parents. I am a democrat and at this point am LEANING towards Obama, but I'm still unsure. I want to know how both of them plan to get jobs back in America, my husband has been laid off for the last 3 years. We as American should care about that. Since, he's been laid off we have not had health insurance, and the only people who care about that are the one's who have lost their health insurance. I AM bitter about how the republican have ran this country for the last 8 years, and anyone in my shoes surely feels the same way. It isn't the 50's, 60's or 70's anymore, so people really need to stop acting like it is.

Is this the Clinton-Stephanopolis debate?

Anyone who has to bring up the color of Obama skin is the one who is racist. He's not racist, you are. I'm white and proudly was not raised to be racist by my parents. I am a democrat and at this point am LEANING towards Obama, but I'm still unsure. I want to know how both of them plan to get jobs back in America, my husband has been laid off for the last 3 years. We as American should care about that. Since, he's been laid off we have not had health insurance, and the only people who care about that are the one's who have lost their health insurance. I AM bitter about how the republican have ran this country for the last 8 years, and anyone in my shoes surely feels the same way. It isn't the 50's, 60's or 70's anymore, so people really need to stop acting like it is.

Hillary has a few "friends" too:

Norman Hsu bundled more than $850,000 for Hillary's presidential campaign and $260,000 for Clinton's Senate races.
Hsu parlayed his charming, obsequious personality into a spot as one of the top twenty Democratic fund-raisers nationwide. Problem is, he turned out to be a convicted felon, on the lam since 1992 due to a grand theft conviction. Then, this December, Hsu was indicted for running a pyramid scheme that defrauded investors out of at least $20 million and that made $25,000 a year in fraudulent political donations.

Marc Rich, fugitive American businessman; Denise Rich, songwriter and socialite.
Denise Rich contributed $70,000 to Hillary's Senate campaign and $450,000 to the Clinton presidential library fund.
Over seventeen years after Marc Rich fled to Switzerland to avoid charges of racketeering, illegal trading, and tax evasion (he owed $48 million), Bill Clinton pardoned Rich during his last moments in the White House. His ex-wife Denise's generous donations and Friend of Bill status gave the pardon a particularly rotten stench.

Aaron Tonken, former Hollywood fund-raiser, current federal penitentiary inmate in California.
In 2000 he hosted a fund-raiser that took in more than $1 million for Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign.
Tonken originally drew interest from the FBI for failing to report some donations from the event to the FEC. Although he was never charged for election-law violations, in 2003 he pleaded guilty to stealing from charities, including, according to an ABC News report, the Betty Ford clinic. He is currently serving a five-year sentence for mail and wire fraud.

Peter F. Paul, renaissance man, jack of all trades co-hosted the 2000 fund-raiser with Tonken.
How did Paul underwrite the gala? According to The Washington Post, by improperly borrowing more than $4 million from Merrill Lynch. Shortly after that was discovered, Paul hopped a plane to Brazil and spent years waging a two-front war: fighting extradition and trying to sue Hillary for underreporting the value of the event. In 2003, Paul was extradited to the U.S., and Clinton agreed to pay a $35,000 fine to the Federal Election Commission.

Sant S. Chatwal, founder of Bombay Palace restaurants.
In 2000, Chatwal hosted a half-million dollar fund-raiser for Clinton in New York. In 2007, he declared his intentions to raise $5 million for Hillary's presidential campaign.
According to The Washington Post, as of September 2007, The IRS was pursuing him for $4 million in back taxes, the State of New York for another $5 million, and the FDIC is suing himin connection with a failed bank venture. The Post wrote, "Yet none of the legal and financial woes--occasionally touched on in American or Indian newspapers or highlighted by political opponents--raised red flags inside Hillary Clinton's fund-raising operation."

International Profit Associates (IPA), an Illinois-based management consulting and business development company.
Bill Clinton pocketed $125,000 for addressing IPA workers in December 2001. The Chicago Sun-Times reported that firm employees have forked over nearly $130,000 in contributions to Hillary's Senate campaigns since 2000.
IPA has faced a string of scandals--most notably, a widely reported sexual harassment suit involving 113 former female employees. Two of them told their stories on a 2005 episode of "Oprah Winfrey Show."

Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie, Taiwanese-Arkansan restaurateur-turned-fund-raiser.
Trie funnelled more than $2.2 million, much of it from foreign corporate donors, to the DNC from 1994-1996 and helped pay $460,000 of the Clintons' legal bills between 1994-1997.
Trie, who knew Clinton from his days as the owner of the Fu Lin restaurant in Little Rock, moved to Washington in 1994 and began donating to the Clintons and the DNC through various shady channels, including through "straw donors," typically poor legal immigrants who stand in for foreign businesspeople.

John Huang, businessman and Commerce Department official under the Clinton administration from 1993 to 1995.
He raised $3.4 million for the DNC in 1996. Most of it has since been returned.
In 1996 Huang solicited an illegal donation of $250,000 from a company in South Korea, as well as $425,000 from donors whose U.S. citizenship was an issue of contention. He also co-organized a 1996 fund-raising event at the Hsi Lai Temple in Southern California, where monks and nuns under an oath of poverty mysteriously contributed large sums of money to the DNC. It was later revealed that they were reimbursed for their donations by the church, and the money had to be returned.

James Riady, Indonesian banking magnate.
Riady and his business associates gave more than $700,000 to the Democratic Party between 1991 and 1997. They also paid $100,000 to Clinton friend Webster L. Hubbell, who resigned from his job as associate attorney general after being charged with tax evasion and mail fraud.
Riady, a regular visitor to the Clinton White House, was busted by the Justice Department in 2001 for funneling foreign corporate money into Clinton's 1992 election effort. (He had to pay out $8.6 million to the DOJ--the largest campaign finance settlement in history.) In 1997, the Thompson-led committee accused Riady of maintaining "a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency."

Jeffrey Epstein: In 2002, the wealthy money-manager and Friend of Bill flew the former president in his private jet to Africa to discuss AIDS policy. He was recently indicted on charges of soliciting prostitution from underage girls. The Smoking Gun has the gruesome details. (Warning: Link is disgusting.)

John K.H. Lee: The South Korean businessman scored a meeting with President Clinton in 1996 after making a $250,000 donation to the DNC. Under U.S. federal election law, foreign companies and individuals are not permitted to make donations, but Lee tried to skirt the restriction by donating via a U.S. subsidiary of his company, which, problematically, didn't really exist. When it was discovered in September 1996 that the money had originated from Lee's South Korea-based parent company, the DNC returned the contribution.

Pauline Kanchanalak: Kanchanalak, a business executive and Democratic fund-raiser who met frequently with President Clinton, was sentenced to six months of house arrest in 1996 for funneling $690,000 of foreign contributions to the DNC. She claimed the money came from her in-laws.

Ng Lap Seng: The businessman and owner of Macau's Fortuna Hotel (per The Washington Post, "known as much for its prostitutes working the lobby as for its floor show of whip-wielding, leather-clad dancers upstairs") wired more than one million dollars to convicted Clinton donor Charlie Trie between 1994 and 1996 through a company the two co-owned--nearly a quarter of that money ended up in the DNC's hands. Ng attended DNC events and met with the Clintons at the White House.

Abdul Rehman Jinnah: According to the Los Angeles Times, this Pakistani immigrant raised more than $45,000 for Hillary Clinton's HillPac, allegedly reimbursing employees who contributed to Democratic causes, including Clinton's political action committee, which is illegal. He fled to Pakistan after a grand jury indicted him for violations of election law in 2006, and was placed on the FBI "featured fugitives" list. He returned to the U.S. last year.

Ron Burkle: He's never been accused of any crimes, but Ron Burkle lies at the center of any innuendo about Bill Clinton's post-presidential life. A much-commented-upon May 2006 New York Times article stated, "Mr. Clinton is rarely without company in public, yet the company he keeps rarely includes his wife. Nights out find him zipping around Los Angeles with his bachelor buddy, Ronald W. Burkle." The zippy Burkle, friends with Bill since 1992, often flies the former president in his private Boeing 575, described by Clinton as "Ron Air" and "Air Force Two." Burkle, also reportedly a "longtime friend" of Michael Jackson, has thrown lavish fund-raisers for Hillary at Green Acres, his Hollywood estate. Rumors abound about the supermarket billionaire's private life. "Page Six" covered Bill's bachelor buddy unfavorably, writing that he used the jet to entertain young models--and that he was dating Gisele Bundchen. Burkle then made headlines by secretly recording an alleged extortion attempt by a reporter for the gossip column. He has also been accused of using his influence as a Democratic donor to speed a law through the California legislature that would have kept the records of his messy divorce proceedings sealed.

Bill Clinton has been a senior advisor to Burkle's Yucaipa Cos. since early 2002. Clinton is only now trying to untangle himself from the company, a move that will simultaneously free him from questions about Yucaipa's ties to Dubai, while also netting a reported $20 million payday. One particularly shady deal Clinton's scheduler helped Yucaipa arrange was its investment in Catholic Church properties at the urging of a young Italian businessman named Raffaello Follieri. As The Wall Street Journal reported last fall, in 2005, Follieri intimated to Clinton aide Douglas Band that Yucaipa could make a killing on the deal--and that his ties to the Vatican would smooth the transaction. Yucaipa plowed as much as $100 million into the venture, and Band was paid a $400,000 "finder's fee" by Follieri. The Italian then spent Yucaipa's cash on an apartment in New York, private jets, and gifts for himself and his girlfriend, The Devil Wears Prada star Anne Hathaway. Burkle is currently suing Follieri for misappropriating at least $1.3 million.

I notice that the closeup shots are of Chelsy or other Clinton supporters only?
Why only focus on the gaffs and not the issues. It seem to be more Sling the Dirt Washington reporting

I thought this was going to be a debate on issues. The moderators are attacking the candidates, and on non-issues. If this pattern continues then we will see questions on this pole and that, and on demographic appeal and no questions on any issue that really is presidential. At least Obama has been trying to bring them back on issue. I think these moderators need to be fired.

Once again we are listening to who did or said what. OK no one is perfect. My interest is how a single mom can afford to pay for a college education for her child when tuition continues to go up and federal funds continue to charge 8% interest on 10 - 20 years student/ parent federal loans? How can we continue to pay the high gas prices to get work where no raises are in sight? How can my son who is soon to graduate afford to pay for health care when he enters the workforce? Can we please stop the noise about their statements, thier associations and FOCUS on the real issues? Unbelievable.

Forty-nine minutes into the debate and we haven't made it pass the stupid nonsense to the canidates' actual views. This wastes the time of everyone truly wanting a change in the country. Thanks for nothing ABC.

Where is Hillary's flag pin? No one is questioning her patriatism. Also, her diamonds are a little distracting.

Where is Hillary's flag pin? No one is questioning her patriatism. Also, her diamonds are a little distracting.

This entire debate has no focus on any key important issues. This is the same old garbage that the media has covered throughout this campaign. Where are the real questions for the canditates to address what they will do? Let hear more of what their plans for the future will be.

And we wonder why no good people run for president. Exhibit A:You will be secretly taped by an internet "reporter" where you think comments are off the record.

About 6 months ago I registered as a Democrat looking for someone to lead us out of the mess we have been led into by President Bush. I would appreciate it if you would allow Senators Obama and Clinton to discuss the issues and how they will get the US back on track. Please drop asking them all of the "garbage" questions that you have harped on for almost an hour.

Any one who has to raise the issue of Obama's skin color is the one who is racist. I am white and proudly raise not to be racist by great parents. Stop being so narrow minded that the only thing to complain about is the color of someone's skin. This isn't the 50's, 60's or 70's anymore!! I am LEANING towards Obama at this point but still keeping an open mind. I want to know how both of them plan to get jobs here in America. My husband was laid off 3 years ago. We lost our health insurance and the only people who really care about that issue are the people who unfortunately lost it due to job loss. Can't afford health insurance on unemployment!! I AM bitter about how our government has let the American people down during the last 8 years, which seems to be dragging out. We need to come together to get the republican out!! I am asking the racist americans to come out of the past and into the present. Your arguments make no sense anymore and you all just sound like narrowminded idiots!!

Will either of the candidates raise taxes? If they do, the tax revenue will likely go down. What is the proactive stimulus option?

Watch the Obamamania black list this debate and the debate monitors now. You want to blame Hillary for her "mis-speaking," Obama can't even answer a question straight. So I see, disowning Wright is like disowning his racist grandmother,not possible, but there he was saying "that is why I disowned him" before having the monitor repeat the word to him. (And so did I with a question mark.) He's asked about the "CASCADES" of emails being sent out from HIS CAMP questioning Hillary's credibility over her "misspeaking," to which he answers about the ridiculousness of focusing on these gaffes he has also made and will make (including in this debate just before). Hypocrite.

I guess that lack of ties between Obama and lobbyists is just another myth about Senator Boy Wonder

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-04-15-obama_N.htm

We are now an hour into this 'debate' and so far we have heard nothing but ridiculous, time wasting rhetoric about NOTHING. If our country has been reduced to electing a president based on whether or not he wears a flag pin, we have a serious problem. I hope that something of substance will be asked in this next hour. I'm disappointed that this is the best two commentators of the quality of Charles Hume and George Stephanopoulos can come up with.

I hope this comes up in the debate tonight!

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton offered a new explanation on Wednesday for what occurred during her visit to Tuzla, Bosnia in 1996. It turns out that she's a U.S. Navy-certified expert sharpshooter, and the news of her armed arrival in Tuzla caused a rebel retreat.

Courtesy of MrSensible.com

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton offered a new explanation on Wednesday for what occurred during her visit to Tuzla, Bosnia in 1996.

Several times during the campaign, Clinton said she "remembered landing under sniper fire" in Tuzla. When footage of the landing showed that not to be the case, Clinton said the remarks were "misstatements."

But at a speech in Pittsburgh, Pa., Clinton said the tranquility in Tuzla was due to intimidation. Accordingly to Clinton, her reputation as a marksman had preceded her.

"I�ve let the secret out in the few days," Clinton said, "but before that it wasn�t widely known that I�m quite a good shot. Maybe I�m being too modest here... I�m actually a great shot. In fact, the U.S. Navy has awarded me with a metal as a certified expert sharpshooter.

"That actually puts me in a very, very elite group. So when we sent word to the rebel factions that I was flying over and I had this distinction and I was armed, they immediately vacated the area surrounding the airfield. That�s why I was able to spend all that time with the little girl in the video."

Clinton said she misspoke about landing under sniper fire because she prefers to be modest about her skills as a marksman.

"I know that people will find this hard to believe. In fact, my opponent has made some rather disparaging comments recently about me thinking I�m Annie Oakley. Obviously he didn�t take my marksmanship seriously. That�s why I am challenging him to a duck hunt for the nomination. If he kills one duck for every three of mine, I�ll declare him the winner. I couldn�t possibly expect such a condescending elitist to be my peer in duck hunting."

Please note that in reality, a duck hunt for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination is highly unlikely. This story is fiction. For more satirical takes on the election, visit MrSensible.com

Re: The Weather Underground. Another misstatement by Clinton. In NO instances did people die due to bombs set off by The Weathermen, save for one of the members when a bomb in the making went off prematurely in NYC. They were actually opposed to killing (at least at the time that they were known as The Weather Underground, however in one case an ex- member was implicated in the killing of a police officer and is currently serving life in prison). They did extensive recon to avoid injury to persons and rather targeted "institutions and ideas". Their motto "bring the war home" put into action was an attempt to increase awareness in America of the War in Vietnam.
Source: The Weather Underground. A Documentary Film

A short note on the "Racist" issue. I am a partner at a Media boutique in the Midwest. At the last big advertising awards show, (800+ attendees), there were (not counting the people on the convention center staff,) a total of 4 African Americans, Myself, a local photographer, a young intern, and the hired female awards presenter. Racism is most certainly still an issue in real-world America, unless you can somehow tell me that in a city with a sizable African-American population, the advertising industry has a African American employment of .03% Maybe it's just a matter that African Americans just don't have a natural ability to draw, or design, or code.

Nora---nobody raised the question of the pin because Hilary wasn't STUPID enough to not put her hand over her heart, and didn't make STUPID statements about the pins!
I'll vote for Obama if he continues getting his butt faked up our ticket by all the Repugs who will vote R in the fall.
Why is this happening?
Where's the media been?
Didn't anybody else wonder what he was hustling out of the country on that Caribbean vacation normal americans take 50 weeks a year (not elitist--snobbery, kids--there's a difference, one is earned, the other is Obama-esque).
- - --
Hey Jilly, tell Angellight and Julie Mack and the other kids travelin' with the messiah hoping to get a job in the white house that attacking HIlary right now is exactly what Howard Dean asked the campaigns not to do.
Hilary's been a class act.
Not so Obama. When he issues his W.O.R.M. statements (what i really meant) he ALWAYS blames Hilary for it making the news-- and it's always false! It is always a news story ahead of time.
rezko=Obama=Mccain.
He's a spoiler.
I think he's crooked and you don't wanna see it.
It would be a form of withdrawal from the messianic training the Obamas made you endure. (The campaign's looking more and more like a bad cult--the worse thing in the Mayhill Fowler piece was the bit where he said he wanted 'new people' to replace the party stalwarts. He doesn't mention anything about stolen elections. And he's a closet sexist who won't admit he likes his women a certain demure way).
Wake up.
Why you think he took that trip to the caribbean right about now--with all those secret service guys to hurry through the security? Taking cash? Documents about Rezko and god knows what?
Read a newspaper. Get off the blogs and live your life!
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-court-story,0,7957753.htmlstory
- - - -
- Witness tells of mysterious ‘consultant’
- Investment firm received contract from Caribbean.
-
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-rezko-court-story,0,7957753.htmlstory
- - - -
- Witness tells of mysterious ‘consultant’
- Investment firm received contract from Caribbean.
=======

this "debate" is unfair...no equal time for each candidate!!!!! ABC sux!!!

correction: 0.3%

What are the Candidates proposals for increasing the AMT? AMT was calculated based on 1960's income. It has not been adjusted for inflation. Will they raise the AMT limit?

H. Clinton is another George Bush - she is incredibly power hungry and will say whatever she thinks the crowds want to hear in order to gain their votes - therefore it is impossible to understand who she is and what she stands for. At least Barrack is consistent in his message as to what he represents and his plans for our country's problems. I laugh at those who think Hillary is some angle - hello Whitewater???? She was the ring-leader and people committed suicide over it! Hello Bosnia - she is a LIAR!! Also, how is she "in touch" with the middle class when she and her husband made $50 Million? I'm so glad people brought up her "Screw 'em" comment. If she runs our country like she runs her campaign she's right - we will be screwed!

Two comments: How can Hillary Clinton bring people together, when she has made blatent racist remarks about Indians, and joked about Ghandi? If this kind of remark was made publicly, what does she say privately (about e.g., blacks and Jews)? Also, how dare she critize Mr. Obama's serving on a board with a '70s Weatherman, when her husband pardoned militant Puerto Ricans who killed U. S. citizens via bombings in New York City because it would help her Hispan ic votes when she ran for the Senate? This pardon was done with her approval.

what are both planning on doing about illegal immigration? the job shortage that is allowing our counry to be over ran with illegals is a fraud and it has to stop. I also think something has to be done that will not allow someone to break into our country and get free stuff, THEY ARE CRIMINALS and I want to know what they are going to do to stop this.

During this long primary campaign, Hillary Clinton has always been penned-in (no pun intended) by her own history. Years of being a target by media sources and Republicans raised her unfavorability numbers to near 50%, usually hovering around 45%-48%. This history makes it difficult for her to go on the attack because to do so plays directly into her unfavorables.

Clinton supporters have told me, over and over, that Clinton is a "known quantity," and, therefore, voters who don't like her already don't like her. In other words, her negative numbers were topped out.

Frankly, I never bought that argument. Her numbers could always go higher. And they have.

Which brings us to Obama's "bitter" comment..

As I wrote in a number of early posts by Hillary loyalists pumping Obama's "bitter" comment:

We'll see how it plays out. But I'm wondering if Hillary's fierce and repeated denunciations play into negative perceptions of her already held by many voters.

... on this subject, regardless of what one thinks of what Obama said, Hillary and her surrogates, particularly a hack like Vilsack who is counting desperately on a Hillary win so he can be the next Secretary of Education (or, who knows, maybe even VP pick), are at risk of overplaying their hand on this.

Hillary has high negatives for a reason. If voters don't think this as serious as Hillary and company continue to claim it is, this may come back to bite her.

We'll see. Judging by the Sunday morning shows and today's PA newspaper endorsements, Clinton and her pals may be in danger of simply looking desperate.

As I noted, the next few days will tell...

I have no control over what anyone says. It appears Hillary thinks she's onto something big. I am not convinced, judging by reactions in PA.

"Mountain" and "molehill" come to mind. Maybe this will really be Obama's undoing. Who knows?

Still, I think Hillary runs the risk of:

Appearing desperate, and
Playing into her negatives.

A look at the Rasmussen rolling favorable/unfavorable numbers show that Clinton's unfavorable number has dipped below 50% only eight days since February 11. And, in fact, her unfavorables have gone from 51% on April 13, the day Obama's comments broke, to 56% today.

Couple that with all of the latest Pennsylvania polls showing little or no movement among the electorate (and, yes, Clinton is headed for a win with only the margin to be determined), and Obama's continued strength in the Gallup, Rasmussen, Reuters and ABC/WaPo national Dem nomination polls, and the conclusion is that Hillary going on the attack drives up her unfavorables.

The boomerang effect that is unique to Clinton because of her history appears to be in full effect.

Out of the three news stories that have dominated the primary campaign over the last several weeks -- Wright, Tuzla and "bitter" -- it appears that Tuzla has had the biggest impact on the electorate. Today's ABC/Washington Post poll includes this paragraph:

Clinton is viewed as "honest and trustworthy" by just 39 percent of Americans, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, compared with 52 percent in May 2006. Nearly six in 10 said in the new poll that she is not honest and trustworthy. And now, compared with Obama, Clinton has a deep trust deficit among Democrats, trailing him by 23 points as the more honest, an area on which she once led both Obama and John Edwards.

The Tuzla fable played to Hillary's biggest weakness among voters: the belief that she is not honest/can't be trusted.

I know Clinton backers will tell me that Michelle Obama's comments, the Wright story and "bitter" will doom Obama in the general, but that is a hypothetical. He may be doomed, he may not be doomed. But he has shown an ability to respond to these crises which inevitably arise in a campaign.

What is a fact are Clinton's rock-solid negatives. And, yes, they can go up. Because voters have preconceived notions about her and every time she attacks or gets caught in even the mildest inaccuracy, all of these doubts about her bubble to the surface again.

Now, I think McCain is an eminently beatable candidate. Regardless of what polls show today, McCain has yet to be tested. (We've been too busy in the primary.) Frankly, he is a lousy candidate and a lousy campaigner in a very, very bad year for Republicans. The economy is not going to be improving before the general. We know Iraq will be the same, or, more likely, worse. McCain is the second coming of Bob Dole and he will meet the same fate as Dole, regardless of who the Democrats nominate.

But Clinton is hamstrung by her past. Would Hillary beat McCain? Of course! Even with her high negatives. But for her campaign to be making the argument that Obama is unelectable is laughable in light of her own problems. And saying that Obama is not electable, doe not, conversely, mean that she's more electable.

The flip side every superdelegate should be asking her/himself when Camp Clinton makes this argument in private conversations is, "But what are Hillary's chances versus Obama's?"

Given the last six weeks, I'd say Obama's chances are better than Clinton's. And both of their chances of becoming president are better than McCain's.

Hillary is doing great in this debate.

as a 56 yo "boomer" i have seen my social security benefits assessments go from approx $1500 per month to approx $600 per month since 2000. i have worked since i was 15 yo until 2001 when i was injured. i have been unable to find reemployment due to those injuries. fortunately, for now anyway, i have someone who is paying my bills. i know that won't last forever. i am single and have no savings...i earned a meager income. i am very unimpressed with the current administration!!! IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE!!!

as a 56 yo "boomer" i have seen my social security benefits assessments go from approx $1500 per month to approx $600 per month since 2000. i have worked since i was 15 yo until 2001 when i was injured. i have been unable to find reemployment due to those injuries. fortunately, for now anyway, i have someone who is paying my bills. i know that won't last forever. i am single and have no savings...i earned a meager income. i am very unimpressed with the current administration!!! IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE!!!

Matias is full of it.
Listen to stupid Bill Ayers' comments.
I have FRIENDS who were frightened out of their skins by those numbskulls.
and Obama...he's a thug. Plain and simple.

What the heck are George and especially Charlie Gibson thinking?? This is not a debate.....It is a set-up for Hillary Clinton........All of the hard questions for Barack and the fluff for Hillary........Abc should be ashamed!

Ask them questions that matter, not whether they are in love with the flag. I had a son in Iraq, thank god he came home alive. Let them tell us how they can make America a better place for all of us. It is an embarrassment to say the Pennsylvania is the debate sight. We need to know the answers to real questions not waste our time like this.

Ask them questions that matter, not whether they are in love with the flag. I had a son in Iraq, thank god he came home alive. Let them tell us how they can make America a better place for all of us. It is an embarrassment to say the Pennsylvania is the debate sight. We need to know the answers to real questions not waste our time like this.

Hillary has got the plans, Obama's got hope, hope that he doesn't get further exposed.

SILLY SEASON IN POLITICS... BARACK IS CLEARLY THE BETTER CHOICE FOR PRESIDENT. HILLARY IS POWER HUNGRY AND WILL DO OR SAY ANYTHING TO GET THE PRESIDENCY. I WILL VOTE FOR MCCAIN BEFORE I VOTE FOR HER, EVEN THOUGH IM A STAUNCH DEMOCRAT.

I was realling hoping to hear questions like...
If NAFTA is renegotiated what details would change that would make a difference to an out of work auto worker?

An anti-biotic can succesfully treat many ailments; but it still usually gets worse before they get better. So what do the candidates think, honestly, will get worse for the country aafter they take office before they get better?

What do they expect citizens to do for their country to help them make the USA as strong as it was once was?

I am so disappointed to see so much time given to lapel pins, inlfammatory comments made by people who are not running, sniper fire, etc...

What a let down.

Please don't "share" my little prosperity Hillary. I work harder than most for it. Please let me keep it. Don't take my money to buy votes to win you an election. Because once you're in you'll just take more from me to stay there. Who won the cold war anyway? I guess the commies did.

Here’s a good summary of some reasons to consider supporting Obama. Share it with friends in Pennsylvania.
http://acropolisreview.com/2008/04/top-reasons-to-give-barack-obama-your.html

Looks like Clintons "Annie Oakley" act in Pa has "backfired" on her:

"Today, the President of the
American Hunters and Shooters Association (AHSA), announced the endorsement of Senator Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States. Because the gun issue has recently become a factor in the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania, I want to share the remarks they made today:

"As a gun rights organization we have not come to this decision lightly. We were formed two years ago because our research shows that millions of gun owners wanted a change. They not only wanted an organization that would protect their gun rights but an organization that was also committed to the protection of their communities as well as the protection of our lands".

"We reached out to the Obama campaign several weeks ago to offer our support and approval as was reported by Paul Bedard of US News and World Report".

"We believe recent attacks on Senator Obama's stand on the 2nd Amendment and his commitment to our hunting and shooting heritage are unfair and American Hunters and Shooters Association is stepping up to set the record straight".

"Senator Obama has clearly demonstrated his commitment to the 2nd Amendment by his vote in support of the Vitter amendment to HR 5441, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations bill of 2007. This amendment prevents the Government from confiscating guns in a time of crisis or emergency".

"Imagine how the citizens felt during Hurricane Katrina when government agents kicked in doors to confiscate law abiding citizens' guns at a time when they needed them the most. We know Senator Obama "gets it." To say that he is an elitist is patently ridiculous".

"To hunters and shooters everywhere, Senator Obama's vote demonstrated a fundamental understanding of the meaning of the 2nd Amendment which means he recognizes the individual right of all citizens to keep and bear arms. Senator Clinton, on the hand, failed to grasp the importance of this critical issue to hunters and shooters and voted against this Amendment. She turned her back on America's gun owners".

"In addition, Senator Obama's commitment to conservation and protection of our natural resources and access to public lands demonstrates to us his commitment to America's hunting and shooting heritage".

"Senator Obama will be a strong and authentic voice for America's hunters and shooters and it is with great pleasure that we endorse his candidacy".

http://www.huntersandshooters.com

Saw the documentary. How nice of young don Cheadle to introduce it.
This is the problem with the loss of journalists under the Reagan (Obama loves him). we LOST depth and a memory in the newsroom.
Cointelpro tactics put fake activists into the peace movement.
When I see a former weathermen who didn't get prosecuted and yet gets a cushy gig at a conservative organization--it sends my B.S. detectors into full alert.
Darn near everyone of statute associated with the Obama campaign makes my B.S. detector scream "Spoiler!"
Sorry. I think Obama needs to learn a LOT about how to 'do' statesmanship. And the Clintons can help.
We need to reform our finance system for candidates.
That was the first bill Bill Clinton took into Congress and lost.
Everyone forgets what Bill Clinton was up against--and I'm thinking that the "Gingrich revolution" involved stolen votes at the state level--we just didn't know what to watch for then.
The clintons are NOT the enemy. The non-violent peace movement the Weathermen ruined (like SDS) were NOT the enemy. I really gotta wonder about FBI plants from cointelpro that we don't know about and yeah, the weathermen make me suspicious.
I think Obama has as good judgment as he can have about people who say they wanna help his career. I do think he meant well. Too bad he started out in Chicago. He learned some bad habits and hung out with bad guys.
I don't knwo if he can weather this.
But is it WORTH risking our chances to get the Repugs outta the white house?

I wish the gobamas (or is it Obama HQ) would pick their own handles. Or maybe it's just more McCarthyistic tactics of Marxists (they tend to be really rich, by the way) who want to destroy anyone who disagrees with them in the slightest.
If Hilary had ridiculed Obama's secrecy re: his basketball workouts by labeling him Dennis Rodman, Obama woulda brought Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton outta hibernation--and Tawana Brawley with them.
Use your own handles, kids.
Don't try libeling me as some gun nut.
How thuggish.
Is this Obama time tactics?
Hope not.

THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN IS ALREADY BOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY THE EXACT SAME SOURCES THAT PUT CHENEY IN POWER - NOT OPINION - JUST FACT -CHECK OUT THE DONORS IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME -BUT DO NOT BE SO STUPID AS TO USE THE LYING CLINTONS AS YOUR REFERENCE SOURCE (THE FACT THAT THE CLINTONS LIE OFTEN IS ALSO NOT SUBJECT TO DEBATE - AGAIN, IT IS FACT, NOT OPINION)

AHSA seems like some Manchurian Candidate group put together by some well-meaning libs.
and they no doubt cautioned a young Obama in the IL House to back off and merely vote present after all that TALK all those WORDS about gun control.
Obama coulda learned from BIll Clinton that it's better to lose a race over PRINCIPLE than to strive for the career, the Rezko mansion for it ALL too soon.
Sorry. B.S. detector going full blast again.
Obama HQ--when you shoot emails to media organizations like it's a dang t-shirt gun at a basketball game--somebody's gonna get hurt---like your CANDIIDATE and the PARTY.
All that money to blog? You shoulda got the ground game going--and not use some fake John Kerry style gun group.
Gimme a break.

Hillary was wonderful tonight. She did answer questions regarding the price of gas, how to get money for college loans, social security, Iran and so much more. People need to start listening to the debates with open ears. So many Obama supporters will keep saying anything bad about her even if they agree with her plans

I cannot believe that ABC News tonight spent 45 minutes on "misspeaks" surrounding the issues of Rev. Wright, Bosnia, etc. I, for one, think it is the media's responsibility to focus on the important issues for this country and how they will be handled--not on comments made by the candidates that can be hammered ad nauseum.

I hated Easy Rider---what a sexist movie.
But the polls about Hilary are wrong.
And even they weren't--we don't vote that way.
While you were stoned Easy Rider, there was something called the electoral college. (Is this your first election? Read any newspapers before this year?)
So, no, I disagree that Hilary's behind.
And Obama's place in this race is FAKE.
The caucusing in Iowa, handing a vote in to your BOSS and not wanting to seem 'racist' (and who worries themost about looks---a REAL racist who when voting in private LIKE THEY WILL IN THE FALL will vote Repug)--that's no way to pick a Democratic party candidate.
And letting Repugs change and vote in OUR primary?
Dumb!
Worse---Obama DOESN'T CARE that it's gonna blow up in our faces!
There are a LOT of good military folks who don't want McCain in.
Look who's backed HIlary for god's sake.
If you CARE about America you'll help Hilary.

WHEN are these debates going to delve into issues? Who cares if the Reverend loves America? Who cares if someone wears a pin? George and Charlie, I'm ashamed of you. So Hillary made up a story about Bosnia. So Barack said people are 'bitter.' The media has churned that over and over. MOVE ON!

CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS ARE AFRAID OF OBAMA:

Focusing this time on Rep. Jason Altmire, D-Pa., the National Republican Congressional Committee is trying to damn local Democrats with the comments about small towns made by Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

"Jason Altmire Should Stop Flirting With Obama Campaign," says an NRCC news release sent to local media in the Keystone State. "Time for Superdelegate to Say Who He Supports."

NRCC Communications Director Karen Hanretty then says, "Congressman Jason Altmire, a superdelegate who’s been flirting with Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and who has received $10,000 from Obama's Hope Fund PAC, should denounce Sen. Obama’s statement that Pennsylvania voters are ‘bitter’ and ‘cling to guns or religion’ because they ‘can’t count on Washington.’

Barack Obama's comments about the bitterness of Americans let down by their government has prompted derision from the Clintons, John McCain and the Congressional Republicans, who are all saying roughly the same thing. Is it good for Democratic politics to have message discipline between Hillary Clinton and the GOP?

The motives behind the attacks on Obama are also similar. Of course Clinton is trying to deny Obama the nomination. She can't win, as is obvious to anyone who can figure out the delegate math, unless Obama drops out. So this is just another pathetic attempt at what the journalist Elizabeth Drew, writing about Clinton's tactics in this campaign, calls "molehill politics." If Obama is eventually seen as unelectable, then he'll have to step aside and, apparently according to the Clinton team, Clinton will become the nominee. At this point, that's her only way of winning the nomination.

So molehill politics it is, trying to create a controversy where there is none, trying to distort Obama's statements, and trying to deny the truth in what he said in favor of pushing sunny nostrums about how people getting screwed by our economic system of the last 40 years are upbeat, optimistic and resilient (all while jobs leave their communities, their kids leave home for big cities or become soldiers because they can't afford to become students, homeowners and parents, and they feel the government hasn't done a damn thing to help them out).

The GOP, it appears, also wants to deny Obama the nomination. There's no short-term gain for McCain to jump on Obama's comments, so jumping only on Obama suggests he'd prefer to run against Clinton. Likewise, if the NRCC really thought Obama's comments were lethal, they wouldn't blow their shot now with a press release, they'd tie vulnerable Democratic candidates to Obama at election time, when it could sink their chances (just as being tied to Bill Clinton sunk a lot of Democrats in 1994, and being tied to Bush helped sink many Republican incumbents in 2006). They wouldn't waste their shot now.

ABC's Jake Tapper has the correct interpretation of the NRCC's stated plan to use Obama's comments against several rural Democrats:

If local reporters ask these members of Congress what they think of Obama's remarks, that could extend this story and hurt him with all-important superdelegates. That's the NRCC's hope, anyway.

The Republicans don't want to run against Barack Obama. And Hillary Clinton is parroting the Republican attacks.

BOTH WILL RAISE TAXES FOR EVERYONE!!!! WORKERS TOO!!!!
OBAMA SAID " YOU CAN'T GET SOMETHING FOR NOTHING"

I cannot believe that ABC News tonight spent 45 minutes on "misspeaks" surrounding the issues of Rev. Wright, Bosnia, etc. I, for one, think it is the media's responsibility to focus on the important issues for this country and how they will be handled--not on comments made by the candidates that can be hammered ad nauseum.

WHAT? BOTH SAY THEY'LL EXIT IRAQ IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE WE ARE LOSING. YET, THEY THREATEN IRAN NOT TO MESS WITH ISREAL, OR ELSE U.S. WILL COME DOWN ON YOU?
THAT'S WHY THEY WILL LOSE AGAINST MCCAIN NEITHER HAVE A CLUE OF THE IMPORTANCE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY.

I am amused by all you whiners. A few debates back Clinton was asked all the tough questions and looked pretty bad. The SNL skits may have a little over the top but obviously that is what people saw. What goes around comes around. Suck it up it was his turn to take the public lashing. I loved it.

Oh an his repeated comments "that voters don't care about this stuff" doesn't jive based on all you Obama supporters tears.

MinisterP - Father, Husband, 15 year Navy Vet, business owner and McCain support.

the none-to-stable Iraq.

Lisa Anderson

I believe you mean the "none-too-stable Iraq."

That said, your conclusion doesn't match your reporting. And I also saw part of the debate on TV.

Barack was particularly strong in noting that he can't be criticized for what other people said or did in the past, and he can't be criticized for sitting on the same board and working with someone who might have done something wrong - and presumably has either paid his debt or was never convicted.

And how can you NOT work with someone with whom you disagree. Many MARRIAGES continue despite disagreements. Just ask Hillary and Bill.

And yet Hillary doesn't want to deal with people around the world with whom she disagrees? Certainly on this basis, she should have filed for divorce A LONG TIME AGO.

Obama made a great point talking about the Republican conservative Senator with whom he disagrees but whom he still befriends.

George Stephanopolous clearly dislikes Obama - trying to trip him up on his "disowning" Rev. Wright's words and not the man.

The bottom line is that Obama offers us a better opportunity to work through our disagreements with others.

And finally, what's up with threatening Iran. DOES ANYONE REALLY BELIEVE THAT ISRAEL IS INCAPABLE OF TAKING CARE OF ITSELF AGAINST IRAN? DOES ANYONE REALLY DOUBT THAT ISRAEL ALREADY HAS THE BOMB AND THAT IF IRAN ATTACKS ISRAEL IT WON'T BE MET WITH HARSH RETALIATION?

This is a strawman.

But Obama didn't fall for it. He realized that promising to bomb Iran is not a good starter for future negotiations with that country. And he realizes full-well that Israel is plenty able to take care of itself and is nuclear ready.

WHAT? BOTH SAY THEY'LL EXIT IRAQ IMMEDIATELY BECAUSE WE ARE LOSING. YET, THEY THREATEN IRAN NOT TO MESS WITH ISREAL, OR ELSE U.S. WILL COME DOWN ON YOU?
THAT'S WHY THEY WILL LOSE AGAINST MCCAIN NEITHER HAVE A CLUE OF THE IMPORTANCE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY.

Shame on ABC, awful job, terrible questions.

They forgot the real issues and focused on the silly media spin they want to report on.

this "debate" is unfair"
What a bunch of babies (obama supporters).
He had a bad night just admitted geez!!
Everytime he does bad it's somehow Hillary's fault. Maybe he should pick his friends and associates better.
Quit Crying.

Clinton read from notes on her long winded speeches. Who gave her the questions in advance of the debate?

Hillary looked like the stronger candidate tonite. Obama look unsure and didn't look comfortable answering tough questions. Makes me wonder if Obama can handle tough problems since he hasn't been through much in his life.

Charlie Gibson has no business moderating these things.

He was barely tolerable as a morning chat show host.

He's totally in over his head as a newsman.

I hate it when they ask questions like "do you think he loves America as much as you" or "do you think he's as patriotic as you" (George S.). Stupid. How can one person see into another's heart? Sounds like McCarthyism all over again. I'm surprised George Stephanopolis would stoop so low. Disgusting.

I'm hearing nothing about the IMPORTANT issues. In a few years, left alone, Social Security, Medicare, and payments on the national debt will consume, oh, about 120% of the federal budget. I want to know what the candidates would do about this. I don't want to hear drivel about lapel pins. But the candidates are all afraid to address any difficult issue. And so it will in office be with whomever is elected. I'm disgusted with all three candidates and the whole election process.

The questions are terrible! The commentators are divisive and accusatory. So far, no issue of value has been raised. What about substance in the questions?

This is no debate. This is a request to each candidate to defend the magnification of every flaw in recent statements made by each of them or their associates, or irrelevant personal things.

Nit-picking will only help the Republicans. Thirty minutes is enough! We can't watch this event anymore.

The whole country wants to know!

Will Charlie Gibson have to pay more capital gains tax?

TEERIBLE TERRIBLE SHAME ON YOU ...THATS A DEBATE..TWO PATHETIC PEOPLE HAVING TO DEFEND THEMSELVES FOR 90 MINUTES..ITS A HORROR...AND YOU ARE JUST SMUT TV THAT THINKS THE VOTERS ARE A BUNCH OF UNEDUCATED MORONS..WHICH WE ARE NOT..HAVE SOME CHUTZPAH AND ASK SOME REAL QUESTIONS WHEN MRS CLINTON IS MEETING ALL THE FAMILIES OF FALLEN SOLDIRS WHAT DOES SHE SAY WHEN THEY ASK HER WHY DID YOU VOTE FOR THIS WAR...HOW DO YOU KNOW HOW IT FEELS NOT TO BE ABLE TO AFFORD MEDICATION AND HAVE TO CHOOSE DAILY BETWEEN FOOD AND MEDICINE..REALLY IT WAS PAINFUL TO WATCH GEORGE S STOOP SOOOOOO LOW...AND CHARLES SHOW COULD YOU 2 SMART MEN BE SO FOOLISH TO BUY INTO THIS POLITICAL TERROIRSM..HAD TO TURN IT OFF...GOD BLEES THIS COUNTRY AND WHATS AHEAD FOR ALL OF US..HOPW THINGS OR ON THE WAY TO SOMETING BETTER...

It is incredibly depressing to see how ABC's debate today has been so controlled by pro-Clinton and her Republican conservative friends. Both groups want Senator Obama out of the race. Hillary only knows how to attack. Her entire personailty is negative. No wonder Bill looked for satisfaction from loose bimbos. None of the questions in today's debate took on Hillary's outright lies, her tax problems, the hidden off-shore shady businesses and lobbyists who give the Clinton ndynastyy megebucks, her Penn and husband's Colombia free trade support, etc, Obama obviously threatens business as usual in Congress and the WH. He will change our government to take it away from the lobbyists and oligarchs. He will work openly for national security, peace and the American people. Hillary, Wolfson, and the Clinton machine seize every opportunity to smear Obama, to throw the whole dirty kitchen sink at him (flag pins, guilt by assocation, etc, etc). Where is the debate on issues crucial to our nation, economy, education, security, future? This ABC cheap take on gotcha politics proves how mainstream media is still owned and run by Clinton power brokers. Our beloved republic is well on its way to becoming a Roman dynastic empire, with the Bush-Clinton dynasties leaching off the ordinary citizens, enabled by their henchmen and women.

I must say that this whole debate accomplished nothing. I did not get a chance to hear what the candidates are going to do to win my vote. Instead I hear ignorant questions. Im completely turned off my ABC news. Good job ABC on asking completely pointless questions. You just lost a viewer.

I must say that this whole debate accomplished nothing. I did not get a chance to hear what the candidates are going to do to win my vote. Instead I hear ignorant questions. Im completely turned off my ABC news. Good job ABC on asking completely pointless questions. You just lost a viewer.

I must say that this whole debate accomplished nothing. I did not get a chance to hear what the candidates are going to do to win my vote. Instead I hear ignorant questions. Im completely turned off my ABC news. Good job ABC on asking completely pointless questions. You just lost a viewer.

I have lost respect for Charlie and George. Their constant stream of gutter questions prevented a real debate on the issues for a tleast the first half of the so-called debate. This is demeaning to the candidates, to the process, and to the American people.

I think the issue of barrack's "misspeaks" were aimed at way more than hillary's. The fact is He was trying to make a very valid and important statement for us to understand the greater importance of our "issues" and Hillary just straight up LIED!!

Carol, the upcoming Peter Paul trial has nothing to do with Hillary. Read the papers or the online mags ... she's been completely exhonerated of any connection to him whatsoever. Better yet, try reading Raymond's book, "How to rig an election" and you just might recognize the tactics Paul was trying to use....

It is simply sickening to watch ABC allow Senator Clinton to perpetuate this political philosophy of "not issues." As this debate goes on it becomes obvious that Senator Obama is trying to talk about the issues, while ABC and Clinton just want to continue slinging this mass media mud that is totally irrelevant to the job of the presidency. The trials we face as a country and as a people are far too important to ignore with what is nothing more than political pop-culture.

Wow,have you ever seen or heard anybody as nasty,mean,venomous and evil as shrillary clinton?I used to like her and feel sorry for her putting up with her lothario of a husband.She has shown her true face tonight1Obama is a kind and decent person.clinton is a witch.

George, kick Charlie and tell him to stop being so rude by interrupting !!!

This debate was the most fair one yet. I liked that the responses were timed, and each were given an equal amount of time. I liked that the questions were staggered, and that they "flipped a coin" to see who would go first on opening and closings. I was impressed that both were challenged with tough questions and not allowed to wiggle out of fully answering.

ABC handled this debate in a very admirable way, and I think both candidates supporters should have been satisfied with the fairness of the debate, for a change.

Clinton was questioned about her positions on Wright and Obama's bitter comments, and she responded, owning her position, while Obama hedged on the Bosnia question, admitting his "campaign" was hammering on it, "of course," yet somehow dodging personal responsibility for what his campaign is doing? That just seemed dishonest to me. If his campaign is doing it - HE is. I'd much rather see the candidates own their positions and actions, than try and appear above the fray, when their actions don't match the perception they're trying to falsly portray.

What an amazing botched debate and waste of time. If Gibson and George prepared these questions, it was not in the best interest of those who really wanted to know about the issues! It is simply incredible that they would spend first 45 " of this important debate asking questions about flag pin? I wanted to hear solutions and details of their action as a President. Shame on ABC for allowing this line of questioning. My set was turned off in disgust.

What an amazing botched debate and waste of time. If Gibson and George prepared these questions, it was not in the best interest of those who really wanted to know about the issues! It is simply incredible that they would spend first 45 " of this important debate asking questions about flag pin? I wanted to hear solutions and details of their action as a President. Shame on ABC for allowing this line of questioning. My set was turned off in disgust.

Lead in to Question: Senator Clinton, more than once in statements during campaign you have referred to the time period (which (F) Pres. Clinton was in office and a said amount of new jobs were created obviously referring to a period of a Democratic White House. This also happens to be the same time that military troop reduction and post closures occured which obviously, lessened a budget strain on the government but, did in fact cause military personnel some an unexpected unemployement.

Q: Is it in either Sen. Obama or Sen. Clintons strategy to allow for our military forces which have been burdened ("spread thin") to increase the number of Military Personnel for Future events in the World when the instruments that provide peace and freedom must be called upon again. The size of Military Force in the Early 90's would have been less strained and more capable to implement any Commander in Chief's "Mission" what do either feel about military force size up or reduction as a means of budget control in world we live in now.

The Shameful Failure to Think

The ABC anchors consistently stumbled toward the inconsequential, investing time and implying importance to questions of a "gotcha" nature. These debates offer the chance to see the big picture and learn of the policy alternatives. Instead, the anchors tried to sensationalize and get Clinton and Obama to attach each other on the petty and small things while ignoring the policy issues that matter. It is am embarassment for ABC that such a chance was squandered.

Obama has the worse background check that anyone could imagine. Obama gave thousands of dollars to a racist church, that believes in the teachings of James Cone's Black Liberation Theory:

James Cone's Black Liberation theology

Christ is black therefore not because of some cultural or psychological need of black people, but because and only because Christ really enters into our world where the poor were despised and the
black are, disclosing that he is with them enduring humiliation and pain and transforming oppressed slaves into liberating servants.

Rather than viewing God as a sovereign being who does as he wills according to his purposes, Cone insists God must do what we want him to do, or we must reject him.

What the black community wants, Cone says, is for God to assist in its goal of destroying "the white enemy."

Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him.
The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community

... Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people
to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love.

Jeremiah Wright, the racist anti-American pastor of this church gave a lifetime achievement award to Louis Farrakhan, an anti-semite that spent a lifetime hating Jews and believing the holocaust never happened. He is friends with the two other anti-semites, Jesse Jackson & Al Sharpton
Obama and his followers like to divert facts about Obama with their stupid little finger pointing at Hillary about taxes, snipers, and dumb speeches (not votes) Obama gave about the Iraqi war in 2002, before he was in the Senate, and nobody heard.
Obama is a big liar, hypocrite and egomaniac, who smoked crack, his wife is a racist, his pastor, mentor
and close friend is a racist, and then Obama denies he knew this, but spent 20 years in that church, he was friends and did business for 17 years with Tony Rezko, a Syrian criminal slumlord (now in jail), who caused poor
people to live in squalor on the south side of Chicago, & freeze without heat in the dead of winter, but at first he denied this, and said he knew him for 5 months.. He lied and said he did something about the Exelon nuclear dumping that contaminated the drinking water,
He denies he received campaign funding from Saddam Hussein terrorist funder, Nadmi Auchi, his first cousin, Raila Odinga, is a terrorist, mass murderer that killed thousands of people and burned children in a church, he received campaign funding from Rashid Khalid, a Pakistani terrorist,
He has close ties to Edward Said--plagiarist, fabricator, and prominent PLO/Arafat advisor, Ali Abunimah, Palestinian activist and Islamist, and are among many other Middle Eastern terrorist supporters,
along with his ties with anti-american socialists, the Weathermen, William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.....

Obama got his money from Rezko who got his 3.5 million from Auchi:

Where's the media?

-Nadhmi Auchi is an Iraqi-born billionaire who was charged along with Saddam Hussein for conspiring to assassinate Prime minister (president) Abdul Karim Qasim and stood trial in 1959. (Auchi gave fellow Baath Party members machine guns from his home for Saddam Hussein.)

-Auchi protected secret money for Saddam Hussein AND Muammar al-Gadaffi.

(Remember, Obama's Trinity church Pastor Wright went with Nation of Islam minister Louis Farrakhan in 1993 to visit Libyan socialist leader Gadaffi.)

-Auchi also financially backed Saddam Hussein's plan for a pipeline from Iraq to Saudi Arabia.

-Rezko was also a business partner with Nation of Islam Founder's son: Jabir Herbert Muhammad.

Why isn't the media talking about all of Barack Obama's scary friends who have ties to the worst people in history?

*Obama's first cousin and close friend, Raila Odinga just became co-President of Kenya (after 1,000 people were killed) ...who signed a secret pact with Muslim jihadists who were to ethnically cleanse people?

And why does Raila Odinga use Obama's exact same campaign slogan: CHANGE....Vote for CHANGE: Look at his website:

http://www.raila07.com/

Barack Obama’s influences and associates have Communist connections. Obama himself admits attending "socialist conferences."
Obama's communist connections

* DAVID AXELROD is a left-leaning Democratic political consultant who’s mother was once a journalist on the pro-communist paper PM. PM was considered the alternative paper in Communist Party circles to the Daily Worker. David Axelrod is a political consultant for Barack Obama.

* William Ayers was a former member of the Weathermen, a revolutionary Marxist organization that engaged in bombings. Ayers had no regrets in his group's terrorist activities which included bombings of the United States Senate and Pentagon; Ayers was quoted saying, "I don't regret setting bombs; I feel we didn't do enough." Ayers is now a college professor. Obama praised Ayers concerning an article he wrote on the juvenile justice system in Chicago. Ayers and Obama served together on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago. Ayers gave Obama a $200 donation for his reelection for state senate of Illinois.

* Frank Marshall Davis, a close mentor of Obama’s in the 70’s, was an admitted member of the Communist Party-USA. Obama mentions him multiple times in his book. The House on Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations."

Tim Wheeler of Baltimore, Maryland an Obama supporter and a second generation member of the Communist Party

The wolves were out tonight ... Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolis of
Third Reich fame didn't waste any time in the torturing of Obama. The only person who won tonight was John McCain........ I can't remember right now, but where did George Stephanopolis work before ? Accepting to do this debate was the worst mistake that the candidates could have made. Howard Dean should not have allowed this to happen. It really set back the Democratic Party.

I think a large group of people need to form an armed militia and takeover ABC NEWS.

The first hour was a complete and total waste of an hour of my life! Context. Housing/foreclosure crisis. Recession. War in Iraq for 100 years. Incredible deficits, looming environmental disasters, gasoline at $4 a gallon. And what questions do the talking heads of ABC news ask the candidates? FLAG LAPEL pins, associations with some old balding hippie fart from the 60's, whether some pulpit leader is an idiot and whether people in small town America are bitter!!

Well, I'll tell you what, after hour one, I was REALLY bitter! Don't waste my time with stupid BS politco-talking point worthless bot talk in a national debate. Save these petty issues like who wears a Flag lapel pin (probably made in China) for people who sit on their butt all day blogging politicalspeak, worrying about issues that don't affect 99% of real people. For the record, I don't care who or where the candidates are wearing pins. John McCain could be wearing one on his butt, Hillary on a breast and Obama on his belly button, this kind of none issues aren't why gas is $4 a gallon or how we're gonna deal with the housing crisis.

I have to say that I got tired of hearing the mantra of "change" allthe time. But after suffering through this debacle of a debate, the whole system has to change. For starters, get some debate moderators who can actually manage questions that actually affect voters. And quit focusing on these Jerry Springer type hot button but worthless debate points. I don't give a damn about ABC news ratings. I care about REAL issues.

The wolves were out tonight ... Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolis of
Third Reich fame didn't waste any time in the torturing of Obama. The only person who won tonight was John McCain........ I can't remember right now, but where did George Stephanopolis work before ? Accepting to do this debate was the worst mistake that the candidates could have made. Howard Dean should not have allowed this to happen. It really set back the Democratic Party.

HRC took the debate for sure..I agree a vote for Obama will just get McCain elected and ours SOLDIERS WILL NEVER get to come home...People at the polls will vote how they really feel { the good old boys for sure } and we will have 4 more years Of Bush!!!,As Democrats I think we all agree that is not what we want....VOTE HRC for America and Our Soldiers...

And Senator Obamas house of cards is starting to fall down.....

This is a Presidential Election, if the candidates are unable to answer hardball questions from Charles Gibson And George Stephanopoulis how in the hell are they going to handle real problems. Senator Clinton handled herself extremely well, Senator Obama not so much. The pressure seams to be getting to him, and perhaps he is finding out that pretty Rhetoric will take you only so far. If cocksure arrogance were the only requirement for the job Senator Obama would win hands down. Too bad that because of these two candidates the White House will go to McCain.

After watching the debate, are you any closer in deciding who to vote for? Which ticket would you prefer:
Obama/Clinton
Clinton/Obama
McCain/Romney
None of the abovehttp://www.springfieldmedia.com/services.html

After watching the debate, are you any closer in deciding who to vote for? Which ticket would you prefer:
Obama/Clinton
Clinton/Obama
McCain/Romney
None of the abovehttp://www.springfieldmedia.com/services.html

Senator Baerck Obama hit the canvas last night and he ain't getting up.

http://hickeysite.blogspot.com/2008/04/john-mccain-sen-obama-hits-canvas-ayers.html

Going into this process, Obama had "nothing" that could be used against him because he has done "nothing' other than give pretty speeches. Oh, I forgot he organized in Chicago, spoke at the Democratic National Convention, proposed legislation, voted present, http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/20/528491.aspx , wrote a book inspired by a racist.http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/custom/religion/profiles/chi-070121-relig_wright,0,5184608.story?page=2&coll=chi_news_custom_religion_promo I am fair minded enough to admit that I have over simplified a bit, but I remember how Mr. Obama hailed himself as Mr. "get it right the first time" How Mr. Obama allowed his peons to fan the flames of racial tension between the Clinton's and Black Americans leading up to the S.C. primary. The media has been giving him a free ride from the very beginning, but now that he is on the record, and it is being used against him, I wonder if he now has any regrets for the way he has treated Senator Clinton doing this entire process.

You bet your skippy I am for Hillary Clinton, and it is BECAUSE she is tuff, smart, visionary(she was talking about health care before many even realized that we were headed for disaster), and knows how to get things done. CHANGE requires more than enthusiasm and rallying people around a cause. How do we achieve it? Define it with concrete goals and objectives; Who will lead it? Ted Kennedy?, Oprah?, or some other unelectable rich Democrat with a personal agenda? What are their qualifications? Obama has admitted that he is lacking. Obama is buying an election. The sad part is some of the contributors are the very people that he insulted with his bitter remark. This Democrat is not for sale. I too would like to live to see a Black person elected President of the United States in my lifetime, but not at the expense of my life. I too would like to see a woman elected President of the United States, and we have her. She is more than a woman. She is the best candidate for the job. If we allow this opportunity to slip away, and slip away it will, if Obama is our nominee, shame on us.

I was delighted so see Obama get a taste his own medicine last night. Last night's debate was a cake walk compared to what the Republicans are going to unleash on him. Oh, I will be forced to vote for him,although many Democrats will not. I am also going to say "I told you so" when the Republican kick our butts in the General election.

I am just trying to get my voice heard without knowing how to use the latest technology. I am trying to tell Hillary that if she keeps on this on this low road tack and still somehow wins the nomination then, as a life long democrat, I will vote for John McCain. I do not want a dishonest person for the president of the U.S., and I will vote for the person with the most integrity. At this point that means John McCain or Barack Obama. If Hillary can win without knowingly slandering Obama then I will vote for her, however if she answers on more question in the vein of Obama being a Muslim (not that I think that that matters) with "I take him at his word" instead of the obvious reality that he is a Christian and the accusation is rediculous, I will not vote for her in the general election. I want, and the country needs, someone with more intergrity than that.

Joan:

What a wild, unjustified rant! Let you tell it , the guy is the worst to ever seek the office. Oh come on, and stop it with that silly nonsense.

I cannot believe that so many people act like the smartest, most morally upstanding people in the world have had the job the of chief executive already. You mean Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and now Bush II? Gimme a break! We don't want to talk about people's friends, now do we? Skeletons would be dancing in the streets!

Barack Obama is the "living embodiment" of America's progress and it's hope, and what is claims to be. While the commentaries of Dr. Wright have been explosive, he is a theologian and that is it, and Obama has already addressed the matter. But obviously that will never be good enough.

Hillary Clinton is reaching hard to save her political life. It is time for real change, because America's "skirt is slipping," and she had better do something before it hits the ground!

http://www.nationalnightmare.com/

I see this just another blog by the latte drinking liberals who are determined to get their "popular kid" elected. Who cares if you know very llittle about him, has little accomplishments and is in bed with the nuclear industry and voted for Cheney's 2005 bill. This is the same bill that you criticized becaused it was written in secret by lobbyists. But who cares. You just want to make sure the "nice" orator with no concrete solutions for our dwinding economy gets elected.
Obama and his surrogates got accustomed to the "hands off approach" and pro-Obama settings like CNN and MSNBC. For the first time he encountered semi-tough questions (I don't think they were grueling questions) and you cry foul. He is applying for the most important job in the country and you all whine about the how "mean" the moderators were to Obama. Give me break! What are you all going to do when that "mean" dictator tells obama where to go and he crumbles? Are you all going to solve it with angry blogs and postings

Democrats are so brainwashed by the media, they wouldn't recognize the truth if they tripped over it.

Democrates are not brainwashed, we just know what the truth is.

What did McCain just say, about pointing a gun at someone? You've got to be prepared to pull the trigger. He said if we pull food aid from Pakistan, that is what we are doing. Wait, so you want to continue aiding a foreign country because you are afraid of it, but you talk about less government. Stop waisting your money on bullshit wars, that I don't support.

What did McCain just say, about pointing a gun at someone? You've got to be prepared to pull the trigger. He said if we pull food aid from Pakistan, that is what we are doing. Wait, so you want to continue aiding a foreign country because you are afraid of it, but you talk about less government. Stop waisting your money on bullshit wars, that I don't support.

It's like watching a president on the stage with a whiney child repeating his little notes...nice to hear a real man speaking from the heart

I think Sen. McCain did an outstanding job tonight. All Obama could do was smile...I think he spends more time whitening his teeth than he does in the Senate Chambers actually casting a vote on anything

McCain was super tonight
Exactly what this country needs!
Please Americans!!
Listen to what Obama actually says
It's nothing but fluff & gov. BS.

Barrack says McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time and that's a bad thing but, last night Obama "agreed" with McCain over 80% of the time so, what's the deal? Does McCain have good judgement or not? Isn't Obama just "using sound bytes"?

Is Palin speaking on Alaska's behalf, or, on America's behalf? I can see her breath...she should be wearing a fur coat.