McCain: Iraq success within reach

Ah, yes, McCain sees "the light at the end of the tunnel."

You can bet McCain represents the worst choice for showing judgment about war.

And this is the same guy who said BHO is prepared for the job. The only thing they have in common is the sexism. WHEN WILL THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ASK FOR THIRTY YEARS WORTH OF OBAMA AND ROBINSON TAX RECORDS. THESE TWO HAVEN'T BEEN MARRIED THAT LONG, SO LET'S REALLY INVESTIGATE THIRTY YEARS OF EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THEIR LIVES NOW BEFORE THE REPUBLICANS DO!
The Obama supporters relentlessly race-bait anyone who disagrees with them even SLIGHTLY.
And, apparently being sexist is the last allowable habit of stupid people (male and female in America. But the smart people are now fighting back. Watch Geraldine Ferraro expose Randi Rhodes for the pea-brained person she really is:
http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2008/04/geraldine-ferraro-responds-to-randi.html
Why wouldn’t the other media outlets run this? Well, Fox knows there’s very little risk of Hilary winning anyway, so why not? But the other mainstream media outlets do not want to get caught doing anything to help THE ONE CANDIDATE WHO CAN STILL BEAT JOHN MCCAIN—AND THAT’S HILARY. Note who’s posting it—Tennessee Guerilla Women. News Flash—Hilary TOOK the mid-South, and you need that to win in the fall campaign. Barack’s fake wins in Iowa and elsewhere (republicans cross over, bosses intimidate caucus employees, stuffed ballot boxes in Minnesota), EVEN WHILE OBAMA REFUSES TO STEP IN AND SAY THE DEMS WILL REVOTE MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA!
Now, watch the Obama campaign trolls call me racist for saying so.
Unbelievable!

McCain pushes his easy victory pablum again just like he did in the run up to the war in 2002.

“Because I know that as successful as I believe we will be, and I believe that the success will be fairly easy, we will still lose some American young men or women.” [CNN, 9/24/02]

“We’re not going to get into house-to-house fighting in Baghdad. We may have to take out buildings, but we’re not going to have a bloodletting of trading American bodies for Iraqi bodies.” [CNN, 9/29/02]

“But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” [MSNBC, 1/22/03]

He was wrong then, and he's wrong now. Victory isn't in
sight.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/32337.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23922935/

Is McCain overly optimistic or dishonest? It doesn't really matter in the end to the dead americans and their families who pay the pricef or McCain's positions.

Maybe he beleives the song "When You Wish Upon a Star" and his dreams really will come true?

War monger!

war·mon·ger Audio Help /ˈwɔrˌmʌŋgər, -ˌmɒŋ-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[wawr-muhng-ger, -mong-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun a person who advocates, endorses, or tries to precipitate war.

war·mon·ger Audio Help (wôr'mŭng'gər, -mŏng'-) Pronunciation Key
n. One who advocates or attempts to stir up war.
Bomb Bomb Iran

The repub strategy is clear. They know the White House and Congress are lost, so they need something to save face. After Barack or Hillary ends this nonsense, and I'm really not so sure about Barack, the GOP can go on the air saying, "we were soooo close to victory, but the defeatocrats surrendered." Never mind that the situation in Iraq is just as it was when the idiot declared, "mission accomplished."

What is this about a US success? I thought it was about Iraq pulling themselves together politically. I thought it was all about Iraq's success. The US troops are a success. No more lies. No more proping up a Mid East country that will not prop itself up. No more US money to go to Iraq when Iraq has a higher current account balance ranking than does the
USA. The USA ranking is dead last of the 164 nations for which information is available-----see, CIA The World Factbook Rank Order- Current account balance March 20, 2008.

The USA is much further behind in ranking order than the many nations we give billions of dollars in aid to each year. Why do we pay fed income tax to an anti-American or irresponsible Bush fed gov't? Why does Bush (and now McCain) want to bankrupt America? For what multinational corporations is this being done? Since we are now the United Corporations for Free Trade instead of the United States of America-- this means that Bush is forcing America into socialism, to our demise, for the benefit of the REST of the world---while gaining more "free" trade and more profitable enterprise for a few large business/multi nationals.

I think Iraq was about hurling the biggest blow to take the life out of and pull America down--to make us subservient to multi nationals, about elected "officials" making defense dividends, and all bout the oil for a few profiteers. McCain would just be a long, evil arm of Bush/Cheney reaching into the next four or eight years--making sure that BushCorp's agenda sticks. No, no McCain. I'm for life, for America owning America, and for financial responsibility on the part of those elected to care for all of America.

You're an idiot, Bill Hussein. No candidate in this race knows the very real costs of war and has seen them up close and personal more than John McCain. He's the only candidate whose sons are in the military. He's the only candidate who has 20 years of military experience as a basis to form his strategy for victory on. He's the only veteran running, and even your Obamessiah has told you that he's not a "warmonger."

You lefties have whined for months that you didn't know what "victort in Iraq" was. McCain just told you. Now you complain because his vision isn't defeatist enough for you. Don't you all have a Che Guevara picture you have to go hang up or something?

p.s. Chuckman, isn't Canada on strike still?

You're an idiot, Bill Hussein. No candidate in this race knows the very real costs of war and has seen them up close and personal more than John McCain. He's the only candidate whose sons are in the military. He's the only candidate who has 20 years of military experience as a basis to form his strategy for victory on. He's the only veteran running, and even your Obamessiah has told you that he's not a "warmonger."

You lefties have whined for months that you didn't know what "victory in Iraq" was. McCain just told you. Now you complain because his vision isn't defeatist enough for you. Don't you all have a Che Guevara picture you have to go hang up or something?

Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran Jeff.
He is a warmonger and has his sites on Iran. He sings a cute little ditty about it. Didn't he sing it for you?

Don't you all have a Che Guevara picture you have to go hang up or something?

Posted by: Jeff | April 7, 2008 1:17 PM

Don't you have a war to sign up for? Chickenpoop!

Chickenpoop? And you have the gall to accuse other posters of acting childish.

Bomb Iran? A joke he made at a campaign event? That's your substantive argument against the candidate? I love how devoted the hardcore left is to using BS as an issue in this election. They have to trot out the 100 years in Iraq and Bomb Iran stuff because they can't touch McCain on experience or credibility. Your guy's already lost, Mr. Hussein, you just don't know it yet.

You lefties have whined for months that you didn't know what "victort in Iraq" was. McCain just told you.

*The advance of religious tolerance over violent radicalism.
-
In which century is that going to happen? If that's one of McCain's definitions of victory, then he underestimated when he said 100 years.

Jeffy, McCain did a nice job of describing what he will consider a victory, I suppose. Trouble is, judging by the recent fighting between Shiite militia groups, the rocket attacks in the green zone, and the failure of Iraqi leaders to reach a compromise, stabilizing Iraq may take several decades.