Paul Krugman wins Nobel Prize

After the Acorn scandal, The Fannie and Freddy link to our party, The need of our democratic leaders to inject race into the election by clearly implying that if people do not vote for our campaign that they are racist.

I think that we proud democrats need to really rethink our presidential choice, because this is not who we are or what our party stands for.

Obama needs to denounce Acorn......immediately because voter fraud within this group is Off the Scale.

Thanks to our party, race may very well play a huge role in this election..............

Almost immediately after the ceremony, Paul Krugman gave an Special interview on U.S. economy to FOX. watch here: http://tubedirect.net/index.php?q=Nobel-Prize-2008-ec
Highly recommended!

Congratulations, Mr. Krugman. It is good to see, someone who deserves an award, receive an award !! Your observations on our economy, during these troubling times, have been very helpful and the remedies you have outlined, seem to be right on the money, so to speak. I wish you continued success and I look forward to your next column.
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.

Notice how the hate-filled Frank James labels people who disagree with Paul Krugman "haters?"

Mostly, opponents just laugh at Krugman. There's a whole website devoted to how Krugman stretches the truth in his columns: http://www.krugmanwatch.com/

Take a look and get the "other side" the Swamp writers never give its readers.

The best thing about Krugman is that he uses FACTS, LOGIC, and EVIDENCE to support his arguments. He doesn't just shout at, point at and/or get into his opponents face like a Right Wing lunatic.

Krugman is almost always right. He predicted the "Great Unraveling" as did Warren Buffett, another target of the delusional right. It's telling that sheeple on the right will embrace easily debunked talking points from the likes of Sean Insanity as gospel, yet dismiss the wisdom of truly gifted individuals like Krugman, simply based on differences in ideology. Lincoln was never so blinded (read 'Team of Rivals'). It's another reason why Republicans can't govern.

He's much to partisan to be giving reliable information on the BANKING COLLAPSE....however, he does fit as a winner of the Nobel ha.

He stated on Olberman video posted above, that the HOMEOWNERS should have been looked after in this bailout as the DEMS wanted, then he says McCain would be the wrong guy for President.

SAY WHAT?>McCain has been doing nothing BUT talking about having some of this already set aside BAILOUT MONEY to go to the homeowners who could afford their loans to begin with, rather than it going to WALL STREET as planned, and OBAMA POO POOED THAT IDEA.

Now, Obama/Biden were both pushing for lowering the PRINCIPLE on those loans while it was still in the BANKS HANDS....and that would have COMPLETELY FINISHED OFF WHAT WAS LITTLE WAS LEFT OF THE BANKS AFTER ACORN/CRA/DEMS got done with them.
McCain/Palin 08

In the words of Barak Obama "When you put lipstick on a pig it still is a pig"

1st Al Gore now Krugman which relegates the stature of the Nobel Prize to something you get from a box of Cracker Jack!

Congratulations Mr. Krugman. You have been calling this catastrophe for 2 years or so.
You have been correct all along.
You would make a great Treasury Secretary, or perhaps Fed or SEC chief?

The 'Joe Sixpacks' posting here are pretty funny.
Fellas, you couldn't carry Krugman's doctoral thesis.
These 22 percenters actually think they know more about econ. than Krugman?

Hey, " Mike C " enjoy your Cracker Jacks and hold your head high, another American has won a very prestigious award !! Don't let your politics get in the way of celebrating an American's success !! Now, if they gave the award to either, Secretary Paulson or President Bush, you definitely would have something to frown about !! Thank God, they didn't !! Now that would be debasing the Award, don't you think !!?
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.

When Al Bore was given the Nobel Peace Prize, I was reading a story about the Monks in Myanmar who were protesting against the military rule, risking life, and I became embarrassed for the U.S. and for the Nobel committee. I am embarrassed again.
http://www.boppoll.com

The most important questions should be debated among political theorists that need to inform economists. Is capitalism good for social responsibility? is liberal perceptions of the global economy have not been distorted? Is it not the time for the US to entrench a more social democratic virtues instead of mere capitalism? Economists like Krugman are expected to ask these questions that are above the inclination to only fix problems without examining various political visions of the 'good society'.

Gad Barzilai [Ph.d.; JD] University of Washington.

Listen up 22 percenters:
KRUGMAN CALLED IT TWO YEARS AGO.
Paulson didn't
Bush didn't
Paulson didn't
Cox didn't
The caps are shouting, not emphasis.
It's the only thing you understand.

Posted by: You really gotta get your info from reliable sources | October 13, 2008 12:02 PM
_________________________
And now, for your viewing pleasure, we present a link to a Miami-Dade press release featuring little jonny mcBUSH as a headline speaker at an event sponsored by ... wait for it ... ta da ... ACORN!

Gotcha!

http://www.mdc.edu/Home/Press/rally.htm

_________________________

This is just soooooo easy! Obama08!

This just in;
Sean Hannity wins Nobel Prize for Bloviating.

Was Matt Damon runner up I hope?