Rhetoric meets reality for Obama agenda: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune
Posted November 9, 2008 8:20 AM
The Swamp

By Jim Tankersley

Forget "hope" and "change" and "yes we can." The word that will matter most, when Barack Obama assumes the Oval Office, is "doable."

Teary-eyed jubilation is giving way to clear-eyed realism. As his campaign rhetoric runs into governing reality, Obama will have to contend with a set of political and practical restrictions that are perhaps more daunting than any faced by an incoming president since Franklin Roosevelt took over amid the Great Depression. And he will have to tailor his early policy agenda accordingly.

Obama is set to inherit a plunging economy, ongoing wars and a massive federal deficit coupled with a long national wish list. His party owns large House and Senate majorities, but the numbers hide major disagreements over priorities. He will be pulled by core Democratic groups who have waited years to advance their interests, by the weight of his campaign promises and by the expectations of a beleaguered electorate.

So what can he do? With those constraints and history in mind, politicians and policy experts suggest several domestic and foreign initiatives, costing relatively modest amounts by today's spending standards, many of them tinged in green. Read on for their full list, from today's Chicago Tribune.

Nearly all the officeholders and experts said the president-elect must begin by stimulating the economy further, a move Obama himself called "long overdue" in a news conference Friday. Several suggested building the stimulus package around energy development, including modernizing the electric grid, building mass transit lines and creating manufacturing jobs in the alternative energy sector.

"I hope they realize the seriousness of what's in front of them and make the economy an absolute priority," said Gov. Ted Strickland of Ohio, a Democrat who has pushed alternative energy development to soothe his state's aching economy.

Added Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter, a Democrat who took office two years after his party won control of the state legislature--the same scenario Obama will face in Washington: "From the perspective of creating jobs, at a time when you also have to alter course on our energy policy, thinking about a new energy economy is absolutely the way to do it."

One possible blueprint for an energy-themed stimulus plan comes from the Center for American Progress Action Fund, headed by Obama transition team member--and former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton-- John Podesta. The center's nearly $55 billion proposal aims to immediately boost energy production and efficiency, including weatherizing 1 million homes, encouraging solar panel construction and funding transit projects in 23 states.

Daniel Weiss, a senior fellow at the center, estimates the plan would create 1 million jobs. As a side benefit, it would help cut heating costs, save energy and nudge the country away from its dependence on foreign oil--benefits that "you wouldn't get from, say, repaving a highway," he said.

Robert Shapiro, a former Clinton economic adviser who now heads the Globalization Initiative for Washington-based NDN, a progressive think tank, said Obama should include alternative energy development in a stimulus package that also advances his campaign goals of health-care reform and worker training.

Obama should use the stimulus, Shapiro said, "to make down payments on the long-term investments he's committed to already for the health of the economy."

Shapiro and others also say Obama needs more stimulus to address the economy early on; in Weiss' words, it's step one of a three-part "stop the bleeding, surgery, healing" process that also includes stabilizing the banking and automotive industries and fostering economic growth.

Among the ideas Shapiro offers is using the government's new control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to renegotiate terms of mortgages in danger of foreclosure, in hopes of preventing a second housing crisis.

Obama could borrow a quick and marketable longer-term growth plan--entirely or in pieces--from his new chief of staff, Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.). In the House, Emanuel pushed a so-called New Deal for the New Economy, which included a consolidated higher education tax credit, expanded health-care access, a new retirement savings plan to supplement Social Security and alternative energy investment.

Some foreign policy experts also encouraged Obama to think green as he charts his administration's course abroad.

William Chandler, the director of the Carnegie Energy and Climate Program, urged Obama to quickly seek a partnership with China to address global warming--including joint financing for energy-efficiency technologies, teaming up on research and development to capture carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants and laying groundwork for a global climate-change accord.

"If we approach this early," Chandler said, "with a package of ideas that benefit both sides, it would signal a new kind of American foreign policy, one more of partnership."

Other foreign policy questions appear more pressing to voters, starting with the Iraq War. Obama has pledged to withdraw troops, but how quickly he does that could divide his own party between more liberal and more centrist members.

Rifts could also appear over taxes and spending. Some Capitol Hill Democrats appear inclined to roll up more government debt--for stimulus or other major proposals, such as health-care reform. Others, including the large "Blue Dog" coalition that preaches fiscal conservatism, would prefer to keep deficits down.

Obama could learn from Clinton and former President Jimmy Carter, who both entered with Democratic majorities in Congress but struggled to advance some of their top priorities.

Ritter, the Colorado governor, said the most important lesson he could offer Obama was to make a good plan for dealing with legislators. He recalled one of the first pieces of legislation that Colorado Democrats sent to his desk after his 2006 election, a bill that made union organizing easier, and which Ritter didn't like. He vetoed it.

Obama, Ritter said, "certainly wants to avoid having that happen."

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Typical Swamp--the "experts" in the article turn out to be all Democrats.

The Swamp--all Democrat, all biased, all the time. No wonder nobody trusts newspapers to tell the truth.


Why is it, when the Rejected Right reads something in The Swamp and agrees with, we hear absolutely no moaning. let them read one piece that has a sentence or two, that they disagree with and we hear them drone on about the " liberal press". If that were really the case, and if you used, just a little common sense, doesn't it stand to reason, that their would have been many more liberal Presidents than we have had. What nonsense the Rejected Right panders and bemoans !! At the moment, they are living up to the charge of, The Whiners Party !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.


Regime: people like you need to stop complaining and crying about media bias all the time. In this day and age there is a diverse media that represents all viewpoints. The left complains about media bias just as much as you do. People in the middle are always aggravated about how people like you on both sides constantly yammer and cry.


This past year the exorbitant cost of fuel has seriously damaged our economy.From filling up the car to paying more for every consumer product whose cost of production and shipping was passed on to us there was little left over.We spend less because we have less, this results in even more job losses. OPEC has us over a barrel literally.WE reduce our use cut production by 1.5 million barrels a day & will cut more they say. .Our country needs to invest in reducing our dependence on foreign oil. The 168 Billion they paid out in the last stimulus pkg that did nothing at all for our economy would have gone a long way toward getting us started on the road to energy impendence. Utilizing renewable energy sources would not only provide clean low cost fuel it would create an estimated 1million plus jobs. I just read Jeff Wilson’s new book The Manhattan Project of 2009. I highly recommend this book for anyone interested in seeing America become more energy independent.



Obama is not in the slightest Hawaiian, Native American, Polynesian, Samoan, European, Asian or Persian. We all know because we've all checked him out, and he isn't one of any of us.

Obama has turned out to be half southern/central African, or "black", and half northern African, or Arabian, or "white".

He even lied about his race card. So what else has lied about??!!



"Joe", "Don", what do you have against equality? Diversity?

More to the point, what does Mr. Tankersley have against equality and diversity? Last time I looked, these were concepts Leftists claimed to be in favor of.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "l" in the field below:

Barack Obama
Want to see more photos? Click here