by Mark Silva
Remember Mitt Romney?
The former governor of Massachusetts and venture capitalist who had invested millions of his own money in an ill-fated campaign for the Republican Party's presidential nomination, back in those pre-maverick days of John McCain and Sarah Palin?
Romney is hitting the road again, this time for Sen. Saxby Chambliss, the Georgia Republican embroiled in a campaign for a Dec. 2 runoff election for his Senate seat. The outcome of Georgia's election will have a big impact on the Democratic Party's advantage in the new Senate that greets President-elect Barack Obama in January.
Romney plans to campaign for Chambliss on Friday, and Romney's "Free and Strong America PAC'' has given the Georgian $5,000 for his runoff campaign.
Romney plans appearances at rallies in Atlanta and Savannah, as well as at "a series" of private fundraisers.
Neither Chambliss nor Democrat Jim Martin claimed 50 percent of Geogia's vote on Nov. 4, requiring the runoff -- a particularly Southern tradition in elections that often has worked against minorities winning important offices but is simply a fact of election math in this contest.
This contest, Romney insists, is about control of the Senate.
"This is a critical election whose outcome will be important to maintaining a balance of power in the Senate," Romney says. "It is critical that Republicans safely retain the ability to filibuster in order to prevent the worst abuses of single party rule."
Romney's PAC is committed to supporting those "who are dedicated to advancing social, fiscal and foreign policies that will strengthen America.'' Its focus is on "core principles: Uncompromised military strength, a belief in the power of free markets and that a competitive America is one where taxes are low and government is small, an emphasis on strong families and a federalist approach to government that leaves decision-making as close to the people as possible.''









Comments
" . . . in order to prevent the worst abuses of single party rule."
-
It sure is funny how the repubs never had a problem with that when they were the single party rulers.
Posted by: Bruce Y | November 18, 2008 12:34 PM
Great - we now have TWO Viet Nam War "deferrers" campaigning against the man who served in Viet Nam. Mitt was too busy traveling in Europe and Saxby got to take all those deferrals to keep out of the Army.
Posted by: BobinATL | November 18, 2008 1:34 PM
What's he got to say about the Detroit bailout (his father was CEO of AMC during the glory years of the Rambler, Javelin, and Pacer)?
Posted by: Kenny Bunkport ☮ | November 18, 2008 7:25 PM
I've got my answer this morning:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/opinion/19romney.html?_r=1&hp
Posted by: Kenny Bunkport ☮ | November 19, 2008 6:24 AM
The comments that you referenced are spot on.....This is exactly the remedy that is needed for this ongoing problem....Do you have a problem with reality, facts and the truth?
Posted by: ron in ocala | December 5, 2008 10:01 AM
I got to meet Mitt at the Atlanta rally for Saxby and he is a very nice, personable man. I am glad he came out for Saxby. I wish he had been the Repub nominee instead of McCain.
Posted by: Laurie | January 27, 2009 11:37 PM
Laurie look beyond the illusion, Nice people do not do this when someone disagrees with them. Mitts niceness is an illusion. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l07qpHR1UQ
Posted by: J Merrill | October 9, 2009 8:57 AM