by Frank James
Here's President-elect Barack Obama's opening statement from today's press conference at which he announced his nomination of Peter Orszag as director of his Office of Management and Budget and Rob Nabors as the deputy director.
Obama also sent the message that he planned to search the federal budget for spending cuts to off set the additional spending needed to prop up the economy.
PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA: Good morning.
I speak to you today, mindful that we meet at a moment of great challenge for America, as our credit markets are stressed, and our families are struggling. But as difficult as these times are, I'm confident that we will rise to meet this challenge - if we're willing to band together and recognize that Wall Street cannot thrive so long as Main Street is struggling; if we're willing to summon a new spirit of ingenuity and determination; and if Americans of great intellect, broad experience, and good character are willing to serve in government at this hour of need.
Yesterday, I announced four such Americans to help lead the economic team that will advise me as we seek to climb out of this crisis. Today, Vice President-elect Biden and I are pleased to announce two other key members of our team - Peter Orszag as Director and Robert Nabors as Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
Before I explain why I selected these outstanding public servants, let me just say a word about the work I am asking them to undertake. As I said yesterday, the economic crisis we face demands that we invest immediately in a series of measures that will help save or create two and a half million jobs and put tax cuts in the pockets of the hard-pressed middle class. Many of those new jobs will come in areas such as energy independence, technology, and health care modernization that will strengthen our economy for the future.
But if we're going to make the investments we need, we must also be willing to shed the spending we don't. In these challenging times, when we are facing both rising deficits and a sinking economy, budget reform is not an option. It is an imperative. We cannot sustain a system that bleeds billions of taxpayer dollars on programs that have outlived their usefulness, or exist solely because of the power of a politician, lobbyist, or interest group. We simply cannot afford it.
This isn't about big government or small government. It's about building a smarter government that focuses on what works. That is why I will ask my team to think anew and act anew to meet our new challenges. We will go through our federal budget - page by page, line by line - eliminating those programs we don't need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way.
Let me give you one example of what I'm talking about. There's a report today that from 2003 to 2006, millionaire farmers received $49 million in crop subsidies even though they were earning more than the $2.5 million cutoff for such subsidies. If this is true, it is a prime example of the kind of waste I intend to end as President.
And we will also focus on one of the biggest, long-run challenges that our budget faces - namely, the rising cost of health care in both the public and private sectors. This is not just a challenge but also an opportunity to improve the health care that Americans rely on and to bring down the costs that taxpayers, businesses, and families have to pay.
That is what the OMB will do in my administration - it will not only help design a budget and manage its implementation, it will also help make sure that our government - your government - is more efficient and more effective at serving the American people.
There is no better person to help lead this effort as Director of the OMB than my friend Peter Orszag. Peter has been one of our nation's leading voices on budgetary issues. It is said that a nation's budget reflects its priorities. I believe that is true. And I know that Peter will bring to his work at the OMB a set of priorities that I - and the American people - share.
Throughout his career, he has made significant contributions in our understanding of all the major economic challenges we are now confronting - from reducing medical costs to saving Social Security to fighting global climate change to helping put the dream of a college degree within reach for more students.
As Director of the Congressional Budget Office, he reenergized and reinvigorated the agency, while shifting its focus to confront the health care crisis that is not only a cause of so much suffering for so many families, but a rapidly growing portion of our budget and a drag on our entire economy.
But it is not simply Peter's past career that makes him qualified for his new appointment, it is his vision for the future. He believes, as I do, that even as we take steps to restore discipline to our budget, we must also take the steps right now that are necessary to solve our immediate crisis.
Peter doesn't need a map to tell him where the bodies are buried in the federal budget. He knows what works and what doesn't, what is worthy of our precious tax dollars and what is not. Just because a program, a special interest tax break or corporate subsidy is tucked into this year's budget, does not mean it should survive the next. The old ways of Washington simply can't meet the challenges of today and tomorrow.
And no one is more able or more qualified to assist Peter in this work as Deputy Director of the OMB than Robert Nabors. Rob will bring to this post experience in the executive branch, at the OMB, where he helped the Clinton administration achieve balanced budgets, as well as in the legislative branch, where he led the appropriations committee staff as a driving force for a responsible budget. Together with Peter, Rob will help steer our budget through Congress so that I can sign it into law. Now, let me be clear: these appointments and the appointments I announced yesterday are not the sum of my economic team. These appointees will work with those I have yet to announce - including the secretaries of Energy and Labor, Commerce and Health and Human Services and others in my administration - to design a recovery plan for both Wall Street and Main Street, and to put our economy on a path to long-term growth and prosperity.
Because at this moment, we must not only restore confidence in our markets. We must also restore the confidence of middle class families that their government is on their side - that it's working for them - on their behalf - to meet their families' needs. And that is exactly what I intend to do as President of the United States of America. Thank you.
Comments
Other than the usual vague Obama "goals" ('think anew", "review", and other blather), we find in the above exactly one semi-specific item: a pledge that he "intends" to (maybe) cut out some $49 million in farm subsidies.
Wow. An "intent" to (maybe) eliminate a minor item in a multi-trillion dollar budget.
The question that should be asked: since Obama was a senator the last 4 years, charged with approving and monitoring such spending--where was he all this time? Why wasn't he doing this "reviewing" and 'thinking" the last 4 years?
Posted by: Change You can Believe In | November 25, 2008 12:51 PM
I don't think that it's necessarily possibly for Obama's team to go line by line in the budget and cut every bit of waste....the budget is so huge I think it's unrealistic. Possibly having an incentive plan set up for heads of all the depts that spend this money that comes from the budget might work.
Posted by: Teresa | November 25, 2008 1:00 PM
It already has been reported in real newspapers that the first Obama deficit will exceed $1 TRILLION. Wonder if the Loons from the Left will cry over those record and alarming deficits? My guess is that would be a "no."
Posted by: John D | November 25, 2008 2:21 PM
I think cutting positions that are redundant and/or no longer necessary should be looked at and cut. I wonder how many government jobs are no longer needed because a program was cut or they do something totaly different now. Streamlining processes and purchasing should be number one.
Posted by: lochnessmonster | November 25, 2008 2:26 PM
Lochness,
I think its been tried - remember teh gov't shutdown in the mid-90's? Do you think the AFSMCE will stand for this?
Teresa,
Are you saying that departments heads s/b incentivized for not spending their budget? If that happens, guess how that will happen? By padding the budget in the first place with fluff (more than there is now)
Posted by: Terry | November 25, 2008 8:51 PM
Terry>if you let depts run with business as usual then Obama will make his cuts and start up new govt wasteful depts and then we've gained nothing. Gotta make them feel the burn if they don't cut back and give them bonuses (much cheeper than a free hand at all the dough they want) if they do. It's the only way.
Posted by: Teresa | November 26, 2008 11:22 AM
Teresa,
Cutting back on loon spending. I want to see BO try to get Harry and Nancy to go along wth that. The only federal gov't spending he will cut back on is military. remember, he wants the gov't to take over everything - health care, education, ...
Posted by: Terry | November 27, 2008 9:31 AM
Terry>I want loons who are spending to take a look at what they are doing and try and spend less. Harry and Nancy want the loons to keep spending.....Barrak wants to put a stop to it that suits me fine. If he wants to stop them from making to much money on deals to China I say go ahead but China will spend us into oblivian. Everytime we spend more then China spends more of our money. That tax refund is going to hurt us and we both know we can't have that.
Posted by: Teresa | November 28, 2008 11:37 AM