by Christi Parsons and Peter Nicholas
The roster shaping up for the Barack Obama administration is starting to look a little familiar, with an ironic pattern emerging as one name after another is added to it.
A striking number of new and potential team members so far can trace their professional history to the same political birthplace -- the administration of one President Bill Clinton.
There's Sen. Hillary Clinton, of course, the former First Lady now under consideration for Secretary of State. And Rep. Rahm Emanuel, the former Bill Clinton aide who will be Obama's chief of staff. And Eric Holder, once deputy to former Att'y. Gen. Janet Reno and now Obama's likely pick for attorney general. There's the new White House lawyer, the budget director, and so on.
For all his talk of transformation, Obama's earliest decisions suggest something odd: the more things change, the more they look like the 1990s. Some predict a Clinton Restoration in the making.
"Voters hoping to see Obama bring a lot of fresh faces to D.C. must be disappointed," said Alex Conant, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee. "So far, it's been more like Clinton.gov than Change.gov."
It makes sense that the incoming Democratic president might fish for talent in the same pond as the last Democratic president. If Obama is looking for depth of expertise, there's a good chance that many job prospects were in or around the White House a decade ago.
But there's a certain irony to the developing pattern, given Obama's campaign pledge not to spend the next four years "refighting the same fights that we had in the 1990s."
"There's no question about the talent level," said Doug Holtz-Eakin, a former Congressional Budget Office director and senior policy advisor to Republican Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign. "They have a public relations problem in the appearance of not really fulfilling the, quote, change mandate.''
See the rest of the story on Obama's Clinton-heavy lineup in the Tribune newspapers and here in the Swamp:
The Clinton alums began to populate the new team right away, when Obama picked Emanuel from the Illinois congressional delegation for the first big assignment. After serving as political director in the Clinton White House, Emanuel agreed to help assemble and captain the Obama team as chief of staff.
Since then, the Clinton names have flowed plentifully, with more than two dozen set either to serve on an Obama transition team or to actually staff positions in the newly forming administration. Greg Craig, who was Clinton's impeachment lawyer, will serve as White House counsel. Vice President Al Gore's chief of staff, Ron Klain, will do the same job for Joe Biden. Gore's counsel, Lisa Brown, will be staff secretary.
At the same time, Hillary Clinton appears to be a serious candidate to head the State department. By some lights, Obama never really considered Clinton as his vice presidential running mate, instead floating her name for the job while never actually going to the trouble of formally vetting her.
But Clinton friends believe Obama seems more serious now, and developments this week suggest she is getting a more thorough review this time around.
Hoping to ease qualms about how the former president's tangled business dealings might affect his wife's shot at the job, Bill Clinton even gave the Obama transition team a complete list of more than 200,000 donors to his presidential library and charitable foundation, according to a Democrat familiar with discussions between the two camps.
Clinton had not previously released this material, arguing that many donors had given money under the assumption the gifts would not be disclosed.
With that donor list in hand, Obama has important new information needed to investigate whether making her Secretary of State might pose any conflicts of interest.
Clinton loyalists think that her prospects of becoming Secretary of State are improving, as rivals for the position fall away. Allies of Clinton consider her possible nomination a smart one.
"You have to give the president-elect an incredible amount of credit for building a Cabinet with stars in it," said Gov. Ed Rendell, credited with helping Clinton win the Pennsylvania primary. "It goes against the grain. You're told, 'Don't have anyone in there with their own base of support, or too famous.'"
Still, Clinton could complicate things. Obama has a vast network of volunteers whom he is counting on to help him get what he wants out of Congress - supporters who worked explicitly for "change."
Tom Bethany, 22, is an Obama voter who briefly ran the Obama campus campaign organization at Bowling Green State University in Ohio. He says he's worried about the abundance of people with ties to the Clinton White House landing jobs.
"I think Obama's message of change could very easily be lost,'' Bethany said, "if he picks the same people who've been running in Washington and promising the same things for years . . . There are a lot of young Democrats I know who wanted change and wanted something different."
James Lautzenheiser, 27, an Obama volunteer from Ohio, is also dubious.
"It seems as though the more that these Cabinet positions get filled by Clinton-era folks, (the more) we lose the possibility for change,'' Lautzenheiser said. "If all this is just going to be a third Clinton term, then should we expect a reemergence of another Bush next time around to repeal all the progress?"
Still, the list grows. On the economic team, several Clinton veterans are in the mix. CBO Director Peter Orszag is the possible budget director. Jacob "Jack" Lew could have a post on the National Economic Council. Daniel Tarullo may land there, too.
And in an anxiously awaited pick, Clinton Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers has been mentioned frequently for Obama's Treasury Secretary.
The fact that such positions are still up in the air makes it too early to guess the actual impact of a Clinton reunion, says Republican Holtz-Eakin.
"Key appointments haven't happened yet," he said. "The question is, 'What will he choose to do?'"











Comments
Who defines change the change-agent or his critics !!? Are we daft here? That's like asking the fox to design the henhouse !! An agent of change, in this case, President-elect Obama will select those who he thinks will best implement his agenda for change, not those who do not want to see him succeed, for any number of selfish reasons !! Shipmates do not change the course of the ship's route, the Captain does !! In this case, allow me to remind you, the Captain is President-elect Obama !! He gives the command, he picks the crew and he sets the course. To all of his eager, restless critics, take your time, there will be plenty of time for you to re-start your mud-slinging machine and try, again, to dirty his reputation, or his new Commander-in-Chief uniform !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, Chicago | November 21, 2008 8:50 AM
The last democratic president was Clinton. A lot of people got a lot of experience during those 8 years, and Obama knows it. His job is to vet them and make sure the AGENDA is his, and them place them. The agenda is what defines what the change will be, not the underlings.
All this gobbledy goo murmuring about equating his presidency to Clinton is not only premature, it's just nonsensical.
Posted by: Joe | November 21, 2008 8:59 AM
Wonder if this gang will be able to agree together-
Posted by: Inky | November 21, 2008 9:43 AM
Who cares what Holtz-Eakin and Conant think? Are they ever relevant?? News flash to these guys: Your candidate LOST the election. Therefore, what you think about Obama and his cabinet picks is not of interest to anyone.
"Change" meant a change from the economic and foreign policies of the past 8 years. If accomplishing that means having some members of a successful Democratic President advising, then so be it.
Posted by: BobinATL | November 21, 2008 10:47 AM
In Clinton's last year in office, I earned more than any other year in my life. His administartion saw an increase in my income each year. It's gone downhill every year since Bush became president and brouhjt back voodoo economics. I would have loved to see a third term for Bill Clinton. I'd like to see him president today. I'll settle for Obama. I am glad to see so many successful Americans running the country again. Please, don't ever let republicanism happen again.
Posted by: Bruce Y | November 21, 2008 10:56 AM
From what other talent pool is Obama supposed to be choosing his staff--former Carter administrators? If he went in the other direction and brought a group of people unfamilliar with Washington into office with him, he'd be setting himself up for failure. He's a strong, self-contained personality, and that will set the tone for his administration. All this talk of how he won't be able to bring about change now because of whom he's picking to join his staff is silly.
Posted by: Heron | November 21, 2008 11:26 AM
It's going to be a long eight years for Christi Parsons.
Posted by: JLE | November 21, 2008 11:36 AM
If he went in the other direction and brought a group of people unfamilliar with Washington into office with him, he'd be setting himself up for failure.
Posted by: Heron | November 21, 2008 11:26 AM
That is their idea. They are the party of defeat for America in the name of their own agenda. Country first you know. After 5 years of mismanagement and disasters in Iraq, Americans grew tired of it and the republicans decided to turn on and call all Americans who disagreed with their bumbling by saying they are for defeat. Now, before Obama has even taken office, listen to the vitriol and whinning taking place.
Posted by: bill r. | November 21, 2008 12:08 PM
How about writers, pundits, and critics let Obama take the oath of office before they start bashing and trashing his decisions? That would be real change.
Posted by: Carol A. | November 21, 2008 3:28 PM
Obama doesn't really know how to run anything, except a campaign. Of course he needs to find people who've actualy accomplished something of substance in governing.
Posted by: tired of worshipping Obama | November 21, 2008 4:25 PM
How about Harvard Prof. Paul C. Weiler or Columbia Prof. Mark Barenberg at Labor or NLRB?
Posted by: Centrist Dem | November 21, 2008 4:45 PM
Barack Obama, December 27, 2007: "The real gamble in this election is playing the same Washington game with the same Washington players and expecting a different result."
Judge for yourself how seriously Obama's appointments match Obama's campaign pledge.
Posted by: Change You can Believe In | November 22, 2008 9:04 AM