Automakers' plans due today: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune
Posted December 2, 2008 8:38 AM
The Swamp

by Frank James

Today's the deadline for the Big Three automakers to send their restructuring plans to Congress as they attempt to get a $25 billion taxpayer bailout they say they need to avoid insolvency.

Congress requested the plans after the chief executive officers of Ford, GM and Chrysler failed to have ready answers to the straight-forward question "what would you do with the money," when they appeared before Congress last month.

Chastened, the automakers now not only have their plans in hand but they also intend to leave behind the flying public-relations disasters known as their private jets. Flying by private jet to Washington the last time they came seeking money turned out to be not such a good idea.

Ford's CEO Alan Mulally plans to ride in a Ford hybrid all the way to Washington to make the point that he's a true penitent. The others apparently intend to fly commercial for their appearances before congressional committees later this week.

As the Associated Press reports:

GM will outline efforts to negotiate swapping some of the company's debt for equity stakes in the automaker, either shares or warrants for them, said two people briefed on the company's plan.

With eight separate brands, GM will also discuss efforts to shed brands but it would prefer to sell them instead of shutting down Pontiac, Saturn or Saab, said one of the people briefed on the plan. Killing off brands, like GM did with Oldsmobile in 2004, would require cash the company doesn't have, the person said. The people briefed on GM's preparations didn't want to be identified because the plan hadn't been completed.

Some members of Congress have urged the Big Three executives to take major pay cuts as part of the deal. Chrysler Chief Executive Robert Nardelli said he would work for $1 a year, and a similar commitment is expected from GM CEO Rick Wagoner. Ford plans to include a pay cut for Ford CEO Alan Mulally, although the size of the cut was not immediately available.

Chrysler is expected to outline changes that would include a swap of debt in the company for equity stakes and reductions in some vehicle models, according to a person who was briefed on the plan. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions were private.

Ford, meanwhile, is not expected to immediately seek the loans. Mulally told Congress last month that the company would only seek funding if the U.S. market continued to deteriorate. He mortgaged factories to arrange a $23.4 billion credit line shortly after taking over the company in 2006 and he has said Ford can last at least until 2010.

Ford plans to emphasize a major shift towards green auto technology, which has long been an interest of William Ford Jr., the most high-profile descendant of the company's founder. As the Wall Street Journal reports:

In a phone interview Monday, Mr. Mulally said Ford will explain to Congress it is rushing to launch new hybrids and electric vehicles by 2011, including a battery-powered commercial van and compact sedan. A plug-in electric vehicle that can be recharged from a standard electrical outlet should follow in 2012, he said.

In a separate interview, Ford Chairman William Ford Jr. said the company is looking beyond survival to opportunity. "We want to come blasting out as a global, green, high-tech company that's exactly where the country and the Obama administration want us to head," he said. Ford's recovery plan "isn't just about slashing -- we've already done that slashing and burning -- but about building for the future."

While AP reported that the issue of the salary of Ford's Mulally was still a work in process, the Journal reported that will concede like the other Big Three CEOs to work for one dollar a year which is probably good for him since it's unlikely Congress would have been happy with him remaining CEO based on his answer at one of last month's hearings when he was asked if he would take a pay cut.

Another WSJ excerpt:

Mr. Mulally added that he would work for $1 a year if Ford received any federal loan or other aid, a change from the view he expressed last month. While testifying before Congress, he was asked if he would be willing to cut his annual salary to that amount and responded, "I think I'm OK where I am." He took home $21.67 million in 2007.

Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

I believe the best solution to the problems of the so-called "Big 3" is a pre-planned bankruptcy.

The UAW is not going to offer the contract modifications needed for the survival of the auto companies and they are still stuck with a dealer network that is dragging them down.

It is time to face the facts and file for Chapter 11!


If they would just take automakers and give them a better deal to opporate in our country than the foreign dealers then they wouldn't have to do any more than that. NO BAILOUT PERIOD !


The real truth, coming from a car guy...

Ford has two legs... and a great plan... The article barely touches what they have planned... Take a look at the portfolio by clicking on to www.ford.co.uk... That is our future... Most all those cars are coming in one form or another....

GM... Dead.... The only vision of hope they have for a better future is their Saturn division... They were talking of bringing re-badged Opels, now it sounds that that is off...

Chrysler.... Only thing that is worth anything to any company is Jeep.... Renault wants it back but not the weight and junk of the other divisions...

FYI... Toyota is next... There is no clear cut plan what they are doing... Quality is down and the sizes are up... How can we learn from them?????


So, Dane, you mean you think there should be NO BAILOUT TOO?


No bailout.


The Dems better do something for these car companies because the unions put their boy in the White House. The Car companies need to file for bankruptcy under chapter 11. Re do their union contracts, get rid of half their dealerships and start many cars with some styling. Something like back to the 50's. Seems to me that all the automobiles look alike.


Right on Paul>cars today are so ugly, no style at all. I miss the sharp sharp cars of days gone by, but even the days not that long ago were better than the ugly look alikes of today. I'm sure the new GREEN CARS WILL BE WORSE!


precisely why they are in this position. they just keep giving us what we want, big, ugly, gas-guzzling trophies with the added bonus of planned obsolescence so we just buy another one in 4 or 5 years.

with gas back below $2/ga, don't look for anything to change with the big 3 unless it is forced into the package from barack.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "w" in the field below:













Want to see more photos? Click here