by Mark Silva
The ever-impartial folks over at Vanity Fair have rounded up some talking heads for an "oral history'' of the Bush administration.
And they have some fairly rough words for the retiring president.
Larry Wilkerson, the former assistant to Secretary of State Colin Powell who has been outspoken in his criticism of the Bush White House - particularly the hand that Vice President Dick Cheney has played - says former Deputy Secretary Richard Armitage called Cheney's office "the Gestapo,'' and says Powell's task was "cleaning the dog---- off the carpet in the Oval Office.''
This and more can be found in the February issue, with an article prepapred by Todd Purdum and Cullen Murphy, on sale New Year's Eve in New York and Los Angeles and Jan. 6 throughout the rest of the nation:
John Bellinger III, legal adviser to the National Security Council and later to the secretary of state, says that "one of the great tragedies for this administration has been the damage caused by its detainee policies... The Justice Department really never lived up to its name.... It was often the Department of Litigation Risk."
Joschka Fischer, German foreign minister and vice-chancellor, talks about how stunned the Germans were that the U.S. used their source (codename: "Curveball"), whom they were unsure about, as the single source for Powell's U.N. presentation about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction: "I was astonished that the Americans used Curveball, really astonished. This was our stuff. But they presented it not in the way we knew it. They presented it as a fact, and not as the way an intelligence assessment is--could be, but could also be a big lie. We don't know."
Bob Graham, retired Democratic senator from Florida and chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, says that one of our biggest challenges will be getting the rest of the world to trust the U.S. again: "One of our difficulties now is getting the rest of the world to accept our assessment of the seriousness of an issue, because they say, You screwed it up so badly with Iraq, why would we believe that you're any better today?"
Mark McKinnon, chief campaign media adviser to Bush, calls the failure of immigration reform Bush's real regret: "Immigration was one of his most heartfelt issues.''
Matthew Dowd, Bush pollster and chief strategist for the 2004 presidential campaign, contends that Karl Rove's strategy for winning was all about painting one side as good, the other as bad: "Karl wasn't receptive to ideas that would've called the country to certain things and brought them to a common purpose and a sense of shared sacrifice. Karl came from a perspective of: you defeat people in politics by calling one side bad and one side good."
According to Dowd, Vanity Fair reports, "The headline in [Bush's] presidency will be missed opportunity. That is the headline, ultimately. It's missed opportunity, missed opportunity."











Comments
President Bush's presidency aught to be known as " The Misfortunate Presidency". He sure has visited misfortune on America and on the nation, formerly know as, Iraq !!
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, BRING THEM HOME, ALIVE AND WHOLE. NOW.
Posted by: Don Fitzgerald, Chicago | December 29, 2008 12:54 PM
Bruce, on your wager, I am taking the over. Cutting taxes is not what leftists do.
Posted by: Django - N Exile somewhere in/around the 30th Parallel | December 29, 2008 11:48 AM
Is this a good example of what "rightists" do?
Posted by: bill r. | December 29, 2008 1:00 PM
The GOP used to be unified behind Bush - he was the second coming of Ronald Reagan. After he became unpopular there was a problem. Bush was the successor to Reagan's policies, but keeping Bush tied to Reagan threatened to send the manufactured legacy of Ol' Saint Ronny over the cliff with Bush.
So, the natural thing is to throw Bush under the bus, to reverse course and claim that Bush's problem was that he wasn't conservative enough, that his problem was that he walked away from Reaganism.
This works for part of the GOP. The part it doesn't work for is the part of the GOP the most deeply tied to George W. Bush, and who will rise or fall with how Bush is seen after he leaves office.
They are both "right". Those throwing Bush under the Bus are right, Bush was a terrible president. The Bushies are right, Bush was the second coming of Reagan.
Posted by: gorty | December 29, 2008 2:00 PM
He mightily misoverestimated himself and most everything stemmed from that. Why more realistic, grounded, and experienced people all around him did the same is somewhat of a mystery, but I don't imagine one could go far wrong in attributing it all to varying combinations of ideology-induced blindness and arrogance exacerbated by the temptations of money and power.
Posted by: mark | December 29, 2008 2:44 PM
Worst president ever.
Posted by: Quippy | December 29, 2008 4:18 PM
"the ever-impartial folks at Vanity Fair....", as Mark Silva calls them, may be a lot of things.
But NOT impartial.
FEC records show 16 campaign contributions during the 2008 election cycle from Vanity Fair employees. All 16 were to Democrats (12 to Obama alone). 0 were to Republicans.
Vanity Fair is about as impartial as Rahm Emanuel, Swamp writers, and other DNC affiliates.
Posted by: Bruce | December 29, 2008 4:44 PM
Pretty easy to miss opportunities when you spend 485 days on vacation in Crawford.
Worst President Ever.
Posted by: Bubba | December 29, 2008 6:03 PM
Yeah Larry Wilkerson was one of the guys who though it was a great idea when Iran offered to "help" the U.S. stabilize Iraq after the invasion. Cheney didn't think it was such a hot idea. And Armitage was the guy who actually outed CIA agent Valerie Plame.
Posted by: jimboster | December 29, 2008 6:47 PM
At least for those 485 days in Crawford, we knew where he was. No one ever explained where he was when he was supposedly guarding Texas while wearing his famous flight suit.
Posted by: Kenneth Janowski | December 29, 2008 6:51 PM