Child Web-pornography law expires: The Swamp
The Swamp
Chicago Tribune
Posted January 21, 2009 11:15 AM
The Swamp

by David G. Savage

A 13-year legal drive to shield children from pornography on the Internet ended in defeat today when the Supreme Court let the Child Online Protection Act die quietly.

The measure, which never went into effect, made it a crime to put sexually explicit material on a web site for commercial gain unless the sponsor used some means, such as requiring a credit card, to keep out minors.

It was repeatedly blocked from taking effect on free-speech grounds by judges, including by the Supreme Court in 2004. The justices had also voided an earlier, even broader law passed in 1996 that prohibited "indecency" on the Web.

The outcome preserves the Web as a wide-open forum for free expression. It also leaves to parents the duty to install software filters if they wish to block pornography on their home computers.

The judges in Philadelphia who struck down the law last year called these filters an "equally effective" means of protecting children from pornography on the Web.

In October, however, Bush administration lawyers disputed that claim and urged the high court to revive the law. It "would leave millions of children unprotected from the harmful effects of the enormous amount of pornography on the World Wide Web," they said. About half of all parents do not use filters on their computers, they added.

Countering that contention, the American Civil Liberties Union said the challenged law would crimp free speech on the Web for adults and would not shield children, since at least half of the sexually explicit web sites are outside the United States.

Five years ago, the issue split the high court, but not along the usual ideological lines. Voting to block the law on free-speech grounds were Justices John Paul Stevens, Anthony M. Kennedy, David H. Souter, Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. The justices sent the case back to lower courts to decide whether internet filters would be sufficient to protect minors.

The dissenters were led by Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen G. Breyer. They were joined by the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and the now-retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

The Supreme Court considered the appeal in two closed door meetings in recent weeks and said today it had been turned down without comment. The case was Mukasey v. ACLU.


Digg Delicious Facebook Fark Google Newsvine Reddit Yahoo

Comments

Not a fan of porn; am a fan of freedom of speech. I think there are other ways to limit the effects of porn. In the meantime, I bought a copy of this book called, "The Underground Guide to Teenage Sexuality," for myself and my pre-teen and teen. This issue is addressed (among many others) and we're talking about potential harm and consequences with porn, online predators, and other 'electronic age' threats. Still not a vaccination against harm, but I am sleeping better at nights knowing there's no secrets, open talking, awareness and some education.


Post a comment

(Anonymous comments will not be posted. Comments aren't posted immediately. They're screened for relevance to the topic, obscenity, spam and over-the-top personal attacks. We can't always get them up as soon as we'd like so please be patient. Thanks for visiting The Swamp.)

Please enter the letter "f" in the field below:

Barack Obama
Want to see more photos? Click here

Play "Budget Hero"

Play Budget Hero

Latest polls

News, but funnier

Cartoon

Walt Handelsman

Cartoon

The Lowe- Down

Cartoon

Joe Fournier

Cartoon

Editorial cartoons

Quizzes

Rahm Emanuel

Know the real Rahm?

McCain

Presidential trivia